Garcia 2007

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		77	0.20	35	0.00	64	0.03	82	0.03	61	0.04	82	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		43	0.30	50	0.00	21	0.06	19	0.41	41	0.21	13	0.29
Ashkenazy 1981		53	0.27	69	0.00	58	0.05	58	0.05	71	0.05	56	0.05
Bacha 2000		67	0.23	64	0.00	75	0.05	65	0.05	65	0.04	61	0.04
Badura 1965		72	0.21	58	0.00	70	0.05	63	0.05	82	0.03	70	0.04
Barbosa 1983		18	0.34	20	0.00	12	0.09	13	0.53	46	0.09	24	0.22
Biret 1990		68	0.23	54	0.00	72	0.06	49	0.06	65	0.04	58	0.05
Blet 2003		59	0.26	37	0.00	63	0.03	80	0.03	72	0.03	80	0.03
Block 1995		17	0.36	5	0.02	13	0.08	20	0.40	43	0.12	25	0.22
Blumental 1952		55	0.27	9	0.01	52	0.04	71	0.04	62	0.05	71	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		2	0.46	2	0.09	2	0.40	2	0.76	15	0.55	3	0.65
Brailowsky 1960		74	0.21	63	0.00	81	0.04	75	0.04	78	0.04	63	0.04
Bunin 1987		33	0.31	76	0.00	39	0.05	37	0.16	52	0.06	38	0.10
Bunin 1987b		29	0.32	73	0.00	40	0.05	36	0.16	44	0.13	31	0.14
Chiu 1999		34	0.31	40	0.00	30	0.08	28	0.30	57	0.05	34	0.12
Cohen 1997		60	0.26	23	0.00	44	0.05	43	0.10	51	0.06	41	0.08
Cortot 1951		73	0.21	77	0.00	79	0.03	79	0.03	60	0.06	72	0.04
Csalog 1996		28	0.32	18	0.00	29	0.08	29	0.30	39	0.12	26	0.19
Czerny 1949		85	0.16	78	0.00	77	0.04	76	0.04	66	0.04	69	0.04
Czerny 1990		35	0.31	80	0.00	43	0.04	44	0.09	69	0.04	48	0.06
Duchoud 2007		46	0.29	46	0.00	53	0.05	53	0.05	49	0.07	47	0.06
Ezaki 2006		71	0.22	52	0.00	71	0.05	55	0.05	68	0.05	49	0.05
Falvay 1989		45	0.29	48	0.00	33	0.10	33	0.21	61	0.05	36	0.10
Farrell 1958		62	0.25	53	0.00	51	0.05	66	0.05	57	0.06	51	0.05
Ferenczy 1958		82	0.17	84	0.00	83	0.02	87	0.02	66	0.05	81	0.03
Fliere 1977		5	0.43	14	0.00	4	0.20	3	0.69	43	0.17	12	0.34
Fou 1978		32	0.31	25	0.00	42	0.04	42	0.10	62	0.04	46	0.06
Francois 1956		79	0.19	79	0.00	80	0.05	56	0.05	75	0.03	73	0.04
Friedman 1923		50	0.29	27	0.00	55	0.05	54	0.05	57	0.06	60	0.05
Friedman 1923b		51	0.28	68	0.00	60	0.05	51	0.05	49	0.06	57	0.05
Friedman 1930		23	0.33	10	0.01	31	0.09	31	0.24	56	0.05	35	0.11
Garcia 2007		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Garcia 2007b		1	0.55	1	0.74	1	0.73	1	0.88	1	0.87	1	0.87
Gierzod 1998		42	0.30	12	0.00	22	0.08	24	0.35	57	0.06	33	0.14
Gornostaeva 1994		40	0.30	45	0.00	47	0.05	60	0.05	42	0.09	44	0.07
Groot 1988		38	0.30	59	0.00	35	0.07	35	0.17	67	0.04	42	0.08
Harasiewicz 1955		11	0.38	6	0.01	7	0.15	10	0.57	43	0.12	20	0.26
Hatto 1993		21	0.34	17	0.00	27	0.09	17	0.42	49	0.07	28	0.17
Hatto 1997		57	0.27	49	0.00	38	0.06	41	0.10	49	0.05	43	0.07
Horowitz 1949		49	0.29	36	0.00	59	0.05	50	0.05	56	0.05	52	0.05
Indjic 1988		24	0.33	55	0.00	26	0.07	18	0.41	68	0.05	32	0.14
Kapell 1951		4	0.43	7	0.01	9	0.18	9	0.59	26	0.31	7	0.43
Kissin 1993		61	0.25	66	0.00	67	0.04	77	0.04	50	0.07	53	0.05
Kushner 1989		12	0.37	28	0.00	5	0.17	8	0.61	33	0.29	9	0.42
Luisada 1991		48	0.29	85	0.00	61	0.07	46	0.07	59	0.06	45	0.06
Lushtak 2004		47	0.29	72	0.00	54	0.06	47	0.06	54	0.05	55	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		13	0.37	22	0.00	8	0.16	7	0.63	31	0.33	6	0.46
