Hatto 1993

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		40	0.49	40	0.00	31	0.05	29	0.19	47	0.05	40	0.10
Anderszewski 2003		4	0.70	7	0.00	3	0.24	5	0.61	5	0.50	5	0.55
Ashkenazy 1981		3	0.73	11	0.00	4	0.15	6	0.61	4	0.54	3	0.57
Bacha 2000		29	0.52	17	0.00	34	0.04	26	0.21	34	0.18	25	0.19
Badura 1965		44	0.48	34	0.00	46	0.05	54	0.05	32	0.28	37	0.12
Barbosa 1983		53	0.45	22	0.00	49	0.04	64	0.04	41	0.13	55	0.07
Biret 1990		21	0.55	55	0.00	27	0.08	24	0.25	41	0.15	28	0.19
Blet 2003		22	0.55	41	0.00	26	0.06	20	0.27	29	0.23	19	0.25
Block 1995		84	0.26	12	0.00	77	0.04	73	0.04	74	0.03	79	0.03
Blumental 1952		25	0.53	76	0.00	56	0.03	80	0.03	30	0.17	57	0.07
Boshniakovich 1969		56	0.45	77	0.00	40	0.06	38	0.12	32	0.21	33	0.16
Brailowsky 1960		58	0.44	56	0.00	67	0.06	48	0.06	66	0.04	62	0.05
Bunin 1987		49	0.46	78	0.00	61	0.04	58	0.04	42	0.16	53	0.08
Bunin 1987b		52	0.45	57	0.00	60	0.04	60	0.04	41	0.15	49	0.08
Chiu 1999		27	0.53	58	0.00	48	0.04	61	0.04	34	0.19	42	0.09
Cohen 1997		62	0.43	35	0.00	70	0.03	84	0.03	31	0.15	58	0.07
Cortot 1951		54	0.45	79	0.00	62	0.05	53	0.05	60	0.05	64	0.05
Csalog 1996		82	0.27	42	0.00	66	0.06	50	0.06	37	0.15	45	0.09
Czerny 1949		51	0.46	10	0.00	42	0.05	39	0.12	74	0.04	56	0.07
Czerny 1990		31	0.51	59	0.00	53	0.04	62	0.04	57	0.04	71	0.04
Duchoud 2007		18	0.56	80	0.00	13	0.11	19	0.29	19	0.36	15	0.32
Ezaki 2006		13	0.58	43	0.00	28	0.07	36	0.15	53	0.04	46	0.08
Falvay 1989		80	0.28	24	0.00	83	0.02	88	0.02	69	0.04	73	0.03
Farrell 1958		28	0.53	23	0.00	63	0.06	47	0.06	53	0.06	61	0.06
Ferenczy 1958		43	0.48	60	0.00	45	0.05	55	0.05	33	0.20	39	0.10
Fliere 1977		7	0.62	8	0.00	9	0.10	7	0.60	30	0.29	9	0.42
Fou 1978		35	0.50	18	0.00	24	0.09	25	0.22	64	0.04	43	0.09
Francois 1956		75	0.32	28	0.00	72	0.04	74	0.04	84	0.02	87	0.03
Friedman 1923		17	0.56	44	0.00	50	0.04	69	0.04	26	0.29	38	0.11
Friedman 1923b		15	0.57	15	0.00	33	0.05	44	0.09	23	0.31	31	0.17
Friedman 1930		23	0.55	6	0.00	25	0.06	28	0.19	20	0.41	16	0.28
Garcia 2007		39	0.49	45	0.00	55	0.04	70	0.04	39	0.16	52	0.08
Garcia 2007b		48	0.46	36	0.00	52	0.04	56	0.04	33	0.14	59	0.07
Gierzod 1998		10	0.60	61	0.00	12	0.16	8	0.59	22	0.35	8	0.45
Gornostaeva 1994		73	0.33	62	0.00	78	0.04	71	0.04	86	0.02	81	0.03
Groot 1988		69	0.35	81	0.00	69	0.03	82	0.03	75	0.03	83	0.03
Harasiewicz 1955		38	0.49	63	0.00	23	0.09	23	0.26	43	0.10	34	0.16
Hatto 1993		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Hatto 1997		2	0.98	2	0.01	2	0.95	2	0.98	2	0.97	2	0.97
Horowitz 1949		45	0.47	29	0.00	20	0.08	27	0.20	30	0.33	18	0.26
Indjic 1988		1	0.99	1	0.99	1	0.98	1	1.00	1	1.00	1	1.00
Kapell 1951		34	0.51	64	0.00	18	0.10	18	0.29	38	0.15	22	0.21
Kissin 1993		55	0.45	25	0.00	22	0.07	22	0.26	36	0.15	24	0.20
Kushner 1989		36	0.50	4	0.00	58	0.06	52	0.06	83	0.03	68	0.04
Luisada 1991		5	0.69	9	0.00	5	0.12	3	0.63	8	0.49	4	0.56
Lushtak 2004		8	0.62	13	0.00	19	0.11	17	0.32	42	0.10	29	0.18
Malcuzynski 1961		72	0.34	26	0.00	38	0.08	30	0.19	55	0.04	44	0.09
Magaloff 1978		66	0.41	82	0.00	35	0.05	33	0.17	60	0.04	47	0.08
Magin 1975		11	0.58	3	0.00	11	0.18	12	0.47	23	0.26	12	0.35
