Friedman 1923

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		53	0.29	21	0.00	61	0.04	69	0.04	44	0.11	44	0.07
Anderszewski 2003		73	0.23	57	0.00	74	0.05	65	0.05	79	0.03	68	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		9	0.43	25	0.00	6	0.24	7	0.67	18	0.54	6	0.60
Bacha 2000		80	0.18	68	0.00	80	0.03	82	0.03	80	0.03	75	0.03
Badura 1965		24	0.38	11	0.00	16	0.13	17	0.54	8	0.55	11	0.54
Barbosa 1983		47	0.30	22	0.00	57	0.05	62	0.05	78	0.04	67	0.04
Biret 1990		68	0.25	58	0.00	65	0.05	58	0.05	77	0.03	72	0.04
Blet 2003		22	0.38	45	0.00	25	0.14	25	0.43	25	0.41	19	0.42
Block 1995		16	0.40	26	0.00	21	0.12	15	0.54	34	0.26	21	0.37
Blumental 1952		54	0.28	27	0.00	56	0.05	63	0.05	50	0.07	50	0.06
Boshniakovich 1969		21	0.38	59	0.00	13	0.11	16	0.54	48	0.07	28	0.19
Brailowsky 1960		41	0.32	38	0.00	47	0.07	48	0.07	39	0.15	38	0.10
Bunin 1987		48	0.30	69	0.00	29	0.07	31	0.30	51	0.06	32	0.13
Bunin 1987b		64	0.26	17	0.00	48	0.06	54	0.06	52	0.05	55	0.05
Chiu 1999		19	0.39	12	0.00	26	0.08	27	0.39	32	0.21	25	0.29
Cohen 1997		78	0.18	70	0.00	83	0.04	76	0.04	79	0.03	82	0.03
Cortot 1951		81	0.18	46	0.00	82	0.03	84	0.03	76	0.03	84	0.03
Csalog 1996		37	0.33	39	0.00	50	0.06	56	0.06	43	0.11	42	0.08
Czerny 1949		86	0.12	71	0.00	86	0.03	78	0.03	87	0.02	87	0.02
Czerny 1990		25	0.37	72	0.00	20	0.10	18	0.54	38	0.19	24	0.32
Duchoud 2007		52	0.29	73	0.00	45	0.05	60	0.05	44	0.09	45	0.07
Ezaki 2006		75	0.20	74	0.00	77	0.02	88	0.02	71	0.04	74	0.03
Falvay 1989		74	0.23	75	0.00	72	0.05	67	0.05	80	0.03	64	0.04
Farrell 1958		55	0.28	6	0.00	49	0.07	49	0.07	47	0.07	43	0.07
Ferenczy 1958		87	0.08	32	0.00	87	0.03	77	0.03	84	0.03	80	0.03
Fliere 1977		3	0.50	23	0.00	3	0.30	3	0.78	23	0.46	4	0.60
Fou 1978		26	0.36	13	0.00	23	0.12	21	0.49	58	0.05	29	0.16
Francois 1956		72	0.23	60	0.00	40	0.06	43	0.11	63	0.04	47	0.07
Friedman 1923		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Friedman 1923b		1	0.97	1	0.99	1	0.98	1	1.00	1	1.00	1	1.00
Friedman 1930		2	0.67	2	0.00	2	0.85	2	0.94	1	0.95	2	0.94
Garcia 2007		51	0.29	18	0.00	58	0.06	57	0.06	54	0.05	59	0.05
Garcia 2007b		59	0.28	28	0.00	59	0.07	45	0.07	62	0.05	53	0.06
Gierzod 1998		71	0.23	61	0.00	76	0.04	75	0.04	86	0.03	81	0.03
Gornostaeva 1994		66	0.26	76	0.00	39	0.06	39	0.14	76	0.03	51	0.06
Groot 1988		35	0.34	40	0.00	33	0.08	30	0.33	65	0.04	36	0.11
Harasiewicz 1955		20	0.39	5	0.00	36	0.08	34	0.26	71	0.05	37	0.11
Hatto 1993		29	0.36	77	0.00	30	0.07	26	0.41	66	0.04	33	0.13
Hatto 1997		62	0.27	29	0.00	62	0.05	61	0.05	85	0.03	69	0.04
Horowitz 1949		23	0.38	33	0.00	22	0.11	19	0.52	7	0.63	9	0.57
Indjic 1988		33	0.35	30	0.00	34	0.11	29	0.36	56	0.06	31	0.15
Kapell 1951		56	0.28	47	0.00	64	0.07	50	0.07	63	0.05	49	0.06
Kissin 1993		31	0.35	14	0.00	37	0.09	35	0.24	44	0.17	27	0.20
Kushner 1989		30	0.35	19	0.00	38	0.11	32	0.28	56	0.05	34	0.12
Luisada 1991		18	0.39	35	0.00	24	0.11	23	0.48	37	0.15	26	0.27
Lushtak 2004		40	0.33	48	0.00	43	0.06	42	0.11	72	0.04	46	0.07
Malcuzynski 1961		32	0.35	78	0.00	46	0.06	53	0.06	54	0.05	56	0.05
Magaloff 1978		10	0.42	49	0.00	10	0.12	10	0.64	19	0.40	14	0.51
