Sokolov 2002

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		11	0.68	31	0.00	24	0.08	16	0.42	39	0.20	29	0.29
Anderszewski 2003		14	0.66	23	0.01	10	0.09	14	0.44	9	0.46	8	0.45
Ashkenazy 1981		7	0.69	18	0.01	14	0.08	13	0.44	27	0.30	21	0.36
Bacha 2000		71	0.48	52	0.00	79	0.02	85	0.02	76	0.03	90	0.02
Badura 1965		53	0.56	12	0.02	19	0.07	31	0.34	17	0.38	20	0.36
Barbosa 1983		76	0.44	28	0.00	60	0.04	53	0.04	47	0.07	58	0.05
Biret 1990		6	0.69	22	0.01	29	0.08	25	0.37	23	0.28	27	0.32
Blet 2003		49	0.57	68	0.00	43	0.04	43	0.08	45	0.06	49	0.07
Block 1995		75	0.45	69	0.00	67	0.03	76	0.03	76	0.03	84	0.03
Blumental 1952		73	0.45	24	0.01	59	0.04	52	0.04	68	0.03	85	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		43	0.59	73	0.00	52	0.05	47	0.05	64	0.04	70	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		67	0.50	71	0.00	77	0.03	81	0.03	72	0.04	76	0.03
Bunin 1987		18	0.65	6	0.05	7	0.09	6	0.48	7	0.52	4	0.50
Bunin 1987b		21	0.65	42	0.00	8	0.09	8	0.48	7	0.52	2	0.50
Chiu 1999		79	0.42	83	0.00	72	0.03	74	0.03	69	0.03	77	0.03
Cohen 1997		87	0.32	50	0.00	86	0.03	78	0.03	74	0.03	86	0.03
Cortot 1951		28	0.63	77	0.00	35	0.09	36	0.29	17	0.38	25	0.33
Csalog 1996		77	0.44	36	0.00	65	0.03	66	0.03	67	0.04	82	0.03
Czerny 1949		26	0.63	11	0.03	22	0.07	22	0.39	28	0.30	24	0.34
Czerny 1990		13	0.67	58	0.00	28	0.08	23	0.38	37	0.15	33	0.24
Duchoud 2007		1	0.76	1	0.17	1	0.17	1	0.57	3	0.55	1	0.56
Ezaki 2006		9	0.69	9	0.03	5	0.12	3	0.50	10	0.45	6	0.47
Falvay 1989		63	0.52	39	0.00	46	0.05	48	0.05	53	0.06	55	0.05
Farrell 1958		47	0.58	26	0.01	44	0.04	44	0.08	65	0.04	53	0.06
Ferenczy 1958		58	0.54	54	0.00	58	0.04	61	0.04	36	0.14	50	0.07
Fliere 1977		8	0.69	51	0.00	25	0.07	32	0.34	43	0.12	34	0.20
Fou 1978		59	0.54	66	0.00	64	0.04	55	0.04	60	0.04	63	0.04
Francois 1956		44	0.58	37	0.00	41	0.07	41	0.14	44	0.11	42	0.12
Friedman 1923		84	0.36	64	0.00	76	0.03	70	0.03	57	0.06	74	0.04
Friedman 1923b		83	0.36	74	0.00	75	0.02	87	0.02	48	0.07	71	0.04
Friedman 1930		78	0.44	82	0.00	63	0.04	60	0.04	53	0.05	67	0.04
Garcia 2007		57	0.54	80	0.00	54	0.04	62	0.04	29	0.30	43	0.11
Garcia 2007b		80	0.41	90	0.00	73	0.03	67	0.03	59	0.04	89	0.03
Gierzod 1998		10	0.68	8	0.03	27	0.07	24	0.38	36	0.20	30	0.28
Gornostaeva 1994		19	0.65	15	0.02	21	0.07	19	0.40	18	0.38	16	0.39
Groot 1988		41	0.59	46	0.00	40	0.07	39	0.20	54	0.04	46	0.09
Harasiewicz 1955		42	0.59	3	0.08	3	0.21	4	0.49	14	0.42	9	0.45
Hatto 1993		66	0.51	78	0.00	57	0.05	51	0.05	63	0.04	73	0.04
Hatto 1997		54	0.54	67	0.00	53	0.04	65	0.04	33	0.16	48	0.08
Horowitz 1949		64	0.52	76	0.00	68	0.03	77	0.03	52	0.05	64	0.04
Indjic 1988		62	0.52	84	0.00	56	0.06	45	0.06	40	0.13	45	0.09
Kapell 1951		5	0.70	13	0.02	6	0.10	7	0.48	17	0.37	11	0.42
Kissin 1993		36	0.60	44	0.00	49	0.04	58	0.04	70	0.03	81	0.03
Kushner 1989		4	0.70	14	0.02	20	0.07	15	0.43	23	0.35	14	0.39
Luisada 1991		51	0.57	17	0.01	45	0.04	54	0.04	61	0.04	61	0.04
Lushtak 2004		27	0.63	61	0.00	15	0.07	12	0.44	27	0.24	26	0.32
Malcuzynski 1961		22	0.64	30	0.00	38	0.10	35	0.30	21	0.28	28	0.29
Magaloff 1978		33	0.62	4	0.07	13	0.09	40	0.18	41	0.14	37	0.16