Magaloff 1978		52	0.28	65	0.00	50	0.04	69	0.04	78	0.03	74	0.03
Magin 1975		54	0.27	71	0.00	56	0.05	52	0.05	76	0.04	65	0.04
Michalowski 1933		69	0.23	34	0.00	74	0.04	72	0.04	69	0.05	67	0.04
Milkina 1970		70	0.23	33	0.00	34	0.07	39	0.14	54	0.05	40	0.08
Mohovich 1999		3	0.44	3	0.03	3	0.37	4	0.68	15	0.58	4	0.63
Moravec 1969		39	0.30	21	0.00	62	0.05	67	0.05	74	0.03	62	0.04
Morozova 2008		36	0.30	24	0.00	17	0.10	21	0.39	41	0.17	18	0.26
Neighaus 1950		56	0.27	13	0.00	73	0.05	57	0.05	88	0.02	85	0.03
Niedzielski 1931		44	0.29	11	0.01	32	0.10	32	0.21	36	0.24	22	0.22
Ohlsson 1999		64	0.25	89	0.00	46	0.05	59	0.05	70	0.04	66	0.04
Osinska 1989		19	0.34	61	0.00	25	0.07	22	0.38	59	0.05	30	0.14
Pachmann 1927		25	0.33	39	0.00	36	0.05	34	0.18	26	0.37	17	0.26
Paderewski 1930		22	0.33	15	0.00	28	0.09	27	0.31	15	0.55	10	0.41
Perlemuter 1992		26	0.33	47	0.00	20	0.07	30	0.26	32	0.24	21	0.25
Pierdomenico 2008		6	0.42	8	0.01	6	0.16	5	0.65	3	0.69	2	0.67
Poblocka 1999		37	0.30	31	0.00	41	0.05	40	0.12	67	0.05	39	0.08
Rabcewiczowa 1932		30	0.31	44	0.00	37	0.05	38	0.16	57	0.06	37	0.10
Rachmaninoff 1923		66	0.24	86	0.00	65	0.03	78	0.03	75	0.03	75	0.03
Rangell 2001		7	0.42	26	0.00	11	0.14	11	0.56	11	0.55	5	0.55
Richter 1976		10	0.38	56	0.00	15	0.12	12	0.55	31	0.34	8	0.43
Rosen 1989		9	0.39	4	0.02	14	0.10	15	0.47	41	0.14	19	0.26
Rosenthal 1930		81	0.18	60	0.00	87	0.03	83	0.03	84	0.03	83	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		87	0.11	81	0.00	86	0.03	85	0.03	80	0.03	79	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		84	0.17	88	0.00	82	0.03	86	0.03	65	0.04	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		75	0.20	43	0.00	78	0.04	73	0.04	78	0.03	87	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		80	0.18	87	0.00	84	0.03	81	0.03	70	0.04	84	0.03
Rossi 2007		63	0.25	51	0.00	45	0.05	64	0.05	7	0.59	27	0.17
Rubinstein 1939		78	0.20	70	0.00	68	0.04	68	0.04	82	0.03	77	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		58	0.27	57	0.00	57	0.07	45	0.07	75	0.03	59	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		8	0.41	29	0.00	10	0.18	6	0.64	39	0.13	14	0.29
Schilhawsky 1960		65	0.24	41	0.00	69	0.04	70	0.04	53	0.05	68	0.04
Shebanova 2002		16	0.36	19	0.00	16	0.10	14	0.49	43	0.16	15	0.28
Smith 1975		86	0.12	42	0.00	85	0.03	84	0.03	81	0.03	76	0.03
Sokolov 2002		83	0.17	62	0.00	66	0.04	74	0.04	67	0.04	64	0.04
Sztompka 1959		27	0.32	67	0.00	19	0.08	25	0.33	48	0.07	29	0.15
Tomsic 1995		20	0.34	38	0.00	18	0.10	16	0.46	25	0.30	11	0.37
Uninsky 1932		31	0.31	90	0.00	48	0.06	48	0.06	59	0.05	54	0.05
Uninsky 1971		76	0.20	82	0.00	76	0.05	62	0.05	87	0.02	78	0.03
Wasowski 1980		41	0.30	32	0.00	49	0.05	61	0.05	68	0.05	50	0.05
Zak 1937		14	0.37	30	0.00	24	0.09	26	0.33	42	0.15	23	0.22
Zak 1951		15	0.37	16	0.00	23	0.07	23	0.35	33	0.20	16	0.26
Random 1		90	-0.07	74	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	48	0.05	89	0.02
Random 2		88	-0.02	83	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	68	0.03	88	0.02
Random 3		89	-0.05	75	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	64	0.03	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).