Milkina 1970

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		16	0.45	31	0.00	24	0.11	22	0.50	1	0.66	18	0.57
Anderszewski 2003		11	0.47	14	0.00	9	0.18	11	0.66	6	0.70	6	0.68
Ashkenazy 1981		47	0.34	53	0.00	62	0.04	67	0.04	56	0.07	66	0.05
Bacha 2000		35	0.38	37	0.00	41	0.06	41	0.17	11	0.56	37	0.31
Badura 1965		52	0.33	40	0.00	54	0.07	50	0.07	24	0.31	45	0.15
Barbosa 1983		17	0.44	62	0.00	21	0.12	17	0.58	13	0.52	20	0.55
Biret 1990		10	0.47	6	0.05	6	0.24	5	0.74	2	0.77	4	0.75
Blet 2003		62	0.29	41	0.00	73	0.03	77	0.03	75	0.03	86	0.03
Block 1995		78	0.23	87	0.00	61	0.05	61	0.05	67	0.04	82	0.04
Blumental 1952		29	0.40	33	0.00	34	0.10	33	0.36	31	0.31	35	0.33
Boshniakovich 1969		59	0.30	60	0.00	42	0.06	44	0.12	56	0.05	56	0.08
Brailowsky 1960		57	0.31	54	0.00	74	0.03	76	0.03	55	0.06	71	0.04
Bunin 1987		65	0.29	78	0.00	67	0.04	64	0.04	56	0.05	83	0.04
Bunin 1987b		61	0.29	63	0.00	66	0.05	62	0.05	54	0.05	61	0.05
Chiu 1999		37	0.38	46	0.00	39	0.07	40	0.19	40	0.14	44	0.16
Cohen 1997		46	0.34	55	0.00	35	0.09	37	0.29	6	0.64	30	0.43
Cortot 1951		75	0.25	82	0.00	70	0.04	72	0.04	51	0.07	67	0.05
Csalog 1996		73	0.26	75	0.00	72	0.04	75	0.04	57	0.05	80	0.04
Czerny 1949		1	0.56	1	0.37	1	0.37	4	0.74	3	0.82	2	0.78
Czerny 1990		24	0.42	59	0.00	27	0.09	24	0.49	30	0.46	26	0.47
Duchoud 2007		50	0.33	71	0.00	51	0.06	51	0.06	25	0.33	46	0.14
Ezaki 2006		26	0.42	58	0.00	15	0.13	28	0.43	28	0.42	31	0.42
Falvay 1989		4	0.52	5	0.08	4	0.27	7	0.70	3	0.63	12	0.66
Farrell 1958		33	0.38	18	0.00	30	0.10	32	0.36	11	0.49	32	0.42
Ferenczy 1958		49	0.34	34	0.00	63	0.05	56	0.05	25	0.55	43	0.17
Fliere 1977		54	0.32	57	0.00	55	0.04	65	0.04	64	0.04	69	0.04
Fou 1978		19	0.44	9	0.01	29	0.09	27	0.44	26	0.37	33	0.40
Francois 1956		18	0.44	29	0.00	20	0.12	19	0.57	1	0.79	9	0.67
Friedman 1923		85	0.18	56	0.00	85	0.03	83	0.03	74	0.04	88	0.03
Friedman 1923b		84	0.19	80	0.00	84	0.02	85	0.02	65	0.05	87	0.03
Friedman 1930		82	0.19	72	0.00	82	0.02	88	0.02	79	0.03	89	0.02
Garcia 2007		79	0.23	17	0.00	52	0.05	54	0.05	39	0.14	55	0.08
Garcia 2007b		69	0.28	23	0.00	46	0.08	48	0.08	30	0.26	47	0.14
Gierzod 1998		34	0.38	68	0.00	38	0.10	38	0.24	41	0.13	42	0.18
Gornostaeva 1994		25	0.42	43	0.00	19	0.11	18	0.57	11	0.61	16	0.59
Groot 1988		31	0.39	36	0.00	31	0.09	30	0.40	34	0.25	36	0.32
Harasiewicz 1955		5	0.52	11	0.01	5	0.23	1	0.81	3	0.66	5	0.73
Hatto 1993		7	0.49	15	0.00	11	0.15	12	0.66	15	0.54	15	0.60
Hatto 1997		6	0.51	7	0.05	8	0.24	6	0.72	5	0.65	7	0.68
Horowitz 1949		71	0.27	49	0.00	71	0.03	79	0.03	49	0.06	77	0.04
Indjic 1988		8	0.49	30	0.00	12	0.16	13	0.66	15	0.58	13	0.62
Kapell 1951		21	0.43	13	0.00	22	0.10	20	0.55	16	0.40	25	0.47
Kissin 1993		53	0.32	66	0.00	57	0.04	74	0.04	62	0.06	62	0.05
Kushner 1989		22	0.43	50	0.00	16	0.09	16	0.58	22	0.42	23	0.49
Luisada 1991		30	0.39	26	0.00	28	0.09	36	0.30	26	0.30	38	0.30
Lushtak 2004		66	0.29	81	0.00	59	0.04	68	0.04	70	0.04	81	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		44	0.35	44	0.00	44	0.07	43	0.14	58	0.05	54	0.08
