Rosenthal 1931c

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		17	0.35	69	0.00	20	0.10	18	0.49	32	0.27	17	0.36
Anderszewski 2003		32	0.32	9	0.00	35	0.06	29	0.25	58	0.05	30	0.11
Ashkenazy 1981		41	0.30	57	0.00	55	0.05	60	0.05	61	0.06	58	0.05
Bacha 2000		34	0.32	60	0.00	51	0.05	54	0.05	42	0.15	38	0.09
Badura 1965		65	0.25	61	0.00	64	0.04	69	0.04	75	0.03	82	0.03
Barbosa 1983		64	0.25	77	0.00	73	0.03	79	0.03	86	0.02	88	0.02
Biret 1990		75	0.22	14	0.00	74	0.03	71	0.03	72	0.04	83	0.03
Blet 2003		49	0.28	20	0.00	54	0.05	55	0.05	59	0.04	66	0.04
Block 1995		45	0.30	22	0.00	39	0.08	31	0.24	71	0.04	36	0.10
Blumental 1952		21	0.34	39	0.00	18	0.11	20	0.48	54	0.06	21	0.17
Boshniakovich 1969		57	0.26	58	0.00	59	0.05	57	0.05	63	0.05	57	0.05
Brailowsky 1960		12	0.37	10	0.00	15	0.12	14	0.54	23	0.50	8	0.52
Bunin 1987		53	0.27	85	0.00	58	0.05	53	0.05	70	0.04	69	0.04
Bunin 1987b		54	0.27	82	0.00	57	0.04	65	0.04	74	0.03	74	0.03
Chiu 1999		31	0.32	59	0.00	27	0.05	28	0.26	75	0.04	34	0.10
Cohen 1997		33	0.32	46	0.00	22	0.14	23	0.43	29	0.47	14	0.45
Cortot 1951		25	0.33	31	0.00	33	0.06	40	0.16	25	0.34	18	0.23
Csalog 1996		50	0.28	78	0.00	34	0.06	42	0.15	49	0.07	35	0.10
Czerny 1949		47	0.28	34	0.00	44	0.07	43	0.14	45	0.08	32	0.11
Czerny 1990		52	0.27	49	0.00	49	0.05	56	0.05	61	0.05	59	0.05
Duchoud 2007		84	0.19	45	0.00	71	0.04	68	0.04	64	0.05	67	0.04
Ezaki 2006		5	0.42	30	0.00	7	0.28	5	0.71	18	0.55	5	0.62
Falvay 1989		15	0.36	27	0.00	23	0.12	22	0.44	49	0.06	22	0.16
Farrell 1958		66	0.25	24	0.00	70	0.04	63	0.04	75	0.03	73	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		14	0.36	40	0.00	13	0.13	16	0.50	21	0.62	7	0.56
Fliere 1977		10	0.38	41	0.00	10	0.14	9	0.62	57	0.05	19	0.18
Fou 1978		35	0.31	12	0.00	45	0.06	46	0.06	68	0.04	50	0.05
Francois 1956		60	0.26	79	0.00	42	0.06	38	0.18	34	0.19	20	0.18
Friedman 1923		71	0.24	48	0.00	67	0.03	72	0.03	51	0.07	60	0.05
Friedman 1923b		70	0.24	87	0.00	68	0.05	59	0.05	48	0.07	47	0.06
Friedman 1930		69	0.24	51	0.00	60	0.06	47	0.06	60	0.05	55	0.05
Garcia 2007		81	0.20	42	0.00	75	0.03	78	0.03	73	0.04	81	0.03
Garcia 2007b		87	0.15	52	0.00	83	0.02	82	0.02	83	0.03	90	0.02
Gierzod 1998		7	0.41	17	0.00	5	0.19	11	0.58	23	0.39	11	0.48
Gornostaeva 1994		42	0.30	80	0.00	31	0.06	27	0.28	61	0.05	27	0.12
Groot 1988		27	0.32	70	0.00	21	0.15	19	0.48	62	0.04	25	0.14
Harasiewicz 1955		40	0.30	13	0.00	46	0.05	51	0.05	80	0.04	70	0.04
Hatto 1993		23	0.34	38	0.00	30	0.06	30	0.25	70	0.04	37	0.10
Hatto 1997		19	0.35	4	0.00	24	0.08	25	0.33	73	0.04	31	0.11
Horowitz 1949		72	0.23	35	0.00	69	0.05	61	0.05	51	0.06	53	0.05
Indjic 1988		36	0.31	29	0.00	47	0.05	52	0.05	79	0.04	65	0.04
Kapell 1951		74	0.23	83	0.00	81	0.02	84	0.02	80	0.03	85	0.02
Kissin 1993		79	0.21	62	0.00	82	0.02	85	0.02	77	0.04	78	0.03
Kushner 1989		24	0.33	53	0.00	28	0.06	33	0.23	66	0.05	29	0.11
Luisada 1991		56	0.26	65	0.00	56	0.04	64	0.04	78	0.04	61	0.04
Lushtak 2004		46	0.29	68	0.00	38	0.06	34	0.22	71	0.04	40	0.09
Malcuzynski 1961		22	0.34	44	0.00	14	0.11	21	0.47	64	0.05	24	0.15
