Ohlsson 1999

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		13	0.71	41	0.00	13	0.12	14	0.43	16	0.43	15	0.43
Anderszewski 2003		12	0.71	59	0.00	19	0.07	22	0.33	14	0.41	21	0.37
Ashkenazy 1981		6	0.77	23	0.01	4	0.23	4	0.57	1	0.59	4	0.58
Bacha 2000		34	0.64	65	0.00	41	0.04	41	0.10	9	0.45	34	0.21
Badura 1965		49	0.59	78	0.00	39	0.05	37	0.16	21	0.36	33	0.24
Barbosa 1983		67	0.51	33	0.00	55	0.05	46	0.05	18	0.31	44	0.12
Biret 1990		8	0.73	46	0.00	15	0.13	19	0.39	7	0.46	16	0.42
Blet 2003		45	0.60	60	0.00	54	0.04	58	0.04	41	0.10	70	0.06
Block 1995		80	0.44	77	0.00	80	0.03	84	0.03	57	0.04	87	0.03
Blumental 1952		76	0.47	71	0.00	76	0.03	85	0.03	52	0.04	88	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		36	0.63	68	0.00	51	0.04	65	0.04	49	0.06	75	0.05
Brailowsky 1960		40	0.61	52	0.00	62	0.04	71	0.04	43	0.11	64	0.07
Bunin 1987		58	0.57	53	0.00	66	0.05	48	0.05	30	0.30	45	0.12
Bunin 1987b		60	0.56	19	0.01	65	0.04	57	0.04	26	0.33	48	0.11
Chiu 1999		59	0.56	29	0.00	28	0.05	29	0.26	13	0.47	22	0.35
Cohen 1997		86	0.39	28	0.00	82	0.04	59	0.04	58	0.04	80	0.04
Cortot 1951		47	0.59	74	0.00	53	0.05	55	0.05	37	0.18	55	0.09
Csalog 1996		77	0.46	16	0.01	42	0.05	43	0.09	23	0.30	38	0.16
Czerny 1949		30	0.65	67	0.00	32	0.07	25	0.29	32	0.25	30	0.27
Czerny 1990		17	0.68	13	0.01	35	0.07	35	0.17	44	0.08	46	0.12
Duchoud 2007		1	0.80	2	0.21	2	0.30	2	0.62	1	0.73	1	0.67
Ezaki 2006		11	0.71	49	0.00	24	0.09	24	0.29	25	0.31	26	0.30
Falvay 1989		70	0.50	10	0.02	57	0.04	66	0.04	49	0.07	73	0.05
Farrell 1958		32	0.65	15	0.01	52	0.05	54	0.05	41	0.11	66	0.07
Ferenczy 1958		63	0.54	61	0.00	71	0.04	69	0.04	43	0.07	74	0.05
Fliere 1977		3	0.79	20	0.01	6	0.16	7	0.52	11	0.48	9	0.50
Fou 1978		54	0.57	48	0.00	27	0.05	40	0.14	36	0.14	42	0.14
Francois 1956		41	0.61	62	0.00	48	0.05	45	0.05	41	0.13	62	0.08
Friedman 1923		82	0.43	79	0.00	78	0.03	78	0.03	33	0.24	63	0.08
Friedman 1923b		81	0.44	80	0.00	77	0.03	81	0.03	33	0.25	54	0.09
Friedman 1930		69	0.50	58	0.00	72	0.04	72	0.04	32	0.24	53	0.10
Garcia 2007		62	0.54	70	0.00	61	0.04	67	0.04	30	0.29	50	0.11
Garcia 2007b		72	0.49	85	0.00	67	0.04	60	0.04	26	0.19	57	0.09
Gierzod 1998		2	0.79	3	0.07	3	0.19	3	0.61	3	0.62	3	0.61
Gornostaeva 1994		31	0.65	25	0.00	45	0.04	62	0.04	36	0.17	61	0.08
Groot 1988		55	0.57	9	0.02	50	0.05	52	0.05	70	0.04	82	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		64	0.54	32	0.00	38	0.06	38	0.15	50	0.05	56	0.09
Hatto 1993		25	0.67	84	0.00	12	0.10	13	0.44	4	0.62	8	0.52
Hatto 1997		15	0.69	54	0.00	10	0.09	10	0.44	4	0.57	11	0.50
Horowitz 1949		56	0.57	66	0.00	59	0.04	73	0.04	34	0.32	49	0.11
Indjic 1988		18	0.68	18	0.01	9	0.10	9	0.45	3	0.63	6	0.53
Kapell 1951		21	0.68	55	0.00	20	0.07	15	0.40	21	0.34	20	0.37
Kissin 1993		38	0.62	51	0.00	23	0.08	23	0.33	22	0.32	25	0.32
Kushner 1989		9	0.72	36	0.00	14	0.09	16	0.40	9	0.49	14	0.44
Luisada 1991		16	0.68	39	0.00	17	0.13	12	0.44	17	0.46	13	0.45
Lushtak 2004		20	0.68	21	0.01	11	0.09	21	0.38	10	0.41	19	0.39
Malcuzynski 1961		46	0.59	45	0.00	63	0.03	77	0.03	46	0.06	78	0.04
Magaloff 1978		39	0.62	35	0.00	56	0.04	63	0.04	64	0.04	76	0.04
