Boshniakovich 1969

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		65	0.33	67	0.00	70	0.06	51	0.06	54	0.05	78	0.05
Anderszewski 2003		39	0.40	5	0.05	7	0.12	13	0.58	7	0.67	14	0.62
Ashkenazy 1981		38	0.40	73	0.00	42	0.06	39	0.20	27	0.37	40	0.27
Bacha 2000		70	0.30	84	0.00	78	0.04	75	0.04	50	0.06	74	0.05
Badura 1965		64	0.33	75	0.00	60	0.04	82	0.04	18	0.41	53	0.13
Barbosa 1983		14	0.47	17	0.01	10	0.11	9	0.68	3	0.70	5	0.69
Biret 1990		62	0.33	51	0.00	64	0.05	64	0.05	39	0.21	61	0.10
Blet 2003		41	0.40	55	0.00	50	0.07	46	0.07	18	0.48	46	0.18
Block 1995		35	0.40	54	0.00	35	0.06	27	0.32	20	0.49	28	0.40
Blumental 1952		58	0.35	57	0.00	68	0.05	60	0.05	55	0.06	79	0.05
Boshniakovich 1969		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Brailowsky 1960		61	0.34	69	0.00	59	0.04	74	0.04	29	0.35	56	0.12
Bunin 1987		55	0.36	27	0.00	53	0.05	59	0.05	25	0.36	55	0.13
Bunin 1987b		56	0.35	58	0.00	57	0.05	61	0.05	29	0.33	52	0.13
Chiu 1999		66	0.31	60	0.00	69	0.04	69	0.04	62	0.05	82	0.04
Cohen 1997		68	0.31	78	0.00	66	0.06	54	0.06	35	0.30	54	0.13
Cortot 1951		80	0.23	72	0.00	75	0.03	87	0.03	34	0.22	63	0.08
Csalog 1996		53	0.36	35	0.00	62	0.04	72	0.04	44	0.11	65	0.07
Czerny 1949		77	0.26	45	0.00	76	0.04	79	0.04	44	0.14	66	0.07
Czerny 1990		50	0.36	70	0.00	56	0.05	67	0.05	47	0.08	71	0.06
Duchoud 2007		74	0.29	64	0.00	73	0.04	73	0.04	41	0.10	70	0.06
Ezaki 2006		63	0.33	63	0.00	65	0.05	65	0.05	57	0.06	73	0.05
Falvay 1989		69	0.31	36	0.00	54	0.05	62	0.05	48	0.06	76	0.05
Farrell 1958		83	0.21	87	0.00	81	0.04	77	0.04	60	0.05	84	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		85	0.20	71	0.00	84	0.04	81	0.04	46	0.08	69	0.06
Fliere 1977		2	0.54	1	0.26	1	0.25	2	0.74	9	0.65	4	0.69
Fou 1978		29	0.42	7	0.03	23	0.11	20	0.47	18	0.52	23	0.49
Francois 1956		76	0.28	53	0.00	77	0.04	76	0.04	40	0.15	64	0.08
Friedman 1923		46	0.38	30	0.00	47	0.07	48	0.07	16	0.54	45	0.19
Friedman 1923b		42	0.39	46	0.00	40	0.07	42	0.16	15	0.56	37	0.30
Friedman 1930		32	0.41	22	0.00	38	0.07	36	0.25	14	0.57	31	0.38
Garcia 2007		16	0.46	9	0.02	9	0.10	15	0.55	2	0.76	11	0.65
Garcia 2007b		45	0.38	34	0.00	41	0.07	43	0.13	15	0.56	41	0.27
Gierzod 1998		13	0.47	32	0.00	15	0.15	10	0.63	5	0.66	12	0.64
Gornostaeva 1994		34	0.41	65	0.00	28	0.07	29	0.30	18	0.53	29	0.40
Groot 1988		40	0.40	44	0.00	49	0.06	50	0.06	48	0.06	72	0.06
Harasiewicz 1955		7	0.50	26	0.00	8	0.12	4	0.71	9	0.58	13	0.64
Hatto 1993		47	0.38	49	0.00	46	0.09	45	0.09	39	0.17	58	0.12
Hatto 1997		72	0.30	25	0.00	58	0.05	57	0.05	51	0.05	77	0.05
Horowitz 1949		54	0.36	50	0.00	52	0.04	68	0.04	20	0.51	50	0.14
Indjic 1988		52	0.36	74	0.00	48	0.06	53	0.06	40	0.18	60	0.10
Kapell 1951		31	0.41	42	0.00	36	0.06	28	0.31	25	0.31	35	0.31
Kissin 1993		27	0.42	37	0.00	32	0.06	33	0.28	23	0.54	30	0.39
Kushner 1989		1	0.54	2	0.22	2	0.23	1	0.77	2	0.73	1	0.75
Luisada 1991		20	0.44	31	0.00	33	0.07	25	0.36	16	0.50	27	0.42
Lushtak 2004		24	0.44	16	0.01	20	0.11	22	0.45	9	0.61	18	0.52
Malcuzynski 1961		3	0.53	4	0.06	4	0.17	6	0.69	4	0.67	7	0.68
Magaloff 1978		15	0.47	19	0.00	16	0.11	19	0.48	10	0.55	19	0.51
