Perlemuter 1992

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		3	0.73	33	0.00	15	0.08	10	0.45	32	0.27	21	0.35
Anderszewski 2003		56	0.58	54	0.00	33	0.06	36	0.13	32	0.17	37	0.15
Ashkenazy 1981		53	0.59	51	0.00	49	0.04	62	0.04	58	0.04	79	0.04
Bacha 2000		68	0.50	19	0.01	74	0.03	74	0.03	53	0.06	73	0.04
Badura 1965		39	0.61	58	0.00	42	0.04	40	0.11	34	0.26	35	0.17
Barbosa 1983		45	0.60	35	0.00	55	0.05	48	0.05	15	0.36	43	0.13
Biret 1990		43	0.61	82	0.00	39	0.04	44	0.08	51	0.06	63	0.07
Blet 2003		5	0.73	21	0.01	7	0.10	7	0.51	3	0.54	3	0.52
Block 1995		33	0.62	10	0.04	12	0.09	27	0.25	2	0.51	15	0.36
Blumental 1952		61	0.55	41	0.00	59	0.04	69	0.04	44	0.09	69	0.06
Boshniakovich 1969		27	0.64	30	0.00	45	0.05	54	0.05	28	0.26	47	0.11
Brailowsky 1960		41	0.61	37	0.00	73	0.04	60	0.04	60	0.05	75	0.04
Bunin 1987		48	0.60	44	0.00	57	0.08	45	0.08	24	0.35	36	0.17
Bunin 1987b		55	0.58	50	0.00	56	0.05	53	0.05	22	0.38	41	0.14
Chiu 1999		36	0.62	68	0.00	50	0.05	52	0.05	42	0.13	54	0.08
Cohen 1997		85	0.38	77	0.00	79	0.02	87	0.02	50	0.05	86	0.03
Cortot 1951		47	0.60	78	0.00	60	0.04	67	0.04	41	0.15	58	0.08
Csalog 1996		82	0.40	45	0.00	65	0.04	70	0.04	42	0.10	67	0.06
Czerny 1949		29	0.63	46	0.00	53	0.06	46	0.06	64	0.05	71	0.05
Czerny 1990		8	0.71	71	0.00	19	0.09	13	0.41	22	0.31	16	0.36
Duchoud 2007		65	0.54	83	0.00	66	0.04	64	0.04	45	0.06	72	0.05
Ezaki 2006		10	0.71	75	0.00	27	0.07	25	0.26	36	0.17	32	0.21
Falvay 1989		18	0.67	7	0.05	38	0.06	32	0.16	24	0.38	29	0.25
Farrell 1958		50	0.59	6	0.06	11	0.09	26	0.26	10	0.41	23	0.33
Ferenczy 1958		32	0.62	42	0.00	47	0.06	47	0.06	16	0.32	42	0.14
Fliere 1977		11	0.70	11	0.04	8	0.12	4	0.52	35	0.24	17	0.35
Fou 1978		6	0.72	22	0.01	14	0.08	11	0.43	21	0.37	9	0.40
Francois 1956		19	0.67	38	0.00	22	0.08	22	0.30	17	0.42	22	0.35
Friedman 1923		86	0.37	84	0.00	86	0.03	75	0.03	41	0.15	65	0.07
Friedman 1923b		87	0.37	87	0.00	85	0.03	77	0.03	40	0.16	62	0.07
Friedman 1930		80	0.43	59	0.00	82	0.03	84	0.03	78	0.04	84	0.03
Garcia 2007		40	0.61	23	0.01	16	0.07	23	0.30	2	0.64	7	0.44
Garcia 2007b		76	0.45	62	0.00	54	0.05	49	0.05	10	0.32	44	0.13
Gierzod 1998		49	0.59	67	0.00	52	0.04	55	0.04	80	0.03	85	0.03
Gornostaeva 1994		42	0.61	18	0.01	32	0.06	30	0.17	33	0.24	34	0.20
Groot 1988		7	0.71	2	0.08	6	0.10	6	0.51	3	0.56	2	0.53
Harasiewicz 1955		1	0.73	3	0.08	2	0.11	2	0.58	6	0.47	4	0.52
Hatto 1993		81	0.41	80	0.00	83	0.03	83	0.03	51	0.06	80	0.04
Hatto 1997		73	0.45	90	0.00	78	0.03	76	0.03	57	0.05	78	0.04
Horowitz 1949		57	0.58	72	0.00	61	0.04	68	0.04	37	0.20	52	0.09
Indjic 1988		78	0.43	85	0.00	84	0.04	58	0.04	62	0.05	77	0.04
Kapell 1951		52	0.59	60	0.00	25	0.09	24	0.27	37	0.15	33	0.20
Kissin 1993		9	0.71	17	0.01	17	0.07	18	0.35	24	0.30	25	0.32
Kushner 1989		13	0.69	5	0.07	4	0.12	8	0.48	20	0.43	6	0.45
Luisada 1991		28	0.64	16	0.01	31	0.05	29	0.19	40	0.11	39	0.14
Lushtak 2004		4	0.73	9	0.04	3	0.14	3	0.53	5	0.46	5	0.49
Malcuzynski 1961		63	0.54	79	0.00	63	0.03	71	0.03	71	0.04	82	0.03
