Rosenthal 1931

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		49	0.41	14	0.00	53	0.04	62	0.04	73	0.03	75	0.03
Anderszewski 2003		19	0.52	9	0.00	18	0.07	25	0.36	40	0.09	13	0.18
Ashkenazy 1981		57	0.41	78	0.00	57	0.05	45	0.05	87	0.03	54	0.04
Bacha 2000		53	0.41	15	0.00	56	0.04	53	0.04	79	0.03	59	0.03
Badura 1965		84	0.26	18	0.00	74	0.02	81	0.02	86	0.02	89	0.02
Barbosa 1983		87	0.21	46	0.00	66	0.04	54	0.04	73	0.04	50	0.04
Biret 1990		32	0.46	35	0.00	51	0.04	55	0.04	72	0.04	57	0.04
Blet 2003		59	0.40	47	0.00	65	0.05	47	0.05	67	0.04	51	0.04
Block 1995		51	0.41	83	0.00	49	0.03	66	0.03	70	0.03	78	0.03
Blumental 1952		75	0.32	12	0.00	40	0.04	43	0.09	63	0.03	45	0.05
Boshniakovich 1969		50	0.41	68	0.00	58	0.04	60	0.04	77	0.03	79	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		11	0.58	64	0.00	7	0.14	11	0.52	22	0.34	8	0.42
Bunin 1987		67	0.34	6	0.00	76	0.05	46	0.05	77	0.03	55	0.04
Bunin 1987b		69	0.34	11	0.00	75	0.03	77	0.03	72	0.04	65	0.03
Chiu 1999		83	0.27	45	0.00	55	0.04	57	0.04	58	0.04	46	0.04
Cohen 1997		79	0.29	28	0.00	46	0.03	71	0.03	24	0.23	35	0.08
Cortot 1951		62	0.39	30	0.00	77	0.02	85	0.02	74	0.04	82	0.03
Csalog 1996		66	0.36	58	0.00	67	0.03	65	0.03	59	0.04	71	0.03
Czerny 1949		60	0.40	59	0.00	63	0.03	75	0.03	78	0.03	74	0.03
Czerny 1990		27	0.50	65	0.00	20	0.07	18	0.42	71	0.03	25	0.11
Duchoud 2007		64	0.38	84	0.00	69	0.04	59	0.04	82	0.03	76	0.03
Ezaki 2006		23	0.51	23	0.00	22	0.09	15	0.46	58	0.04	18	0.14
Falvay 1989		17	0.53	79	0.00	10	0.11	10	0.52	30	0.35	7	0.43
Farrell 1958		38	0.44	38	0.00	36	0.05	33	0.18	75	0.04	32	0.08
Ferenczy 1958		71	0.33	69	0.00	82	0.02	83	0.02	78	0.03	86	0.02
Fliere 1977		13	0.57	66	0.00	23	0.09	13	0.50	86	0.02	27	0.10
Fou 1978		24	0.50	36	0.00	11	0.12	12	0.51	52	0.05	17	0.16
Francois 1956		29	0.48	48	0.00	42	0.05	37	0.14	75	0.03	42	0.06
Friedman 1923		86	0.22	22	0.00	87	0.03	69	0.03	69	0.05	58	0.04
Friedman 1923b		85	0.22	7	0.00	86	0.03	72	0.03	67	0.05	56	0.04
Friedman 1930		74	0.32	5	0.00	70	0.03	73	0.03	68	0.04	72	0.03
Garcia 2007		61	0.40	20	0.00	62	0.03	64	0.03	74	0.03	77	0.03
Garcia 2007b		70	0.34	50	0.00	59	0.04	52	0.04	75	0.03	83	0.03
Gierzod 1998		20	0.52	42	0.00	32	0.06	35	0.16	83	0.03	37	0.07
Gornostaeva 1994		5	0.65	32	0.00	6	0.23	7	0.61	22	0.32	6	0.44
Groot 1988		28	0.48	51	0.00	21	0.07	24	0.37	58	0.04	21	0.12
Harasiewicz 1955		37	0.44	52	0.00	16	0.08	21	0.40	72	0.03	26	0.11
Hatto 1993		82	0.28	80	0.00	80	0.02	82	0.02	68	0.04	81	0.03
Hatto 1997		80	0.29	53	0.00	79	0.02	87	0.02	74	0.04	73	0.03
Horowitz 1949		58	0.41	43	0.00	54	0.04	51	0.04	76	0.03	66	0.03
Indjic 1988		81	0.28	85	0.00	81	0.03	79	0.03	69	0.04	70	0.03
Kapell 1951		26	0.50	86	0.00	37	0.04	38	0.14	84	0.03	40	0.06
Kissin 1993		21	0.52	24	0.00	17	0.09	17	0.44	76	0.03	24	0.11
Kushner 1989		9	0.60	54	0.00	14	0.10	23	0.38	78	0.03	23	0.11
Luisada 1991		35	0.45	55	0.00	39	0.05	40	0.12	76	0.03	39	0.06
Lushtak 2004		68	0.34	44	0.00	41	0.05	41	0.10	85	0.02	53	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		10	0.58	87	0.00	24	0.12	22	0.38	52	0.04	20	0.12