Magaloff 1978		6	0.41	47	0.00	9	0.24	6	0.66	25	0.34	12	0.47
Magin 1975		68	0.24	81	0.00	66	0.03	74	0.03	46	0.07	49	0.05
Michalowski 1933		86	0.16	84	0.00	87	0.03	76	0.03	80	0.03	77	0.03
Milkina 1970		51	0.28	63	0.00	53	0.06	45	0.06	73	0.04	51	0.05
Mohovich 1999		11	0.38	23	0.00	11	0.21	7	0.64	36	0.31	13	0.45
Moravec 1969		8	0.41	15	0.00	8	0.24	10	0.61	17	0.41	9	0.50
Morozova 2008		28	0.32	6	0.00	29	0.06	37	0.18	75	0.04	45	0.08
Neighaus 1950		30	0.32	21	0.00	25	0.08	24	0.38	60	0.05	26	0.14
Niedzielski 1931		29	0.32	25	0.00	19	0.11	17	0.50	19	0.38	16	0.44
Ohlsson 1999		55	0.27	86	0.00	61	0.06	50	0.06	49	0.05	54	0.05
Osinska 1989		44	0.30	76	0.00	50	0.05	58	0.05	80	0.03	62	0.04
Pachmann 1927		76	0.22	71	0.00	80	0.02	87	0.02	75	0.04	76	0.03
Paderewski 1930		80	0.20	90	0.00	76	0.04	70	0.04	70	0.04	64	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		82	0.20	73	0.00	72	0.03	75	0.03	76	0.04	72	0.03
Pierdomenico 2008		78	0.22	64	0.00	85	0.02	83	0.02	83	0.03	84	0.02
Poblocka 1999		67	0.25	88	0.00	52	0.06	48	0.06	74	0.04	48	0.05
Rabcewiczowa 1932		9	0.40	8	0.00	6	0.27	8	0.64	13	0.59	6	0.61
Rachmaninoff 1923		18	0.35	7	0.00	12	0.17	12	0.56	28	0.34	15	0.44
Rangell 2001		58	0.26	32	0.00	40	0.06	44	0.12	63	0.04	46	0.07
Richter 1976		62	0.25	50	0.00	78	0.04	66	0.04	83	0.03	75	0.03
Rosen 1989		13	0.37	19	0.00	17	0.11	15	0.52	51	0.05	23	0.16
Rosenthal 1930		4	0.61	5	0.00	4	0.77	4	0.91	2	0.90	4	0.90
Rosenthal 1931		3	0.71	2	0.18	2	0.54	3	0.95	3	0.97	2	0.96
Rosenthal 1931b		1	0.76	1	0.66	1	0.65	1	0.97	3	0.97	1	0.97
Rosenthal 1931c		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosenthal 1931d		2	0.71	3	0.12	3	0.90	2	0.95	3	0.97	3	0.96
Rossi 2007		85	0.17	89	0.00	77	0.03	77	0.03	49	0.06	63	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		26	0.33	28	0.00	37	0.07	35	0.21	55	0.04	39	0.09
Rubinstein 1952		39	0.30	74	0.00	26	0.06	26	0.32	67	0.04	33	0.11
Rubinstein 1966		20	0.35	54	0.00	36	0.07	32	0.24	77	0.03	44	0.08
Schilhawsky 1960		61	0.25	72	0.00	65	0.03	73	0.03	82	0.03	79	0.03
Shebanova 2002		59	0.26	66	0.00	62	0.04	62	0.04	69	0.06	56	0.05
Smith 1975		16	0.36	11	0.00	16	0.16	13	0.56	25	0.41	10	0.48
Sokolov 2002		37	0.30	26	0.00	32	0.06	36	0.20	47	0.06	28	0.11
Sztompka 1959		43	0.30	36	0.00	43	0.07	41	0.16	79	0.04	42	0.08
Tomsic 1995		48	0.28	43	0.00	48	0.06	49	0.06	73	0.04	52	0.05
Uninsky 1932		63	0.25	37	0.00	63	0.04	67	0.04	74	0.03	80	0.03
Uninsky 1971		38	0.30	33	0.00	41	0.05	39	0.18	71	0.04	43	0.08
Wasowski 1980		83	0.20	55	0.00	86	0.03	80	0.03	81	0.04	71	0.03
Zak 1937		77	0.22	18	0.00	84	0.02	86	0.02	85	0.03	86	0.02
Zak 1951		73	0.23	16	0.00	79	0.02	81	0.02	85	0.03	87	0.02
Random 1		89	-0.01	75	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	18	0.41	41	0.09
Random 2		88	0.00	56	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	58	0.05	89	0.02
Random 3		90	-0.02	67	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	36	0.18	68	0.04

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).