Ohlsson 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		42	0.38	46	0.00	62	0.03	78	0.03	31	0.28	57	0.09
Anderszewski 2003		41	0.38	48	0.00	33	0.07	36	0.24	31	0.36	36	0.29
Ashkenazy 1981		16	0.45	19	0.01	21	0.08	14	0.42	23	0.47	18	0.44
Bacha 2000		73	0.31	70	0.00	56	0.03	75	0.03	21	0.34	53	0.10
Badura 1965		55	0.36	22	0.00	24	0.08	23	0.33	6	0.57	19	0.43
Barbosa 1983		39	0.39	62	0.00	36	0.05	38	0.20	37	0.21	39	0.20
Biret 1990		33	0.41	64	0.00	23	0.07	18	0.37	19	0.56	14	0.46
Blet 2003		31	0.41	37	0.00	47	0.05	48	0.05	23	0.43	43	0.15
Block 1995		40	0.39	27	0.00	16	0.09	25	0.32	26	0.41	26	0.36
Blumental 1952		80	0.26	87	0.00	80	0.04	58	0.04	76	0.04	81	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		26	0.42	63	0.00	26	0.09	21	0.33	32	0.28	34	0.30
Brailowsky 1960		74	0.31	59	0.00	72	0.04	60	0.04	46	0.08	64	0.06
Bunin 1987		69	0.33	51	0.00	64	0.03	77	0.03	53	0.06	84	0.04
Bunin 1987b		68	0.33	81	0.00	60	0.03	80	0.03	42	0.18	61	0.07
Chiu 1999		9	0.48	29	0.00	12	0.12	11	0.48	9	0.55	9	0.51
Cohen 1997		58	0.36	41	0.00	65	0.04	67	0.04	24	0.51	45	0.14
Cortot 1951		72	0.31	77	0.00	77	0.05	53	0.05	38	0.16	58	0.09
Csalog 1996		60	0.36	66	0.00	57	0.03	79	0.03	62	0.05	78	0.04
Czerny 1949		61	0.35	33	0.00	51	0.04	64	0.04	34	0.35	51	0.12
Czerny 1990		37	0.39	61	0.00	48	0.06	46	0.06	44	0.12	59	0.08
Duchoud 2007		15	0.46	8	0.03	13	0.11	19	0.36	4	0.68	10	0.49
Ezaki 2006		38	0.39	25	0.00	31	0.06	41	0.14	36	0.37	38	0.23
Falvay 1989		65	0.34	35	0.00	66	0.04	62	0.04	76	0.04	75	0.04
Farrell 1958		49	0.37	79	0.00	43	0.06	42	0.13	32	0.21	41	0.17
Ferenczy 1958		87	0.14	88	0.00	87	0.03	84	0.03	64	0.05	79	0.04
Fliere 1977		1	0.50	6	0.06	3	0.16	2	0.66	25	0.45	5	0.54
Fou 1978		34	0.41	20	0.00	41	0.06	40	0.15	43	0.12	46	0.13
Francois 1956		52	0.37	17	0.01	67	0.05	57	0.05	20	0.46	44	0.15
Friedman 1923		21	0.43	80	0.00	27	0.07	17	0.39	12	0.60	13	0.48
Friedman 1923b		27	0.42	15	0.01	28	0.10	16	0.41	13	0.59	12	0.49
Friedman 1930		13	0.46	23	0.00	17	0.11	12	0.48	10	0.60	7	0.54
Garcia 2007		83	0.25	85	0.00	74	0.04	70	0.04	59	0.05	80	0.04
Garcia 2007b		82	0.26	78	0.00	73	0.03	81	0.03	54	0.05	87	0.04
Gierzod 1998		51	0.37	82	0.00	46	0.06	47	0.06	51	0.07	66	0.06
Gornostaeva 1994		43	0.38	52	0.00	58	0.03	76	0.03	51	0.06	85	0.04
Groot 1988		57	0.36	83	0.00	55	0.05	55	0.05	53	0.05	70	0.05
Harasiewicz 1955		3	0.50	28	0.00	7	0.14	5	0.57	28	0.36	16	0.45
Hatto 1993		12	0.46	9	0.02	10	0.10	20	0.36	28	0.31	31	0.33
Hatto 1997		36	0.39	68	0.00	40	0.07	39	0.18	44	0.08	50	0.12
Horowitz 1949		77	0.30	40	0.00	81	0.05	50	0.05	52	0.06	69	0.05
Indjic 1988		20	0.43	69	0.00	18	0.10	27	0.30	31	0.29	35	0.29
Kapell 1951		62	0.35	72	0.00	54	0.04	65	0.04	61	0.05	76	0.04
Kissin 1993		35	0.40	55	0.00	39	0.07	33	0.26	33	0.42	30	0.33
Kushner 1989		7	0.48	39	0.00	15	0.11	9	0.52	27	0.33	20	0.41
Luisada 1991		47	0.38	42	0.00	59	0.03	73	0.03	53	0.06	72	0.04
Lushtak 2004		44	0.38	14	0.01	6	0.13	26	0.31	24	0.37	28	0.34
Malcuzynski 1961		28	0.42	73	0.00	45	0.08	45	0.08	61	0.05	65	0.06
