Czerny 1949

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		35	0.34	31	0.00	38	0.07	37	0.27	52	0.05	42	0.12
Anderszewski 2003		31	0.36	44	0.00	21	0.20	20	0.61	26	0.44	21	0.52
Ashkenazy 1981		73	0.19	79	0.00	86	0.02	84	0.02	78	0.04	82	0.03
Bacha 2000		44	0.30	67	0.00	46	0.07	47	0.07	39	0.18	44	0.11
Badura 1965		71	0.22	80	0.00	68	0.06	52	0.06	50	0.05	60	0.05
Barbosa 1983		40	0.31	73	0.00	40	0.08	39	0.23	61	0.06	40	0.12
Biret 1990		13	0.46	23	0.00	18	0.18	19	0.64	20	0.54	17	0.59
Blet 2003		75	0.19	47	0.00	77	0.04	72	0.04	71	0.04	69	0.04
Block 1995		74	0.19	51	0.00	74	0.03	80	0.03	85	0.03	81	0.03
Blumental 1952		60	0.26	35	0.00	49	0.06	50	0.06	60	0.06	54	0.06
Boshniakovich 1969		59	0.26	27	0.00	41	0.07	44	0.14	79	0.04	52	0.07
Brailowsky 1960		48	0.30	52	0.00	48	0.06	51	0.06	63	0.05	55	0.05
Bunin 1987		51	0.29	28	0.00	60	0.05	65	0.05	77	0.03	75	0.04
Bunin 1987b		55	0.28	32	0.00	61	0.05	63	0.05	68	0.04	65	0.04
Chiu 1999		57	0.27	54	0.00	69	0.04	71	0.04	87	0.02	78	0.03
Cohen 1997		25	0.38	20	0.00	30	0.13	24	0.53	12	0.59	19	0.56
Cortot 1951		18	0.42	16	0.01	19	0.19	17	0.67	1	0.74	9	0.70
Csalog 1996		70	0.22	69	0.00	75	0.03	75	0.03	87	0.02	87	0.02
Czerny 1949		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Czerny 1990		11	0.46	19	0.00	14	0.15	13	0.70	29	0.48	18	0.58
Duchoud 2007		64	0.24	66	0.00	72	0.04	74	0.04	73	0.04	71	0.04
Ezaki 2006		3	0.52	8	0.02	2	0.27	5	0.80	1	0.76	3	0.78
Falvay 1989		14	0.44	30	0.00	22	0.21	23	0.55	31	0.30	26	0.41
Farrell 1958		6	0.50	4	0.05	6	0.31	4	0.81	1	0.77	2	0.79
Ferenczy 1958		23	0.39	12	0.01	29	0.12	26	0.53	8	0.73	15	0.62
Fliere 1977		66	0.23	82	0.00	70	0.04	68	0.04	82	0.04	62	0.04
Fou 1978		29	0.36	17	0.01	34	0.10	33	0.43	61	0.04	35	0.13
Francois 1956		12	0.46	21	0.00	11	0.19	11	0.73	3	0.78	6	0.75
Friedman 1923		84	0.12	89	0.00	82	0.02	87	0.02	78	0.03	89	0.02
Friedman 1923b		86	0.11	90	0.00	83	0.03	81	0.03	79	0.03	83	0.03
Friedman 1930		81	0.15	68	0.00	81	0.02	85	0.02	81	0.03	88	0.02
Garcia 2007		80	0.16	74	0.00	64	0.04	66	0.04	76	0.04	72	0.04
Garcia 2007b		76	0.19	70	0.00	76	0.03	76	0.03	78	0.04	84	0.03
Gierzod 1998		33	0.35	33	0.00	31	0.13	30	0.45	61	0.05	32	0.15
Gornostaeva 1994		5	0.51	10	0.01	7	0.15	7	0.77	6	0.66	8	0.71
Groot 1988		65	0.24	57	0.00	66	0.04	67	0.04	66	0.04	76	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		7	0.49	9	0.02	5	0.30	6	0.80	6	0.60	10	0.69
Hatto 1993		39	0.31	71	0.00	43	0.07	40	0.22	76	0.04	48	0.09
Hatto 1997		17	0.43	18	0.01	20	0.23	21	0.60	23	0.35	24	0.46
Horowitz 1949		87	0.10	81	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	87	0.03	86	0.02
Indjic 1988		45	0.30	36	0.00	44	0.11	41	0.21	78	0.04	46	0.09
Kapell 1951		34	0.34	11	0.01	25	0.12	29	0.49	43	0.09	27	0.21
Kissin 1993		67	0.23	63	0.00	62	0.04	69	0.04	67	0.06	59	0.05
Kushner 1989		28	0.36	43	0.00	26	0.09	28	0.50	54	0.06	29	0.17
Luisada 1991		69	0.22	83	0.00	73	0.03	78	0.03	86	0.03	77	0.03
Lushtak 2004		42	0.30	49	0.00	51	0.06	53	0.06	85	0.03	73	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		21	0.40	25	0.00	17	0.15	16	0.68	28	0.40	20	0.52
