Kushner 1989

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		73	0.33	86	0.00	82	0.03	84	0.03	70	0.04	86	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		26	0.46	9	0.01	10	0.14	13	0.54	8	0.67	14	0.60
Ashkenazy 1981		6	0.54	5	0.02	11	0.12	16	0.52	4	0.70	15	0.60
Bacha 2000		39	0.43	13	0.01	26	0.06	35	0.24	5	0.65	31	0.39
Badura 1965		49	0.40	65	0.00	27	0.06	30	0.30	5	0.62	25	0.43
Barbosa 1983		37	0.44	68	0.00	51	0.07	50	0.07	44	0.16	65	0.11
Biret 1990		61	0.37	45	0.00	63	0.05	62	0.05	40	0.21	72	0.10
Blet 2003		77	0.32	84	0.00	79	0.03	82	0.03	66	0.04	85	0.03
Block 1995		46	0.41	53	0.00	29	0.07	32	0.29	14	0.54	30	0.40
Blumental 1952		22	0.47	72	0.00	32	0.09	25	0.36	9	0.65	23	0.48
Boshniakovich 1969		8	0.54	4	0.13	4	0.26	2	0.73	1	0.77	3	0.75
Brailowsky 1960		76	0.32	61	0.00	73	0.04	74	0.04	45	0.08	78	0.06
Bunin 1987		54	0.40	35	0.00	58	0.10	43	0.10	19	0.47	42	0.22
Bunin 1987b		56	0.38	75	0.00	59	0.08	46	0.08	26	0.40	46	0.18
Chiu 1999		29	0.45	44	0.00	43	0.05	44	0.10	30	0.22	52	0.15
Cohen 1997		65	0.36	30	0.00	75	0.03	81	0.03	39	0.24	75	0.08
Cortot 1951		84	0.26	64	0.00	84	0.04	79	0.04	55	0.06	81	0.05
Csalog 1996		55	0.39	26	0.00	45	0.05	64	0.05	13	0.45	55	0.15
Czerny 1949		64	0.36	52	0.00	61	0.06	54	0.06	28	0.50	48	0.17
Czerny 1990		11	0.52	27	0.00	13	0.13	9	0.61	12	0.73	11	0.67
Duchoud 2007		48	0.41	46	0.00	39	0.06	41	0.12	8	0.60	39	0.27
Ezaki 2006		47	0.41	55	0.00	40	0.05	40	0.14	43	0.23	45	0.18
Falvay 1989		9	0.53	24	0.00	14	0.15	10	0.61	1	0.65	12	0.63
Farrell 1958		66	0.35	17	0.00	38	0.07	38	0.18	18	0.42	38	0.27
Ferenczy 1958		87	0.21	82	0.00	87	0.04	77	0.04	52	0.06	79	0.05
Fliere 1977		4	0.57	23	0.00	5	0.27	4	0.73	7	0.70	5	0.71
Fou 1978		13	0.51	21	0.00	16	0.15	14	0.53	10	0.63	16	0.58
Francois 1956		82	0.28	74	0.00	81	0.03	85	0.03	62	0.04	88	0.03
Friedman 1923		67	0.35	15	0.01	69	0.05	56	0.05	32	0.28	63	0.12
Friedman 1923b		68	0.35	22	0.00	68	0.05	67	0.05	33	0.34	60	0.13
Friedman 1930		62	0.36	56	0.00	62	0.05	58	0.05	66	0.04	83	0.04
Garcia 2007		59	0.37	42	0.00	33	0.10	33	0.29	8	0.61	27	0.42
Garcia 2007b		33	0.44	59	0.00	18	0.13	17	0.51	3	0.74	13	0.61
Gierzod 1998		12	0.52	18	0.00	7	0.12	8	0.65	1	0.75	7	0.70
Gornostaeva 1994		44	0.42	54	0.00	47	0.05	69	0.05	25	0.46	56	0.15
Groot 1988		28	0.45	12	0.01	21	0.08	29	0.30	23	0.38	36	0.34
Harasiewicz 1955		31	0.45	62	0.00	41	0.05	39	0.15	46	0.07	73	0.10
Hatto 1993		21	0.48	67	0.00	30	0.09	24	0.38	20	0.44	29	0.41
Hatto 1997		45	0.42	63	0.00	57	0.07	48	0.07	37	0.14	70	0.10
Horowitz 1949		78	0.31	41	0.00	74	0.04	80	0.04	43	0.11	77	0.07
Indjic 1988		20	0.48	49	0.00	22	0.07	23	0.41	17	0.54	24	0.47
Kapell 1951		17	0.49	20	0.00	15	0.14	15	0.52	7	0.54	18	0.53
Kissin 1993		7	0.54	6	0.02	9	0.18	12	0.57	5	0.82	8	0.68
Kushner 1989		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Luisada 1991		43	0.42	66	0.00	48	0.05	60	0.05	27	0.30	61	0.12
Lushtak 2004		15	0.51	10	0.01	12	0.11	11	0.60	2	0.75	10	0.67
Malcuzynski 1961		5	0.56	1	0.26	1	0.26	5	0.71	1	0.74	4	0.72
