Pachmann 1927

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		70	0.22	47	0.00	75	0.04	77	0.04	62	0.04	70	0.04
Anderszewski 2003		82	0.17	70	0.00	64	0.05	64	0.05	82	0.03	67	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		17	0.38	29	0.00	23	0.11	20	0.45	54	0.07	25	0.18
Bacha 2000		64	0.25	42	0.00	63	0.05	60	0.05	64	0.04	57	0.04
Badura 1965		56	0.26	61	0.00	37	0.05	39	0.15	51	0.04	41	0.08
Barbosa 1983		62	0.25	73	0.00	58	0.04	67	0.04	77	0.04	66	0.04
Biret 1990		75	0.21	64	0.00	76	0.03	82	0.03	74	0.04	82	0.03
Blet 2003		71	0.22	35	0.00	74	0.04	78	0.04	87	0.02	77	0.03
Block 1995		25	0.36	38	0.00	21	0.09	22	0.44	49	0.07	24	0.18
Blumental 1952		77	0.19	52	0.00	79	0.04	76	0.04	71	0.05	71	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		2	0.48	1	0.40	1	0.39	2	0.79	12	0.59	2	0.68
Brailowsky 1960		73	0.21	78	0.00	70	0.04	71	0.04	73	0.05	59	0.04
Bunin 1987		40	0.31	39	0.00	34	0.07	33	0.24	50	0.06	36	0.12
Bunin 1987b		43	0.31	79	0.00	33	0.07	34	0.24	46	0.09	28	0.15
Chiu 1999		26	0.35	23	0.00	35	0.08	32	0.28	49	0.06	29	0.13
Cohen 1997		66	0.24	55	0.00	71	0.03	80	0.03	78	0.03	81	0.03
Cortot 1951		74	0.21	74	0.00	72	0.03	79	0.03	69	0.04	83	0.03
Csalog 1996		18	0.38	48	0.00	22	0.10	14	0.50	37	0.15	16	0.27
Czerny 1949		80	0.17	27	0.00	73	0.04	74	0.04	70	0.04	69	0.04
Czerny 1990		58	0.26	26	0.00	51	0.08	47	0.08	68	0.04	48	0.06
Duchoud 2007		36	0.32	41	0.00	40	0.06	36	0.18	47	0.08	35	0.12
Ezaki 2006		53	0.28	36	0.00	53	0.06	56	0.06	66	0.05	50	0.05
Falvay 1989		57	0.26	85	0.00	54	0.07	52	0.07	86	0.02	60	0.04
Farrell 1958		59	0.26	32	0.00	50	0.07	50	0.07	64	0.05	46	0.06
Ferenczy 1958		85	0.12	69	0.00	85	0.03	87	0.03	79	0.03	79	0.03
Fliere 1977		3	0.45	18	0.01	4	0.18	3	0.69	54	0.06	21	0.20
Fou 1978		31	0.33	11	0.01	25	0.12	28	0.36	66	0.04	34	0.12
Francois 1956		76	0.20	40	0.00	81	0.03	81	0.03	86	0.02	89	0.02
Friedman 1923		12	0.40	24	0.00	12	0.14	10	0.56	22	0.49	7	0.52
Friedman 1923b		7	0.42	3	0.08	6	0.17	7	0.61	21	0.52	5	0.56
Friedman 1930		27	0.35	22	0.00	29	0.07	31	0.31	43	0.10	23	0.18
Garcia 2007		35	0.33	34	0.00	27	0.06	26	0.37	34	0.18	18	0.26
Garcia 2007b		54	0.27	44	0.00	46	0.08	48	0.08	61	0.05	49	0.06
Gierzod 1998		34	0.33	58	0.00	41	0.05	41	0.14	71	0.04	44	0.07
Gornostaeva 1994		38	0.31	50	0.00	55	0.07	49	0.07	72	0.03	55	0.05
Groot 1988		49	0.28	81	0.00	56	0.08	45	0.08	84	0.03	56	0.05
Harasiewicz 1955		16	0.38	59	0.00	30	0.08	30	0.33	66	0.05	31	0.13
Hatto 1993		55	0.27	83	0.00	59	0.06	54	0.06	82	0.03	72	0.04
Hatto 1997		83	0.16	86	0.00	82	0.05	65	0.05	84	0.03	68	0.04
Horowitz 1949		67	0.23	87	0.00	61	0.05	66	0.05	82	0.03	63	0.04
Indjic 1988		65	0.24	89	0.00	62	0.05	62	0.05	83	0.03	65	0.04
Kapell 1951		24	0.36	8	0.01	20	0.10	18	0.47	68	0.05	27	0.15
Kissin 1993		23	0.36	9	0.01	17	0.08	15	0.49	42	0.18	13	0.30
Kushner 1989		21	0.37	21	0.00	19	0.08	16	0.48	65	0.05	26	0.15
Luisada 1991		47	0.29	75	0.00	67	0.05	63	0.05	71	0.05	51	0.05
Lushtak 2004		50	0.28	49	0.00	49	0.08	46	0.08	75	0.04	47	0.06
Malcuzynski 1961		13	0.39	12	0.01	7	0.15	6	0.61	41	0.16	12	0.31
Magaloff 1978		6	0.43	6	0.02	3	0.19	4	0.64	16	0.44	6	0.53
Magin 1975		10	0.40	25	0.00	10	0.11	8	0.61	35	0.30	8	0.43
