Morozova 2008

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		6	0.71	7	0.04	3	0.13	3	0.50	17	0.43	6	0.46
Anderszewski 2003		36	0.61	54	0.00	42	0.05	42	0.10	27	0.20	42	0.14
Ashkenazy 1981		11	0.69	10	0.02	9	0.13	7	0.42	23	0.36	8	0.39
Bacha 2000		83	0.40	52	0.00	50	0.04	58	0.04	46	0.07	71	0.05
Badura 1965		15	0.67	6	0.06	11	0.08	9	0.38	2	0.61	5	0.48
Barbosa 1983		56	0.55	36	0.00	52	0.05	46	0.05	23	0.27	46	0.12
Biret 1990		40	0.60	39	0.00	25	0.06	31	0.21	35	0.19	35	0.20
Blet 2003		19	0.67	63	0.00	34	0.07	26	0.24	23	0.31	21	0.27
Block 1995		70	0.50	58	0.00	46	0.04	56	0.04	39	0.11	68	0.07
Blumental 1952		39	0.60	12	0.01	39	0.05	38	0.13	19	0.23	38	0.17
Boshniakovich 1969		18	0.67	76	0.00	30	0.05	33	0.18	18	0.39	23	0.26
Brailowsky 1960		48	0.58	9	0.02	63	0.04	49	0.04	35	0.23	51	0.10
Bunin 1987		59	0.54	49	0.00	69	0.04	52	0.04	34	0.26	56	0.10
Bunin 1987b		61	0.54	37	0.00	68	0.04	54	0.04	35	0.27	54	0.10
Chiu 1999		23	0.65	27	0.01	29	0.05	25	0.24	10	0.49	13	0.34
Cohen 1997		87	0.26	68	0.00	87	0.04	60	0.04	79	0.03	84	0.03
Cortot 1951		46	0.59	47	0.00	59	0.04	64	0.04	32	0.21	61	0.09
Csalog 1996		86	0.29	72	0.00	86	0.03	69	0.03	70	0.04	83	0.03
Czerny 1949		26	0.63	5	0.07	8	0.16	10	0.35	29	0.28	17	0.31
Czerny 1990		5	0.72	16	0.01	7	0.15	6	0.42	19	0.39	7	0.40
Duchoud 2007		50	0.57	79	0.00	44	0.04	43	0.08	21	0.35	37	0.17
Ezaki 2006		3	0.75	4	0.08	6	0.14	15	0.33	21	0.33	15	0.33
Falvay 1989		62	0.53	41	0.00	71	0.03	70	0.03	60	0.05	76	0.04
Farrell 1958		38	0.60	20	0.01	47	0.04	62	0.04	25	0.25	53	0.10
Ferenczy 1958		69	0.50	48	0.00	84	0.02	84	0.02	75	0.03	88	0.02
Fliere 1977		2	0.75	2	0.15	2	0.14	2	0.55	13	0.45	3	0.50
Fou 1978		14	0.68	28	0.00	13	0.09	12	0.34	16	0.39	10	0.36
Francois 1956		66	0.51	78	0.00	37	0.05	39	0.12	34	0.22	40	0.16
Friedman 1923		75	0.47	75	0.00	77	0.04	65	0.04	28	0.29	50	0.11
Friedman 1923b		74	0.48	81	0.00	76	0.02	87	0.02	28	0.29	66	0.08
Friedman 1930		57	0.54	35	0.00	65	0.04	47	0.04	30	0.28	48	0.11
Garcia 2007		55	0.56	86	0.00	66	0.04	59	0.04	28	0.30	49	0.11
Garcia 2007b		65	0.52	85	0.00	62	0.04	57	0.04	25	0.19	62	0.09
Gierzod 1998		43	0.60	33	0.00	28	0.05	34	0.18	44	0.11	44	0.14
Gornostaeva 1994		54	0.56	14	0.01	48	0.04	66	0.04	47	0.05	79	0.04
Groot 1988		53	0.56	31	0.00	38	0.05	41	0.11	37	0.20	41	0.15
Harasiewicz 1955		20	0.66	82	0.00	22	0.06	27	0.24	35	0.18	33	0.21
Hatto 1993		34	0.62	53	0.00	31	0.06	29	0.22	21	0.26	29	0.24
Hatto 1997		24	0.64	87	0.00	18	0.06	24	0.24	22	0.27	26	0.25
Horowitz 1949		45	0.59	42	0.00	64	0.04	48	0.04	25	0.38	45	0.12
Indjic 1988		32	0.62	77	0.00	32	0.09	28	0.22	21	0.29	25	0.25
Kapell 1951		52	0.56	38	0.00	43	0.04	44	0.07	71	0.04	73	0.05
Kissin 1993		8	0.70	64	0.00	19	0.06	18	0.30	19	0.38	14	0.34
Kushner 1989		4	0.73	1	0.20	1	0.20	1	0.58	2	0.60	1	0.59
Luisada 1991		1	0.78	3	0.09	5	0.12	5	0.46	7	0.50	4	0.48
Lushtak 2004		10	0.69	22	0.01	12	0.09	13	0.34	21	0.28	18	0.31
Malcuzynski 1961		67	0.51	71	0.00	58	0.03	71	0.03	81	0.03	81	0.03