Magaloff 1978		32	0.44	80	0.00	44	0.05	45	0.09	22	0.39	43	0.19
Magin 1975		16	0.50	25	0.00	19	0.10	21	0.42	10	0.63	20	0.51
Michalowski 1933		70	0.34	69	0.00	60	0.05	57	0.05	6	0.58	47	0.17
Milkina 1970		40	0.43	38	0.00	24	0.06	22	0.42	16	0.58	22	0.49
Mohovich 1999		30	0.45	11	0.01	23	0.07	28	0.30	20	0.49	33	0.38
Moravec 1969		24	0.46	37	0.00	37	0.07	37	0.18	11	0.49	37	0.30
Morozova 2008		10	0.53	14	0.01	8	0.17	7	0.66	1	0.70	9	0.68
Neighaus 1950		72	0.34	81	0.00	78	0.04	78	0.04	67	0.04	84	0.04
Niedzielski 1931		75	0.33	78	0.00	70	0.05	68	0.05	43	0.11	76	0.07
Ohlsson 1999		19	0.48	29	0.00	35	0.10	27	0.33	9	0.52	28	0.41
Osinska 1989		35	0.44	7	0.01	20	0.09	18	0.47	18	0.52	21	0.49
Pachmann 1927		60	0.37	50	0.00	65	0.05	65	0.05	16	0.48	54	0.15
Paderewski 1930		71	0.34	73	0.00	67	0.05	59	0.05	17	0.53	50	0.16
Perlemuter 1992		36	0.44	70	0.00	55	0.08	47	0.08	7	0.59	41	0.22
Pierdomenico 2008		57	0.38	31	0.00	54	0.06	53	0.06	5	0.58	44	0.19
Poblocka 1999		25	0.46	36	0.00	36	0.07	36	0.23	20	0.50	35	0.34
Rabcewiczowa 1932		69	0.35	79	0.00	66	0.04	73	0.04	40	0.18	74	0.08
Rachmaninoff 1923		80	0.30	83	0.00	72	0.04	75	0.04	68	0.04	82	0.04
Rangell 2001		50	0.40	43	0.00	42	0.05	42	0.10	13	0.55	40	0.23
Richter 1976		2	0.58	8	0.01	6	0.27	3	0.73	3	0.80	1	0.76
Rosen 1989		27	0.45	16	0.00	28	0.06	26	0.35	13	0.44	32	0.39
Rosenthal 1930		83	0.28	60	0.00	86	0.03	86	0.03	70	0.04	87	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		79	0.31	58	0.00	77	0.04	71	0.04	31	0.40	59	0.13
Rosenthal 1931b		81	0.30	90	0.00	80	0.03	83	0.03	30	0.38	66	0.11
Rosenthal 1931c		74	0.33	85	0.00	76	0.05	66	0.05	33	0.23	67	0.11
Rosenthal 1931d		85	0.25	87	0.00	85	0.04	76	0.04	45	0.06	80	0.05
Rossi 2007		86	0.25	89	0.00	83	0.03	87	0.03	27	0.33	68	0.10
Rubinstein 1939		42	0.43	47	0.00	31	0.09	34	0.26	12	0.52	34	0.37
Rubinstein 1952		18	0.48	48	0.00	25	0.06	20	0.45	11	0.59	19	0.52
Rubinstein 1966		3	0.57	3	0.16	3	0.33	6	0.69	7	0.71	6	0.70
Schilhawsky 1960		58	0.38	57	0.00	64	0.05	63	0.05	14	0.40	57	0.14
Shebanova 2002		1	0.61	2	0.24	2	0.28	1	0.76	4	0.77	2	0.76
Smith 1975		63	0.36	71	0.00	71	0.06	55	0.06	38	0.18	69	0.10
Sokolov 2002		52	0.40	32	0.00	46	0.04	72	0.04	27	0.41	58	0.13
Sztompka 1959		14	0.51	34	0.00	17	0.13	19	0.45	10	0.66	17	0.54
Tomsic 1995		23	0.46	19	0.00	34	0.08	31	0.29	3	0.62	26	0.42
Uninsky 1932		53	0.40	28	0.00	52	0.06	52	0.06	21	0.42	51	0.16
Uninsky 1971		51	0.40	33	0.00	56	0.07	49	0.07	42	0.16	64	0.11
Wasowski 1980		34	0.44	40	0.00	49	0.04	70	0.04	30	0.38	62	0.12
Zak 1937		41	0.43	51	0.00	53	0.06	51	0.06	18	0.43	49	0.16
Zak 1951		38	0.44	39	0.00	50	0.05	61	0.05	14	0.48	53	0.15
Random 1		88	0.01	88	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	7	0.48	71	0.10
Random 2		89	0.00	76	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	72	0.03	89	0.02
Random 3		90	-0.03	77	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	52	0.04	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).