Luisada 1991

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		27	0.67	30	0.00	25	0.09	27	0.37	31	0.29	28	0.33
Anderszewski 2003		4	0.75	6	0.05	2	0.13	11	0.48	3	0.53	8	0.50
Ashkenazy 1981		6	0.73	16	0.01	4	0.12	5	0.51	9	0.48	11	0.49
Bacha 2000		34	0.64	2	0.10	11	0.11	23	0.41	2	0.61	6	0.50
Badura 1965		67	0.50	70	0.00	73	0.03	84	0.03	62	0.04	87	0.03
Barbosa 1983		59	0.56	44	0.00	57	0.04	55	0.04	37	0.18	55	0.08
Biret 1990		13	0.70	41	0.00	26	0.10	21	0.42	8	0.46	20	0.44
Blet 2003		21	0.68	17	0.01	36	0.09	32	0.26	14	0.37	30	0.31
Block 1995		45	0.59	36	0.00	43	0.04	42	0.08	13	0.36	39	0.17
Blumental 1952		49	0.58	20	0.01	49	0.06	47	0.06	22	0.21	48	0.11
Boshniakovich 1969		35	0.64	40	0.00	45	0.06	45	0.06	39	0.17	51	0.10
Brailowsky 1960		8	0.72	10	0.04	10	0.10	22	0.41	3	0.59	10	0.49
Bunin 1987		74	0.47	78	0.00	84	0.03	85	0.03	71	0.04	88	0.03
Bunin 1987b		75	0.47	73	0.00	83	0.03	83	0.03	71	0.04	81	0.03
Chiu 1999		18	0.69	65	0.00	24	0.13	24	0.41	5	0.57	12	0.48
Cohen 1997		85	0.40	64	0.00	82	0.03	81	0.03	42	0.08	71	0.05
Cortot 1951		71	0.50	54	0.00	80	0.02	87	0.02	67	0.04	89	0.03
Csalog 1996		87	0.33	62	0.00	72	0.03	80	0.03	31	0.21	56	0.08
Czerny 1949		57	0.56	80	0.00	55	0.04	68	0.04	52	0.06	70	0.05
Czerny 1990		15	0.69	71	0.00	29	0.08	25	0.38	27	0.25	31	0.31
Duchoud 2007		56	0.56	53	0.00	54	0.04	69	0.04	46	0.05	77	0.04
Ezaki 2006		2	0.77	32	0.00	9	0.12	12	0.48	19	0.37	23	0.42
Falvay 1989		47	0.58	48	0.00	58	0.04	64	0.04	37	0.26	49	0.10
Farrell 1958		31	0.66	61	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.08	27	0.24	42	0.14
Ferenczy 1958		53	0.57	26	0.00	50	0.05	50	0.05	74	0.03	76	0.04
Fliere 1977		3	0.76	4	0.07	6	0.13	1	0.63	10	0.48	2	0.55
Fou 1978		14	0.69	35	0.00	21	0.08	19	0.44	12	0.42	21	0.43
Francois 1956		64	0.52	68	0.00	56	0.05	52	0.05	37	0.18	54	0.09
Friedman 1923		83	0.44	76	0.00	76	0.03	82	0.03	42	0.14	66	0.06
Friedman 1923b		82	0.44	69	0.00	77	0.04	62	0.04	44	0.12	59	0.07
Friedman 1930		72	0.49	51	0.00	65	0.04	66	0.04	52	0.05	75	0.04
Garcia 2007		42	0.61	84	0.00	47	0.05	51	0.05	20	0.36	43	0.13
Garcia 2007b		48	0.58	45	0.00	33	0.08	34	0.20	6	0.39	34	0.28
Gierzod 1998		24	0.68	7	0.05	18	0.10	16	0.47	18	0.39	22	0.43
Gornostaeva 1994		37	0.63	55	0.00	42	0.04	43	0.08	35	0.19	44	0.12
Groot 1988		51	0.57	72	0.00	60	0.05	49	0.05	51	0.04	79	0.04
Harasiewicz 1955		39	0.62	81	0.00	37	0.07	37	0.15	41	0.10	45	0.12
Hatto 1993		19	0.69	19	0.01	5	0.12	8	0.49	3	0.63	1	0.56
Hatto 1997		12	0.70	33	0.00	8	0.11	13	0.48	6	0.53	9	0.50
Horowitz 1949		58	0.56	59	0.00	68	0.04	57	0.04	41	0.10	61	0.06
Indjic 1988		16	0.69	42	0.00	7	0.10	9	0.49	5	0.61	3	0.55
Kapell 1951		46	0.58	39	0.00	40	0.05	39	0.13	62	0.04	57	0.07
Kissin 1993		11	0.71	11	0.03	17	0.10	4	0.52	12	0.48	7	0.50
Kushner 1989		7	0.72	29	0.00	23	0.11	15	0.48	16	0.45	17	0.46
Luisada 1991		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Lushtak 2004		28	0.66	46	0.00	35	0.07	33	0.23	26	0.24	35	0.23
Malcuzynski 1961		66	0.51	87	0.00	70	0.03	74	0.03	78	0.03	82	0.03
