Duchoud 2007

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		58	0.26	41	0.00	65	0.04	68	0.04	71	0.04	69	0.04
Anderszewski 2003		71	0.22	20	0.01	53	0.06	56	0.06	74	0.03	65	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		9	0.39	32	0.00	19	0.11	16	0.45	41	0.19	12	0.29
Bacha 2000		59	0.26	33	0.00	61	0.04	81	0.04	70	0.04	54	0.04
Badura 1965		62	0.25	72	0.00	32	0.08	31	0.25	27	0.29	15	0.27
Barbosa 1983		66	0.24	89	0.00	72	0.07	48	0.07	87	0.02	64	0.04
Biret 1990		23	0.34	61	0.00	31	0.07	24	0.33	49	0.06	29	0.14
Blet 2003		50	0.29	53	0.00	48	0.06	51	0.06	53	0.05	52	0.05
Block 1995		76	0.19	73	0.00	66	0.04	72	0.04	83	0.03	80	0.03
Blumental 1952		82	0.13	76	0.00	86	0.03	83	0.03	84	0.03	81	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		45	0.29	42	0.00	43	0.05	41	0.10	73	0.04	48	0.06
Brailowsky 1960		83	0.12	90	0.00	84	0.03	86	0.03	79	0.04	76	0.03
Bunin 1987		39	0.30	49	0.00	12	0.15	17	0.43	26	0.35	10	0.39
Bunin 1987b		38	0.31	9	0.02	10	0.18	14	0.47	23	0.42	9	0.44
Chiu 1999		2	0.45	4	0.12	3	0.23	1	0.73	5	0.58	1	0.65
Cohen 1997		61	0.25	23	0.00	69	0.04	71	0.04	70	0.03	82	0.03
Cortot 1951		81	0.16	80	0.00	82	0.04	77	0.04	80	0.02	84	0.03
Csalog 1996		11	0.39	22	0.00	8	0.14	7	0.62	10	0.49	6	0.55
Czerny 1949		63	0.24	63	0.00	75	0.04	73	0.04	74	0.04	68	0.04
Czerny 1990		21	0.34	55	0.00	41	0.04	39	0.13	62	0.05	43	0.08
Duchoud 2007		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Ezaki 2006		75	0.20	83	0.00	74	0.04	75	0.04	78	0.04	53	0.04
Falvay 1989		27	0.33	59	0.00	34	0.07	32	0.23	72	0.04	37	0.10
Farrell 1958		5	0.42	5	0.06	5	0.23	5	0.65	8	0.55	2	0.60
Ferenczy 1958		87	0.04	77	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	87	0.02	86	0.02
Fliere 1977		12	0.38	36	0.00	9	0.19	6	0.62	52	0.06	19	0.19
Fou 1978		41	0.30	67	0.00	52	0.06	52	0.06	79	0.03	60	0.04
Francois 1956		55	0.27	34	0.00	62	0.04	76	0.04	54	0.04	74	0.04
Friedman 1923		49	0.29	56	0.00	40	0.04	44	0.09	60	0.05	45	0.07
Friedman 1923b		47	0.29	37	0.00	38	0.05	38	0.13	41	0.16	27	0.14
Friedman 1930		26	0.33	11	0.01	26	0.08	26	0.32	32	0.24	13	0.28
Garcia 2007		43	0.29	45	0.00	45	0.07	49	0.07	53	0.05	47	0.06
Garcia 2007b		36	0.32	44	0.00	30	0.07	29	0.30	44	0.10	23	0.17
Gierzod 1998		78	0.18	85	0.00	76	0.04	74	0.04	88	0.02	79	0.03
Gornostaeva 1994		37	0.31	65	0.00	35	0.08	35	0.22	44	0.09	28	0.14
Groot 1988		18	0.36	13	0.01	18	0.09	18	0.43	63	0.04	32	0.13
Harasiewicz 1955		65	0.24	88	0.00	70	0.05	61	0.05	79	0.04	72	0.04
Hatto 1993		15	0.37	24	0.00	17	0.10	20	0.40	52	0.07	22	0.17
Hatto 1997		22	0.34	29	0.00	28	0.07	33	0.22	58	0.05	38	0.10
Horowitz 1949		68	0.23	51	0.00	58	0.05	62	0.05	67	0.04	61	0.04
Indjic 1988		17	0.36	60	0.00	24	0.10	21	0.35	70	0.05	30	0.13
Kapell 1951		10	0.39	35	0.00	13	0.11	10	0.54	49	0.07	20	0.19
Kissin 1993		42	0.30	68	0.00	36	0.06	36	0.14	58	0.06	41	0.09
Kushner 1989		6	0.41	6	0.05	6	0.14	8	0.60	41	0.12	14	0.27
Luisada 1991		53	0.28	28	0.00	57	0.05	59	0.05	57	0.06	50	0.05
Lushtak 2004		33	0.32	27	0.00	21	0.09	22	0.34	62	0.05	31	0.13
Malcuzynski 1961		60	0.26	25	0.00	50	0.08	46	0.08	72	0.04	46	0.06
Magaloff 1978		52	0.28	84	0.00	54	0.06	54	0.06	70	0.03	57	0.04