Magaloff 1978		64	0.52	25	0.01	49	0.04	63	0.04	63	0.04	75	0.04
Magin 1975		7	0.70	13	0.01	10	0.12	20	0.27	15	0.31	19	0.29
Michalowski 1933		68	0.50	51	0.00	45	0.04	67	0.04	42	0.16	64	0.08
Milkina 1970		47	0.59	21	0.01	15	0.07	19	0.27	31	0.24	24	0.25
Mohovich 1999		35	0.61	55	0.00	51	0.04	53	0.04	61	0.04	78	0.04
Moravec 1969		80	0.43	26	0.01	56	0.03	75	0.03	36	0.23	63	0.08
Morozova 2008		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Neighaus 1950		33	0.62	11	0.02	26	0.05	14	0.34	41	0.12	36	0.20
Niedzielski 1931		81	0.43	67	0.00	73	0.03	80	0.03	54	0.04	80	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		29	0.63	24	0.01	27	0.06	23	0.24	31	0.25	28	0.24
Osinska 1989		25	0.64	32	0.00	21	0.06	22	0.25	32	0.24	27	0.24
Pachmann 1927		76	0.45	83	0.00	85	0.03	72	0.03	71	0.04	82	0.03
Paderewski 1930		72	0.50	65	0.00	83	0.02	83	0.02	72	0.03	87	0.02
Perlemuter 1992		13	0.68	74	0.00	20	0.07	16	0.33	15	0.38	11	0.35
Pierdomenico 2008		58	0.54	84	0.00	61	0.03	68	0.03	32	0.31	52	0.10
Poblocka 1999		44	0.60	61	0.00	54	0.04	61	0.04	46	0.06	72	0.05
Rabcewiczowa 1932		42	0.60	40	0.00	24	0.06	37	0.17	25	0.30	30	0.23
Rachmaninoff 1923		9	0.70	19	0.01	4	0.11	4	0.49	3	0.57	2	0.53
Rangell 2001		85	0.36	34	0.00	72	0.03	78	0.03	80	0.03	85	0.03
Richter 1976		49	0.58	69	0.00	67	0.04	51	0.04	26	0.28	47	0.11
Rosen 1989		37	0.61	8	0.02	23	0.06	30	0.22	29	0.24	31	0.23
Rosenthal 1930		71	0.50	56	0.00	57	0.03	77	0.03	24	0.27	60	0.09
Rosenthal 1931		79	0.43	60	0.00	79	0.03	79	0.03	28	0.23	65	0.08
Rosenthal 1931b		82	0.40	80	0.00	80	0.03	76	0.03	36	0.10	74	0.05
Rosenthal 1931c		78	0.43	45	0.00	78	0.02	86	0.02	38	0.18	69	0.06
Rosenthal 1931d		84	0.38	73	0.00	81	0.02	88	0.02	52	0.05	86	0.03
Rossi 2007		73	0.49	66	0.00	82	0.03	82	0.03	36	0.17	67	0.07
Rubinstein 1939		63	0.53	23	0.01	74	0.03	81	0.03	27	0.30	57	0.09
Rubinstein 1952		77	0.45	30	0.00	75	0.03	74	0.03	42	0.14	70	0.06
Rubinstein 1966		41	0.60	50	0.00	53	0.05	45	0.05	22	0.40	43	0.14
Schilhawsky 1960		31	0.62	70	0.00	35	0.07	36	0.17	36	0.26	32	0.21
Shebanova 2002		28	0.63	15	0.01	17	0.06	17	0.31	19	0.35	16	0.33
Smith 1975		22	0.65	29	0.00	40	0.06	35	0.17	32	0.16	39	0.16
Sokolov 2002		30	0.62	46	0.00	36	0.06	32	0.20	30	0.35	22	0.26
Sztompka 1959		17	0.67	17	0.01	33	0.06	21	0.26	25	0.32	20	0.29
Tomsic 1995		60	0.54	62	0.00	70	0.04	50	0.04	35	0.20	58	0.09
Uninsky 1932		27	0.63	57	0.00	55	0.04	55	0.04	32	0.26	55	0.10
Uninsky 1971		51	0.57	59	0.00	60	0.03	73	0.03	65	0.05	77	0.04
Wasowski 1980		21	0.66	43	0.00	41	0.05	40	0.11	13	0.36	34	0.20
Zak 1937		16	0.67	44	0.00	16	0.06	11	0.34	22	0.36	12	0.35
Zak 1951		12	0.68	18	0.01	14	0.09	8	0.40	20	0.34	9	0.37
Random 1		90	-0.16	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	67	0.03	89	0.02
Random 2		88	-0.04	88	0.00	88	0.02	85	0.02	10	0.38	59	0.09
Random 3		89	-0.11	89	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	68	0.04	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).