Moravec 1969

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		9	0.61	12	0.02	18	0.07	25	0.34	58	0.04	29	0.12
Anderszewski 2003		68	0.41	38	0.00	59	0.03	80	0.03	72	0.03	72	0.03
Ashkenazy 1981		53	0.48	18	0.01	30	0.06	35	0.24	68	0.03	44	0.08
Bacha 2000		31	0.55	49	0.00	15	0.07	22	0.36	43	0.14	20	0.22
Badura 1965		71	0.40	9	0.02	50	0.03	65	0.03	76	0.03	76	0.03
Barbosa 1983		56	0.45	54	0.00	54	0.03	70	0.03	68	0.04	71	0.03
Biret 1990		8	0.62	20	0.00	6	0.15	7	0.49	43	0.12	18	0.24
Blet 2003		39	0.53	72	0.00	56	0.03	74	0.03	78	0.03	73	0.03
Block 1995		70	0.40	81	0.00	75	0.04	63	0.04	87	0.02	77	0.03
Blumental 1952		21	0.58	2	0.18	2	0.26	3	0.62	1	0.50	3	0.56
Boshniakovich 1969		74	0.37	88	0.00	84	0.03	78	0.03	74	0.03	78	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		40	0.53	73	0.00	38	0.06	42	0.18	64	0.04	38	0.08
Bunin 1987		82	0.30	48	0.00	87	0.04	60	0.04	84	0.02	80	0.03
Bunin 1987b		83	0.29	69	0.00	86	0.02	86	0.02	84	0.02	87	0.02
Chiu 1999		57	0.45	53	0.00	34	0.06	34	0.24	46	0.07	26	0.13
Cohen 1997		76	0.35	19	0.00	70	0.04	64	0.04	51	0.05	57	0.04
Cortot 1951		10	0.61	76	0.00	17	0.09	16	0.40	26	0.29	12	0.34
Csalog 1996		11	0.61	58	0.00	12	0.09	18	0.39	9	0.49	6	0.44
Czerny 1949		14	0.60	10	0.02	13	0.07	11	0.46	38	0.16	16	0.27
Czerny 1990		1	0.73	1	0.38	1	0.37	1	0.72	13	0.47	2	0.58
Duchoud 2007		55	0.47	33	0.00	68	0.04	62	0.04	69	0.04	56	0.04
Ezaki 2006		23	0.57	14	0.01	25	0.08	19	0.39	57	0.04	28	0.12
Falvay 1989		3	0.67	3	0.05	4	0.16	8	0.49	14	0.47	4	0.48
Farrell 1958		29	0.56	41	0.00	37	0.07	32	0.26	60	0.05	31	0.11
Ferenczy 1958		46	0.51	15	0.01	20	0.07	44	0.14	52	0.05	41	0.08
Fliere 1977		38	0.53	68	0.00	48	0.04	61	0.04	75	0.03	61	0.03
Fou 1978		52	0.48	70	0.00	53	0.03	66	0.03	77	0.04	66	0.03
Francois 1956		6	0.65	7	0.03	8	0.14	14	0.41	32	0.23	14	0.31
Friedman 1923		87	0.20	86	0.00	82	0.03	69	0.03	55	0.06	60	0.04
Friedman 1923b		86	0.21	71	0.00	81	0.03	68	0.03	54	0.06	58	0.04
Friedman 1930		79	0.32	30	0.00	74	0.04	52	0.04	64	0.05	55	0.04
Garcia 2007		73	0.38	79	0.00	76	0.03	67	0.03	65	0.04	75	0.03
Garcia 2007b		85	0.22	85	0.00	80	0.04	50	0.04	83	0.02	86	0.03
Gierzod 1998		15	0.59	75	0.00	28	0.07	30	0.32	63	0.04	33	0.11
Gornostaeva 1994		36	0.54	27	0.00	60	0.03	83	0.03	75	0.03	81	0.03
Groot 1988		35	0.54	61	0.00	52	0.03	75	0.03	76	0.03	83	0.03
Harasiewicz 1955		69	0.40	43	0.00	61	0.03	76	0.03	66	0.03	85	0.03
Hatto 1993		84	0.29	40	0.00	78	0.04	57	0.04	79	0.03	84	0.03
Hatto 1997		78	0.33	39	0.00	77	0.03	72	0.03	81	0.03	74	0.03
Horowitz 1949		51	0.48	32	0.00	64	0.03	73	0.03	82	0.03	68	0.03
Indjic 1988		81	0.32	51	0.00	79	0.05	48	0.05	84	0.03	52	0.04
Kapell 1951		7	0.64	8	0.03	10	0.09	6	0.50	52	0.05	23	0.16
Kissin 1993		24	0.57	74	0.00	35	0.06	26	0.34	48	0.06	25	0.14
Kushner 1989		13	0.61	57	0.00	31	0.06	27	0.33	64	0.04	32	0.11
Luisada 1991		54	0.47	47	0.00	29	0.06	38	0.22	60	0.04	36	0.09
Lushtak 2004		63	0.43	64	0.00	57	0.03	82	0.03	87	0.02	89	0.02
