Poblocka 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		5	0.76	21	0.01	7	0.12	7	0.50	13	0.46	11	0.48
Anderszewski 2003		44	0.61	40	0.00	18	0.09	25	0.26	11	0.45	23	0.34
Ashkenazy 1981		34	0.63	20	0.01	15	0.12	16	0.36	19	0.42	16	0.39
Bacha 2000		70	0.51	80	0.00	54	0.05	56	0.05	28	0.23	46	0.11
Badura 1965		52	0.58	75	0.00	38	0.05	32	0.19	18	0.38	29	0.27
Barbosa 1983		78	0.42	70	0.00	68	0.04	70	0.04	46	0.07	66	0.05
Biret 1990		33	0.63	84	0.00	34	0.06	30	0.21	21	0.31	31	0.26
Blet 2003		12	0.72	47	0.00	25	0.08	18	0.33	10	0.43	17	0.38
Block 1995		55	0.57	44	0.00	58	0.04	66	0.04	38	0.12	58	0.07
Blumental 1952		77	0.44	15	0.01	29	0.06	31	0.20	18	0.23	35	0.21
Boshniakovich 1969		21	0.68	13	0.01	36	0.05	36	0.16	15	0.41	30	0.26
Brailowsky 1960		71	0.50	61	0.00	77	0.03	81	0.03	65	0.04	81	0.03
Bunin 1987		42	0.61	73	0.00	40	0.06	42	0.13	14	0.43	34	0.24
Bunin 1987b		43	0.61	71	0.00	39	0.05	41	0.13	14	0.44	33	0.24
Chiu 1999		81	0.41	67	0.00	62	0.05	61	0.05	52	0.05	62	0.05
Cohen 1997		86	0.32	82	0.00	79	0.04	69	0.04	29	0.18	52	0.08
Cortot 1951		16	0.69	51	0.00	21	0.09	17	0.35	7	0.49	13	0.41
Csalog 1996		26	0.64	6	0.06	24	0.08	34	0.17	2	0.65	25	0.33
Czerny 1949		17	0.69	85	0.00	19	0.11	14	0.40	20	0.39	15	0.39
Czerny 1990		20	0.68	64	0.00	37	0.05	33	0.18	40	0.11	43	0.14
Duchoud 2007		36	0.63	65	0.00	33	0.06	29	0.23	7	0.42	27	0.31
Ezaki 2006		18	0.68	27	0.01	31	0.06	27	0.24	37	0.16	36	0.20
Falvay 1989		68	0.51	34	0.00	81	0.04	67	0.04	48	0.07	63	0.05
Farrell 1958		62	0.54	57	0.00	64	0.03	83	0.03	64	0.04	84	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		6	0.75	39	0.00	10	0.11	10	0.47	2	0.68	2	0.57
Fliere 1977		2	0.78	3	0.08	3	0.18	2	0.57	12	0.47	7	0.52
Fou 1978		58	0.55	46	0.00	59	0.05	53	0.05	61	0.04	75	0.04
Francois 1956		51	0.58	60	0.00	60	0.05	59	0.05	54	0.05	70	0.05
Friedman 1923		85	0.34	43	0.00	66	0.03	85	0.03	44	0.10	71	0.05
Friedman 1923b		84	0.35	62	0.00	63	0.03	76	0.03	57	0.06	77	0.04
Friedman 1930		75	0.44	66	0.00	67	0.04	71	0.04	42	0.15	50	0.08
Garcia 2007		60	0.55	49	0.00	47	0.05	52	0.05	11	0.43	41	0.15
Garcia 2007b		79	0.41	63	0.00	61	0.04	68	0.04	37	0.13	59	0.07
Gierzod 1998		4	0.77	8	0.04	6	0.15	3	0.56	6	0.55	4	0.55
Gornostaeva 1994		46	0.60	86	0.00	71	0.04	65	0.04	66	0.03	88	0.03
Groot 1988		56	0.56	30	0.00	65	0.03	82	0.03	50	0.05	79	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		63	0.54	68	0.00	28	0.06	28	0.23	38	0.16	37	0.19
Hatto 1993		67	0.52	32	0.00	14	0.12	26	0.25	11	0.48	22	0.35
Hatto 1997		54	0.57	7	0.05	8	0.13	19	0.33	10	0.47	14	0.39
Horowitz 1949		50	0.59	25	0.01	48	0.06	50	0.06	20	0.41	40	0.16
Indjic 1988		64	0.54	18	0.01	13	0.11	24	0.27	10	0.50	18	0.37
Kapell 1951		1	0.80	1	0.19	1	0.18	1	0.58	1	0.53	3	0.55
Kissin 1993		11	0.72	11	0.02	17	0.08	20	0.32	25	0.29	28	0.30
Kushner 1989		15	0.70	24	0.01	41	0.05	40	0.14	46	0.06	48	0.09
Luisada 1991		38	0.61	28	0.00	27	0.08	38	0.15	38	0.13	42	0.14
Lushtak 2004		28	0.64	22	0.01	23	0.11	15	0.37	16	0.34	21	0.35
Malcuzynski 1961		29	0.63	36	0.00	56	0.05	58	0.05	43	0.11	56	0.07
Magaloff 1978		59	0.55	58	0.00	75	0.03	84	0.03	62	0.04	83	0.03
