Rubinstein 1952

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		30	0.53	22	0.01	46	0.06	54	0.06	82	0.03	62	0.04
Anderszewski 2003		82	0.24	36	0.00	76	0.05	62	0.05	76	0.03	59	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		54	0.42	28	0.00	61	0.04	65	0.04	79	0.03	79	0.03
Bacha 2000		22	0.56	39	0.00	19	0.10	20	0.45	16	0.34	15	0.39
Badura 1965		74	0.31	73	0.00	63	0.06	52	0.06	75	0.04	53	0.05
Barbosa 1983		37	0.50	41	0.00	31	0.09	29	0.31	35	0.18	27	0.24
Biret 1990		24	0.55	43	0.00	29	0.07	26	0.36	65	0.05	34	0.13
Blet 2003		31	0.53	84	0.00	44	0.08	40	0.16	62	0.04	42	0.08
Block 1995		62	0.39	61	0.00	34	0.05	45	0.10	68	0.03	54	0.05
Blumental 1952		45	0.46	42	0.00	42	0.06	41	0.15	43	0.09	35	0.12
Boshniakovich 1969		53	0.44	68	0.00	53	0.06	55	0.06	79	0.03	64	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		16	0.58	18	0.01	8	0.12	14	0.53	9	0.46	10	0.49
Bunin 1987		76	0.30	66	0.00	83	0.05	60	0.05	86	0.02	80	0.03
Bunin 1987b		75	0.30	78	0.00	82	0.04	76	0.04	87	0.02	67	0.03
Chiu 1999		40	0.49	86	0.00	23	0.08	23	0.38	35	0.19	25	0.27
Cohen 1997		26	0.54	23	0.01	7	0.21	15	0.51	1	0.58	8	0.54
Cortot 1951		65	0.36	33	0.00	77	0.04	69	0.04	83	0.03	83	0.03
Csalog 1996		3	0.70	6	0.05	4	0.22	11	0.56	1	0.65	4	0.60
Czerny 1949		69	0.32	56	0.00	78	0.05	59	0.05	76	0.04	61	0.04
Czerny 1990		28	0.54	49	0.00	37	0.05	34	0.25	77	0.03	41	0.09
Duchoud 2007		66	0.35	46	0.00	75	0.04	73	0.04	88	0.02	76	0.03
Ezaki 2006		39	0.50	15	0.01	48	0.09	47	0.09	48	0.05	43	0.07
Falvay 1989		1	0.73	5	0.07	3	0.23	3	0.66	1	0.70	2	0.68
Farrell 1958		19	0.56	64	0.00	30	0.08	28	0.31	42	0.11	29	0.18
Ferenczy 1958		58	0.40	75	0.00	65	0.03	83	0.03	42	0.08	51	0.05
Fliere 1977		20	0.56	30	0.00	27	0.07	22	0.44	48	0.05	30	0.15
Fou 1978		8	0.66	3	0.08	5	0.21	4	0.62	8	0.47	7	0.54
Francois 1956		25	0.54	26	0.00	32	0.07	31	0.29	57	0.05	36	0.12
Friedman 1923		88	-0.05	81	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	89	0.01	90	0.01
Friedman 1923b		86	-0.04	88	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	89	0.01	89	0.01
Friedman 1930		85	0.05	83	0.00	85	0.03	80	0.03	88	0.02	87	0.02
Garcia 2007		72	0.32	90	0.00	74	0.04	66	0.04	72	0.03	77	0.03
Garcia 2007b		83	0.21	47	0.00	73	0.04	68	0.04	80	0.03	85	0.03
Gierzod 1998		41	0.49	37	0.00	50	0.09	46	0.09	82	0.03	52	0.05
Gornostaeva 1994		52	0.45	25	0.00	51	0.11	44	0.11	73	0.03	49	0.06
Groot 1988		10	0.66	8	0.04	9	0.13	8	0.58	18	0.45	9	0.51
Harasiewicz 1955		71	0.32	14	0.01	56	0.04	75	0.04	69	0.03	84	0.03
Hatto 1993		81	0.27	48	0.00	71	0.04	70	0.04	76	0.03	82	0.03
Hatto 1997		78	0.30	54	0.00	72	0.05	61	0.05	63	0.04	60	0.04
Horowitz 1949		60	0.39	72	0.00	62	0.05	58	0.05	86	0.02	69	0.03
Indjic 1988		79	0.29	50	0.00	70	0.03	82	0.03	74	0.03	72	0.03
Kapell 1951		35	0.51	67	0.00	33	0.06	43	0.11	41	0.11	37	0.11
Kissin 1993		7	0.66	11	0.02	10	0.14	2	0.67	23	0.31	12	0.46
Kushner 1989		21	0.56	35	0.00	25	0.09	21	0.45	57	0.05	31	0.15
Luisada 1991		27	0.54	10	0.02	18	0.14	19	0.45	35	0.19	24	0.29
Lushtak 2004		18	0.57	4	0.07	12	0.12	17	0.47	24	0.25	20	0.34
