Rosen 1989

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		33	0.41	45	0.00	37	0.06	43	0.12	13	0.51	37	0.25
Anderszewski 2003		77	0.31	76	0.00	70	0.03	74	0.03	57	0.05	80	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		65	0.34	66	0.00	77	0.03	85	0.03	65	0.06	83	0.04
Bacha 2000		84	0.29	79	0.00	84	0.03	78	0.03	73	0.03	86	0.03
Badura 1965		67	0.34	80	0.00	50	0.05	54	0.05	14	0.46	46	0.15
Barbosa 1983		60	0.35	90	0.00	63	0.04	67	0.04	66	0.05	79	0.04
Biret 1990		58	0.35	61	0.00	64	0.04	60	0.04	37	0.24	61	0.10
Blet 2003		73	0.33	78	0.00	76	0.03	87	0.03	54	0.05	81	0.04
Block 1995		27	0.42	22	0.00	17	0.10	17	0.39	12	0.57	15	0.47
Blumental 1952		72	0.33	26	0.00	59	0.03	77	0.03	40	0.15	69	0.07
Boshniakovich 1969		6	0.50	24	0.00	5	0.30	5	0.67	7	0.68	5	0.67
Brailowsky 1960		36	0.41	67	0.00	39	0.06	34	0.18	19	0.58	27	0.32
Bunin 1987		81	0.30	64	0.00	67	0.05	53	0.05	38	0.16	64	0.09
Bunin 1987b		80	0.30	83	0.00	66	0.03	75	0.03	39	0.20	66	0.08
Chiu 1999		10	0.47	32	0.00	13	0.11	8	0.51	6	0.58	9	0.54
Cohen 1997		50	0.38	18	0.00	52	0.05	47	0.05	10	0.62	42	0.18
Cortot 1951		55	0.37	46	0.00	25	0.07	38	0.16	17	0.51	32	0.29
Csalog 1996		18	0.45	28	0.00	29	0.07	27	0.28	11	0.48	24	0.37
Czerny 1949		79	0.31	86	0.00	83	0.03	83	0.03	55	0.05	82	0.04
Czerny 1990		62	0.35	85	0.00	71	0.04	70	0.04	80	0.04	84	0.04
Duchoud 2007		24	0.44	39	0.00	14	0.11	10	0.50	2	0.72	6	0.60
Ezaki 2006		12	0.46	25	0.00	18	0.11	14	0.43	12	0.58	10	0.50
Falvay 1989		37	0.41	62	0.00	42	0.07	35	0.18	44	0.10	51	0.13
Farrell 1958		57	0.35	27	0.00	53	0.04	56	0.04	36	0.16	65	0.08
Ferenczy 1958		68	0.34	15	0.00	61	0.04	68	0.04	23	0.61	44	0.16
Fliere 1977		2	0.59	1	0.47	1	0.47	1	0.81	2	0.77	2	0.79
Fou 1978		13	0.46	6	0.01	19	0.09	28	0.27	28	0.33	30	0.30
Francois 1956		64	0.35	54	0.00	68	0.04	61	0.04	21	0.43	55	0.13
Friedman 1923		26	0.43	41	0.00	27	0.06	21	0.31	8	0.66	16	0.45
Friedman 1923b		28	0.42	42	0.00	28	0.06	23	0.30	8	0.66	17	0.44
Friedman 1930		25	0.43	9	0.01	12	0.09	16	0.42	9	0.60	12	0.50
Garcia 2007		46	0.39	13	0.01	35	0.05	41	0.14	15	0.47	36	0.26
Garcia 2007b		86	0.26	69	0.00	80	0.03	86	0.03	45	0.06	85	0.04
Gierzod 1998		20	0.44	47	0.00	22	0.08	22	0.30	24	0.38	26	0.34
Gornostaeva 1994		3	0.54	4	0.05	4	0.39	4	0.69	3	0.78	4	0.73
Groot 1988		44	0.39	12	0.01	15	0.08	15	0.42	25	0.37	21	0.39
Harasiewicz 1955		7	0.49	29	0.00	9	0.12	9	0.50	35	0.30	22	0.39
Hatto 1993		31	0.42	63	0.00	32	0.06	40	0.15	57	0.07	62	0.10
Hatto 1997		30	0.42	19	0.00	31	0.06	31	0.21	33	0.24	39	0.22
Horowitz 1949		76	0.32	65	0.00	69	0.04	64	0.04	25	0.48	47	0.14
Indjic 1988		49	0.38	57	0.00	56	0.04	58	0.04	54	0.06	74	0.05
Kapell 1951		43	0.39	84	0.00	54	0.04	63	0.04	69	0.05	75	0.04
Kissin 1993		70	0.33	88	0.00	75	0.03	79	0.03	64	0.06	78	0.04
Kushner 1989		17	0.45	36	0.00	10	0.08	13	0.44	26	0.35	20	0.39
Luisada 1991		53	0.37	23	0.00	60	0.04	72	0.04	41	0.12	68	0.07
Lushtak 2004		48	0.39	17	0.00	49	0.06	46	0.06	28	0.30	54	0.13
Malcuzynski 1961		40	0.40	51	0.00	47	0.05	49	0.05	65	0.05	73	0.05