Magaloff 1978		46	0.60	34	0.00	34	0.06	37	0.12	39	0.16	40	0.14
Magin 1975		62	0.55	20	0.01	35	0.06	41	0.10	42	0.11	49	0.10
Michalowski 1933		74	0.45	88	0.00	62	0.04	56	0.04	55	0.06	70	0.05
Milkina 1970		31	0.63	24	0.01	40	0.04	39	0.11	62	0.05	61	0.07
Mohovich 1999		2	0.73	1	0.16	1	0.16	1	0.60	5	0.57	1	0.58
Moravec 1969		69	0.50	74	0.00	81	0.03	82	0.03	77	0.03	81	0.03
Morozova 2008		15	0.68	28	0.00	18	0.08	15	0.38	16	0.33	20	0.35
Neighaus 1950		17	0.67	8	0.05	5	0.11	9	0.47	22	0.32	11	0.39
Niedzielski 1931		71	0.48	52	0.00	69	0.03	78	0.03	33	0.17	60	0.07
Ohlsson 1999		64	0.54	66	0.00	64	0.03	72	0.03	74	0.03	83	0.03
Osinska 1989		24	0.65	57	0.00	51	0.04	57	0.04	62	0.04	74	0.04
Pachmann 1927		59	0.56	40	0.00	71	0.03	80	0.03	27	0.21	55	0.08
Paderewski 1930		44	0.60	27	0.00	58	0.05	51	0.05	33	0.17	53	0.09
Perlemuter 1992		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Pierdomenico 2008		67	0.51	55	0.00	67	0.03	73	0.03	42	0.13	66	0.06
Poblocka 1999		51	0.59	48	0.00	44	0.04	43	0.09	55	0.05	59	0.07
Rabcewiczowa 1932		35	0.62	69	0.00	30	0.06	35	0.14	15	0.41	30	0.24
Rachmaninoff 1923		21	0.66	12	0.03	9	0.08	16	0.37	16	0.38	13	0.37
Rangell 2001		83	0.39	70	0.00	80	0.02	86	0.02	53	0.04	87	0.03
Richter 1976		38	0.62	15	0.01	37	0.06	33	0.16	16	0.42	28	0.26
Rosen 1989		54	0.58	65	0.00	48	0.04	66	0.04	37	0.15	57	0.08
Rosenthal 1930		70	0.49	63	0.00	68	0.03	81	0.03	30	0.23	56	0.08
Rosenthal 1931		75	0.45	81	0.00	75	0.03	79	0.03	26	0.31	50	0.10
Rosenthal 1931b		79	0.43	56	0.00	76	0.04	65	0.04	24	0.32	48	0.11
Rosenthal 1931c		72	0.46	29	0.00	70	0.04	63	0.04	22	0.35	45	0.12
Rosenthal 1931d		77	0.44	26	0.00	77	0.04	59	0.04	39	0.13	64	0.07
Rossi 2007		60	0.56	39	0.00	72	0.03	85	0.03	16	0.37	46	0.11
Rubinstein 1939		84	0.39	61	0.00	87	0.04	61	0.04	56	0.05	76	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		66	0.53	13	0.03	36	0.06	31	0.17	27	0.31	31	0.23
Rubinstein 1966		58	0.57	4	0.07	29	0.06	38	0.11	38	0.20	38	0.15
Schilhawsky 1960		22	0.66	14	0.02	13	0.09	12	0.41	31	0.33	14	0.37
Shebanova 2002		30	0.63	32	0.00	43	0.05	42	0.10	77	0.04	68	0.06
Smith 1975		20	0.67	25	0.01	21	0.07	17	0.36	19	0.35	18	0.35
Sokolov 2002		34	0.62	53	0.00	20	0.08	20	0.34	18	0.41	12	0.37
Sztompka 1959		16	0.68	43	0.00	24	0.09	14	0.40	20	0.40	10	0.40
Tomsic 1995		26	0.64	76	0.00	41	0.04	34	0.15	15	0.48	27	0.27
Uninsky 1932		23	0.66	47	0.00	28	0.07	28	0.21	20	0.43	26	0.30
Uninsky 1971		25	0.64	49	0.00	26	0.11	21	0.31	19	0.39	19	0.35
Wasowski 1980		37	0.62	64	0.00	46	0.05	50	0.05	29	0.17	51	0.09
Zak 1937		14	0.68	36	0.00	23	0.08	19	0.35	24	0.31	24	0.33
Zak 1951		12	0.70	31	0.00	10	0.09	5	0.52	18	0.34	8	0.42
Random 1		88	-0.11	89	0.00	89	0.01	88	0.01	51	0.04	89	0.02
Random 2		90	-0.16	73	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	66	0.03	88	0.02
Random 3		89	-0.15	86	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	73	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).