Magaloff 1978		6	0.64	67	0.00	5	0.24	5	0.65	18	0.37	5	0.49
Magin 1975		12	0.57	70	0.00	12	0.08	14	0.49	46	0.05	16	0.16
Michalowski 1933		78	0.30	71	0.00	78	0.02	84	0.02	78	0.03	84	0.02
Milkina 1970		7	0.61	13	0.00	9	0.17	8	0.57	59	0.05	14	0.17
Mohovich 1999		15	0.53	56	0.00	25	0.11	16	0.45	65	0.04	19	0.13
Moravec 1969		18	0.52	19	0.00	15	0.08	19	0.42	24	0.34	9	0.38
Morozova 2008		43	0.43	26	0.00	33	0.06	28	0.23	79	0.03	34	0.08
Neighaus 1950		46	0.43	40	0.00	60	0.04	48	0.04	87	0.02	80	0.03
Niedzielski 1931		41	0.43	72	0.00	48	0.03	74	0.03	83	0.03	63	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		52	0.41	88	0.00	61	0.04	49	0.04	87	0.03	69	0.03
Osinska 1989		30	0.47	16	0.00	50	0.03	67	0.03	87	0.03	61	0.03
Pachmann 1927		54	0.41	49	0.00	45	0.04	63	0.04	59	0.05	48	0.04
Paderewski 1930		44	0.43	27	0.00	64	0.03	68	0.03	60	0.04	68	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		34	0.45	21	0.00	27	0.10	26	0.31	79	0.03	28	0.10
Pierdomenico 2008		48	0.42	57	0.00	52	0.04	50	0.04	58	0.05	47	0.04
Poblocka 1999		55	0.41	81	0.00	73	0.04	56	0.04	87	0.02	62	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932		39	0.44	10	0.00	19	0.11	27	0.26	49	0.05	22	0.11
Rachmaninoff 1923		14	0.54	41	0.00	13	0.10	9	0.54	51	0.05	15	0.16
Rangell 2001		25	0.50	74	0.00	29	0.06	34	0.18	59	0.04	36	0.08
Richter 1976		65	0.36	31	0.00	72	0.03	78	0.03	69	0.03	67	0.03
Rosen 1989		16	0.53	25	0.00	30	0.08	29	0.23	88	0.02	38	0.07
Rosenthal 1930		4	0.78	4	0.00	4	0.66	4	0.86	2	0.83	4	0.84
Rosenthal 1931		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosenthal 1931b		1	0.98	1	0.95	1	0.94	1	0.99	1	0.99	1	0.99
Rosenthal 1931c		3	0.87	3	0.01	3	0.85	3	0.94	3	0.92	3	0.93
Rosenthal 1931d		2	0.95	2	0.03	2	0.93	2	0.97	2	0.97	2	0.97
Rossi 2007		72	0.33	17	0.00	34	0.06	36	0.16	57	0.05	29	0.09
Rubinstein 1939		42	0.43	60	0.00	35	0.07	39	0.13	20	0.32	12	0.20
Rubinstein 1952		33	0.46	82	0.00	26	0.16	20	0.41	35	0.25	10	0.32
Rubinstein 1966		36	0.45	75	0.00	38	0.05	31	0.19	63	0.04	30	0.09
Schilhawsky 1960		31	0.46	89	0.00	28	0.08	32	0.18	60	0.04	33	0.08
Shebanova 2002		56	0.41	90	0.00	71	0.04	58	0.04	76	0.04	52	0.04
Smith 1975		8	0.60	33	0.00	8	0.13	6	0.62	35	0.13	11	0.28
Sokolov 2002		22	0.52	76	0.00	31	0.06	30	0.20	79	0.03	31	0.08
Sztompka 1959		63	0.38	37	0.00	68	0.04	61	0.04	78	0.04	49	0.04
Tomsic 1995		47	0.42	73	0.00	44	0.03	44	0.06	50	0.05	44	0.05
Uninsky 1932		76	0.31	8	0.00	83	0.02	86	0.02	77	0.03	87	0.02
Uninsky 1971		73	0.32	34	0.00	84	0.02	80	0.02	84	0.03	85	0.02
Wasowski 1980		77	0.30	61	0.00	85	0.03	70	0.03	72	0.04	60	0.03
Zak 1937		45	0.43	77	0.00	47	0.03	76	0.03	83	0.03	64	0.03
Zak 1951		40	0.43	62	0.00	43	0.04	42	0.09	84	0.03	43	0.05
Random 1		88	-0.09	29	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	18	0.36	41	0.06
Random 2		89	-0.11	63	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	56	0.04	88	0.02
Random 3		90	-0.11	39	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	78	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).