Richter 1976

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		11	0.63	58	0.00	26	0.08	24	0.29	79	0.03	40	0.09
Anderszewski 2003		31	0.55	25	0.00	13	0.10	18	0.38	37	0.12	18	0.21
Ashkenazy 1981		38	0.52	18	0.01	22	0.06	22	0.31	50	0.05	27	0.12
Bacha 2000		80	0.29	77	0.00	77	0.03	80	0.03	87	0.02	83	0.02
Badura 1965		20	0.58	10	0.02	14	0.10	17	0.40	28	0.33	10	0.36
Barbosa 1983		73	0.35	55	0.00	75	0.02	86	0.02	84	0.03	87	0.02
Biret 1990		66	0.39	84	0.00	69	0.03	71	0.03	74	0.04	77	0.03
Blet 2003		23	0.57	39	0.00	50	0.06	51	0.06	55	0.05	54	0.05
Block 1995		12	0.62	22	0.01	16	0.08	27	0.28	29	0.24	13	0.26
Blumental 1952		87	0.16	53	0.00	87	0.03	79	0.03	87	0.02	88	0.02
Boshniakovich 1969		10	0.64	27	0.00	11	0.12	10	0.48	19	0.37	8	0.42
Brailowsky 1960		50	0.48	56	0.00	54	0.06	48	0.06	70	0.04	50	0.05
Bunin 1987		7	0.65	61	0.00	6	0.20	8	0.51	8	0.51	6	0.51
Bunin 1987b		8	0.65	7	0.03	5	0.19	7	0.51	9	0.51	5	0.51
Chiu 1999		71	0.36	65	0.00	55	0.06	52	0.06	62	0.04	51	0.05
Cohen 1997		84	0.22	26	0.00	72	0.03	78	0.03	55	0.04	75	0.03
Cortot 1951		29	0.55	35	0.00	47	0.06	50	0.06	46	0.07	49	0.06
Csalog 1996		68	0.37	31	0.00	39	0.05	43	0.11	44	0.10	34	0.10
Czerny 1949		26	0.56	68	0.00	25	0.08	31	0.23	51	0.06	26	0.12
Czerny 1990		43	0.51	83	0.00	58	0.05	59	0.05	73	0.03	62	0.04
Duchoud 2007		47	0.49	89	0.00	38	0.06	33	0.19	47	0.05	35	0.10
Ezaki 2006		19	0.58	71	0.00	33	0.05	32	0.23	64	0.04	30	0.10
Falvay 1989		62	0.41	24	0.00	74	0.02	85	0.02	77	0.04	67	0.03
Farrell 1958		67	0.38	85	0.00	76	0.02	84	0.02	70	0.04	69	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		28	0.55	16	0.01	32	0.09	36	0.15	32	0.20	20	0.17
Fliere 1977		5	0.67	30	0.00	9	0.14	6	0.54	47	0.05	21	0.16
Fou 1978		36	0.53	47	0.00	35	0.07	39	0.13	68	0.04	44	0.07
Francois 1956		65	0.39	69	0.00	81	0.03	70	0.03	65	0.04	81	0.03
Friedman 1923		86	0.22	72	0.00	84	0.02	81	0.02	76	0.04	82	0.03
Friedman 1923b		85	0.22	70	0.00	82	0.03	74	0.03	62	0.05	61	0.04
Friedman 1930		76	0.33	78	0.00	66	0.04	60	0.04	57	0.05	58	0.04
Garcia 2007		54	0.46	36	0.00	49	0.06	47	0.06	69	0.04	55	0.05
Garcia 2007b		81	0.26	57	0.00	67	0.05	57	0.05	77	0.03	64	0.04
Gierzod 1998		40	0.52	81	0.00	45	0.05	54	0.05	79	0.03	59	0.04
Gornostaeva 1994		52	0.47	42	0.00	61	0.04	67	0.04	82	0.02	76	0.03
Groot 1988		27	0.55	63	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.10	47	0.05	46	0.07
Harasiewicz 1955		3	0.68	2	0.16	2	0.26	3	0.59	10	0.45	3	0.52
Hatto 1993		60	0.42	29	0.00	30	0.06	25	0.29	34	0.16	16	0.22
Hatto 1997		57	0.45	21	0.01	20	0.07	21	0.31	52	0.05	25	0.12
Horowitz 1949		6	0.67	4	0.10	4	0.29	4	0.58	8	0.59	2	0.58
Indjic 1988		58	0.44	46	0.00	31	0.10	23	0.30	42	0.12	19	0.19
Kapell 1951		22	0.57	9	0.02	19	0.07	15	0.43	55	0.05	22	0.15
Kissin 1993		4	0.68	5	0.07	8	0.12	9	0.48	29	0.22	11	0.32
Kushner 1989		24	0.57	8	0.03	42	0.08	37	0.15	81	0.03	45	0.07
Luisada 1991		45	0.50	67	0.00	57	0.04	65	0.04	78	0.03	65	0.03
Lushtak 2004		30	0.55	38	0.00	17	0.07	28	0.27	63	0.04	36	0.10
Malcuzynski 1961		16	0.59	51	0.00	24	0.06	29	0.26	53	0.04	31	0.10
Magaloff 1978		56	0.46	62	0.00	63	0.04	64	0.04	86	0.03	66	0.03