Magaloff 1978		4	0.51	7	0.01	6	0.20	6	0.57	8	0.56	7	0.56
Magin 1975		66	0.34	34	0.00	72	0.04	65	0.04	51	0.06	71	0.05
Michalowski 1933		82	0.30	40	0.00	86	0.03	76	0.03	53	0.06	77	0.04
Milkina 1970		59	0.35	37	0.00	58	0.04	59	0.04	49	0.07	72	0.05
Mohovich 1999		5	0.50	3	0.06	3	0.27	3	0.72	2	0.77	3	0.74
Moravec 1969		52	0.37	33	0.00	41	0.07	36	0.18	37	0.21	40	0.19
Morozova 2008		38	0.40	8	0.01	23	0.07	24	0.30	32	0.32	29	0.31
Neighaus 1950		22	0.44	59	0.00	24	0.07	26	0.29	18	0.44	25	0.36
Niedzielski 1931		63	0.35	73	0.00	55	0.04	71	0.04	26	0.32	57	0.11
Ohlsson 1999		9	0.48	30	0.00	8	0.11	11	0.48	10	0.50	13	0.49
Osinska 1989		1	0.60	2	0.22	2	0.46	2	0.81	3	0.79	1	0.80
Pachmann 1927		19	0.45	11	0.01	26	0.07	29	0.22	5	0.62	23	0.37
Paderewski 1930		87	0.25	75	0.00	87	0.04	66	0.04	69	0.04	76	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		21	0.44	20	0.00	21	0.08	18	0.39	4	0.63	11	0.50
Pierdomenico 2008		14	0.46	35	0.00	34	0.05	42	0.13	9	0.55	34	0.27
Poblocka 1999		23	0.44	43	0.00	20	0.10	20	0.38	22	0.49	18	0.43
Rabcewiczowa 1932		47	0.39	74	0.00	36	0.06	32	0.20	22	0.50	28	0.32
Rachmaninoff 1923		69	0.34	21	0.00	43	0.08	39	0.16	30	0.31	38	0.22
Rangell 2001		39	0.40	5	0.02	33	0.06	37	0.17	15	0.54	31	0.30
Richter 1976		8	0.48	10	0.01	11	0.08	19	0.38	27	0.43	19	0.40
Rosen 1989		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosenthal 1930		54	0.37	50	0.00	57	0.05	52	0.05	13	0.62	41	0.18
Rosenthal 1931		83	0.29	55	0.00	82	0.03	84	0.03	33	0.38	58	0.11
Rosenthal 1931b		78	0.31	77	0.00	79	0.03	81	0.03	24	0.48	56	0.12
Rosenthal 1931c		51	0.37	44	0.00	51	0.05	51	0.05	15	0.52	45	0.16
Rosenthal 1931d		85	0.28	71	0.00	78	0.03	80	0.03	20	0.42	59	0.11
Rossi 2007		74	0.32	31	0.00	85	0.04	69	0.04	17	0.42	50	0.13
Rubinstein 1939		75	0.32	38	0.00	81	0.03	82	0.03	56	0.04	87	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		41	0.40	52	0.00	46	0.05	50	0.05	48	0.08	70	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		16	0.45	56	0.00	30	0.06	25	0.29	65	0.06	53	0.13
Schilhawsky 1960		61	0.35	53	0.00	74	0.04	57	0.04	32	0.19	63	0.09
Shebanova 2002		11	0.47	14	0.01	7	0.17	7	0.56	12	0.54	8	0.55
Smith 1975		45	0.39	58	0.00	65	0.05	55	0.05	36	0.19	60	0.10
Sokolov 2002		56	0.37	48	0.00	62	0.04	62	0.04	26	0.41	49	0.13
Sztompka 1959		29	0.42	70	0.00	48	0.06	45	0.06	33	0.33	48	0.14
Tomsic 1995		42	0.40	49	0.00	38	0.05	33	0.18	17	0.42	35	0.27
Uninsky 1932		71	0.33	60	0.00	73	0.03	73	0.03	71	0.04	88	0.03
Uninsky 1971		15	0.45	68	0.00	16	0.09	12	0.45	17	0.49	14	0.47
Wasowski 1980		34	0.41	16	0.00	40	0.06	30	0.21	33	0.36	33	0.27
Zak 1937		32	0.41	81	0.00	45	0.05	48	0.05	26	0.32	52	0.13
Zak 1951		35	0.41	72	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.08	23	0.37	43	0.17
Random 1		88	0.00	87	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	22	0.35	67	0.08
Random 2		89	-0.02	89	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	57	0.05	89	0.03
Random 3		90	-0.07	82	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	57	0.03	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).