Magin 1975		19	0.45	23	0.00	37	0.07	34	0.27	22	0.43	33	0.34
Michalowski 1933		60	0.34	24	0.00	67	0.05	66	0.05	21	0.40	51	0.14
Milkina 1970		71	0.30	48	0.00	55	0.05	56	0.05	44	0.12	62	0.08
Mohovich 1999		9	0.49	3	0.10	3	0.18	8	0.68	4	0.71	6	0.69
Moravec 1969		73	0.30	68	0.00	72	0.07	47	0.07	67	0.04	75	0.05
Morozova 2008		26	0.42	38	0.00	22	0.13	23	0.42	14	0.51	25	0.46
Neighaus 1950		11	0.48	18	0.00	21	0.13	18	0.54	2	0.64	16	0.59
Niedzielski 1931		57	0.35	20	0.00	61	0.04	70	0.04	33	0.25	59	0.10
Ohlsson 1999		28	0.42	47	0.00	26	0.10	32	0.28	21	0.33	36	0.30
Osinska 1989		12	0.47	33	0.00	18	0.11	14	0.57	17	0.56	17	0.56
Pachmann 1927		10	0.48	8	0.02	14	0.12	12	0.59	2	0.79	8	0.68
Paderewski 1930		30	0.41	43	0.00	34	0.07	31	0.28	1	0.76	24	0.46
Perlemuter 1992		23	0.44	62	0.00	27	0.08	30	0.29	2	0.65	26	0.43
Pierdomenico 2008		48	0.38	59	0.00	51	0.06	52	0.06	22	0.39	48	0.15
Poblocka 1999		21	0.44	66	0.00	25	0.11	21	0.46	15	0.53	22	0.49
Rabcewiczowa 1932		67	0.31	77	0.00	71	0.05	58	0.05	48	0.07	68	0.06
Rachmaninoff 1923		81	0.22	76	0.00	82	0.04	71	0.04	77	0.03	87	0.03
Rangell 2001		22	0.44	6	0.04	13	0.11	16	0.55	2	0.66	15	0.60
Richter 1976		8	0.50	12	0.02	11	0.14	11	0.63	9	0.70	10	0.66
Rosen 1989		6	0.50	21	0.00	12	0.15	7	0.68	5	0.67	9	0.67
Rosenthal 1930		84	0.20	61	0.00	87	0.04	78	0.04	74	0.04	85	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		87	0.17	85	0.00	85	0.03	86	0.03	62	0.04	88	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		82	0.21	89	0.00	83	0.04	84	0.04	46	0.07	80	0.05
Rosenthal 1931c		78	0.26	79	0.00	80	0.05	63	0.05	57	0.05	81	0.05
Rosenthal 1931d		86	0.20	81	0.00	86	0.04	85	0.04	62	0.04	86	0.04
Rossi 2007		75	0.28	88	0.00	79	0.04	83	0.04	25	0.34	57	0.12
Rubinstein 1939		79	0.24	83	0.00	74	0.04	80	0.04	64	0.04	83	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		33	0.41	52	0.00	39	0.07	38	0.21	36	0.28	43	0.24
Rubinstein 1966		25	0.43	13	0.02	19	0.13	17	0.55	20	0.45	20	0.50
Schilhawsky 1960		18	0.45	10	0.02	17	0.12	24	0.37	1	0.68	21	0.50
Shebanova 2002		17	0.46	39	0.00	24	0.09	26	0.35	30	0.35	32	0.35
Smith 1975		59	0.34	28	0.00	63	0.06	49	0.06	29	0.36	47	0.15
Sokolov 2002		44	0.39	41	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.11	28	0.40	44	0.21
Sztompka 1959		36	0.40	86	0.00	31	0.06	40	0.17	32	0.33	42	0.24
Tomsic 1995		43	0.39	15	0.01	43	0.07	41	0.17	16	0.43	38	0.27
Uninsky 1932		51	0.36	29	0.00	45	0.06	55	0.06	22	0.40	49	0.15
Uninsky 1971		49	0.37	40	0.00	29	0.07	37	0.22	33	0.32	39	0.27
Wasowski 1980		37	0.40	56	0.00	30	0.07	35	0.25	29	0.38	34	0.31
Zak 1937		4	0.51	14	0.02	5	0.17	3	0.73	2	0.76	2	0.74
Zak 1951		5	0.51	11	0.02	6	0.27	5	0.71	2	0.77	3	0.74
Random 1		90	-0.04	80	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	72	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		89	-0.03	82	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	75	0.03	89	0.02
Random 3		88	-0.03	90	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	25	0.26	67	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).