Michalowski 1933		59	0.44	5	0.00	32	0.07	35	0.16	34	0.28	23	0.21
Milkina 1970		57	0.44	30	0.00	36	0.05	31	0.18	78	0.04	48	0.08
Mohovich 1999		61	0.43	83	0.00	47	0.04	59	0.04	64	0.04	70	0.04
Moravec 1969		76	0.29	84	0.00	75	0.03	79	0.03	57	0.04	72	0.03
Morozova 2008		9	0.62	19	0.00	10	0.11	21	0.26	29	0.22	20	0.24
Neighaus 1950		19	0.56	16	0.00	21	0.07	10	0.49	49	0.06	32	0.17
Niedzielski 1931		65	0.41	37	0.00	30	0.05	37	0.13	26	0.28	27	0.19
Ohlsson 1999		6	0.67	65	0.00	6	0.21	4	0.62	13	0.44	6	0.52
Osinska 1989		60	0.43	66	0.00	64	0.08	45	0.08	65	0.04	60	0.06
Pachmann 1927		71	0.34	46	0.00	74	0.04	72	0.04	30	0.18	51	0.08
Paderewski 1930		63	0.42	31	0.00	65	0.06	49	0.06	40	0.11	50	0.08
Perlemuter 1992		67	0.41	20	0.00	68	0.06	51	0.06	83	0.03	65	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		79	0.28	38	0.00	80	0.04	66	0.04	69	0.04	67	0.04
Poblocka 1999		30	0.52	67	0.00	7	0.11	11	0.48	26	0.25	11	0.35
Rabcewiczowa 1932		70	0.35	47	0.00	71	0.03	83	0.03	71	0.03	75	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		42	0.48	68	0.00	59	0.07	46	0.07	72	0.04	63	0.05
Rangell 2001		86	0.24	85	0.00	79	0.03	78	0.03	54	0.04	82	0.03
Richter 1976		64	0.42	69	0.00	39	0.07	34	0.16	25	0.29	21	0.22
Rosen 1989		47	0.46	70	0.00	37	0.07	32	0.18	47	0.06	41	0.10
Rosenthal 1930		68	0.36	86	0.00	73	0.03	75	0.03	69	0.03	78	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		81	0.28	71	0.00	86	0.04	68	0.04	82	0.02	77	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		78	0.29	72	0.00	85	0.03	81	0.03	78	0.03	84	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		77	0.29	73	0.00	82	0.03	77	0.03	76	0.03	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		85	0.26	48	0.00	84	0.03	86	0.03	85	0.02	90	0.02
Rossi 2007		87	0.16	49	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	83	0.03	88	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		16	0.56	50	0.00	29	0.05	42	0.10	14	0.36	26	0.19
Rubinstein 1952		83	0.27	74	0.00	76	0.03	76	0.03	70	0.04	86	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		12	0.58	51	0.00	41	0.06	40	0.12	37	0.23	30	0.17
Schilhawsky 1960		14	0.57	52	0.00	8	0.11	9	0.57	29	0.36	7	0.45
Shebanova 2002		26	0.53	32	0.00	17	0.13	15	0.36	26	0.30	13	0.33
Smith 1975		46	0.47	21	0.00	54	0.04	67	0.04	85	0.02	74	0.03
Sokolov 2002		32	0.51	53	0.00	51	0.04	63	0.04	51	0.05	66	0.04
Sztompka 1959		37	0.50	87	0.00	57	0.04	65	0.04	65	0.05	69	0.04
Tomsic 1995		74	0.33	27	0.00	81	0.04	57	0.04	86	0.02	76	0.03
Uninsky 1932		50	0.46	54	0.00	44	0.05	43	0.09	40	0.18	35	0.13
Uninsky 1971		41	0.49	75	0.00	16	0.08	13	0.43	22	0.36	10	0.39
Wasowski 1980		33	0.51	33	0.00	43	0.05	41	0.10	52	0.05	54	0.07
Zak 1937		20	0.55	14	0.00	15	0.08	14	0.38	28	0.27	14	0.32
Zak 1951		24	0.53	39	0.00	14	0.10	16	0.35	32	0.19	17	0.26
Random 1		90	-0.12	88	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	49	0.05	89	0.02
Random 2		88	0.04	89	0.00	88	0.03	85	0.03	4	0.52	36	0.12
Random 3		89	0.00	90	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	41	0.11	80	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).