Csalog 1996

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		64	0.29	57	0.00	71	0.04	72	0.04	72	0.04	69	0.04
Anderszewski 2003		71	0.28	67	0.00	65	0.05	64	0.05	66	0.04	68	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		58	0.31	80	0.00	58	0.06	53	0.06	52	0.07	54	0.06
Bacha 2000		87	0.14	69	0.00	87	0.03	79	0.03	86	0.02	86	0.02
Badura 1965		48	0.34	46	0.00	54	0.06	56	0.06	28	0.25	37	0.12
Barbosa 1983		63	0.29	81	0.00	62	0.04	67	0.04	70	0.05	67	0.04
Biret 1990		6	0.44	14	0.01	14	0.11	9	0.51	11	0.62	3	0.56
Blet 2003		15	0.41	5	0.05	10	0.08	16	0.42	15	0.49	11	0.45
Block 1995		24	0.37	27	0.00	39	0.05	35	0.15	50	0.07	43	0.10
Blumental 1952		77	0.23	85	0.00	80	0.03	82	0.03	85	0.03	79	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		29	0.36	30	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.11	72	0.04	52	0.07
Brailowsky 1960		61	0.30	53	0.00	72	0.04	76	0.04	76	0.04	61	0.04
Bunin 1987		47	0.34	87	0.00	35	0.06	31	0.19	43	0.13	29	0.16
Bunin 1987b		50	0.33	86	0.00	31	0.06	30	0.22	36	0.23	24	0.22
Chiu 1999		3	0.45	8	0.02	4	0.15	3	0.61	12	0.52	2	0.56
Cohen 1997		74	0.26	22	0.01	66	0.04	71	0.04	64	0.04	71	0.04
Cortot 1951		84	0.19	64	0.00	86	0.03	81	0.03	84	0.02	89	0.02
Csalog 1996		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Czerny 1949		78	0.22	75	0.00	79	0.02	87	0.02	75	0.03	87	0.02
Czerny 1990		44	0.34	24	0.00	28	0.05	27	0.24	48	0.08	33	0.14
Duchoud 2007		21	0.39	15	0.01	15	0.13	10	0.49	7	0.62	4	0.55
Ezaki 2006		73	0.27	89	0.00	78	0.02	86	0.02	82	0.03	85	0.02
Falvay 1989		5	0.45	3	0.10	3	0.22	8	0.51	17	0.42	9	0.46
Farrell 1958		32	0.36	56	0.00	41	0.05	36	0.15	28	0.27	25	0.20
Ferenczy 1958		68	0.28	60	0.00	70	0.04	68	0.04	38	0.34	36	0.12
Fliere 1977		2	0.51	2	0.13	2	0.32	2	0.71	26	0.40	6	0.53
Fou 1978		39	0.35	31	0.00	29	0.05	24	0.27	60	0.04	40	0.10
Francois 1956		85	0.18	84	0.00	85	0.03	83	0.03	74	0.03	84	0.03
Friedman 1923		51	0.33	61	0.00	60	0.11	43	0.11	56	0.06	51	0.08
Friedman 1923b		53	0.33	25	0.00	59	0.07	51	0.07	50	0.06	55	0.06
Friedman 1930		46	0.34	18	0.01	32	0.05	40	0.12	48	0.07	46	0.09
Garcia 2007		56	0.32	12	0.01	43	0.06	39	0.12	29	0.30	27	0.19
Garcia 2007b		62	0.30	13	0.01	46	0.05	60	0.05	77	0.04	73	0.04
Gierzod 1998		76	0.25	88	0.00	67	0.04	73	0.04	76	0.04	70	0.04
Gornostaeva 1994		17	0.40	9	0.01	11	0.08	20	0.35	35	0.29	18	0.32
Groot 1988		13	0.42	54	0.00	23	0.09	22	0.32	61	0.04	38	0.11
Harasiewicz 1955		11	0.43	77	0.00	21	0.10	19	0.36	62	0.05	34	0.13
Hatto 1993		40	0.35	82	0.00	53	0.08	46	0.08	65	0.05	56	0.06
Hatto 1997		43	0.35	65	0.00	56	0.07	47	0.07	70	0.04	60	0.05
Horowitz 1949		67	0.28	37	0.00	74	0.05	61	0.05	59	0.04	64	0.04
Indjic 1988		42	0.35	58	0.00	49	0.06	52	0.06	50	0.07	53	0.06
Kapell 1951		22	0.38	42	0.00	9	0.10	15	0.43	31	0.24	17	0.32
Kissin 1993		30	0.36	28	0.00	18	0.12	14	0.44	31	0.47	10	0.45
Kushner 1989		19	0.39	6	0.03	17	0.12	13	0.45	64	0.05	31	0.15
Luisada 1991		25	0.37	32	0.00	25	0.06	28	0.24	43	0.11	28	0.16
Lushtak 2004		41	0.35	11	0.01	37	0.05	41	0.12	40	0.08	42	0.10
Malcuzynski 1961		57	0.31	38	0.00	48	0.05	59	0.05	60	0.05	58	0.05
