Horowitz 1949

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		26	0.60	37	0.00	31	0.11	32	0.32	53	0.04	35	0.11
Anderszewski 2003		46	0.53	19	0.01	39	0.07	39	0.17	70	0.03	42	0.07
Ashkenazy 1981		19	0.61	28	0.00	21	0.11	14	0.48	54	0.05	32	0.15
Bacha 2000		70	0.45	85	0.00	64	0.03	72	0.03	74	0.04	68	0.03
Badura 1965		43	0.54	46	0.00	43	0.05	43	0.09	63	0.04	47	0.06
Barbosa 1983		82	0.36	56	0.00	78	0.02	83	0.02	75	0.04	74	0.03
Biret 1990		44	0.54	49	0.00	55	0.05	48	0.05	71	0.04	64	0.04
Blet 2003		66	0.47	63	0.00	75	0.04	65	0.04	76	0.03	77	0.03
Block 1995		37	0.57	23	0.00	35	0.09	36	0.30	23	0.29	17	0.29
Blumental 1952		77	0.41	54	0.00	72	0.03	78	0.03	78	0.02	87	0.02
Boshniakovich 1969		4	0.69	20	0.00	10	0.20	4	0.63	5	0.57	2	0.60
Brailowsky 1960		29	0.59	22	0.00	34	0.08	24	0.38	37	0.22	16	0.29
Bunin 1987		20	0.61	39	0.00	24	0.07	23	0.39	19	0.39	13	0.39
Bunin 1987b		21	0.61	58	0.00	23	0.08	22	0.40	20	0.40	11	0.40
Chiu 1999		48	0.52	29	0.00	38	0.09	38	0.18	53	0.04	38	0.08
Cohen 1997		87	0.15	90	0.00	87	0.03	70	0.03	85	0.02	88	0.02
Cortot 1951		36	0.57	82	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.08	66	0.04	48	0.06
Csalog 1996		85	0.35	75	0.00	85	0.04	59	0.04	83	0.03	76	0.03
Czerny 1949		15	0.63	14	0.02	15	0.09	13	0.50	43	0.08	26	0.20
Czerny 1990		33	0.57	79	0.00	49	0.04	64	0.04	79	0.03	82	0.03
Duchoud 2007		53	0.50	32	0.00	56	0.07	45	0.07	73	0.03	51	0.05
Ezaki 2006		18	0.61	40	0.00	30	0.09	33	0.32	82	0.03	36	0.10
Falvay 1989		67	0.46	76	0.00	79	0.02	84	0.02	51	0.06	71	0.03
Farrell 1958		41	0.55	53	0.00	46	0.06	46	0.06	68	0.04	50	0.05
Ferenczy 1958		75	0.42	72	0.00	83	0.03	74	0.03	73	0.03	78	0.03
Fliere 1977		5	0.69	27	0.00	8	0.15	10	0.58	45	0.07	25	0.20
Fou 1978		25	0.60	42	0.00	27	0.08	26	0.38	43	0.09	27	0.18
Francois 1956		60	0.49	87	0.00	68	0.03	66	0.03	64	0.04	84	0.03
Friedman 1923		84	0.35	88	0.00	74	0.03	71	0.03	45	0.08	53	0.05
Friedman 1923b		83	0.35	67	0.00	69	0.03	69	0.03	45	0.08	52	0.05
Friedman 1930		69	0.46	33	0.00	59	0.05	51	0.05	45	0.08	45	0.06
Garcia 2007		58	0.49	77	0.00	53	0.04	57	0.04	43	0.10	46	0.06
Garcia 2007b		79	0.40	64	0.00	58	0.04	56	0.04	71	0.04	67	0.04
Gierzod 1998		16	0.62	34	0.00	20	0.08	18	0.44	45	0.06	29	0.16
Gornostaeva 1994		45	0.54	83	0.00	63	0.04	60	0.04	69	0.03	81	0.03
Groot 1988		10	0.66	26	0.00	11	0.10	16	0.46	25	0.40	10	0.43
Harasiewicz 1955		12	0.65	5	0.07	4	0.17	5	0.60	24	0.35	9	0.46
Hatto 1993		64	0.47	7	0.05	17	0.08	30	0.33	27	0.20	20	0.26
Hatto 1997		55	0.50	45	0.00	19	0.08	35	0.31	34	0.14	24	0.21
Horowitz 1949		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Indjic 1988		59	0.49	62	0.00	18	0.08	31	0.32	30	0.19	21	0.25
Kapell 1951		42	0.55	66	0.00	47	0.04	55	0.04	69	0.04	56	0.04
Kissin 1993		13	0.65	11	0.02	13	0.14	12	0.51	30	0.19	15	0.31
Kushner 1989		38	0.56	84	0.00	52	0.04	58	0.04	85	0.03	73	0.03
Luisada 1991		39	0.56	57	0.00	42	0.05	41	0.10	57	0.04	43	0.06
Lushtak 2004		52	0.50	86	0.00	50	0.03	73	0.03	80	0.03	80	0.03
Malcuzynski 1961		7	0.68	9	0.04	9	0.20	9	0.58	11	0.43	6	0.50
Magaloff 1978		35	0.57	41	0.00	45	0.04	54	0.04	48	0.07	49	0.05
