Kushner 1989

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		9	0.75	52	0.00	9	0.12	18	0.45	20	0.41	21	0.43
Anderszewski 2003		32	0.68	19	0.01	41	0.06	40	0.15	18	0.30	38	0.21
Ashkenazy 1981		28	0.69	7	0.05	13	0.12	7	0.54	15	0.45	9	0.49
Bacha 2000		59	0.59	68	0.00	55	0.04	65	0.04	27	0.25	63	0.10
Badura 1965		55	0.61	59	0.00	47	0.07	45	0.07	9	0.45	42	0.18
Barbosa 1983		78	0.50	70	0.00	65	0.03	74	0.03	49	0.06	79	0.04
Biret 1990		11	0.73	22	0.01	21	0.11	11	0.48	6	0.46	13	0.47
Blet 2003		30	0.69	67	0.00	34	0.05	35	0.18	25	0.29	36	0.23
Block 1995		47	0.64	16	0.01	37	0.06	36	0.17	7	0.45	29	0.28
Blumental 1952		75	0.52	47	0.00	61	0.05	56	0.05	40	0.11	68	0.07
Boshniakovich 1969		29	0.69	56	0.00	38	0.07	38	0.16	14	0.43	31	0.26
Brailowsky 1960		41	0.66	48	0.00	59	0.05	53	0.05	27	0.30	53	0.12
Bunin 1987		79	0.49	74	0.00	83	0.03	79	0.03	67	0.04	87	0.03
Bunin 1987b		81	0.48	88	0.00	82	0.03	80	0.03	61	0.04	85	0.03
Chiu 1999		68	0.56	46	0.00	54	0.05	62	0.05	28	0.26	56	0.11
Cohen 1997		87	0.37	27	0.00	84	0.03	86	0.03	30	0.17	70	0.07
Cortot 1951		52	0.63	65	0.00	67	0.03	76	0.03	50	0.05	84	0.04
Csalog 1996		72	0.53	14	0.02	33	0.06	44	0.10	18	0.38	41	0.19
Czerny 1949		31	0.68	43	0.00	22	0.09	33	0.24	44	0.08	48	0.14
Czerny 1990		1	0.81	2	0.10	2	0.20	4	0.57	7	0.54	5	0.55
Duchoud 2007		50	0.63	35	0.00	49	0.05	50	0.05	34	0.26	59	0.11
Ezaki 2006		18	0.72	54	0.00	36	0.07	31	0.26	39	0.15	39	0.20
Falvay 1989		34	0.68	45	0.00	44	0.06	42	0.12	18	0.42	37	0.22
Farrell 1958		44	0.65	40	0.00	57	0.05	58	0.05	22	0.26	57	0.11
Ferenczy 1958		70	0.55	63	0.00	81	0.03	72	0.03	53	0.05	81	0.04
Fliere 1977		2	0.81	8	0.05	4	0.12	3	0.59	14	0.44	7	0.51
Fou 1978		27	0.69	9	0.05	7	0.09	10	0.48	4	0.52	8	0.50
Francois 1956		17	0.72	11	0.04	6	0.09	13	0.46	9	0.52	10	0.49
Friedman 1923		85	0.39	86	0.00	87	0.04	70	0.04	49	0.07	75	0.05
Friedman 1923b		86	0.39	71	0.00	86	0.02	87	0.02	61	0.05	88	0.03
Friedman 1930		82	0.47	72	0.00	79	0.03	77	0.03	54	0.05	80	0.04
Garcia 2007		67	0.56	60	0.00	50	0.05	51	0.05	12	0.43	45	0.15
Garcia 2007b		84	0.46	37	0.00	60	0.05	60	0.05	14	0.26	62	0.11
Gierzod 1998		8	0.75	29	0.00	18	0.09	12	0.46	19	0.36	22	0.41
Gornostaeva 1994		6	0.76	24	0.00	20	0.12	19	0.44	7	0.53	11	0.48
Groot 1988		36	0.67	28	0.00	30	0.07	30	0.26	23	0.41	26	0.33
Harasiewicz 1955		56	0.61	4	0.06	24	0.09	27	0.31	31	0.26	30	0.28
Hatto 1993		77	0.50	76	0.00	69	0.03	83	0.03	52	0.06	83	0.04
Hatto 1997		73	0.53	50	0.00	71	0.05	49	0.05	51	0.05	74	0.05
Horowitz 1949		66	0.56	82	0.00	78	0.03	85	0.03	58	0.04	86	0.03
Indjic 1988		76	0.51	87	0.00	70	0.05	52	0.05	57	0.05	72	0.05
Kapell 1951		33	0.68	55	0.00	39	0.07	37	0.17	35	0.17	43	0.17
Kissin 1993		7	0.76	13	0.02	10	0.14	8	0.49	8	0.56	6	0.52
Kushner 1989		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Luisada 1991		16	0.72	49	0.00	12	0.11	16	0.45	15	0.48	14	0.46
Lushtak 2004		48	0.64	33	0.00	29	0.07	22	0.36	25	0.24	28	0.29
Malcuzynski 1961		35	0.67	41	0.00	62	0.05	59	0.05	38	0.13	66	0.08