Magaloff 1978		38	0.62	15	0.02	34	0.07	36	0.17	28	0.29	36	0.22
Magin 1975		5	0.75	1	0.18	1	0.18	3	0.54	3	0.55	5	0.54
Michalowski 1933		78	0.46	66	0.00	66	0.04	59	0.04	48	0.07	68	0.05
Milkina 1970		26	0.67	3	0.07	15	0.09	10	0.49	13	0.47	13	0.48
Mohovich 1999		17	0.69	13	0.02	30	0.08	29	0.33	29	0.32	29	0.32
Moravec 1969		73	0.47	56	0.00	63	0.04	60	0.04	38	0.22	52	0.09
Morozova 2008		1	0.78	9	0.04	3	0.16	7	0.50	5	0.46	14	0.48
Neighaus 1950		32	0.65	38	0.00	31	0.08	26	0.38	35	0.20	33	0.28
Niedzielski 1931		63	0.54	67	0.00	38	0.04	41	0.11	25	0.28	37	0.18
Ohlsson 1999		20	0.68	18	0.01	22	0.10	17	0.46	12	0.44	18	0.45
Osinska 1989		30	0.66	28	0.00	28	0.07	28	0.35	26	0.32	27	0.33
Pachmann 1927		79	0.46	49	0.00	85	0.03	79	0.03	31	0.17	58	0.07
Paderewski 1930		65	0.51	85	0.00	75	0.03	75	0.03	63	0.03	84	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		36	0.64	58	0.00	41	0.04	40	0.11	29	0.19	40	0.14
Pierdomenico 2008		55	0.56	79	0.00	51	0.04	70	0.04	33	0.26	50	0.10
Poblocka 1999		40	0.61	43	0.00	39	0.04	38	0.13	38	0.15	41	0.14
Rabcewiczowa 1932		50	0.57	37	0.00	52	0.05	53	0.05	38	0.15	53	0.09
Rachmaninoff 1923		41	0.61	50	0.00	46	0.05	48	0.05	46	0.05	67	0.05
Rangell 2001		77	0.46	52	0.00	67	0.04	65	0.04	41	0.13	60	0.07
Richter 1976		70	0.50	83	0.00	81	0.03	78	0.03	65	0.04	83	0.03
Rosen 1989		9	0.72	14	0.02	12	0.15	2	0.56	8	0.54	4	0.55
Rosenthal 1930		84	0.41	74	0.00	87	0.04	71	0.04	81	0.02	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		80	0.45	82	0.00	79	0.03	76	0.03	40	0.12	63	0.06
Rosenthal 1931b		81	0.44	88	0.00	78	0.02	86	0.02	35	0.10	80	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		86	0.40	90	0.00	86	0.04	72	0.04	43	0.08	65	0.06
Rosenthal 1931d		76	0.46	75	0.00	71	0.03	73	0.03	40	0.13	64	0.06
Rossi 2007		68	0.50	63	0.00	53	0.04	58	0.04	23	0.28	46	0.11
Rubinstein 1939		43	0.60	21	0.01	48	0.06	46	0.06	5	0.47	38	0.17
Rubinstein 1952		62	0.54	8	0.05	27	0.08	35	0.19	19	0.45	32	0.29
Rubinstein 1966		23	0.68	24	0.01	32	0.10	30	0.32	11	0.56	24	0.42
Schilhawsky 1960		60	0.56	60	0.00	61	0.04	56	0.04	72	0.04	74	0.04
Shebanova 2002		25	0.67	23	0.01	19	0.11	18	0.45	15	0.46	19	0.45
Smith 1975		10	0.71	31	0.00	14	0.11	20	0.43	15	0.39	25	0.41
Sokolov 2002		54	0.57	22	0.01	62	0.04	61	0.04	54	0.04	72	0.04
Sztompka 1959		44	0.60	34	0.00	64	0.05	54	0.05	49	0.07	62	0.06
Tomsic 1995		52	0.57	77	0.00	59	0.04	67	0.04	30	0.28	47	0.11
Uninsky 1932		61	0.55	57	0.00	69	0.04	63	0.04	56	0.06	69	0.05
Uninsky 1971		69	0.50	27	0.00	74	0.03	77	0.03	69	0.05	73	0.04
Wasowski 1980		33	0.65	12	0.02	13	0.10	31	0.32	8	0.39	26	0.35
Zak 1937		22	0.68	25	0.01	20	0.13	14	0.48	11	0.46	15	0.47
Zak 1951		29	0.66	5	0.07	16	0.10	6	0.51	13	0.43	16	0.47
Random 1		90	-0.19	86	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	84	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		89	-0.12	89	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	61	0.04	85	0.03
Random 3		88	-0.01	47	0.00	88	0.02	89	0.02	42	0.09	78	0.04

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).