Rabcewiczowa 1932

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		9	0.69	32	0.00	7	0.15	7	0.49	28	0.31	10	0.39
Anderszewski 2003		49	0.53	48	0.00	62	0.04	53	0.04	59	0.03	80	0.03
Ashkenazy 1981		47	0.54	61	0.00	56	0.04	64	0.04	73	0.03	83	0.03
Bacha 2000		63	0.50	86	0.00	55	0.04	61	0.04	48	0.06	53	0.05
Badura 1965		67	0.48	76	0.00	80	0.02	86	0.02	48	0.06	81	0.03
Barbosa 1983		64	0.50	35	0.00	21	0.07	21	0.33	14	0.36	13	0.34
Biret 1990		4	0.71	17	0.01	5	0.14	6	0.52	12	0.39	6	0.45
Blet 2003		22	0.62	82	0.00	20	0.06	20	0.35	31	0.23	18	0.28
Block 1995		77	0.43	63	0.00	69	0.04	50	0.04	66	0.04	66	0.04
Blumental 1952		30	0.59	53	0.00	8	0.10	17	0.39	15	0.30	14	0.34
Boshniakovich 1969		55	0.52	83	0.00	84	0.03	77	0.03	87	0.02	88	0.02
Brailowsky 1960		59	0.51	85	0.00	71	0.03	82	0.03	75	0.04	70	0.03
Bunin 1987		71	0.45	56	0.00	81	0.02	87	0.02	64	0.04	84	0.03
Bunin 1987b		73	0.44	25	0.01	82	0.04	60	0.04	64	0.04	59	0.04
Chiu 1999		60	0.51	9	0.01	60	0.04	51	0.04	49	0.06	54	0.05
Cohen 1997		86	0.34	59	0.00	83	0.03	80	0.03	47	0.06	67	0.04
Cortot 1951		24	0.61	77	0.00	35	0.08	31	0.22	43	0.15	30	0.18
Csalog 1996		68	0.48	37	0.00	73	0.03	83	0.03	48	0.06	62	0.04
Czerny 1949		10	0.67	34	0.00	17	0.06	18	0.39	40	0.12	24	0.22
Czerny 1990		1	0.76	1	0.35	1	0.35	1	0.65	9	0.51	1	0.58
Duchoud 2007		58	0.51	57	0.00	66	0.03	73	0.03	50	0.05	64	0.04
Ezaki 2006		14	0.65	23	0.01	27	0.06	26	0.27	45	0.06	35	0.13
Falvay 1989		33	0.59	14	0.01	36	0.05	30	0.24	21	0.40	17	0.31
Farrell 1958		27	0.60	44	0.00	19	0.07	19	0.38	14	0.35	12	0.36
Ferenczy 1958		29	0.60	42	0.00	12	0.10	28	0.26	24	0.27	19	0.26
Fliere 1977		16	0.64	16	0.01	32	0.06	34	0.21	66	0.04	44	0.09
Fou 1978		50	0.53	21	0.01	42	0.04	40	0.13	54	0.05	48	0.08
Francois 1956		5	0.71	4	0.06	2	0.24	4	0.57	6	0.55	3	0.56
Friedman 1923		84	0.35	60	0.00	77	0.03	66	0.03	48	0.07	58	0.05
Friedman 1923b		85	0.34	88	0.00	76	0.03	69	0.03	50	0.06	68	0.04
Friedman 1930		52	0.53	62	0.00	41	0.05	43	0.10	35	0.22	33	0.15
Garcia 2007		69	0.48	70	0.00	67	0.04	58	0.04	61	0.04	65	0.04
Garcia 2007b		70	0.46	78	0.00	54	0.03	70	0.03	47	0.05	69	0.04
Gierzod 1998		17	0.64	45	0.00	23	0.06	23	0.31	68	0.04	39	0.11
Gornostaeva 1994		13	0.65	54	0.00	31	0.06	22	0.31	37	0.16	25	0.22
Groot 1988		43	0.56	27	0.01	44	0.06	41	0.11	63	0.04	50	0.07
Harasiewicz 1955		62	0.50	52	0.00	53	0.04	52	0.04	84	0.02	86	0.03
Hatto 1993		83	0.35	80	0.00	75	0.03	71	0.03	83	0.03	85	0.03
Hatto 1997		80	0.42	74	0.00	61	0.04	59	0.04	49	0.06	57	0.05
Horowitz 1949		79	0.42	5	0.05	86	0.03	78	0.03	81	0.03	76	0.03
Indjic 1988		81	0.37	90	0.00	72	0.03	81	0.03	78	0.03	79	0.03
Kapell 1951		3	0.71	3	0.08	4	0.21	3	0.58	15	0.39	4	0.48
Kissin 1993		41	0.57	68	0.00	51	0.04	63	0.04	73	0.03	78	0.03
Kushner 1989		6	0.71	30	0.00	6	0.14	5	0.53	21	0.38	5	0.45
Luisada 1991		40	0.57	15	0.01	30	0.06	38	0.15	53	0.05	42	0.09
Lushtak 2004		37	0.58	40	0.00	13	0.07	12	0.43	44	0.09	27	0.20
Malcuzynski 1961		53	0.52	81	0.00	70	0.04	55	0.04	83	0.03	75	0.03