Magin 1975		45	0.60	9	0.03	35	0.05	43	0.10	52	0.05	55	0.07
Michalowski 1933		39	0.61	29	0.00	16	0.12	11	0.44	8	0.48	12	0.46
Milkina 1970		25	0.65	53	0.00	55	0.06	51	0.06	57	0.05	65	0.05
Mohovich 1999		24	0.65	31	0.00	49	0.06	48	0.06	43	0.10	51	0.08
Moravec 1969		66	0.53	69	0.00	74	0.03	80	0.03	46	0.07	61	0.05
Morozova 2008		48	0.60	45	0.00	51	0.06	46	0.06	61	0.04	67	0.05
Neighaus 1950		19	0.68	23	0.01	20	0.08	12	0.41	19	0.34	19	0.37
Niedzielski 1931		41	0.61	54	0.00	45	0.04	64	0.04	9	0.45	44	0.13
Ohlsson 1999		13	0.71	17	0.01	5	0.13	5	0.52	5	0.54	6	0.53
Osinska 1989		14	0.71	50	0.00	26	0.08	21	0.30	25	0.34	26	0.32
Pachmann 1927		65	0.53	77	0.00	73	0.03	74	0.03	29	0.19	49	0.08
Paderewski 1930		23	0.66	10	0.02	30	0.07	22	0.28	6	0.43	20	0.35
Perlemuter 1992		49	0.59	74	0.00	46	0.05	55	0.05	43	0.09	54	0.07
Pierdomenico 2008		73	0.47	78	0.00	76	0.03	78	0.03	49	0.07	64	0.05
Poblocka 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Rabcewiczowa 1932		40	0.61	79	0.00	53	0.06	47	0.06	29	0.25	45	0.12
Rachmaninoff 1923		72	0.49	90	0.00	69	0.05	54	0.05	78	0.03	72	0.04
Rangell 2001		57	0.56	33	0.00	57	0.04	62	0.04	39	0.17	53	0.08
Richter 1976		10	0.72	5	0.07	12	0.12	13	0.40	1	0.64	8	0.51
Rosen 1989		22	0.66	38	0.00	52	0.08	45	0.08	53	0.05	60	0.06
Rosenthal 1930		47	0.60	81	0.00	70	0.05	60	0.05	43	0.09	57	0.07
Rosenthal 1931		80	0.41	76	0.00	85	0.02	87	0.02	56	0.04	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		82	0.41	89	0.00	86	0.04	73	0.04	73	0.03	89	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		61	0.54	42	0.00	80	0.04	63	0.04	56	0.04	80	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		76	0.44	87	0.00	84	0.03	86	0.03	63	0.05	78	0.04
Rossi 2007		87	0.24	72	0.00	87	0.03	75	0.03	67	0.04	82	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		83	0.37	16	0.01	83	0.04	72	0.04	58	0.05	74	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		74	0.46	19	0.01	82	0.05	57	0.05	57	0.05	69	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		69	0.51	26	0.01	78	0.03	77	0.03	50	0.06	76	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		3	0.77	2	0.17	2	0.24	4	0.55	1	0.61	1	0.58
Shebanova 2002		8	0.75	12	0.02	11	0.11	6	0.52	8	0.56	5	0.54
Smith 1975		35	0.63	48	0.00	50	0.06	49	0.06	77	0.03	73	0.04
Sokolov 2002		31	0.63	56	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.09	37	0.29	39	0.16
Sztompka 1959		9	0.74	14	0.01	9	0.13	8	0.49	13	0.48	10	0.48
Tomsic 1995		53	0.58	59	0.00	72	0.03	79	0.03	59	0.04	85	0.03
Uninsky 1932		32	0.63	37	0.00	22	0.10	23	0.27	19	0.44	24	0.34
Uninsky 1971		7	0.75	4	0.08	4	0.14	9	0.48	7	0.51	9	0.49
Wasowski 1980		30	0.63	35	0.00	32	0.05	35	0.16	10	0.39	32	0.25
Zak 1937		27	0.64	41	0.00	42	0.05	39	0.15	33	0.21	38	0.18
Zak 1951		37	0.62	52	0.00	43	0.08	37	0.16	56	0.06	47	0.10
Random 1		90	-0.13	83	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	59	0.04	90	0.02
Random 2		89	-0.11	55	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	37	0.13	68	0.05
Random 3		88	-0.04	88	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	45	0.06	87	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).