Magaloff 1978		67	0.28	69	0.00	53	0.06	53	0.06	69	0.03	74	0.04
Magin 1975		41	0.36	28	0.00	47	0.08	47	0.08	59	0.05	58	0.06
Michalowski 1933		77	0.23	74	0.00	69	0.04	70	0.04	29	0.32	48	0.11
Milkina 1970		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Mohovich 1999		23	0.42	22	0.00	17	0.09	14	0.62	11	0.62	14	0.62
Moravec 1969		12	0.46	16	0.00	14	0.18	10	0.67	4	0.66	10	0.66
Morozova 2008		14	0.45	10	0.01	18	0.10	15	0.59	9	0.55	17	0.57
Neighaus 1950		55	0.32	20	0.00	48	0.08	46	0.08	50	0.05	60	0.06
Niedzielski 1931		81	0.20	76	0.00	80	0.04	71	0.04	80	0.03	84	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		36	0.38	12	0.01	36	0.11	34	0.36	29	0.30	34	0.33
Osinska 1989		15	0.45	3	0.12	7	0.27	8	0.69	9	0.64	11	0.66
Pachmann 1927		83	0.19	42	0.00	87	0.03	82	0.03	72	0.04	85	0.03
Paderewski 1930		87	0.17	79	0.00	86	0.03	84	0.03	56	0.05	79	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		80	0.22	90	0.00	81	0.03	80	0.03	62	0.05	70	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		72	0.27	19	0.00	49	0.09	45	0.09	20	0.44	40	0.20
Poblocka 1999		48	0.34	83	0.00	58	0.04	63	0.04	70	0.04	72	0.04
Rabcewiczowa 1932		32	0.38	27	0.00	26	0.11	25	0.48	12	0.61	21	0.54
Rachmaninoff 1923		64	0.29	73	0.00	65	0.05	60	0.05	59	0.04	75	0.04
Rangell 2001		39	0.36	84	0.00	37	0.12	31	0.36	17	0.53	27	0.44
Richter 1976		60	0.29	70	0.00	64	0.04	69	0.04	68	0.05	78	0.04
Rosen 1989		43	0.35	25	0.00	45	0.07	49	0.07	59	0.04	65	0.05
Rosenthal 1930		68	0.28	39	0.00	77	0.05	57	0.05	41	0.19	52	0.10
Rosenthal 1931		63	0.29	61	0.00	75	0.03	81	0.03	34	0.37	49	0.11
Rosenthal 1931b		74	0.26	45	0.00	79	0.05	55	0.05	37	0.23	50	0.11
Rosenthal 1931c		70	0.28	86	0.00	76	0.04	73	0.04	45	0.06	68	0.05
Rosenthal 1931d		76	0.24	52	0.00	78	0.03	78	0.03	36	0.17	57	0.07
Rossi 2007		86	0.17	85	0.00	83	0.02	87	0.02	48	0.07	73	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		2	0.55	4	0.11	2	0.22	2	0.80	1	0.78	1	0.79
Rubinstein 1952		13	0.46	24	0.00	13	0.15	9	0.69	8	0.65	8	0.67
Rubinstein 1966		3	0.53	2	0.12	3	0.28	3	0.79	5	0.72	3	0.75
Schilhawsky 1960		51	0.33	8	0.01	68	0.05	59	0.05	52	0.06	63	0.05
Shebanova 2002		58	0.30	65	0.00	56	0.05	58	0.05	73	0.05	64	0.05
Smith 1975		28	0.40	47	0.00	32	0.10	35	0.35	15	0.53	28	0.43
Sokolov 2002		20	0.43	35	0.00	23	0.11	26	0.47	5	0.65	19	0.55
Sztompka 1959		42	0.35	64	0.00	43	0.06	42	0.15	41	0.23	41	0.19
Tomsic 1995		38	0.37	67	0.00	33	0.11	29	0.41	14	0.45	29	0.43
Uninsky 1932		40	0.36	48	0.00	40	0.08	39	0.23	29	0.26	39	0.24
Uninsky 1971		9	0.48	21	0.00	10	0.13	21	0.53	11	0.53	22	0.53
Wasowski 1980		27	0.41	32	0.00	25	0.10	23	0.49	24	0.46	24	0.47
Zak 1937		56	0.31	88	0.00	60	0.04	66	0.04	67	0.04	76	0.04
Zak 1951		45	0.34	77	0.00	50	0.06	52	0.06	47	0.06	59	0.06
Random 1		89	0.00	38	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	15	0.42	53	0.09
Random 2		88	0.09	51	0.00	88	0.02	86	0.02	3	0.51	51	0.10
Random 3		90	-0.09	89	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	75	0.03	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).