Harasiewicz 1955

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		21	0.64	13	0.02	25	0.05	20	0.37	29	0.30	28	0.33
Anderszewski 2003		9	0.68	5	0.04	7	0.12	11	0.45	6	0.50	11	0.47
Ashkenazy 1981		22	0.64	34	0.00	14	0.08	12	0.44	13	0.46	18	0.45
Bacha 2000		82	0.39	65	0.00	81	0.03	74	0.03	58	0.05	77	0.04
Badura 1965		4	0.69	12	0.02	33	0.06	36	0.16	10	0.44	34	0.27
Barbosa 1983		61	0.51	38	0.00	57	0.03	65	0.03	43	0.12	71	0.06
Biret 1990		65	0.51	50	0.00	59	0.04	61	0.04	44	0.12	69	0.07
Blet 2003		45	0.57	40	0.00	55	0.04	60	0.04	35	0.17	64	0.08
Block 1995		27	0.63	31	0.00	24	0.06	26	0.31	4	0.47	24	0.38
Blumental 1952		75	0.43	16	0.01	72	0.02	87	0.02	51	0.04	85	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		12	0.67	7	0.04	8	0.10	16	0.39	2	0.63	8	0.50
Brailowsky 1960		36	0.60	58	0.00	62	0.06	45	0.06	20	0.36	43	0.15
Bunin 1987		35	0.60	85	0.00	20	0.05	22	0.36	5	0.53	20	0.44
Bunin 1987b		37	0.59	86	0.00	21	0.10	21	0.36	4	0.54	19	0.44
Chiu 1999		32	0.61	45	0.00	65	0.03	71	0.03	38	0.17	68	0.07
Cohen 1997		85	0.31	52	0.00	86	0.03	75	0.03	62	0.04	86	0.03
Cortot 1951		50	0.55	82	0.00	56	0.04	64	0.04	24	0.30	56	0.11
Csalog 1996		87	0.23	51	0.00	85	0.03	77	0.03	47	0.06	79	0.04
Czerny 1949		14	0.66	74	0.00	18	0.06	18	0.38	16	0.45	22	0.41
Czerny 1990		20	0.65	49	0.00	36	0.08	33	0.21	30	0.21	36	0.21
Duchoud 2007		60	0.52	60	0.00	47	0.04	52	0.04	29	0.32	54	0.11
Ezaki 2006		1	0.76	4	0.11	5	0.13	8	0.45	6	0.52	9	0.48
Falvay 1989		58	0.53	75	0.00	76	0.03	79	0.03	65	0.05	78	0.04
Farrell 1958		66	0.50	69	0.00	71	0.03	83	0.03	44	0.07	72	0.05
Ferenczy 1958		59	0.52	35	0.00	70	0.02	85	0.02	35	0.14	74	0.05
Fliere 1977		5	0.69	9	0.03	6	0.14	3	0.49	16	0.42	16	0.45
Fou 1978		19	0.65	17	0.01	30	0.08	29	0.28	10	0.44	26	0.35
Francois 1956		51	0.54	81	0.00	61	0.05	47	0.05	48	0.05	75	0.05
Friedman 1923		73	0.45	71	0.00	83	0.03	68	0.03	34	0.23	66	0.08
Friedman 1923b		72	0.45	84	0.00	82	0.03	70	0.03	35	0.23	65	0.08
Friedman 1930		40	0.59	23	0.01	58	0.04	63	0.04	22	0.38	50	0.12
Garcia 2007		54	0.54	87	0.00	49	0.04	54	0.04	8	0.47	44	0.14
Garcia 2007b		70	0.49	79	0.00	75	0.03	73	0.03	40	0.10	76	0.05
Gierzod 1998		34	0.61	62	0.00	29	0.07	28	0.31	25	0.32	30	0.31
Gornostaeva 1994		38	0.59	83	0.00	40	0.05	39	0.12	26	0.29	38	0.19
Groot 1988		43	0.58	77	0.00	26	0.06	34	0.20	26	0.38	33	0.28
Harasiewicz 1955		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Hatto 1993		68	0.49	33	0.00	43	0.05	43	0.10	23	0.26	42	0.16
Hatto 1997		64	0.51	72	0.00	37	0.05	37	0.16	30	0.21	40	0.18
Horowitz 1949		18	0.65	28	0.01	23	0.10	24	0.35	5	0.60	13	0.46
Indjic 1988		69	0.49	14	0.02	41	0.04	40	0.11	23	0.25	41	0.17
Kapell 1951		46	0.55	24	0.01	17	0.06	19	0.37	13	0.40	23	0.38
Kissin 1993		16	0.66	44	0.00	27	0.06	27	0.31	15	0.42	25	0.36
Kushner 1989		31	0.61	10	0.03	34	0.06	31	0.26	27	0.31	31	0.28
Luisada 1991		28	0.62	41	0.00	42	0.05	41	0.10	37	0.15	48	0.12
Lushtak 2004		10	0.67	53	0.00	31	0.08	25	0.33	14	0.36	27	0.34
Malcuzynski 1961		23	0.64	3	0.11	2	0.15	7	0.47	2	0.67	2	0.56
