Magaloff 1978

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		41	0.61	52	0.00	49	0.08	45	0.08	60	0.04	58	0.06
Anderszewski 2003		44	0.60	49	0.00	54	0.05	53	0.05	57	0.04	70	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		46	0.59	17	0.01	50	0.06	51	0.06	65	0.04	64	0.05
Bacha 2000		32	0.62	45	0.00	45	0.06	49	0.06	19	0.34	39	0.14
Badura 1965		78	0.44	76	0.00	75	0.04	76	0.04	61	0.04	76	0.04
Barbosa 1983		74	0.45	23	0.01	59	0.05	59	0.05	53	0.06	62	0.05
Biret 1990		21	0.66	47	0.00	39	0.05	35	0.18	60	0.05	51	0.09
Blet 2003		63	0.52	67	0.00	70	0.05	54	0.05	69	0.03	71	0.04
Block 1995		50	0.58	57	0.00	46	0.06	52	0.06	27	0.26	46	0.12
Blumental 1952		70	0.46	68	0.00	72	0.04	74	0.04	83	0.02	85	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		35	0.62	6	0.05	11	0.07	38	0.16	59	0.05	50	0.09
Brailowsky 1960		3	0.74	2	0.17	2	0.18	7	0.48	1	0.61	2	0.54
Bunin 1987		73	0.45	50	0.00	78	0.03	77	0.03	54	0.05	77	0.04
Bunin 1987b		75	0.44	33	0.00	77	0.03	83	0.03	54	0.05	66	0.04
Chiu 1999		62	0.52	82	0.00	47	0.08	46	0.08	36	0.18	43	0.12
Cohen 1997		71	0.46	56	0.00	68	0.04	69	0.04	10	0.39	47	0.12
Cortot 1951		64	0.50	53	0.00	81	0.03	85	0.03	71	0.04	86	0.03
Csalog 1996		79	0.44	81	0.00	74	0.03	84	0.03	73	0.03	82	0.03
Czerny 1949		56	0.55	69	0.00	66	0.04	75	0.04	69	0.04	74	0.04
Czerny 1990		17	0.69	16	0.02	19	0.07	10	0.44	35	0.17	27	0.27
Duchoud 2007		68	0.47	62	0.00	80	0.02	87	0.02	77	0.03	88	0.02
Ezaki 2006		14	0.69	61	0.00	31	0.07	27	0.30	40	0.14	32	0.20
Falvay 1989		5	0.72	1	0.17	1	0.17	1	0.57	5	0.62	1	0.59
Farrell 1958		10	0.70	44	0.00	18	0.08	9	0.47	6	0.49	9	0.48
Ferenczy 1958		76	0.44	90	0.00	85	0.03	78	0.03	66	0.04	83	0.03
Fliere 1977		2	0.74	3	0.09	5	0.12	2	0.56	25	0.31	13	0.42
Fou 1978		25	0.65	32	0.00	21	0.09	13	0.42	27	0.30	18	0.35
Francois 1956		22	0.66	26	0.00	25	0.07	22	0.32	22	0.37	19	0.34
Friedman 1923		87	0.30	84	0.00	87	0.04	72	0.04	66	0.05	79	0.04
Friedman 1923b		86	0.30	78	0.00	86	0.04	65	0.04	64	0.05	78	0.04
Friedman 1930		69	0.47	65	0.00	62	0.04	67	0.04	66	0.05	73	0.04
Garcia 2007		67	0.47	80	0.00	73	0.04	61	0.04	53	0.05	75	0.04
Garcia 2007b		85	0.36	85	0.00	79	0.03	80	0.03	66	0.04	87	0.03
Gierzod 1998		11	0.70	34	0.00	32	0.08	23	0.32	34	0.24	25	0.28
Gornostaeva 1994		4	0.74	46	0.00	10	0.08	5	0.49	8	0.53	4	0.51
Groot 1988		8	0.71	8	0.04	3	0.13	3	0.50	12	0.51	7	0.50
Harasiewicz 1955		59	0.54	51	0.00	35	0.06	37	0.16	48	0.05	52	0.09
Hatto 1993		82	0.41	73	0.00	65	0.04	60	0.04	33	0.17	54	0.08
Hatto 1997		77	0.44	48	0.00	61	0.05	57	0.05	37	0.13	53	0.08
Horowitz 1949		51	0.57	72	0.00	57	0.07	48	0.07	54	0.04	60	0.05
Indjic 1988		81	0.42	63	0.00	64	0.04	71	0.04	38	0.14	55	0.07
Kapell 1951		52	0.55	83	0.00	63	0.04	73	0.04	60	0.04	65	0.04
Kissin 1993		9	0.70	21	0.01	8	0.09	4	0.50	21	0.36	14	0.42
Kushner 1989		12	0.70	42	0.00	33	0.09	29	0.29	41	0.14	33	0.20
Luisada 1991		31	0.62	12	0.02	27	0.07	28	0.29	36	0.17	30	0.22
Lushtak 2004		43	0.60	4	0.05	16	0.08	24	0.31	29	0.22	28	0.26