Malcuzynski 1961		63	0.39	60	0.00	69	0.03	81	0.03	63	0.04	68	0.03
Magaloff 1978		14	0.62	13	0.02	13	0.14	10	0.56	16	0.37	11	0.46
Magin 1975		61	0.39	19	0.01	57	0.04	77	0.04	83	0.02	66	0.03
Michalowski 1933		84	0.10	34	0.00	84	0.03	84	0.03	88	0.02	86	0.02
Milkina 1970		4	0.68	7	0.05	6	0.31	5	0.62	5	0.57	5	0.59
Mohovich 1999		6	0.66	12	0.02	11	0.14	7	0.60	26	0.33	13	0.44
Moravec 1969		15	0.58	16	0.01	26	0.07	24	0.38	15	0.40	16	0.39
Morozova 2008		51	0.45	69	0.00	43	0.06	42	0.14	74	0.03	48	0.06
Neighaus 1950		56	0.41	59	0.00	60	0.06	53	0.06	85	0.02	81	0.03
Niedzielski 1931		55	0.41	85	0.00	59	0.05	63	0.05	74	0.03	56	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		48	0.46	31	0.00	45	0.07	49	0.07	49	0.05	47	0.06
Osinska 1989		17	0.57	20	0.01	20	0.12	18	0.47	61	0.04	32	0.14
Pachmann 1927		43	0.47	24	0.00	35	0.05	38	0.24	22	0.28	26	0.26
Paderewski 1930		34	0.51	82	0.00	47	0.06	51	0.06	66	0.03	57	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		29	0.53	9	0.04	24	0.08	27	0.31	31	0.17	28	0.23
Pierdomenico 2008		44	0.47	44	0.00	49	0.08	48	0.08	57	0.05	46	0.06
Poblocka 1999		47	0.46	32	0.00	55	0.05	57	0.05	57	0.05	50	0.05
Rabcewiczowa 1932		33	0.51	63	0.00	36	0.05	33	0.26	67	0.03	40	0.09
Rachmaninoff 1923		67	0.34	74	0.00	68	0.04	71	0.04	59	0.04	55	0.04
Rangell 2001		42	0.48	51	0.00	21	0.09	37	0.24	46	0.05	38	0.11
Richter 1976		73	0.31	21	0.01	54	0.04	64	0.04	76	0.03	70	0.03
Rosen 1989		23	0.55	29	0.00	28	0.07	25	0.38	51	0.05	33	0.14
Rosenthal 1930		59	0.40	57	0.00	64	0.04	72	0.04	87	0.02	78	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		49	0.46	79	0.00	39	0.06	35	0.25	20	0.41	21	0.32
Rosenthal 1931b		50	0.46	89	0.00	40	0.10	36	0.24	16	0.38	23	0.30
Rosenthal 1931c		38	0.50	62	0.00	38	0.06	32	0.26	21	0.37	22	0.31
Rosenthal 1931d		32	0.51	70	0.00	22	0.08	30	0.30	6	0.53	14	0.40
Rossi 2007		80	0.28	80	0.00	58	0.04	74	0.04	41	0.11	44	0.07
Rubinstein 1939		5	0.67	1	0.26	1	0.26	6	0.60	2	0.63	3	0.61
Rubinstein 1952		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rubinstein 1966		2	0.73	2	0.11	2	0.30	1	0.71	1	0.76	1	0.73
Schilhawsky 1960		64	0.36	45	0.00	67	0.04	78	0.04	80	0.03	73	0.03
Shebanova 2002		11	0.65	55	0.00	14	0.09	16	0.50	24	0.31	17	0.39
Smith 1975		36	0.50	27	0.00	41	0.06	39	0.21	57	0.04	39	0.09
Sokolov 2002		57	0.41	38	0.00	66	0.04	79	0.04	68	0.03	65	0.03
Sztompka 1959		68	0.34	58	0.00	79	0.06	50	0.06	85	0.03	58	0.04
Tomsic 1995		9	0.66	52	0.00	15	0.16	12	0.55	7	0.60	6	0.57
Uninsky 1932		77	0.30	53	0.00	81	0.04	67	0.04	80	0.03	74	0.03
Uninsky 1971		70	0.32	40	0.00	80	0.03	85	0.03	83	0.03	71	0.03
Wasowski 1980		46	0.46	76	0.00	52	0.06	56	0.06	47	0.06	45	0.06
Zak 1937		12	0.65	65	0.00	16	0.14	13	0.53	31	0.22	19	0.34
Zak 1951		13	0.63	17	0.01	17	0.16	9	0.58	27	0.23	18	0.37
Random 1		90	-0.12	77	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	39	0.19	63	0.04
Random 2		87	-0.04	87	0.00	86	0.02	86	0.02	55	0.04	75	0.03
Random 3		89	-0.10	71	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	77	0.02	88	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).