Magin 1975		20	0.65	21	0.01	33	0.10	21	0.39	16	0.31	22	0.35
Michalowski 1933		52	0.56	29	0.00	31	0.06	28	0.35	13	0.42	17	0.38
Milkina 1970		32	0.62	49	0.00	48	0.05	46	0.05	60	0.05	57	0.05
Mohovich 1999		24	0.63	27	0.00	37	0.08	29	0.35	49	0.06	38	0.14
Moravec 1969		74	0.45	38	0.00	82	0.03	84	0.03	81	0.03	75	0.03
Morozova 2008		31	0.62	40	0.00	34	0.11	30	0.35	32	0.20	31	0.26
Neighaus 1950		15	0.66	33	0.00	32	0.07	27	0.35	43	0.10	35	0.19
Niedzielski 1931		72	0.47	85	0.00	71	0.03	82	0.03	73	0.03	79	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		2	0.76	2	0.15	2	0.22	2	0.55	8	0.45	3	0.50
Osinska 1989		45	0.58	43	0.00	47	0.04	59	0.04	60	0.04	62	0.04
Pachmann 1927		82	0.39	70	0.00	83	0.03	75	0.03	61	0.05	65	0.04
Paderewski 1930		60	0.54	62	0.00	74	0.03	83	0.03	74	0.03	80	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		30	0.62	79	0.00	17	0.11	18	0.41	20	0.34	18	0.37
Pierdomenico 2008		56	0.54	60	0.00	66	0.03	71	0.03	48	0.08	56	0.05
Poblocka 1999		25	0.63	45	0.00	36	0.11	37	0.29	44	0.09	36	0.16
Rabcewiczowa 1932		40	0.59	47	0.00	42	0.05	42	0.10	37	0.16	40	0.13
Rachmaninoff 1923		17	0.66	5	0.07	4	0.11	9	0.48	7	0.49	5	0.48
Rangell 2001		61	0.53	59	0.00	69	0.03	80	0.03	65	0.03	87	0.03
Richter 1976		38	0.60	19	0.01	30	0.06	34	0.31	13	0.44	19	0.37
Rosen 1989		48	0.57	65	0.00	62	0.04	63	0.04	55	0.04	69	0.04
Rosenthal 1930		12	0.67	56	0.00	26	0.09	26	0.36	7	0.61	7	0.47
Rosenthal 1931		65	0.52	81	0.00	70	0.03	79	0.03	30	0.20	47	0.08
Rosenthal 1931b		68	0.49	63	0.00	78	0.03	72	0.03	39	0.09	60	0.05
Rosenthal 1931c		37	0.60	75	0.00	51	0.04	56	0.04	14	0.47	39	0.14
Rosenthal 1931d		69	0.49	86	0.00	81	0.03	73	0.03	47	0.06	72	0.04
Rossi 2007		85	0.36	41	0.00	80	0.02	86	0.02	34	0.18	52	0.06
Rubinstein 1939		86	0.35	72	0.00	87	0.03	69	0.03	84	0.03	78	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		81	0.41	32	0.00	85	0.03	68	0.03	79	0.04	88	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		70	0.48	48	0.00	84	0.04	64	0.04	57	0.05	66	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		23	0.64	88	0.00	16	0.09	11	0.46	24	0.39	12	0.42
Shebanova 2002		35	0.61	57	0.00	50	0.04	57	0.04	73	0.04	68	0.04
Smith 1975		16	0.66	7	0.05	12	0.08	10	0.47	20	0.35	13	0.41
Sokolov 2002		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Sztompka 1959		3	0.71	10	0.03	11	0.09	5	0.49	19	0.40	10	0.44
Tomsic 1995		55	0.54	25	0.01	61	0.05	50	0.05	36	0.19	44	0.10
Uninsky 1932		50	0.57	53	0.00	18	0.07	33	0.32	28	0.36	23	0.34
Uninsky 1971		39	0.60	16	0.02	9	0.10	17	0.42	23	0.36	15	0.39
Wasowski 1980		46	0.58	35	0.00	55	0.05	49	0.05	58	0.05	54	0.05
Zak 1937		34	0.61	34	0.00	39	0.10	38	0.27	57	0.06	41	0.13
Zak 1951		29	0.62	20	0.01	23	0.08	20	0.39	37	0.15	32	0.24
Random 1		90	-0.09	55	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	8	0.48	51	0.07
Random 2		89	-0.01	87	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	44	0.07	83	0.03
Random 3		88	0.01	89	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	19	0.28	59	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).