Magaloff 1978		20	0.62	8	0.02	37	0.06	33	0.21	42	0.14	31	0.17
Magin 1975		66	0.48	51	0.00	68	0.03	74	0.03	78	0.03	73	0.03
Michalowski 1933		18	0.63	19	0.01	11	0.09	16	0.41	9	0.48	7	0.44
Milkina 1970		34	0.59	28	0.00	39	0.05	44	0.10	81	0.04	51	0.06
Mohovich 1999		11	0.66	39	0.00	18	0.06	10	0.43	44	0.09	28	0.20
Moravec 1969		23	0.61	18	0.01	29	0.06	32	0.22	10	0.46	16	0.32
Morozova 2008		28	0.60	46	0.00	25	0.08	25	0.30	37	0.17	22	0.23
Neighaus 1950		26	0.60	43	0.00	34	0.06	35	0.19	78	0.04	46	0.09
Niedzielski 1931		61	0.50	47	0.00	74	0.03	75	0.03	77	0.03	72	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		39	0.58	31	0.00	57	0.04	65	0.04	64	0.04	61	0.04
Osinska 1989		7	0.70	36	0.00	15	0.08	9	0.43	31	0.26	15	0.33
Pachmann 1927		76	0.44	26	0.01	79	0.02	84	0.02	54	0.05	77	0.03
Paderewski 1930		8	0.69	11	0.01	10	0.10	13	0.42	7	0.40	8	0.41
Perlemuter 1992		21	0.62	65	0.00	16	0.06	15	0.41	35	0.14	20	0.24
Pierdomenico 2008		57	0.51	58	0.00	65	0.03	72	0.03	45	0.10	55	0.05
Poblocka 1999		25	0.61	13	0.01	26	0.07	29	0.25	47	0.06	37	0.12
Rabcewiczowa 1932		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rachmaninoff 1923		38	0.58	24	0.01	28	0.07	24	0.30	42	0.12	29	0.19
Rangell 2001		72	0.45	20	0.01	78	0.02	85	0.02	68	0.03	89	0.02
Richter 1976		87	0.33	84	0.00	87	0.03	68	0.03	82	0.02	87	0.02
Rosen 1989		12	0.65	29	0.00	14	0.07	11	0.43	23	0.31	11	0.37
Rosenthal 1930		42	0.57	33	0.00	45	0.04	54	0.04	22	0.29	40	0.11
Rosenthal 1931		75	0.44	49	0.00	46	0.05	49	0.05	27	0.26	38	0.11
Rosenthal 1931b		78	0.43	79	0.00	49	0.05	48	0.05	28	0.23	41	0.11
Rosenthal 1931c		48	0.53	64	0.00	47	0.06	45	0.06	26	0.31	34	0.14
Rosenthal 1931d		74	0.44	22	0.01	48	0.04	57	0.04	32	0.18	49	0.08
Rossi 2007		65	0.50	7	0.02	40	0.05	39	0.13	11	0.41	21	0.23
Rubinstein 1939		82	0.36	75	0.00	85	0.03	76	0.03	59	0.04	71	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		56	0.51	66	0.00	52	0.03	67	0.03	33	0.26	47	0.09
Rubinstein 1966		45	0.54	71	0.00	50	0.05	47	0.05	39	0.18	45	0.09
Schilhawsky 1960		44	0.55	67	0.00	59	0.05	46	0.05	53	0.05	56	0.05
Shebanova 2002		36	0.58	50	0.00	58	0.04	56	0.04	65	0.04	63	0.04
Smith 1975		19	0.63	41	0.00	24	0.09	8	0.44	39	0.11	23	0.22
Sokolov 2002		31	0.59	38	0.00	38	0.05	37	0.16	42	0.10	36	0.13
Sztompka 1959		2	0.74	2	0.13	3	0.24	2	0.61	8	0.54	2	0.57
Tomsic 1995		46	0.54	12	0.01	43	0.04	42	0.11	34	0.22	32	0.16
Uninsky 1932		15	0.64	6	0.04	9	0.12	14	0.41	22	0.41	9	0.41
Uninsky 1971		32	0.59	55	0.00	22	0.07	27	0.27	40	0.15	26	0.20
Wasowski 1980		35	0.58	10	0.01	33	0.05	36	0.16	57	0.05	43	0.09
Zak 1937		51	0.53	73	0.00	64	0.03	79	0.03	71	0.04	74	0.03
Zak 1951		54	0.52	69	0.00	63	0.04	62	0.04	72	0.04	60	0.04
Random 1		90	-0.22	87	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	82	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		88	0.00	72	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	21	0.21	52	0.06
Random 3		89	-0.08	89	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	60	0.04	82	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).