Afanassiev 2001

Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Afanassiev 2001   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Anderszewski 2003   68  0.2935  0.0065  0.0466  0.0464  0.0469  0.04
Ashkenazy 1981   13  0.4263  0.0029  0.1025  0.3531  0.3123  0.33
Bacha 2000   52  0.3220  0.0052  0.0460  0.0440  0.1546  0.08
Badura 1965   33  0.3711  0.0315  0.0830  0.3015  0.4620  0.37
Barbosa 1983   32  0.3737  0.0030  0.0733  0.2349  0.0835  0.14
Biret 1990   29  0.3768  0.0040  0.0736  0.1945  0.0738  0.12
Blet 2003   17  0.4021  0.0032  0.0928  0.3228  0.3622  0.34
Block 1995   84  0.2134  0.0070  0.0382  0.0375  0.0386  0.03
Blumental 1952   20  0.3941  0.0018  0.1012  0.5226  0.4114  0.46
Boshniakovich 1969   49  0.3359  0.0054  0.0554  0.0551  0.0659  0.05
Brailowsky 1960   25  0.3836  0.0031  0.0827  0.3424  0.4918  0.41
Bunin 1987   76  0.2667  0.0082  0.0558  0.0566  0.0472  0.04
Bunin 1987b   78  0.2683  0.0081  0.0385  0.0372  0.0380  0.03
Chiu 1999   18  0.4057  0.0038  0.0534  0.2256  0.0540  0.10
Cohen 1997   40  0.3451  0.0047  0.0646  0.0626  0.4931  0.17
Cortot 1951   86  0.1980  0.0085  0.0379  0.0366  0.0487  0.03
Csalog 1996   67  0.2956  0.0075  0.0472  0.0472  0.0468  0.04
Czerny 1949   41  0.3438  0.0048  0.0552  0.0537  0.2737  0.12
Czerny 1990   53  0.3258  0.0046  0.0553  0.0551  0.0752  0.06
Duchoud 2007   77  0.2670  0.0078  0.0471  0.0468  0.0471  0.04
Ezaki 2006   1  0.472  0.142  0.145  0.6320  0.534  0.58
Falvay 1989   9  0.4332  0.0028  0.0829  0.3137  0.1928  0.24
Farrell 1958   58  0.317  0.0512  0.0943  0.1337  0.1634  0.14
Ferenczy 1958   35  0.3526  0.0042  0.0739  0.1617  0.6624  0.32
Fliere 1977   22  0.3933  0.0036  0.0635  0.2169  0.0441  0.09
Fou 1978   5  0.4444  0.0013  0.1011  0.5336  0.2719  0.38
Francois 1956   64  0.3077  0.0060  0.0465  0.0431  0.2045  0.09
Friedman 1923   71  0.2954  0.0039  0.0544  0.1169  0.0451  0.07
Friedman 1923b   66  0.2981  0.0037  0.0540  0.1471  0.0450  0.07
Friedman 1930   70  0.2984  0.0050  0.0555  0.0551  0.0658  0.05
Garcia 2007   85  0.2089  0.0071  0.0461  0.0482  0.0384  0.03
Garcia 2007b   75  0.2790  0.0063  0.0467  0.0460  0.0574  0.04
Gierzod 1998   7  0.434  0.075  0.148  0.6215  0.488  0.55
Gornostaeva 1994   51  0.3345  0.0049  0.0548  0.0550  0.0660  0.05
Groot 1988   11  0.423  0.123  0.146  0.6216  0.4610  0.53
Harasiewicz 1955   15  0.4171  0.0020  0.1017  0.4948  0.0632  0.17
Hatto 1993   26  0.3850  0.0017  0.0814  0.5153  0.0729  0.19
Hatto 1997   8  0.4318  0.0110  0.2210  0.5724  0.3416  0.44
Horowitz 1949   63  0.3055  0.0053  0.0459  0.0429  0.3736  0.12
Indjic 1988   28  0.3849  0.0025  0.0822  0.4460  0.0533  0.15
Kapell 1951   81  0.2387  0.0084  0.0469  0.0486  0.0379  0.03
Kissin 1993   60  0.3165  0.0064  0.0380  0.0365  0.0667  0.04
Kushner 1989   43  0.3385  0.0073  0.0470  0.0484  0.0378  0.03
Luisada 1991   3  0.456  0.064  0.133  0.6512  0.532  0.59
Lushtak 2004   83  0.2288  0.0083  0.0384  0.0365  0.0485  0.03