Magin 1975		18	0.58	12	0.02	23	0.07	14	0.44	43	0.11	14	0.22
Michalowski 1933		63	0.40	79	0.00	46	0.05	53	0.05	54	0.06	53	0.05
Milkina 1970		37	0.53	33	0.00	53	0.06	49	0.06	75	0.04	52	0.05
Mohovich 1999		41	0.52	45	0.00	52	0.06	46	0.06	79	0.03	60	0.04
Moravec 1969		78	0.32	23	0.01	85	0.02	83	0.02	85	0.02	84	0.02
Morozova 2008		21	0.58	41	0.00	28	0.08	26	0.28	51	0.04	29	0.11
Neighaus 1950		35	0.54	50	0.00	29	0.07	19	0.33	62	0.05	24	0.13
Niedzielski 1931		53	0.46	19	0.01	43	0.06	42	0.12	48	0.04	43	0.07
Ohlsson 1999		48	0.49	60	0.00	37	0.05	30	0.26	61	0.04	33	0.10
Osinska 1989		44	0.51	48	0.00	59	0.05	58	0.05	81	0.03	56	0.04
Pachmann 1927		39	0.52	64	0.00	51	0.05	55	0.05	26	0.21	32	0.10
Paderewski 1930		55	0.46	32	0.00	60	0.04	66	0.04	87	0.02	71	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		13	0.62	17	0.01	15	0.12	16	0.42	33	0.16	12	0.26
Pierdomenico 2008		59	0.42	44	0.00	65	0.05	56	0.05	70	0.03	57	0.04
Poblocka 1999		1	0.72	3	0.10	3	0.24	1	0.64	13	0.40	4	0.51
Rabcewiczowa 1932		77	0.33	66	0.00	83	0.02	82	0.02	68	0.03	86	0.02
Rachmaninoff 1923		42	0.51	88	0.00	41	0.06	40	0.12	68	0.04	41	0.07
Rangell 2001		64	0.40	54	0.00	56	0.04	61	0.04	61	0.04	63	0.04
Richter 1976		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rosen 1989		61	0.41	28	0.00	70	0.03	72	0.03	68	0.04	74	0.03
Rosenthal 1930		46	0.50	34	0.00	40	0.05	38	0.14	39	0.14	23	0.14
Rosenthal 1931		70	0.36	82	0.00	68	0.03	69	0.03	78	0.03	72	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		75	0.33	73	0.00	79	0.03	77	0.03	74	0.03	79	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		69	0.37	80	0.00	71	0.03	75	0.03	84	0.02	89	0.02
Rosenthal 1931d		74	0.34	86	0.00	80	0.03	68	0.03	68	0.04	78	0.03
Rossi 2007		83	0.25	87	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	85	0.03	85	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		82	0.26	6	0.03	21	0.07	41	0.12	73	0.04	42	0.07
Rubinstein 1952		79	0.31	13	0.01	73	0.03	76	0.03	64	0.04	80	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		72	0.35	52	0.00	78	0.03	73	0.03	82	0.03	73	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960		2	0.71	1	0.21	1	0.21	2	0.64	2	0.55	1	0.59
Shebanova 2002		34	0.54	11	0.02	36	0.06	34	0.18	49	0.05	39	0.09
Smith 1975		51	0.48	37	0.00	62	0.04	62	0.04	79	0.03	68	0.03
Sokolov 2002		14	0.60	14	0.01	10	0.09	13	0.44	34	0.31	9	0.37
Sztompka 1959		32	0.55	20	0.01	48	0.08	45	0.08	63	0.05	47	0.06
Tomsic 1995		49	0.49	49	0.00	64	0.04	63	0.04	83	0.03	70	0.03
Uninsky 1932		33	0.54	74	0.00	34	0.05	35	0.17	57	0.05	38	0.09
Uninsky 1971		9	0.64	15	0.01	7	0.13	5	0.54	24	0.36	7	0.44
Wasowski 1980		17	0.58	40	0.00	27	0.07	20	0.31	71	0.04	28	0.11
Zak 1937		25	0.57	75	0.00	18	0.07	12	0.45	43	0.11	15	0.22
Zak 1951		15	0.59	90	0.00	12	0.10	11	0.47	43	0.09	17	0.21
Random 1		88	-0.06	59	0.00	88	0.02	89	0.02	9	0.47	37	0.10
Random 2		90	-0.14	43	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	30	0.17	48	0.06
Random 3		89	-0.12	76	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	83	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).