Malcuzynski 1961		17	0.59	6	0.03	14	0.09	23	0.35	34	0.15	19	0.23
Magaloff 1978		22	0.58	34	0.00	36	0.07	21	0.36	55	0.05	27	0.13
Magin 1975		66	0.42	77	0.00	55	0.04	51	0.04	82	0.03	65	0.03
Michalowski 1933		77	0.34	16	0.01	72	0.04	54	0.04	62	0.05	50	0.04
Milkina 1970		4	0.67	21	0.00	5	0.12	4	0.55	42	0.09	21	0.22
Mohovich 1999		28	0.56	36	0.00	44	0.10	40	0.20	81	0.03	43	0.08
Moravec 1969		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Morozova 2008		64	0.43	78	0.00	32	0.07	36	0.23	75	0.03	40	0.08
Neighaus 1950		62	0.43	82	0.00	73	0.05	49	0.05	82	0.03	59	0.04
Niedzielski 1931		2	0.67	5	0.04	3	0.27	2	0.63	1	0.61	1	0.62
Ohlsson 1999		60	0.45	46	0.00	69	0.04	59	0.04	79	0.03	70	0.03
Osinska 1989		5	0.66	65	0.00	9	0.08	9	0.47	53	0.05	24	0.15
Pachmann 1927		75	0.35	60	0.00	83	0.02	87	0.02	73	0.04	69	0.03
Paderewski 1930		33	0.55	45	0.00	43	0.08	41	0.20	68	0.03	39	0.08
Perlemuter 1992		48	0.50	66	0.00	62	0.03	77	0.03	82	0.03	62	0.03
Pierdomenico 2008		65	0.42	62	0.00	58	0.03	84	0.03	61	0.04	64	0.03
Poblocka 1999		37	0.53	83	0.00	47	0.07	46	0.07	80	0.03	48	0.05
Rabcewiczowa 1932		12	0.61	28	0.00	11	0.13	10	0.46	32	0.22	13	0.32
Rachmaninoff 1923		27	0.56	4	0.05	7	0.15	5	0.53	32	0.17	15	0.30
Rangell 2001		61	0.44	44	0.00	71	0.04	55	0.04	85	0.03	82	0.03
Richter 1976		80	0.32	50	0.00	85	0.02	85	0.02	83	0.02	88	0.02
Rosen 1989		34	0.55	87	0.00	41	0.06	39	0.21	85	0.03	42	0.08
Rosenthal 1930		16	0.59	17	0.01	21	0.06	13	0.43	21	0.33	10	0.38
Rosenthal 1931		42	0.52	63	0.00	23	0.08	24	0.34	19	0.42	9	0.38
Rosenthal 1931b		45	0.51	59	0.00	24	0.10	29	0.33	15	0.39	11	0.36
Rosenthal 1931c		19	0.59	26	0.00	16	0.08	12	0.44	12	0.49	5	0.46
Rosenthal 1931d		26	0.57	29	0.00	22	0.08	17	0.39	12	0.46	7	0.42
Rossi 2007		72	0.39	52	0.00	42	0.07	43	0.17	12	0.39	17	0.26
Rubinstein 1939		67	0.41	31	0.00	67	0.03	79	0.03	37	0.18	45	0.07
Rubinstein 1952		20	0.58	11	0.02	19	0.08	15	0.40	24	0.38	8	0.39
Rubinstein 1966		47	0.51	35	0.00	49	0.04	58	0.04	78	0.04	53	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		50	0.49	56	0.00	63	0.04	53	0.04	75	0.04	54	0.04
Shebanova 2002		25	0.57	55	0.00	26	0.06	28	0.33	82	0.03	35	0.10
Smith 1975		30	0.55	23	0.00	27	0.06	20	0.37	73	0.03	30	0.11
Sokolov 2002		59	0.45	42	0.00	66	0.03	81	0.03	84	0.03	63	0.03
Sztompka 1959		44	0.52	22	0.00	45	0.06	47	0.06	69	0.04	49	0.05
Tomsic 1995		49	0.49	90	0.00	65	0.03	71	0.03	68	0.04	67	0.03
Uninsky 1932		43	0.52	13	0.01	46	0.08	45	0.08	68	0.04	46	0.06
Uninsky 1971		58	0.45	80	0.00	51	0.04	56	0.04	78	0.04	51	0.04
Wasowski 1980		18	0.59	37	0.00	33	0.06	37	0.22	32	0.15	22	0.18
Zak 1937		32	0.55	24	0.00	39	0.07	31	0.27	77	0.04	34	0.10
Zak 1951		41	0.53	25	0.00	40	0.07	33	0.26	77	0.03	37	0.09
Random 1		90	-0.18	89	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	69	0.03	90	0.02
Random 2		89	-0.08	67	0.00	88	0.02	89	0.02	34	0.16	47	0.06
Random 3		88	-0.03	84	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	67	0.04	79	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).