Magaloff 1978		6	0.49	1	0.24	1	0.24	6	0.54	6	0.62	3	0.58
Magin 1975		18	0.44	32	0.00	30	0.06	24	0.32	20	0.45	22	0.38
Michalowski 1933		75	0.30	43	0.00	76	0.05	56	0.05	32	0.26	52	0.11
Milkina 1970		45	0.38	7	0.05	20	0.08	29	0.30	34	0.36	29	0.33
Mohovich 1999		67	0.33	56	0.00	70	0.04	69	0.04	74	0.04	83	0.04
Moravec 1969		50	0.37	71	0.00	52	0.04	61	0.04	54	0.06	68	0.05
Morozova 2008		25	0.42	49	0.00	25	0.08	15	0.41	20	0.49	15	0.45
Neighaus 1950		11	0.47	5	0.09	9	0.09	22	0.33	12	0.50	21	0.41
Niedzielski 1931		46	0.38	18	0.01	22	0.08	37	0.23	18	0.39	32	0.30
Ohlsson 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Osinska 1989		10	0.47	4	0.10	5	0.26	3	0.62	16	0.56	2	0.59
Pachmann 1927		48	0.37	26	0.00	53	0.04	66	0.04	21	0.45	47	0.13
Paderewski 1930		71	0.32	67	0.00	75	0.04	71	0.04	31	0.35	49	0.12
Perlemuter 1992		30	0.41	36	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.12	10	0.54	37	0.25
Pierdomenico 2008		56	0.36	44	0.00	49	0.05	52	0.05	15	0.52	42	0.16
Poblocka 1999		63	0.35	54	0.00	69	0.04	72	0.04	71	0.04	73	0.04
Rabcewiczowa 1932		78	0.29	74	0.00	79	0.03	74	0.03	67	0.04	88	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		76	0.30	34	0.00	68	0.04	63	0.04	65	0.04	74	0.04
Rangell 2001		66	0.34	31	0.00	71	0.04	59	0.04	44	0.11	63	0.07
Richter 1976		2	0.50	11	0.02	8	0.10	8	0.53	19	0.56	6	0.54
Rosen 1989		8	0.48	12	0.01	11	0.11	10	0.50	11	0.48	11	0.49
Rosenthal 1930		70	0.32	75	0.00	82	0.05	54	0.05	45	0.07	67	0.06
Rosenthal 1931		84	0.21	58	0.00	84	0.03	85	0.03	53	0.05	77	0.04
Rosenthal 1931b		85	0.18	89	0.00	86	0.04	68	0.04	77	0.03	89	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		79	0.27	84	0.00	83	0.05	49	0.05	50	0.06	71	0.05
Rosenthal 1931d		86	0.18	90	0.00	85	0.03	83	0.03	61	0.05	86	0.04
Rossi 2007		81	0.26	65	0.00	78	0.03	86	0.03	23	0.36	54	0.10
Rubinstein 1939		23	0.43	21	0.00	32	0.07	28	0.30	22	0.39	27	0.34
Rubinstein 1952		17	0.45	16	0.01	14	0.09	7	0.53	23	0.52	8	0.52
Rubinstein 1966		24	0.43	45	0.00	34	0.06	32	0.28	60	0.06	48	0.13
Schilhawsky 1960		53	0.37	24	0.00	63	0.03	82	0.03	25	0.34	56	0.10
Shebanova 2002		4	0.50	3	0.11	4	0.22	4	0.61	14	0.54	4	0.57
Smith 1975		54	0.37	50	0.00	61	0.03	87	0.03	37	0.18	60	0.07
Sokolov 2002		14	0.46	10	0.02	29	0.07	35	0.25	10	0.52	23	0.36
Sztompka 1959		22	0.43	13	0.01	35	0.05	34	0.25	30	0.37	33	0.30
Tomsic 1995		59	0.36	30	0.00	50	0.05	51	0.05	35	0.20	55	0.10
Uninsky 1932		64	0.34	53	0.00	42	0.06	43	0.13	31	0.25	40	0.18
Uninsky 1971		19	0.43	47	0.00	19	0.09	13	0.44	21	0.45	17	0.44
Wasowski 1980		5	0.50	2	0.12	2	0.17	1	0.69	2	0.66	1	0.67
Zak 1937		32	0.41	60	0.00	37	0.07	30	0.29	17	0.45	24	0.36
Zak 1951		29	0.42	57	0.00	38	0.09	31	0.29	17	0.44	25	0.36
Random 1		88	0.00	76	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	37	0.17	82	0.04
Random 2		90	-0.06	86	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	83	0.02	90	0.01
Random 3		89	-0.01	38	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	23	0.28	62	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).