Magaloff 1978		25	0.70	30	0.00	42	0.06	41	0.14	29	0.29	40	0.20
Magin 1975		14	0.72	5	0.06	8	0.13	6	0.54	1	0.60	3	0.57
Michalowski 1933		71	0.54	58	0.00	48	0.06	47	0.06	25	0.33	47	0.14
Milkina 1970		10	0.75	38	0.00	19	0.08	14	0.46	12	0.49	12	0.47
Mohovich 1999		15	0.72	15	0.01	25	0.11	15	0.46	19	0.45	19	0.45
Moravec 1969		57	0.61	32	0.00	52	0.04	64	0.04	27	0.33	55	0.11
Morozova 2008		12	0.73	1	0.17	1	0.17	2	0.60	1	0.58	2	0.59
Neighaus 1950		23	0.70	83	0.00	26	0.07	24	0.33	32	0.20	32	0.26
Niedzielski 1931		63	0.58	79	0.00	72	0.03	73	0.03	46	0.05	77	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		13	0.72	20	0.01	17	0.08	9	0.49	16	0.40	20	0.44
Osinska 1989		5	0.77	17	0.01	14	0.12	17	0.45	12	0.46	16	0.45
Pachmann 1927		74	0.52	51	0.00	80	0.04	71	0.04	69	0.04	78	0.04
Paderewski 1930		43	0.65	61	0.00	58	0.05	55	0.05	19	0.31	54	0.12
Perlemuter 1992		26	0.69	10	0.04	15	0.10	20	0.43	8	0.48	15	0.45
Pierdomenico 2008		38	0.66	62	0.00	28	0.07	25	0.33	1	0.62	17	0.45
Poblocka 1999		24	0.70	39	0.00	46	0.06	46	0.06	40	0.14	65	0.09
Rabcewiczowa 1932		21	0.71	26	0.00	11	0.10	21	0.38	5	0.53	18	0.45
Rachmaninoff 1923		49	0.63	84	0.00	32	0.07	34	0.22	24	0.25	33	0.23
Rangell 2001		53	0.63	3	0.08	16	0.09	32	0.24	2	0.53	24	0.36
Richter 1976		65	0.57	21	0.01	77	0.03	81	0.03	37	0.15	67	0.07
Rosen 1989		3	0.77	12	0.03	3	0.11	5	0.54	6	0.56	4	0.55
Rosenthal 1930		45	0.65	42	0.00	53	0.05	61	0.05	18	0.37	49	0.14
Rosenthal 1931		58	0.60	73	0.00	66	0.03	78	0.03	23	0.38	58	0.11
Rosenthal 1931b		64	0.58	78	0.00	74	0.04	63	0.04	26	0.29	61	0.11
Rosenthal 1931c		54	0.62	66	0.00	63	0.04	67	0.04	20	0.40	52	0.13
Rosenthal 1931d		60	0.59	81	0.00	75	0.04	69	0.04	20	0.31	60	0.11
Rossi 2007		80	0.49	75	0.00	76	0.03	82	0.03	18	0.32	64	0.10
Rubinstein 1939		83	0.46	57	0.00	85	0.03	75	0.03	47	0.06	76	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		69	0.56	36	0.00	56	0.05	57	0.05	21	0.45	46	0.15
Rubinstein 1966		42	0.66	34	0.00	51	0.04	66	0.04	18	0.44	51	0.13
Schilhawsky 1960		51	0.63	80	0.00	64	0.05	54	0.05	55	0.05	73	0.05
Shebanova 2002		4	0.77	6	0.06	5	0.10	1	0.63	5	0.61	1	0.62
Smith 1975		19	0.71	25	0.00	27	0.08	26	0.33	22	0.33	25	0.33
Sokolov 2002		22	0.70	18	0.01	23	0.10	23	0.35	15	0.43	23	0.39
Sztompka 1959		20	0.71	23	0.01	35	0.05	28	0.29	27	0.30	27	0.29
Tomsic 1995		46	0.65	44	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.11	14	0.50	35	0.23
Uninsky 1932		61	0.59	77	0.00	68	0.03	84	0.03	60	0.05	82	0.04
Uninsky 1971		62	0.58	85	0.00	73	0.04	68	0.04	53	0.06	71	0.05
Wasowski 1980		40	0.66	31	0.00	45	0.05	48	0.05	16	0.34	50	0.13
Zak 1937		37	0.67	64	0.00	40	0.06	39	0.15	38	0.17	44	0.16
Zak 1951		39	0.66	53	0.00	31	0.07	29	0.26	29	0.20	34	0.23
Random 1		89	-0.11	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	52	0.04	90	0.02
Random 2		90	-0.12	69	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	65	0.03	89	0.02
Random 3		88	-0.01	89	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	28	0.22	69	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).