Magin 1975		38	0.33	15	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.10	70	0.04	48	0.06
Michalowski 1933		58	0.28	79	0.00	28	0.07	40	0.13	39	0.17	30	0.15
Milkina 1970		83	0.18	80	0.00	73	0.04	74	0.04	83	0.03	78	0.03
Mohovich 1999		50	0.29	50	0.00	63	0.05	59	0.05	70	0.04	71	0.04
Moravec 1969		65	0.26	36	0.00	68	0.04	70	0.04	87	0.02	76	0.03
Morozova 2008		44	0.31	7	0.00	27	0.08	37	0.18	50	0.05	39	0.09
Neighaus 1950		5	0.44	37	0.00	4	0.28	13	0.60	3	0.61	7	0.60
Niedzielski 1931		28	0.36	31	0.00	12	0.14	24	0.47	16	0.44	17	0.45
Ohlsson 1999		7	0.43	34	0.00	11	0.12	12	0.60	17	0.39	16	0.48
Osinska 1989		42	0.32	81	0.00	42	0.06	41	0.12	60	0.05	40	0.08
Pachmann 1927		17	0.40	9	0.00	17	0.10	22	0.49	10	0.56	13	0.52
Paderewski 1930		43	0.31	82	0.00	31	0.07	36	0.24	25	0.43	23	0.32
Perlemuter 1992		27	0.36	16	0.00	32	0.07	28	0.38	24	0.39	20	0.38
Pierdomenico 2008		60	0.27	41	0.00	67	0.05	64	0.05	46	0.05	54	0.05
Poblocka 1999		36	0.33	83	0.00	41	0.06	38	0.14	66	0.05	41	0.08
Rabcewiczowa 1932		85	0.14	84	0.00	84	0.03	83	0.03	87	0.02	85	0.02
Rachmaninoff 1923		12	0.41	20	0.00	9	0.10	9	0.66	13	0.54	5	0.60
Rangell 2001		46	0.30	62	0.00	54	0.06	55	0.06	46	0.07	52	0.06
Richter 1976		13	0.41	4	0.00	18	0.10	20	0.49	37	0.24	22	0.34
Rosen 1989		8	0.43	63	0.00	14	0.14	8	0.66	21	0.31	18	0.45
Rosenthal 1930		61	0.27	51	0.00	69	0.04	68	0.04	61	0.05	70	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		82	0.18	85	0.00	81	0.03	80	0.03	63	0.04	79	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		76	0.20	86	0.00	78	0.03	85	0.03	54	0.05	73	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		69	0.24	52	0.00	60	0.07	51	0.07	72	0.03	60	0.05
Rosenthal 1931d		77	0.19	42	0.00	75	0.03	79	0.03	69	0.04	83	0.03
Rossi 2007		79	0.18	53	0.00	79	0.03	86	0.03	59	0.05	63	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		70	0.23	87	0.00	70	0.04	73	0.04	76	0.03	77	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		45	0.31	54	0.00	52	0.07	47	0.07	85	0.03	61	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		39	0.33	88	0.00	51	0.07	46	0.07	83	0.03	57	0.05
Schilhawsky 1960		49	0.29	89	0.00	53	0.06	52	0.06	63	0.04	58	0.05
Shebanova 2002		4	0.45	3	0.00	5	0.30	6	0.69	22	0.48	8	0.58
Smith 1975		63	0.27	64	0.00	71	0.04	72	0.04	56	0.05	65	0.04
Sokolov 2002		67	0.25	55	0.00	66	0.05	66	0.05	78	0.03	62	0.04
Sztompka 1959		15	0.40	56	0.00	19	0.10	14	0.60	26	0.38	15	0.48
Tomsic 1995		84	0.15	8	0.00	85	0.03	81	0.03	86	0.02	86	0.02
Uninsky 1932		34	0.34	43	0.00	35	0.08	33	0.28	58	0.05	35	0.12
Uninsky 1971		57	0.28	65	0.00	55	0.04	71	0.04	67	0.04	66	0.04
Wasowski 1980		11	0.42	10	0.00	8	0.18	5	0.70	26	0.41	10	0.54
Zak 1937		6	0.43	24	0.00	7	0.23	4	0.73	10	0.60	3	0.66
Zak 1951		14	0.41	66	0.00	15	0.18	11	0.62	19	0.43	12	0.52
Random 1		88	-0.06	90	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	86	0.02	88	0.02
Random 2		89	-0.08	67	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	89	0.01	89	0.01
Random 3		90	-0.12	44	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).