Magin 1975		35	0.32	17	0.01	37	0.06	37	0.14	64	0.04	44	0.07
Michalowski 1933		67	0.23	26	0.00	49	0.08	45	0.08	34	0.25	26	0.14
Milkina 1970		25	0.33	75	0.00	27	0.07	25	0.33	51	0.06	25	0.14
Mohovich 1999		70	0.23	39	0.00	56	0.05	65	0.05	85	0.03	71	0.04
Moravec 1969		48	0.29	58	0.00	60	0.06	50	0.06	85	0.02	75	0.03
Morozova 2008		8	0.39	15	0.01	7	0.16	9	0.59	25	0.42	7	0.50
Neighaus 1950		30	0.33	8	0.02	22	0.08	30	0.30	61	0.04	35	0.11
Niedzielski 1931		64	0.24	43	0.00	59	0.05	58	0.05	73	0.04	59	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		1	0.46	3	0.13	4	0.19	4	0.68	19	0.36	8	0.49
Osinska 1989		28	0.33	14	0.01	20	0.09	23	0.34	48	0.06	24	0.14
Pachmann 1927		31	0.32	50	0.00	47	0.08	47	0.08	36	0.18	33	0.12
Paderewski 1930		80	0.16	82	0.00	79	0.04	69	0.04	63	0.04	62	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		73	0.21	47	0.00	71	0.05	60	0.05	73	0.04	55	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		7	0.40	18	0.01	14	0.09	11	0.54	4	0.58	5	0.56
Poblocka 1999		40	0.30	71	0.00	44	0.05	42	0.09	45	0.08	42	0.08
Rabcewiczowa 1932		54	0.28	57	0.00	67	0.04	67	0.04	82	0.03	77	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		46	0.29	38	0.00	33	0.08	34	0.22	55	0.05	36	0.10
Rangell 2001		20	0.35	10	0.02	25	0.08	27	0.31	40	0.19	16	0.24
Richter 1976		13	0.38	19	0.01	15	0.09	12	0.51	49	0.06	21	0.17
Rosen 1989		4	0.44	2	0.19	2	0.21	2	0.72	10	0.50	3	0.60
Rosenthal 1930		74	0.21	66	0.00	78	0.04	78	0.04	77	0.04	70	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		86	0.08	81	0.00	85	0.03	84	0.03	86	0.02	85	0.02
Rosenthal 1931b		84	0.11	86	0.00	81	0.03	85	0.03	85	0.02	89	0.02
Rosenthal 1931c		77	0.19	64	0.00	73	0.05	64	0.05	68	0.04	73	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		85	0.10	87	0.00	83	0.04	79	0.04	78	0.03	83	0.03
Rossi 2007		72	0.22	79	0.00	63	0.04	70	0.04	37	0.22	39	0.09
Rubinstein 1939		19	0.35	31	0.00	23	0.07	19	0.42	39	0.11	18	0.21
Rubinstein 1952		34	0.32	69	0.00	39	0.04	43	0.09	61	0.04	49	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		16	0.36	21	0.00	29	0.07	28	0.31	69	0.04	34	0.11
Schilhawsky 1960		79	0.17	62	0.00	80	0.04	80	0.04	75	0.04	66	0.04
Shebanova 2002		3	0.44	1	0.21	1	0.20	3	0.72	25	0.45	4	0.57
Smith 1975		69	0.23	54	0.00	77	0.05	66	0.05	71	0.04	58	0.04
Sokolov 2002		51	0.28	70	0.00	64	0.04	82	0.04	63	0.04	56	0.04
Sztompka 1959		44	0.29	52	0.00	55	0.05	63	0.05	67	0.04	63	0.04
Tomsic 1995		32	0.32	7	0.04	11	0.14	15	0.46	33	0.22	11	0.32
Uninsky 1932		57	0.27	16	0.01	51	0.06	53	0.06	78	0.03	67	0.04
Uninsky 1971		56	0.27	40	0.00	68	0.06	57	0.06	85	0.02	78	0.03
Wasowski 1980		14	0.38	12	0.01	16	0.12	13	0.48	41	0.11	17	0.23
Zak 1937		24	0.34	30	0.00	42	0.05	40	0.11	47	0.07	40	0.09
Zak 1951		29	0.33	78	0.00	46	0.06	55	0.06	60	0.05	51	0.05
Random 1		89	-0.07	74	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	76	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		90	-0.07	48	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	59	0.05	87	0.02
Random 3		88	0.00	46	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	47	0.05	88	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).