Zak 1951

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		5	0.73	28	0.00	8	0.14	10	0.48	14	0.43	16	0.45
Anderszewski 2003		71	0.50	47	0.00	63	0.05	57	0.05	34	0.14	63	0.08
Ashkenazy 1981		25	0.65	31	0.00	15	0.08	21	0.33	21	0.40	24	0.36
Bacha 2000		63	0.53	66	0.00	35	0.05	34	0.16	13	0.42	31	0.26
Badura 1965		49	0.59	78	0.00	48	0.06	50	0.06	14	0.39	49	0.15
Barbosa 1983		43	0.60	36	0.00	52	0.06	52	0.06	11	0.45	47	0.16
Biret 1990		41	0.62	12	0.00	28	0.05	26	0.24	16	0.34	28	0.29
Blet 2003		34	0.63	48	0.00	56	0.06	55	0.06	36	0.15	62	0.09
Block 1995		72	0.50	24	0.00	65	0.04	67	0.04	36	0.16	64	0.08
Blumental 1952		69	0.51	25	0.00	71	0.04	75	0.04	45	0.06	74	0.05
Boshniakovich 1969		29	0.64	79	0.00	30	0.05	30	0.19	10	0.55	26	0.32
Brailowsky 1960		55	0.57	49	0.00	40	0.04	44	0.09	15	0.40	43	0.19
Bunin 1987		37	0.62	57	0.00	51	0.06	53	0.06	16	0.42	48	0.16
Bunin 1987b		39	0.62	37	0.00	50	0.04	68	0.04	15	0.43	51	0.13
Chiu 1999		23	0.66	80	0.00	21	0.07	19	0.34	4	0.61	13	0.46
Cohen 1997		87	0.31	81	0.00	86	0.03	80	0.03	43	0.08	75	0.05
Cortot 1951		60	0.55	26	0.00	69	0.04	76	0.04	54	0.05	84	0.04
Csalog 1996		65	0.53	13	0.00	34	0.04	45	0.08	7	0.52	42	0.20
Czerny 1949		31	0.64	38	0.00	44	0.07	40	0.13	24	0.33	41	0.21
Czerny 1990		15	0.69	32	0.00	20	0.06	22	0.30	26	0.26	29	0.28
Duchoud 2007		59	0.56	50	0.00	64	0.05	65	0.05	48	0.05	72	0.05
Ezaki 2006		4	0.73	58	0.00	10	0.15	11	0.46	7	0.48	10	0.47
Falvay 1989		26	0.65	39	0.00	33	0.04	41	0.13	17	0.43	34	0.24
Farrell 1958		47	0.59	40	0.00	55	0.05	64	0.05	26	0.25	55	0.11
Ferenczy 1958		70	0.50	82	0.00	70	0.04	69	0.04	61	0.04	81	0.04
Fliere 1977		3	0.75	23	0.00	2	0.19	3	0.64	3	0.55	4	0.59
Fou 1978		10	0.70	4	0.00	18	0.08	15	0.42	6	0.50	14	0.46
Francois 1956		32	0.63	41	0.00	42	0.05	38	0.14	20	0.39	39	0.23
Friedman 1923		85	0.35	83	0.00	85	0.03	85	0.03	54	0.06	85	0.04
Friedman 1923b		82	0.37	67	0.00	84	0.03	78	0.03	69	0.05	82	0.04
Friedman 1930		79	0.44	59	0.00	76	0.04	73	0.04	55	0.05	80	0.04
Garcia 2007		75	0.48	84	0.00	73	0.03	82	0.03	37	0.17	65	0.07
Garcia 2007b		83	0.36	18	0.00	83	0.04	74	0.04	39	0.11	66	0.07
Gierzod 1998		18	0.67	8	0.00	16	0.09	17	0.36	17	0.40	20	0.38
Gornostaeva 1994		62	0.54	51	0.00	67	0.05	61	0.05	53	0.05	76	0.05
Groot 1988		14	0.69	68	0.00	13	0.10	9	0.48	6	0.55	9	0.51
Harasiewicz 1955		17	0.68	42	0.00	5	0.13	5	0.60	1	0.57	5	0.58
Hatto 1993		64	0.53	17	0.00	36	0.05	32	0.19	16	0.35	32	0.26
Hatto 1997		57	0.56	43	0.00	37	0.05	33	0.16	16	0.34	38	0.23
Horowitz 1949		7	0.72	85	0.00	4	0.15	8	0.49	2	0.65	6	0.56
Indjic 1988		61	0.55	33	0.00	29	0.05	31	0.19	15	0.38	30	0.27
Kapell 1951		30	0.64	14	0.00	43	0.05	39	0.13	39	0.14	50	0.13
Kissin 1993		2	0.75	11	0.00	7	0.17	2	0.65	5	0.67	2	0.66
Kushner 1989		22	0.66	19	0.00	31	0.05	29	0.20	29	0.26	37	0.23
Luisada 1991		20	0.66	3	0.00	3	0.17	13	0.43	6	0.51	11	0.47
Lushtak 2004		9	0.71	7	0.00	11	0.14	6	0.53	1	0.53	8	0.53
Malcuzynski 1961		54	0.58	44	0.00	59	0.07	48	0.07	25	0.23	52	0.13
Magaloff 1978		42	0.61	69	0.00	38	0.05	35	0.15	20	0.35	36	0.23