Magaloff 1978		18	0.39	7	0.02	24	0.09	29	0.23	34	0.22	23	0.22
Magin 1975		12	0.42	50	0.00	19	0.11	18	0.39	31	0.35	13	0.37
Michalowski 1933		55	0.32	17	0.01	26	0.05	45	0.09	14	0.44	26	0.20
Milkina 1970		75	0.26	70	0.00	63	0.05	57	0.05	75	0.04	63	0.04
Mohovich 1999		49	0.33	16	0.01	51	0.06	54	0.06	41	0.10	50	0.08
Moravec 1969		28	0.36	83	0.00	38	0.05	34	0.16	68	0.04	47	0.08
Morozova 2008		33	0.36	90	0.00	36	0.05	32	0.17	56	0.05	45	0.09
Neighaus 1950		59	0.31	59	0.00	61	0.04	70	0.04	74	0.03	83	0.03
Niedzielski 1931		54	0.32	71	0.00	27	0.05	26	0.25	27	0.32	19	0.28
Ohlsson 1999		31	0.36	73	0.00	47	0.05	62	0.05	79	0.03	66	0.04
Osinska 1989		1	0.52	1	0.42	1	0.42	1	0.72	6	0.69	1	0.70
Pachmann 1927		23	0.38	19	0.01	33	0.05	37	0.15	14	0.50	20	0.27
Paderewski 1930		82	0.19	36	0.00	77	0.03	77	0.03	60	0.05	65	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		38	0.35	29	0.00	52	0.07	50	0.07	33	0.22	35	0.12
Pierdomenico 2008		26	0.37	23	0.00	50	0.06	55	0.06	25	0.37	30	0.15
Poblocka 1999		16	0.41	21	0.01	13	0.09	12	0.47	28	0.39	12	0.43
Rabcewiczowa 1932		72	0.27	78	0.00	68	0.05	63	0.05	69	0.04	62	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		45	0.34	39	0.00	22	0.09	23	0.30	38	0.21	21	0.25
Rangell 2001		79	0.21	74	0.00	75	0.04	75	0.04	77	0.03	81	0.03
Richter 1976		10	0.44	10	0.01	12	0.08	17	0.42	33	0.30	15	0.35
Rosen 1989		4	0.45	33	0.00	16	0.14	11	0.48	27	0.28	14	0.37
Rosenthal 1930		80	0.21	79	0.00	83	0.03	84	0.03	79	0.03	78	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		86	0.17	68	0.00	84	0.03	78	0.03	73	0.04	76	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		81	0.21	52	0.00	82	0.04	74	0.04	55	0.05	72	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		69	0.28	41	0.00	57	0.07	49	0.07	42	0.15	44	0.10
Rosenthal 1931d		83	0.19	47	0.00	81	0.03	80	0.03	72	0.04	82	0.03
Rossi 2007		35	0.36	45	0.00	34	0.05	33	0.16	2	0.69	16	0.33
Rubinstein 1939		36	0.35	34	0.00	40	0.05	38	0.13	46	0.05	48	0.08
Rubinstein 1952		27	0.37	43	0.00	45	0.05	58	0.05	49	0.08	57	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		14	0.41	4	0.05	7	0.12	6	0.54	40	0.12	22	0.25
Schilhawsky 1960		66	0.29	63	0.00	64	0.04	69	0.04	78	0.03	77	0.03
Shebanova 2002		20	0.39	49	0.00	20	0.10	21	0.34	68	0.06	32	0.14
Smith 1975		70	0.28	51	0.00	76	0.03	85	0.03	64	0.04	74	0.03
Sokolov 2002		34	0.36	44	0.00	55	0.07	48	0.07	42	0.14	39	0.10
Sztompka 1959		65	0.29	55	0.00	69	0.05	65	0.05	65	0.05	59	0.05
Tomsic 1995		37	0.35	72	0.00	42	0.05	42	0.11	53	0.06	49	0.08
Uninsky 1932		52	0.33	40	0.00	30	0.07	25	0.26	60	0.04	41	0.10
Uninsky 1971		60	0.30	48	0.00	73	0.05	66	0.05	84	0.02	75	0.03
Wasowski 1980		8	0.44	26	0.00	5	0.13	4	0.58	22	0.49	5	0.53
Zak 1937		7	0.44	35	0.00	6	0.12	7	0.53	12	0.52	7	0.52
Zak 1951		9	0.44	20	0.01	8	0.11	5	0.54	11	0.51	8	0.52
Random 1		88	-0.04	76	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	54	0.04	80	0.03
Random 2		90	-0.08	62	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	82	0.02	90	0.01
Random 3		89	-0.06	66	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	63	0.03	88	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).