Magin 1975		23	0.67	8	0.02	16	0.10	11	0.44	5	0.50	12	0.47
Michalowski 1933		48	0.59	76	0.00	31	0.07	28	0.26	17	0.41	24	0.33
Milkina 1970		28	0.66	81	0.00	37	0.06	36	0.17	35	0.17	36	0.17
Mohovich 1999		22	0.67	27	0.00	40	0.05	39	0.15	36	0.20	37	0.17
Moravec 1969		79	0.45	73	0.00	81	0.03	79	0.03	59	0.04	83	0.03
Morozova 2008		37	0.63	47	0.00	29	0.05	31	0.25	23	0.24	32	0.24
Neighaus 1950		4	0.78	4	0.05	8	0.19	6	0.54	8	0.50	7	0.52
Niedzielski 1931		50	0.58	31	0.00	60	0.03	76	0.03	30	0.24	58	0.08
Ohlsson 1999		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Osinska 1989		24	0.67	14	0.01	36	0.09	32	0.24	34	0.19	35	0.21
Pachmann 1927		74	0.48	42	0.00	74	0.04	70	0.04	43	0.10	69	0.06
Paderewski 1930		52	0.58	50	0.00	75	0.04	68	0.04	55	0.04	79	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		65	0.54	72	0.00	64	0.03	74	0.03	72	0.03	84	0.03
Pierdomenico 2008		57	0.57	57	0.00	47	0.05	51	0.05	16	0.42	41	0.14
Poblocka 1999		10	0.71	5	0.05	5	0.18	5	0.54	5	0.52	5	0.53
Rabcewiczowa 1932		53	0.58	44	0.00	69	0.04	64	0.04	65	0.04	77	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		42	0.61	34	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.08	35	0.16	47	0.11
Rangell 2001		44	0.60	38	0.00	46	0.05	47	0.05	11	0.44	39	0.15
Richter 1976		73	0.49	64	0.00	70	0.04	61	0.04	30	0.26	52	0.10
Rosen 1989		19	0.68	43	0.00	34	0.06	30	0.25	21	0.34	28	0.29
Rosenthal 1930		68	0.51	82	0.00	79	0.03	75	0.03	41	0.12	71	0.06
Rosenthal 1931		84	0.41	87	0.00	85	0.03	87	0.03	49	0.04	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		85	0.40	86	0.00	86	0.03	80	0.03	59	0.04	89	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		71	0.50	11	0.02	83	0.05	53	0.05	42	0.09	68	0.07
Rosenthal 1931d		83	0.43	88	0.00	84	0.03	86	0.03	54	0.05	81	0.04
Rossi 2007		87	0.29	69	0.00	87	0.03	83	0.03	68	0.04	85	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		75	0.48	24	0.01	73	0.03	82	0.03	40	0.17	65	0.07
Rubinstein 1952		78	0.46	30	0.00	49	0.05	49	0.05	49	0.07	72	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		43	0.61	22	0.01	58	0.05	50	0.05	43	0.14	59	0.08
Schilhawsky 1960		29	0.66	40	0.00	21	0.08	17	0.39	16	0.44	18	0.41
Shebanova 2002		5	0.78	1	0.28	1	0.28	1	0.63	3	0.61	2	0.62
Smith 1975		26	0.66	26	0.00	33	0.05	34	0.17	38	0.12	40	0.14
Sokolov 2002		7	0.76	6	0.04	7	0.16	8	0.45	2	0.55	10	0.50
Sztompka 1959		14	0.70	56	0.00	26	0.06	27	0.26	33	0.27	31	0.26
Tomsic 1995		61	0.55	63	0.00	68	0.05	56	0.05	44	0.09	67	0.07
Uninsky 1932		66	0.54	83	0.00	43	0.04	42	0.10	39	0.19	43	0.14
Uninsky 1971		51	0.58	7	0.03	25	0.06	26	0.27	27	0.34	27	0.30
Wasowski 1980		35	0.64	37	0.00	30	0.06	33	0.20	12	0.38	29	0.28
Zak 1937		27	0.66	12	0.01	22	0.08	20	0.39	16	0.43	17	0.41
Zak 1951		33	0.64	17	0.01	18	0.08	18	0.39	23	0.30	23	0.34
Random 1		90	-0.14	89	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	45	0.06	90	0.02
Random 2		89	-0.02	75	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	12	0.34	60	0.08
Random 3		88	0.11	90	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	3	0.60	51	0.11

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).