Magin 1975		22	0.60	55	0.00	14	0.10	15	0.48	34	0.16	18	0.28
Michalowski 1933		72	0.43	48	0.00	41	0.05	42	0.10	73	0.04	44	0.06
Milkina 1970		14	0.64	25	0.00	16	0.10	17	0.45	41	0.12	22	0.23
Mohovich 1999		17	0.61	44	0.00	29	0.10	29	0.35	46	0.07	30	0.16
Moravec 1969		62	0.48	35	0.00	71	0.03	82	0.03	73	0.03	69	0.03
Morozova 2008		28	0.59	18	0.01	28	0.09	25	0.38	48	0.04	33	0.12
Neighaus 1950		3	0.70	15	0.02	6	0.21	7	0.59	29	0.27	12	0.40
Niedzielski 1931		40	0.56	17	0.01	22	0.07	27	0.37	17	0.35	14	0.36
Ohlsson 1999		34	0.57	70	0.00	36	0.10	34	0.32	73	0.04	34	0.11
Osinska 1989		23	0.60	21	0.00	40	0.06	40	0.14	68	0.04	39	0.07
Pachmann 1927		56	0.49	16	0.01	62	0.05	53	0.05	39	0.11	41	0.07
Paderewski 1930		68	0.46	24	0.00	80	0.02	88	0.02	75	0.03	86	0.02
Perlemuter 1992		32	0.58	50	0.00	37	0.07	37	0.20	68	0.04	37	0.09
Pierdomenico 2008		51	0.51	31	0.00	48	0.04	61	0.04	40	0.14	40	0.07
Poblocka 1999		30	0.59	36	0.00	25	0.08	20	0.41	50	0.06	28	0.16
Rabcewiczowa 1932		74	0.42	8	0.04	82	0.03	81	0.03	78	0.03	72	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		11	0.66	6	0.05	7	0.12	6	0.60	14	0.39	8	0.48
Rangell 2001		61	0.48	89	0.00	51	0.04	63	0.04	50	0.05	63	0.04
Richter 1976		9	0.67	4	0.09	3	0.18	8	0.59	4	0.58	3	0.58
Rosen 1989		50	0.52	47	0.00	60	0.05	49	0.05	63	0.04	61	0.04
Rosenthal 1930		54	0.50	38	0.00	57	0.05	47	0.05	61	0.04	60	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		78	0.41	73	0.00	73	0.03	76	0.03	51	0.04	75	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		73	0.43	52	0.00	67	0.03	77	0.03	50	0.05	66	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		76	0.42	74	0.00	77	0.02	85	0.02	77	0.03	89	0.02
Rosenthal 1931d		71	0.44	80	0.00	70	0.03	68	0.03	50	0.05	65	0.04
Rossi 2007		86	0.24	59	0.00	86	0.03	80	0.03	75	0.04	70	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		81	0.38	69	0.00	84	0.04	62	0.04	57	0.05	55	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		80	0.39	81	0.00	81	0.02	86	0.02	58	0.05	83	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		65	0.47	71	0.00	76	0.03	75	0.03	53	0.05	59	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		6	0.69	3	0.12	5	0.21	3	0.64	9	0.50	4	0.57
Shebanova 2002		27	0.60	13	0.02	33	0.15	19	0.43	60	0.05	31	0.15
Smith 1975		57	0.49	78	0.00	65	0.03	79	0.03	87	0.02	85	0.02
Sokolov 2002		49	0.52	60	0.00	54	0.05	52	0.05	77	0.03	54	0.04
Sztompka 1959		47	0.53	43	0.00	61	0.05	50	0.05	79	0.04	58	0.04
Tomsic 1995		63	0.48	61	0.00	66	0.03	67	0.03	54	0.05	57	0.04
Uninsky 1932		24	0.60	12	0.02	32	0.10	28	0.35	35	0.21	19	0.27
Uninsky 1971		31	0.58	30	0.00	26	0.09	21	0.40	44	0.11	23	0.21
Wasowski 1980		8	0.68	10	0.02	12	0.12	11	0.54	3	0.44	7	0.49
Zak 1937		1	0.73	1	0.19	1	0.19	1	0.67	5	0.57	1	0.62
Zak 1951		2	0.72	2	0.15	2	0.32	2	0.65	8	0.49	5	0.56
Random 1		90	-0.13	51	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	41	0.13	62	0.04
Random 2		88	-0.05	68	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	45	0.05	79	0.03
Random 3		89	-0.09	65	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	82	0.02	90	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).