Rosenthal 1930

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		9	0.43	27	0.00	8	0.42	7	0.75	2	0.66	8	0.70
Anderszewski 2003		66	0.26	50	0.00	54	0.06	47	0.06	78	0.03	59	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		32	0.33	33	0.00	42	0.07	42	0.18	67	0.05	44	0.09
Bacha 2000		72	0.22	54	0.00	56	0.04	69	0.04	83	0.03	71	0.03
Badura 1965		48	0.29	39	0.00	48	0.05	57	0.05	71	0.03	64	0.04
Barbosa 1983		45	0.30	58	0.00	53	0.06	49	0.06	71	0.04	51	0.05
Biret 1990		41	0.31	16	0.00	40	0.07	40	0.23	58	0.05	40	0.11
Blet 2003		46	0.30	29	0.00	49	0.05	60	0.05	77	0.03	60	0.04
Block 1995		47	0.30	89	0.00	34	0.09	33	0.32	77	0.03	43	0.10
Blumental 1952		25	0.35	11	0.01	17	0.11	16	0.60	44	0.12	17	0.27
Boshniakovich 1969		77	0.20	42	0.00	68	0.04	74	0.04	78	0.04	65	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		6	0.44	13	0.00	7	0.28	8	0.75	8	0.69	7	0.72
Bunin 1987		59	0.27	81	0.00	66	0.06	53	0.06	67	0.04	52	0.05
Bunin 1987b		61	0.27	70	0.00	63	0.05	59	0.05	63	0.04	57	0.04
Chiu 1999		52	0.28	82	0.00	59	0.04	67	0.04	79	0.03	73	0.03
Cohen 1997		49	0.29	34	0.00	30	0.12	32	0.38	37	0.24	16	0.30
Cortot 1951		40	0.31	36	0.00	36	0.07	35	0.30	32	0.23	18	0.26
Csalog 1996		75	0.21	52	0.00	77	0.03	79	0.03	84	0.03	81	0.03
Czerny 1949		44	0.30	45	0.00	37	0.07	38	0.27	43	0.15	23	0.20
Czerny 1990		19	0.37	20	0.00	21	0.10	14	0.61	50	0.07	21	0.21
Duchoud 2007		76	0.21	64	0.00	76	0.04	77	0.04	78	0.04	63	0.04
Ezaki 2006		12	0.40	28	0.00	11	0.24	10	0.69	31	0.41	11	0.53
Falvay 1989		31	0.33	49	0.00	35	0.13	31	0.40	62	0.05	35	0.14
Farrell 1958		28	0.34	6	0.02	32	0.11	36	0.30	42	0.14	22	0.20
Ferenczy 1958		29	0.34	35	0.00	28	0.12	27	0.50	24	0.58	10	0.54
Fliere 1977		11	0.41	37	0.00	12	0.14	21	0.56	61	0.05	27	0.17
Fou 1978		15	0.37	40	0.00	24	0.10	22	0.56	59	0.05	28	0.17
Francois 1956		55	0.28	67	0.00	46	0.05	56	0.05	60	0.04	69	0.04
Friedman 1923		60	0.27	73	0.00	62	0.05	61	0.05	68	0.04	70	0.04
Friedman 1923b		56	0.28	30	0.00	55	0.05	63	0.05	75	0.04	66	0.04
Friedman 1930		51	0.28	51	0.00	43	0.07	43	0.13	46	0.07	42	0.10
Garcia 2007		82	0.18	72	0.00	84	0.03	84	0.03	83	0.03	83	0.03
Garcia 2007b		78	0.20	71	0.00	78	0.04	65	0.04	87	0.02	86	0.03
Gierzod 1998		24	0.36	17	0.00	22	0.10	25	0.55	47	0.07	24	0.20
Gornostaeva 1994		23	0.36	90	0.00	27	0.11	24	0.55	45	0.08	20	0.21
Groot 1988		10	0.41	41	0.00	9	0.28	11	0.68	35	0.25	14	0.41
Harasiewicz 1955		38	0.31	83	0.00	50	0.06	50	0.06	83	0.03	67	0.04
Hatto 1993		20	0.37	7	0.01	26	0.10	28	0.43	63	0.05	34	0.15
Hatto 1997		13	0.39	21	0.00	23	0.11	26	0.54	60	0.05	30	0.16
Horowitz 1949		26	0.35	26	0.00	20	0.09	20	0.57	17	0.53	9	0.55
Indjic 1988		34	0.32	84	0.00	38	0.08	37	0.28	76	0.04	37	0.11
Kapell 1951		54	0.28	85	0.00	65	0.05	54	0.05	82	0.03	56	0.04
Kissin 1993		85	0.17	78	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	84	0.03	89	0.02
Kushner 1989		57	0.28	65	0.00	71	0.04	70	0.04	86	0.03	76	0.03
Luisada 1991		35	0.32	10	0.01	47	0.06	52	0.06	80	0.03	53	0.04
Lushtak 2004		63	0.26	43	0.00	60	0.04	68	0.04	82	0.03	84	0.03
Malcuzynski 1961		65	0.26	62	0.00	72	0.04	73	0.04	78	0.03	77	0.03