Magin 1975		52	0.58	9	0.00	26	0.06	28	0.21	21	0.28	35	0.24
Michalowski 1933		84	0.36	86	0.00	79	0.03	87	0.03	63	0.05	79	0.04
Milkina 1970		21	0.66	10	0.00	12	0.12	12	0.43	8	0.52	12	0.47
Mohovich 1999		6	0.73	15	0.00	9	0.18	7	0.52	4	0.59	7	0.55
Moravec 1969		66	0.53	52	0.00	75	0.03	77	0.03	33	0.26	60	0.09
Morozova 2008		16	0.68	27	0.00	23	0.10	20	0.34	8	0.40	22	0.37
Neighaus 1950		8	0.71	60	0.00	6	0.15	4	0.63	3	0.59	3	0.61
Niedzielski 1931		58	0.56	53	0.00	49	0.06	54	0.06	10	0.45	46	0.16
Ohlsson 1999		28	0.64	70	0.00	27	0.06	23	0.30	18	0.39	25	0.34
Osinska 1989		35	0.62	87	0.00	45	0.05	58	0.05	39	0.16	61	0.09
Pachmann 1927		50	0.58	54	0.00	53	0.05	59	0.05	3	0.57	45	0.17
Paderewski 1930		73	0.49	88	0.00	74	0.03	83	0.03	70	0.03	86	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		11	0.70	71	0.00	22	0.10	18	0.34	5	0.52	17	0.42
Pierdomenico 2008		56	0.57	72	0.00	60	0.07	46	0.07	14	0.43	44	0.17
Poblocka 1999		38	0.62	20	0.00	46	0.06	56	0.06	37	0.16	57	0.10
Rabcewiczowa 1932		68	0.52	73	0.00	72	0.04	72	0.04	62	0.04	78	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		24	0.65	61	0.00	24	0.13	24	0.29	9	0.46	21	0.37
Rangell 2001		76	0.46	2	0.00	66	0.05	66	0.05	34	0.21	59	0.10
Richter 1976		48	0.59	89	0.00	32	0.04	43	0.09	11	0.47	40	0.21
Rosen 1989		44	0.60	5	0.00	58	0.07	49	0.07	38	0.15	58	0.10
Rosenthal 1930		74	0.49	55	0.00	77	0.05	60	0.05	49	0.05	73	0.05
Rosenthal 1931		81	0.43	29	0.00	82	0.03	84	0.03	42	0.09	71	0.05
Rosenthal 1931b		80	0.43	74	0.00	81	0.03	79	0.03	34	0.11	69	0.06
Rosenthal 1931c		77	0.46	62	0.00	78	0.03	81	0.03	57	0.04	89	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		78	0.44	45	0.00	80	0.03	86	0.03	49	0.06	83	0.04
Rossi 2007		86	0.32	63	0.00	87	0.04	71	0.04	74	0.04	77	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		67	0.52	64	0.00	68	0.04	70	0.04	12	0.37	53	0.12
Rubinstein 1952		33	0.63	21	0.00	14	0.10	27	0.23	9	0.58	23	0.37
Rubinstein 1966		19	0.66	30	0.00	25	0.09	25	0.27	7	0.60	19	0.40
Schilhawsky 1960		13	0.69	56	0.00	19	0.06	16	0.38	11	0.46	18	0.42
Shebanova 2002		12	0.70	22	0.00	17	0.07	14	0.42	12	0.50	15	0.46
Smith 1975		40	0.62	65	0.00	54	0.05	63	0.05	47	0.05	70	0.05
Sokolov 2002		36	0.62	75	0.00	39	0.05	37	0.15	20	0.39	33	0.24
Sztompka 1959		51	0.58	34	0.00	62	0.09	42	0.09	71	0.04	67	0.06
Tomsic 1995		27	0.65	90	0.00	41	0.04	36	0.15	10	0.55	27	0.29
Uninsky 1932		53	0.58	6	0.00	61	0.06	51	0.06	54	0.06	68	0.06
Uninsky 1971		45	0.60	16	0.00	57	0.07	47	0.07	36	0.18	56	0.11
Wasowski 1980		46	0.60	76	0.00	47	0.05	62	0.05	22	0.25	54	0.11
Zak 1937		1	0.99	1	0.99	1	0.98	1	1.00	1	1.00	1	1.00
Zak 1951		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Random 1		89	-0.12	35	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	48	0.05	88	0.03
Random 2		88	-0.11	77	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	49	0.05	87	0.03
Random 3		90	-0.17	46	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	86	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).