Magaloff 1978		56	0.54	63	0.00	60	0.05	48	0.05	37	0.16	58	0.09
Magin 1975		26	0.63	18	0.01	15	0.11	9	0.45	9	0.47	12	0.46
Michalowski 1933		48	0.55	76	0.00	39	0.05	42	0.10	26	0.32	39	0.18
Milkina 1970		41	0.59	32	0.00	32	0.09	32	0.23	22	0.34	32	0.28
Mohovich 1999		25	0.64	42	0.00	16	0.07	15	0.42	13	0.51	15	0.46
Moravec 1969		80	0.40	68	0.00	84	0.03	66	0.03	76	0.03	80	0.03
Morozova 2008		15	0.66	66	0.00	35	0.07	35	0.18	27	0.24	35	0.21
Neighaus 1950		11	0.67	11	0.03	4	0.16	2	0.51	7	0.51	7	0.51
Niedzielski 1931		76	0.42	37	0.00	67	0.03	82	0.03	51	0.04	82	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		52	0.54	26	0.01	46	0.05	50	0.05	38	0.15	59	0.09
Osinska 1989		33	0.61	20	0.01	52	0.04	51	0.04	37	0.16	61	0.08
Pachmann 1927		62	0.51	64	0.00	77	0.02	86	0.02	21	0.29	63	0.08
Paderewski 1930		63	0.51	67	0.00	73	0.03	80	0.03	37	0.13	70	0.06
Perlemuter 1992		2	0.73	22	0.01	11	0.07	6	0.47	2	0.58	4	0.52
Pierdomenico 2008		57	0.54	27	0.01	63	0.04	56	0.04	25	0.37	49	0.12
Poblocka 1999		53	0.54	47	0.00	38	0.05	38	0.16	28	0.23	37	0.19
Rabcewiczowa 1932		67	0.50	55	0.00	69	0.02	84	0.02	52	0.04	83	0.03
Rachmaninoff 1923		13	0.66	54	0.00	22	0.06	23	0.36	8	0.49	21	0.42
Rangell 2001		77	0.42	21	0.01	51	0.04	59	0.04	21	0.34	51	0.12
Richter 1976		7	0.68	6	0.04	10	0.08	10	0.45	3	0.59	5	0.52
Rosen 1989		44	0.57	46	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.09	34	0.22	46	0.14
Rosenthal 1930		71	0.48	48	0.00	48	0.05	49	0.05	17	0.39	45	0.14
Rosenthal 1931		74	0.44	57	0.00	68	0.03	72	0.03	21	0.40	53	0.11
Rosenthal 1931b		78	0.42	43	0.00	78	0.03	81	0.03	23	0.32	57	0.10
Rosenthal 1931c		83	0.38	25	0.01	79	0.03	76	0.03	30	0.27	60	0.09
Rosenthal 1931d		79	0.41	88	0.00	80	0.04	57	0.04	21	0.30	55	0.11
Rossi 2007		42	0.59	15	0.02	74	0.03	78	0.03	31	0.21	62	0.08
Rubinstein 1939		86	0.28	70	0.00	87	0.04	58	0.04	86	0.03	81	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		84	0.32	8	0.04	64	0.03	69	0.03	75	0.04	87	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		81	0.40	39	0.00	54	0.04	62	0.04	49	0.06	73	0.05
Schilhawsky 1960		6	0.69	29	0.00	12	0.06	13	0.44	6	0.52	10	0.48
Shebanova 2002		55	0.54	80	0.00	66	0.03	67	0.03	67	0.04	84	0.03
Smith 1975		3	0.69	36	0.00	28	0.06	30	0.27	17	0.37	29	0.32
Sokolov 2002		39	0.59	56	0.00	13	0.07	14	0.42	4	0.49	17	0.45
Sztompka 1959		30	0.62	73	0.00	45	0.05	46	0.05	36	0.23	52	0.11
Tomsic 1995		47	0.55	61	0.00	53	0.04	53	0.04	19	0.40	47	0.13
Uninsky 1932		17	0.66	30	0.00	19	0.06	17	0.38	6	0.56	14	0.46
Uninsky 1971		29	0.62	2	0.12	3	0.13	5	0.47	2	0.60	3	0.53
Wasowski 1980		49	0.55	19	0.01	50	0.04	55	0.04	36	0.12	67	0.07
Zak 1937		24	0.64	59	0.00	9	0.08	4	0.48	7	0.54	6	0.51
Zak 1951		8	0.68	1	0.16	1	0.15	1	0.57	5	0.60	1	0.58
Random 1		89	-0.13	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	53	0.04	89	0.02
Random 2		90	-0.17	89	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	78	0.03	88	0.02
Random 3		88	-0.12	78	0.00	89	0.01	88	0.01	66	0.04	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).