Luisada 1991

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		14	0.45	24	0.00	14	0.14	12	0.53	3	0.65	11	0.59
Anderszewski 2003		72	0.29	87	0.00	65	0.06	65	0.06	71	0.04	66	0.05
Ashkenazy 1981		5	0.51	20	0.00	9	0.20	5	0.68	8	0.65	4	0.66
Bacha 2000		81	0.24	80	0.00	71	0.04	76	0.04	59	0.04	73	0.04
Badura 1965		68	0.29	37	0.00	70	0.05	69	0.05	87	0.02	83	0.03
Barbosa 1983		6	0.51	6	0.05	8	0.19	7	0.66	8	0.64	5	0.65
Biret 1990		30	0.41	45	0.00	21	0.10	22	0.35	22	0.49	21	0.41
Blet 2003		1	0.54	2	0.19	2	0.26	1	0.73	1	0.81	1	0.77
Block 1995		59	0.35	64	0.00	61	0.06	60	0.06	59	0.05	70	0.05
Blumental 1952		28	0.42	39	0.00	26	0.09	23	0.31	27	0.36	30	0.33
Boshniakovich 1969		17	0.44	29	0.00	13	0.14	16	0.50	25	0.36	19	0.42
Brailowsky 1960		57	0.36	21	0.00	63	0.09	45	0.09	40	0.15	42	0.12
Bunin 1987		15	0.44	12	0.01	17	0.14	18	0.47	5	0.60	15	0.53
Bunin 1987b		24	0.42	58	0.00	23	0.09	19	0.41	8	0.55	17	0.47
Chiu 1999		46	0.39	18	0.01	46	0.06	56	0.06	42	0.13	47	0.09
Cohen 1997		74	0.28	67	0.00	75	0.03	82	0.03	68	0.03	84	0.03
Cortot 1951		86	0.16	63	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	88	0.01	90	0.01
Csalog 1996		52	0.37	33	0.00	41	0.05	43	0.11	28	0.24	38	0.16
Czerny 1949		83	0.22	81	0.00	83	0.03	86	0.03	78	0.03	82	0.03
Czerny 1990		27	0.42	42	0.00	24	0.10	20	0.39	34	0.30	27	0.34
Duchoud 2007		73	0.28	34	0.00	69	0.06	57	0.06	59	0.05	69	0.05
Ezaki 2006		58	0.36	35	0.00	59	0.06	64	0.06	56	0.07	56	0.06
Falvay 1989		16	0.44	9	0.03	12	0.17	17	0.49	24	0.35	20	0.41
Farrell 1958		80	0.24	73	0.00	82	0.03	81	0.03	85	0.02	88	0.02
Ferenczy 1958		82	0.23	31	0.00	81	0.04	77	0.04	51	0.07	67	0.05
Fliere 1977		2	0.54	5	0.06	4	0.20	2	0.72	20	0.49	9	0.59
Fou 1978		29	0.41	70	0.00	37	0.06	35	0.22	42	0.12	37	0.16
Francois 1956		75	0.27	49	0.00	78	0.04	72	0.04	61	0.04	79	0.04
Friedman 1923		41	0.39	55	0.00	36	0.06	37	0.15	23	0.48	32	0.27
Friedman 1923b		37	0.40	59	0.00	35	0.08	33	0.24	19	0.54	25	0.36
Friedman 1930		53	0.37	32	0.00	42	0.05	40	0.14	27	0.38	35	0.23
Garcia 2007		69	0.29	88	0.00	68	0.06	59	0.06	46	0.07	58	0.06
Garcia 2007b		19	0.44	15	0.01	15	0.11	15	0.51	13	0.63	12	0.57
Gierzod 1998		64	0.32	22	0.00	56	0.06	66	0.06	67	0.05	68	0.05
Gornostaeva 1994		60	0.35	74	0.00	52	0.06	62	0.06	62	0.05	71	0.05
Groot 1988		8	0.50	11	0.01	6	0.19	8	0.65	5	0.59	7	0.62
Harasiewicz 1955		26	0.42	75	0.00	49	0.06	55	0.06	70	0.05	72	0.05
Hatto 1993		7	0.50	13	0.01	3	0.28	6	0.67	9	0.62	6	0.64
Hatto 1997		11	0.48	48	0.00	7	0.21	9	0.63	12	0.55	10	0.59
Horowitz 1949		13	0.45	4	0.06	11	0.18	14	0.52	3	0.70	8	0.60
Indjic 1988		3	0.53	1	0.33	1	0.32	3	0.71	7	0.69	2	0.70
Kapell 1951		35	0.40	38	0.00	47	0.07	49	0.07	51	0.07	50	0.07
Kissin 1993		21	0.43	44	0.00	25	0.08	21	0.38	26	0.50	18	0.44
Kushner 1989		25	0.42	28	0.00	27	0.09	27	0.30	60	0.05	43	0.12
Luisada 1991		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Lushtak 2004		66	0.30	89	0.00	67	0.05	70	0.05	81	0.03	77	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		62	0.34	79	0.00	64	0.06	51	0.06	76	0.04	63	0.05
Magaloff 1978		55	0.37	43	0.00	55	0.05	68	0.05	54	0.05	61	0.05
