Indjic 1988

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		49	0.38	23	0.00	51	0.05	60	0.05	22	0.44	48	0.15
Anderszewski 2003		48	0.38	9	0.00	44	0.07	44	0.13	29	0.40	43	0.23
Ashkenazy 1981		7	0.51	3	0.00	13	0.12	11	0.62	6	0.69	11	0.65
Bacha 2000		35	0.41	46	0.00	45	0.09	45	0.09	10	0.58	42	0.23
Badura 1965		67	0.33	19	0.00	66	0.05	67	0.05	44	0.10	66	0.07
Barbosa 1983		12	0.50	24	0.00	12	0.11	9	0.66	5	0.68	10	0.67
Biret 1990		38	0.40	36	0.00	55	0.05	61	0.05	25	0.44	49	0.15
Blet 2003		28	0.42	56	0.00	19	0.12	24	0.41	9	0.53	23	0.47
Block 1995		66	0.34	70	0.00	52	0.06	52	0.06	56	0.05	75	0.05
Blumental 1952		9	0.51	47	0.00	10	0.12	8	0.68	2	0.77	6	0.72
Boshniakovich 1969		56	0.36	57	0.00	42	0.06	40	0.18	53	0.06	61	0.10
Brailowsky 1960		81	0.24	71	0.00	86	0.04	73	0.04	83	0.03	84	0.03
Bunin 1987		45	0.38	58	0.00	24	0.10	34	0.28	8	0.55	30	0.39
Bunin 1987b		50	0.37	72	0.00	26	0.08	36	0.23	11	0.53	33	0.35
Chiu 1999		21	0.45	59	0.00	31	0.09	26	0.39	13	0.51	24	0.45
Cohen 1997		77	0.26	73	0.00	78	0.06	59	0.06	47	0.07	70	0.06
Cortot 1951		86	0.22	20	0.00	84	0.03	85	0.03	54	0.06	81	0.04
Csalog 1996		61	0.35	48	0.00	65	0.07	50	0.07	52	0.06	68	0.06
Czerny 1949		71	0.30	49	0.00	71	0.04	78	0.04	41	0.21	63	0.09
Czerny 1990		5	0.52	5	0.00	6	0.19	5	0.73	11	0.75	4	0.74
Duchoud 2007		57	0.36	60	0.00	59	0.05	70	0.05	21	0.35	55	0.13
Ezaki 2006		63	0.34	10	0.00	69	0.06	57	0.06	63	0.05	71	0.05
Falvay 1989		18	0.48	37	0.00	29	0.09	22	0.46	15	0.44	25	0.45
Farrell 1958		78	0.26	74	0.00	74	0.04	75	0.04	62	0.05	78	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		80	0.25	50	0.00	82	0.03	84	0.03	45	0.09	74	0.05
Fliere 1977		19	0.47	38	0.00	23	0.13	20	0.52	36	0.25	31	0.36
Fou 1978		39	0.40	25	0.00	53	0.07	49	0.07	51	0.05	67	0.06
Francois 1956		76	0.26	75	0.00	77	0.04	71	0.04	57	0.04	83	0.04
Friedman 1923		62	0.35	26	0.00	62	0.06	56	0.06	29	0.36	50	0.15
Friedman 1923b		64	0.34	76	0.00	63	0.07	51	0.07	31	0.37	46	0.16
Friedman 1930		33	0.42	39	0.00	30	0.09	29	0.31	17	0.55	28	0.41
Garcia 2007		68	0.33	8	0.00	46	0.05	68	0.05	18	0.41	53	0.14
Garcia 2007b		22	0.44	7	0.00	7	0.18	12	0.62	2	0.75	9	0.68
Gierzod 1998		37	0.40	27	0.00	34	0.06	30	0.30	26	0.34	35	0.32
Gornostaeva 1994		74	0.28	77	0.00	79	0.04	80	0.04	82	0.03	86	0.03
Groot 1988		6	0.52	28	0.00	5	0.16	3	0.75	3	0.73	5	0.74
Harasiewicz 1955		10	0.50	40	0.00	17	0.12	14	0.58	22	0.43	19	0.50
Hatto 1993		1	0.97	1	0.99	1	0.98	1	1.00	1	1.00	1	1.00
Hatto 1997		2	0.91	2	0.01	2	0.96	2	0.99	1	0.99	2	0.99
Horowitz 1949		59	0.35	51	0.00	61	0.05	62	0.05	19	0.52	45	0.16
Indjic 1988		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Kapell 1951		11	0.50	29	0.00	18	0.17	10	0.63	9	0.52	14	0.57
Kissin 1993		15	0.48	52	0.00	15	0.12	13	0.61	14	0.65	12	0.63
Kushner 1989		17	0.48	14	0.00	20	0.12	17	0.54	23	0.41	20	0.47
Luisada 1991		4	0.53	12	0.00	4	0.23	7	0.69	3	0.71	8	0.70
Lushtak 2004		65	0.34	61	0.00	64	0.08	47	0.08	60	0.05	69	0.06
Malcuzynski 1961		20	0.45	78	0.00	16	0.12	19	0.54	11	0.54	16	0.54