Magaloff 1978		49	0.29	41	0.00	35	0.08	42	0.19	80	0.03	49	0.08
Magin 1975		56	0.28	75	0.00	47	0.08	46	0.08	61	0.05	53	0.06
Michalowski 1933		82	0.13	39	0.00	80	0.03	79	0.03	71	0.04	79	0.03
Milkina 1970		1	0.56	1	0.47	1	0.47	3	0.82	4	0.74	5	0.78
Mohovich 1999		37	0.32	72	0.00	27	0.10	31	0.44	56	0.05	33	0.15
Moravec 1969		15	0.44	5	0.04	9	0.16	12	0.72	6	0.57	12	0.64
Morozova 2008		26	0.38	65	0.00	28	0.11	25	0.53	52	0.05	31	0.16
Neighaus 1950		20	0.40	56	0.00	24	0.14	22	0.57	29	0.31	25	0.42
Niedzielski 1931		88	0.05	84	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	87	0.02	90	0.01
Ohlsson 1999		32	0.35	13	0.01	33	0.08	34	0.35	64	0.04	39	0.12
Osinska 1989		9	0.48	26	0.00	8	0.22	9	0.74	15	0.58	11	0.66
Pachmann 1927		78	0.17	77	0.00	78	0.04	70	0.04	74	0.04	68	0.04
Paderewski 1930		83	0.13	86	0.00	79	0.04	73	0.04	67	0.04	67	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		79	0.16	85	0.00	87	0.02	83	0.02	87	0.02	85	0.02
Pierdomenico 2008		62	0.25	50	0.00	65	0.05	61	0.05	52	0.04	63	0.04
Poblocka 1999		47	0.30	87	0.00	54	0.05	59	0.05	62	0.05	56	0.05
Rabcewiczowa 1932		8	0.48	14	0.01	10	0.18	8	0.75	3	0.70	7	0.72
Rachmaninoff 1923		53	0.29	45	0.00	50	0.06	49	0.06	73	0.04	57	0.05
Rangell 2001		24	0.39	6	0.04	15	0.14	18	0.66	5	0.63	13	0.64
Richter 1976		52	0.29	64	0.00	55	0.07	48	0.07	74	0.04	58	0.05
Rosen 1989		41	0.31	60	0.00	53	0.05	55	0.05	83	0.03	74	0.04
Rosenthal 1930		43	0.30	46	0.00	42	0.07	43	0.15	38	0.27	28	0.20
Rosenthal 1931		63	0.24	58	0.00	57	0.05	54	0.05	38	0.27	41	0.12
Rosenthal 1931b		72	0.20	78	0.00	67	0.05	60	0.05	51	0.05	61	0.05
Rosenthal 1931c		54	0.28	59	0.00	45	0.08	45	0.08	43	0.14	45	0.11
Rosenthal 1931d		68	0.22	40	0.00	59	0.05	58	0.05	42	0.13	50	0.08
Rossi 2007		46	0.30	42	0.00	52	0.05	62	0.05	22	0.37	34	0.14
Rubinstein 1939		4	0.52	2	0.11	3	0.29	2	0.84	3	0.72	4	0.78
Rubinstein 1952		19	0.41	7	0.03	12	0.14	14	0.70	22	0.52	16	0.60
Rubinstein 1966		16	0.44	24	0.00	16	0.14	15	0.69	26	0.33	23	0.48
Schilhawsky 1960		50	0.29	48	0.00	56	0.05	56	0.05	74	0.04	70	0.04
Shebanova 2002		77	0.19	37	0.00	84	0.03	82	0.03	84	0.03	80	0.03
Smith 1975		2	0.53	3	0.08	4	0.33	1	0.84	2	0.80	1	0.82
Sokolov 2002		22	0.40	61	0.00	23	0.12	27	0.50	18	0.46	22	0.48
Sztompka 1959		30	0.36	29	0.00	36	0.09	35	0.35	66	0.05	37	0.13
Tomsic 1995		38	0.32	55	0.00	39	0.09	36	0.32	62	0.05	36	0.13
Uninsky 1932		36	0.33	22	0.00	37	0.10	38	0.25	80	0.03	47	0.09
Uninsky 1971		10	0.46	15	0.01	13	0.17	10	0.74	14	0.52	14	0.62
Wasowski 1980		27	0.36	38	0.00	32	0.08	32	0.44	53	0.06	30	0.16
Zak 1937		61	0.26	88	0.00	63	0.05	64	0.05	78	0.04	64	0.04
Zak 1951		58	0.27	34	0.00	58	0.05	57	0.05	84	0.03	66	0.04
Random 1		90	0.02	76	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	13	0.43	51	0.07
Random 2		85	0.11	62	0.00	71	0.03	77	0.03	1	0.57	38	0.13
Random 3		89	0.04	53	0.00	85	0.02	86	0.02	2	0.68	43	0.12

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).