Malcuzynski 1961		20	0.68	64	0.00	34	0.10	30	0.26	22	0.28	26	0.27
Magaloff 1978		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Magin 1975		42	0.61	54	0.00	41	0.06	40	0.15	44	0.09	44	0.12
Michalowski 1933		84	0.39	55	0.00	82	0.03	82	0.03	57	0.06	68	0.04
Milkina 1970		1	0.75	13	0.02	4	0.10	6	0.48	15	0.41	11	0.44
Mohovich 1999		6	0.72	19	0.01	9	0.08	8	0.47	23	0.39	12	0.43
Moravec 1969		49	0.58	30	0.00	56	0.05	55	0.05	21	0.36	41	0.13
Morozova 2008		61	0.52	35	0.00	52	0.04	63	0.04	63	0.04	72	0.04
Neighaus 1950		16	0.69	24	0.01	28	0.06	25	0.30	39	0.14	35	0.20
Niedzielski 1931		55	0.55	29	0.00	48	0.07	47	0.07	41	0.11	49	0.09
Ohlsson 1999		37	0.62	36	0.00	53	0.04	64	0.04	63	0.04	67	0.04
Osinska 1989		7	0.71	18	0.01	30	0.06	26	0.30	30	0.26	23	0.28
Pachmann 1927		58	0.54	60	0.00	55	0.04	66	0.04	10	0.38	45	0.12
Paderewski 1930		24	0.65	27	0.00	40	0.06	43	0.13	21	0.30	34	0.20
Perlemuter 1992		45	0.60	88	0.00	38	0.05	39	0.16	37	0.12	40	0.14
Pierdomenico 2008		47	0.59	11	0.02	7	0.10	19	0.36	10	0.45	15	0.40
Poblocka 1999		53	0.55	70	0.00	71	0.04	62	0.04	84	0.03	80	0.03
Rabcewiczowa 1932		33	0.62	14	0.02	43	0.06	42	0.14	33	0.21	36	0.17
Rachmaninoff 1923		29	0.64	7	0.04	17	0.09	17	0.37	18	0.36	17	0.36
Rangell 2001		48	0.58	40	0.00	23	0.07	34	0.18	28	0.27	31	0.22
Richter 1976		72	0.46	77	0.00	76	0.03	86	0.03	64	0.04	81	0.03
Rosen 1989		15	0.69	25	0.01	22	0.07	21	0.34	22	0.31	21	0.32
Rosenthal 1930		26	0.64	59	0.00	37	0.06	33	0.20	10	0.48	22	0.31
Rosenthal 1931		28	0.64	87	0.00	20	0.07	18	0.37	5	0.65	8	0.49
Rosenthal 1931b		23	0.66	86	0.00	15	0.10	12	0.42	5	0.63	5	0.51
Rosenthal 1931c		13	0.69	9	0.03	13	0.07	15	0.41	6	0.64	6	0.51
Rosenthal 1931d		18	0.69	15	0.02	14	0.09	11	0.44	5	0.66	3	0.54
Rossi 2007		65	0.48	5	0.05	6	0.07	36	0.18	10	0.45	24	0.28
Rubinstein 1939		66	0.47	31	0.00	69	0.04	70	0.04	21	0.31	48	0.11
Rubinstein 1952		34	0.62	10	0.03	26	0.08	16	0.37	10	0.56	10	0.46
Rubinstein 1966		40	0.61	71	0.00	51	0.06	50	0.06	29	0.29	42	0.13
Schilhawsky 1960		60	0.53	74	0.00	60	0.05	58	0.05	59	0.05	63	0.05
Shebanova 2002		27	0.64	22	0.01	44	0.06	44	0.12	69	0.04	56	0.07
Smith 1975		19	0.68	20	0.01	12	0.07	14	0.41	16	0.37	16	0.39
Sokolov 2002		38	0.62	37	0.00	42	0.05	41	0.14	40	0.18	37	0.16
Sztompka 1959		54	0.55	43	0.00	67	0.04	68	0.04	60	0.06	61	0.05
Tomsic 1995		30	0.63	75	0.00	29	0.06	31	0.25	18	0.44	20	0.33
Uninsky 1932		83	0.41	41	0.00	84	0.03	81	0.03	74	0.04	84	0.03
Uninsky 1971		80	0.42	38	0.00	83	0.03	79	0.03	66	0.05	69	0.04
Wasowski 1980		57	0.54	39	0.00	58	0.05	56	0.05	51	0.05	59	0.05
Zak 1937		36	0.62	66	0.00	36	0.06	32	0.23	42	0.11	38	0.16
Zak 1951		39	0.61	28	0.00	24	0.06	20	0.35	35	0.15	29	0.23
Random 1		90	-0.14	79	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	61	0.04	89	0.02
Random 2		88	-0.04	89	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	31	0.16	57	0.06
Random 3		89	-0.09	58	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	74	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).