Michalowski 1933		29	0.34	16	0.01	26	0.09	25	0.37	22	0.40	9	0.38
Milkina 1970		78	0.19	30	0.00	77	0.04	72	0.04	82	0.03	75	0.03
Mohovich 1999		32	0.33	65	0.00	42	0.06	40	0.15	67	0.04	42	0.08
Moravec 1969		63	0.25	72	0.00	66	0.04	70	0.04	70	0.04	58	0.04
Morozova 2008		42	0.31	37	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.12	62	0.05	40	0.08
Neighaus 1950		22	0.36	46	0.00	24	0.14	23	0.43	40	0.19	15	0.29
Niedzielski 1931		48	0.28	71	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.11	53	0.05	43	0.07
Ohlsson 1999		20	0.37	14	0.01	15	0.10	21	0.45	66	0.04	30	0.13
Osinska 1989		9	0.41	15	0.01	16	0.08	24	0.39	70	0.04	33	0.12
Pachmann 1927		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Paderewski 1930		11	0.40	13	0.01	11	0.10	13	0.53	9	0.60	4	0.56
Perlemuter 1992		15	0.38	31	0.00	28	0.07	27	0.36	39	0.18	19	0.25
Pierdomenico 2008		4	0.45	5	0.02	8	0.15	9	0.60	7	0.58	3	0.59
Poblocka 1999		52	0.28	63	0.00	60	0.07	51	0.07	77	0.03	52	0.05
Rabcewiczowa 1932		51	0.28	33	0.00	57	0.05	59	0.05	70	0.04	62	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		79	0.18	80	0.00	78	0.04	73	0.04	81	0.03	74	0.03
Rangell 2001		37	0.32	56	0.00	38	0.06	37	0.17	57	0.05	38	0.09
Richter 1976		1	0.50	2	0.26	2	0.43	1	0.81	14	0.64	1	0.72
Rosen 1989		5	0.45	4	0.02	9	0.20	5	0.62	29	0.22	10	0.37
Rosenthal 1930		81	0.17	76	0.00	83	0.03	83	0.03	81	0.03	80	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		84	0.13	66	0.00	84	0.03	85	0.03	84	0.02	86	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		86	0.10	84	0.00	86	0.03	86	0.03	84	0.03	84	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		72	0.22	67	0.00	69	0.04	75	0.04	87	0.02	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		87	0.09	90	0.00	87	0.03	84	0.03	88	0.02	88	0.02
Rossi 2007		41	0.31	17	0.01	32	0.07	38	0.17	18	0.41	17	0.26
Rubinstein 1939		61	0.25	10	0.01	52	0.07	53	0.07	74	0.03	53	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		46	0.29	57	0.00	48	0.06	55	0.06	84	0.03	73	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		60	0.26	77	0.00	65	0.04	68	0.04	71	0.03	78	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960		39	0.31	68	0.00	45	0.06	57	0.06	58	0.05	54	0.05
Shebanova 2002		8	0.41	7	0.02	5	0.14	11	0.55	49	0.07	22	0.20
Smith 1975		69	0.23	62	0.00	80	0.05	61	0.05	73	0.04	61	0.04
Sokolov 2002		45	0.30	45	0.00	36	0.06	42	0.14	61	0.05	39	0.08
Sztompka 1959		33	0.33	82	0.00	47	0.05	58	0.05	68	0.04	64	0.04
Tomsic 1995		44	0.30	28	0.00	39	0.06	35	0.19	58	0.05	37	0.10
Uninsky 1932		28	0.35	43	0.00	14	0.09	19	0.47	34	0.19	14	0.30
Uninsky 1971		68	0.23	51	0.00	68	0.04	69	0.04	79	0.03	76	0.03
Wasowski 1980		30	0.34	60	0.00	31	0.08	29	0.35	79	0.04	32	0.12
Zak 1937		14	0.39	20	0.00	13	0.10	12	0.53	36	0.18	11	0.31
Zak 1951		19	0.38	19	0.01	18	0.09	17	0.47	42	0.12	20	0.24
Random 1		88	-0.03	53	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	47	0.05	87	0.02
Random 2		90	-0.07	88	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	86	0.02	90	0.01
Random 3		89	-0.04	54	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	27	0.23	45	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).