Magaloff 1978		47	0.38	41	0.00	43	0.06	42	0.16	39	0.14	47	0.15
Magin 1975		8	0.51	30	0.00	8	0.21	6	0.72	1	0.76	3	0.74
Michalowski 1933		73	0.29	42	0.00	68	0.05	69	0.05	19	0.42	52	0.14
Milkina 1970		14	0.49	79	0.00	14	0.11	15	0.58	13	0.66	13	0.62
Mohovich 1999		46	0.38	31	0.00	21	0.13	28	0.35	26	0.43	29	0.39
Moravec 1969		30	0.42	53	0.00	40	0.08	41	0.17	20	0.37	40	0.25
Morozova 2008		43	0.38	15	0.00	37	0.05	38	0.21	34	0.28	41	0.24
Neighaus 1950		54	0.37	62	0.00	49	0.06	55	0.06	35	0.23	56	0.12
Niedzielski 1931		41	0.39	13	0.00	33	0.11	32	0.29	5	0.57	27	0.41
Ohlsson 1999		27	0.43	63	0.00	32	0.11	31	0.29	27	0.30	39	0.29
Osinska 1989		36	0.41	64	0.00	48	0.05	66	0.05	41	0.17	62	0.09
Pachmann 1927		83	0.24	80	0.00	81	0.03	83	0.03	62	0.05	79	0.04
Paderewski 1930		60	0.35	21	0.00	41	0.05	43	0.14	3	0.68	37	0.31
Perlemuter 1992		72	0.30	81	0.00	67	0.05	64	0.05	41	0.13	64	0.08
Pierdomenico 2008		55	0.36	32	0.00	47	0.05	63	0.05	13	0.54	44	0.16
Poblocka 1999		51	0.37	43	0.00	54	0.08	48	0.08	42	0.16	57	0.11
Rabcewiczowa 1932		75	0.26	82	0.00	75	0.04	81	0.04	66	0.05	77	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		52	0.37	65	0.00	58	0.06	58	0.06	39	0.20	58	0.11
Rangell 2001		79	0.26	33	0.00	76	0.04	74	0.04	55	0.05	80	0.04
Richter 1976		29	0.42	83	0.00	38	0.07	37	0.22	29	0.38	38	0.29
Rosen 1989		44	0.38	4	0.00	50	0.06	54	0.06	58	0.04	76	0.05
Rosenthal 1930		69	0.32	84	0.00	73	0.04	76	0.04	37	0.28	60	0.11
Rosenthal 1931		82	0.24	85	0.00	80	0.04	77	0.04	50	0.06	73	0.05
Rosenthal 1931b		84	0.23	86	0.00	85	0.03	82	0.03	73	0.03	88	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		70	0.31	54	0.00	72	0.04	79	0.04	52	0.05	82	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		85	0.22	66	0.00	83	0.03	86	0.03	66	0.04	87	0.03
Rossi 2007		87	0.06	67	0.00	87	0.02	88	0.02	83	0.02	89	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		32	0.42	68	0.00	35	0.07	33	0.28	16	0.46	32	0.36
Rubinstein 1952		25	0.44	22	0.00	27	0.08	21	0.50	16	0.54	17	0.52
Rubinstein 1966		16	0.48	16	0.00	9	0.14	18	0.54	18	0.49	18	0.51
Schilhawsky 1960		53	0.37	87	0.00	60	0.05	65	0.05	22	0.36	54	0.13
Shebanova 2002		3	0.54	17	0.00	3	0.40	4	0.74	7	0.68	7	0.71
Smith 1975		58	0.35	88	0.00	70	0.04	72	0.04	47	0.07	72	0.05
Sokolov 2002		26	0.43	89	0.00	39	0.08	39	0.19	14	0.50	36	0.31
Sztompka 1959		40	0.39	69	0.00	22	0.11	27	0.38	19	0.51	26	0.44
Tomsic 1995		24	0.44	44	0.00	28	0.07	25	0.40	7	0.55	21	0.47
Uninsky 1932		42	0.39	45	0.00	36	0.07	35	0.24	20	0.43	34	0.32
Uninsky 1971		23	0.44	34	0.00	25	0.09	23	0.44	15	0.51	22	0.47
Wasowski 1980		13	0.49	11	0.00	11	0.11	16	0.56	12	0.55	15	0.55
Zak 1937		31	0.42	6	0.00	56	0.06	53	0.06	32	0.21	59	0.11
Zak 1951		34	0.42	18	0.00	57	0.09	46	0.09	30	0.21	51	0.14
Random 1		89	-0.02	55	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	52	0.04	85	0.03
Random 2		88	0.06	35	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	25	0.26	65	0.07
Random 3		90	-0.07	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	80	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).