Magin 1975		10	0.48	30	0.00	16	0.12	11	0.54	15	0.54	13	0.54
Michalowski 1933		42	0.39	17	0.01	20	0.09	32	0.24	3	0.67	22	0.40
Milkina 1970		44	0.39	26	0.00	28	0.06	26	0.30	36	0.30	31	0.30
Mohovich 1999		39	0.40	60	0.00	38	0.07	36	0.18	39	0.19	36	0.18
Moravec 1969		31	0.41	53	0.00	48	0.06	61	0.06	43	0.11	49	0.08
Morozova 2008		32	0.41	8	0.03	19	0.10	24	0.31	39	0.18	34	0.24
Neighaus 1950		61	0.35	61	0.00	62	0.08	46	0.08	49	0.05	59	0.06
Niedzielski 1931		45	0.39	41	0.00	33	0.06	30	0.27	10	0.52	23	0.37
Ohlsson 1999		51	0.38	54	0.00	54	0.06	53	0.06	73	0.03	75	0.04
Osinska 1989		50	0.38	82	0.00	45	0.06	52	0.06	65	0.05	60	0.05
Pachmann 1927		71	0.29	78	0.00	79	0.05	71	0.05	63	0.05	64	0.05
Paderewski 1930		67	0.30	57	0.00	53	0.05	67	0.05	21	0.48	40	0.15
Perlemuter 1992		43	0.39	25	0.00	51	0.06	58	0.06	27	0.34	41	0.14
Pierdomenico 2008		76	0.26	86	0.00	80	0.04	79	0.04	82	0.03	80	0.03
Poblocka 1999		9	0.49	14	0.01	18	0.15	13	0.53	23	0.48	16	0.50
Rabcewiczowa 1932		79	0.25	52	0.00	72	0.04	75	0.04	72	0.04	74	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		23	0.43	16	0.01	22	0.09	28	0.28	25	0.38	28	0.33
Rangell 2001		70	0.29	62	0.00	74	0.04	74	0.04	78	0.03	85	0.03
Richter 1976		33	0.41	56	0.00	50	0.07	48	0.07	45	0.08	51	0.07
Rosen 1989		54	0.37	27	0.00	39	0.05	41	0.12	72	0.04	53	0.07
Rosenthal 1930		65	0.32	19	0.01	76	0.03	80	0.03	52	0.06	76	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		84	0.19	66	0.00	85	0.03	84	0.03	78	0.03	81	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		85	0.19	68	0.00	84	0.03	83	0.03	76	0.03	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		77	0.26	77	0.00	73	0.04	78	0.04	64	0.04	78	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		78	0.25	47	0.00	77	0.04	73	0.04	44	0.11	55	0.07
Rossi 2007		87	0.14	83	0.00	86	0.03	85	0.03	78	0.02	87	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		63	0.33	50	0.00	66	0.06	63	0.06	49	0.05	62	0.05
Rubinstein 1952		36	0.40	65	0.00	43	0.05	39	0.14	54	0.06	48	0.09
Rubinstein 1966		40	0.39	71	0.00	40	0.06	38	0.15	59	0.07	46	0.10
Schilhawsky 1960		49	0.38	40	0.00	31	0.06	44	0.09	37	0.14	45	0.11
Shebanova 2002		12	0.47	3	0.07	10	0.21	10	0.57	19	0.51	14	0.54
Smith 1975		47	0.38	23	0.00	60	0.07	50	0.07	39	0.16	44	0.11
Sokolov 2002		34	0.40	36	0.00	32	0.06	31	0.25	9	0.53	24	0.36
Sztompka 1959		38	0.40	72	0.00	58	0.08	47	0.08	61	0.05	57	0.06
Tomsic 1995		56	0.36	84	0.00	44	0.06	42	0.12	37	0.19	39	0.15
Uninsky 1932		22	0.43	10	0.02	34	0.06	34	0.22	27	0.29	33	0.25
Uninsky 1971		48	0.38	69	0.00	57	0.06	54	0.06	72	0.04	65	0.05
Wasowski 1980		4	0.52	7	0.04	5	0.20	4	0.70	3	0.65	3	0.67
Zak 1937		18	0.44	46	0.00	30	0.08	29	0.28	22	0.38	29	0.33
Zak 1951		20	0.44	51	0.00	29	0.07	25	0.30	22	0.41	26	0.35
Random 1		89	0.03	76	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	33	0.25	54	0.07
Random 2		88	0.03	85	0.00	88	0.02	89	0.02	31	0.22	52	0.07
Random 3		90	-0.09	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	68	0.03	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).