Malcuzynski 1961   39  0.3430  0.0051  0.0556  0.0575  0.0464  0.04
Magaloff 1978   48  0.3315  0.0141  0.0638  0.1782  0.0349  0.07
Magin 1975   57  0.3223  0.0076  0.0377  0.0366  0.0477  0.03
Michalowski 1933   74  0.2773  0.0074  0.0378  0.0347  0.0757  0.05
Milkina 1970   4  0.4510  0.038  0.161  0.6622  0.506  0.57
Mohovich 1999   12  0.428  0.059  0.197  0.6224  0.489  0.55
Moravec 1969   44  0.3319  0.0145  0.0647  0.0656  0.0553  0.05
Morozova 2008   19  0.3922  0.0019  0.1019  0.4843  0.1326  0.25
Neighaus 1950   16  0.405  0.066  0.159  0.5710  0.5011  0.53
Niedzielski 1931   80  0.2378  0.0072  0.0463  0.0459  0.0562  0.04
Ohlsson 1999   27  0.3814  0.0134  0.0631  0.2878  0.0343  0.09
Osinska 1989   73  0.2882  0.0066  0.0375  0.0377  0.0375  0.03
Pachmann 1927   82  0.2279  0.0086  0.0462  0.0477  0.0466  0.04
Paderewski 1930   79  0.2472  0.0079  0.0374  0.0371  0.0482  0.03
Perlemuter 1992   50  0.3348  0.0058  0.0645  0.0670  0.0454  0.05
Pierdomenico 2008   72  0.2939  0.0069  0.0381  0.0356  0.0476  0.03
Poblocka 1999   34  0.3547  0.0035  0.0642  0.1449  0.0642  0.09
Rabcewiczowa 1932   46  0.3343  0.0024  0.0726  0.3537  0.2525  0.30
Rachmaninoff 1923   23  0.3817  0.0121  0.0918  0.4820  0.4215  0.45
Rangell 2001   69  0.2976  0.0061  0.0383  0.0356  0.0573  0.04
Richter 1976   65  0.3053  0.0080  0.0386  0.0379  0.0481  0.03
Rosen 1989   14  0.4129  0.0014  0.0813  0.5143  0.1227  0.25
Rosenthal 1930   6  0.431  0.191  0.192  0.667  0.751  0.70
Rosenthal 1931   30  0.3728  0.0027  0.0923  0.4310  0.727  0.56
Rosenthal 1931b   31  0.3742  0.0022  0.0920  0.478  0.725  0.58
Rosenthal 1931c   36  0.3569  0.0033  0.1032  0.2718  0.4921  0.36
Rosenthal 1931d   37  0.3513  0.0116  0.0816  0.508  0.703  0.59
Rossi 2007   87  0.1674  0.0087  0.0288  0.0285  0.0288  0.02
Rubinstein 1939   45  0.3346  0.0055  0.0557  0.0552  0.0555  0.05
Rubinstein 1952   61  0.3125  0.0059  0.0551  0.0558  0.0561  0.05
Rubinstein 1966   21  0.3924  0.0023  0.0824  0.3744  0.0930  0.18
Schilhawsky 1960   47  0.3352  0.0077  0.0376  0.0379  0.0383  0.03
Shebanova 2002   38  0.3566  0.0044  0.0741  0.1461  0.0644  0.09
Smith 1975   10  0.4227  0.0026  0.1021  0.4723  0.4513  0.46
Sokolov 2002   42  0.3316  0.0156  0.0550  0.0544  0.0948  0.07
Sztompka 1959   24  0.389  0.0511  0.1315  0.5131  0.3417  0.42
Tomsic 1995   55  0.3275  0.0057  0.0549  0.0560  0.0556  0.05
Uninsky 1932   59  0.3162  0.0062  0.0468  0.0464  0.0470  0.04
Uninsky 1971   2  0.4612  0.037  0.164  0.6424  0.4212  0.52
Wasowski 1980   62  0.3186  0.0043  0.0737  0.1882  0.0447  0.08
Zak 1937   54  0.3240  0.0068  0.0464  0.0476  0.0463  0.04
Zak 1951   56  0.3231  0.0067  0.0473  0.0474  0.0465  0.04
Random 1   89  -0.0460  0.0089  0.0189  0.0167  0.0290  0.01
Random 2   88  0.0564  0.0088  0.0387  0.0310  0.4339  0.11
Random 3   90  -0.0761  0.0090  0.0190  0.0155  0.0489  0.02

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).