Magaloff 1978		14	0.38	44	0.00	13	0.17	15	0.60	64	0.04	31	0.15
Magin 1975		74	0.22	46	0.00	79	0.03	80	0.03	79	0.04	75	0.03
Michalowski 1933		79	0.19	59	0.00	69	0.04	76	0.04	84	0.03	80	0.03
Milkina 1970		53	0.28	32	0.00	41	0.07	41	0.19	57	0.05	41	0.10
Mohovich 1999		27	0.35	38	0.00	29	0.18	23	0.55	78	0.04	33	0.15
Moravec 1969		8	0.43	19	0.00	10	0.18	9	0.73	25	0.33	12	0.49
Morozova 2008		33	0.32	15	0.00	33	0.11	34	0.31	64	0.04	38	0.11
Neighaus 1950		36	0.32	60	0.00	31	0.11	29	0.42	54	0.05	36	0.14
Niedzielski 1931		43	0.30	22	0.00	25	0.09	30	0.41	41	0.15	19	0.25
Ohlsson 1999		37	0.32	76	0.00	51	0.07	45	0.07	54	0.05	47	0.06
Osinska 1989		70	0.25	87	0.00	74	0.04	66	0.04	87	0.02	72	0.03
Pachmann 1927		83	0.17	68	0.00	83	0.03	81	0.03	83	0.03	79	0.03
Paderewski 1930		86	0.15	86	0.00	80	0.03	78	0.03	84	0.03	78	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		67	0.26	47	0.00	45	0.06	48	0.06	43	0.11	45	0.08
Pierdomenico 2008		73	0.22	61	0.00	81	0.03	82	0.03	85	0.03	74	0.03
Poblocka 1999		22	0.36	23	0.00	18	0.11	17	0.59	52	0.06	25	0.19
Rabcewiczowa 1932		7	0.44	8	0.01	6	0.28	6	0.77	4	0.70	6	0.73
Rachmaninoff 1923		5	0.53	4	0.03	5	0.63	5	0.87	1	0.85	5	0.86
Rangell 2001		69	0.26	9	0.01	58	0.04	72	0.04	71	0.03	85	0.03
Richter 1976		42	0.31	56	0.00	52	0.05	58	0.05	60	0.05	50	0.05
Rosen 1989		18	0.37	14	0.00	16	0.10	13	0.62	52	0.05	26	0.18
Rosenthal 1930		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosenthal 1931		4	0.57	5	0.03	4	0.69	3	0.88	4	0.91	3	0.89
Rosenthal 1931b		2	0.60	1	0.35	1	0.35	1	0.90	4	0.93	1	0.91
Rosenthal 1931c		1	0.61	3	0.14	3	0.55	2	0.90	4	0.91	2	0.90
Rosenthal 1931d		3	0.59	2	0.33	2	0.38	4	0.88	4	0.91	4	0.89
Rossi 2007		88	0.04	79	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	89	0.01	90	0.01
Rubinstein 1939		39	0.31	25	0.00	39	0.09	39	0.24	40	0.10	32	0.15
Rubinstein 1952		58	0.27	66	0.00	57	0.05	62	0.05	76	0.03	68	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		30	0.33	12	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.12	88	0.03	48	0.06
Schilhawsky 1960		64	0.26	55	0.00	67	0.06	46	0.06	80	0.03	61	0.04
Shebanova 2002		71	0.22	63	0.00	75	0.04	75	0.04	86	0.03	82	0.03
Smith 1975		21	0.37	31	0.00	19	0.08	19	0.58	31	0.32	13	0.43
Sokolov 2002		68	0.26	53	0.00	64	0.06	51	0.06	72	0.03	55	0.04
Sztompka 1959		17	0.37	18	0.00	14	0.11	18	0.58	43	0.16	15	0.30
Tomsic 1995		80	0.19	74	0.00	73	0.04	71	0.04	79	0.04	58	0.04
Uninsky 1932		50	0.29	24	0.00	61	0.05	55	0.05	75	0.03	62	0.04
Uninsky 1971		16	0.37	48	0.00	15	0.15	12	0.62	68	0.04	29	0.16
Wasowski 1980		62	0.26	75	0.00	70	0.04	64	0.04	64	0.05	54	0.04
Zak 1937		81	0.18	77	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	86	0.03	87	0.02
Zak 1951		84	0.17	88	0.00	87	0.02	86	0.02	87	0.03	88	0.02
Random 1		90	-0.01	69	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	30	0.28	46	0.07
Random 2		87	0.06	80	0.00	82	0.03	83	0.03	17	0.37	39	0.11
Random 3		89	-0.01	57	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	19	0.32	49	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).