Groot 1988

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		7	0.71	4	0.06	13	0.10	21	0.43	35	0.26	28	0.33
Anderszewski 2003		66	0.51	71	0.00	62	0.04	53	0.04	55	0.04	72	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		59	0.56	55	0.00	55	0.04	67	0.04	53	0.05	82	0.04
Bacha 2000		35	0.61	56	0.00	46	0.04	60	0.04	26	0.26	44	0.10
Badura 1965		69	0.49	43	0.00	66	0.04	69	0.04	64	0.04	80	0.04
Barbosa 1983		38	0.60	22	0.00	30	0.10	28	0.38	5	0.60	12	0.48
Biret 1990		30	0.64	69	0.00	39	0.05	39	0.18	63	0.05	50	0.09
Blet 2003		41	0.60	63	0.00	50	0.05	49	0.05	58	0.04	73	0.04
Block 1995		19	0.67	9	0.02	6	0.10	20	0.44	3	0.49	17	0.46
Blumental 1952		79	0.40	46	0.00	77	0.03	74	0.03	74	0.03	87	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		34	0.61	58	0.00	38	0.06	36	0.22	41	0.14	35	0.18
Brailowsky 1960		13	0.70	31	0.00	19	0.07	17	0.48	2	0.61	6	0.54
Bunin 1987		48	0.58	67	0.00	60	0.04	59	0.04	26	0.33	42	0.11
Bunin 1987b		51	0.57	85	0.00	61	0.06	46	0.06	29	0.33	38	0.14
Chiu 1999		53	0.57	59	0.00	32	0.10	31	0.31	19	0.38	26	0.34
Cohen 1997		83	0.35	87	0.00	85	0.04	57	0.04	44	0.07	64	0.05
Cortot 1951		52	0.57	75	0.00	63	0.04	62	0.04	40	0.16	55	0.08
Csalog 1996		65	0.51	28	0.00	40	0.05	41	0.10	33	0.19	39	0.14
Czerny 1949		58	0.56	30	0.00	54	0.04	61	0.04	54	0.05	78	0.04
Czerny 1990		23	0.66	29	0.00	33	0.08	32	0.30	41	0.10	36	0.17
Duchoud 2007		54	0.57	50	0.00	58	0.04	68	0.04	41	0.15	53	0.08
Ezaki 2006		12	0.71	26	0.00	21	0.09	14	0.49	29	0.29	23	0.38
Falvay 1989		3	0.74	15	0.01	9	0.12	7	0.54	6	0.61	5	0.57
Farrell 1958		11	0.71	23	0.00	16	0.08	15	0.49	4	0.52	11	0.50
Ferenczy 1958		60	0.55	32	0.00	64	0.04	52	0.04	55	0.05	76	0.04
Fliere 1977		8	0.71	64	0.00	17	0.07	11	0.52	37	0.19	30	0.31
Fou 1978		17	0.68	16	0.01	18	0.08	5	0.55	15	0.40	14	0.47
Francois 1956		4	0.73	2	0.10	4	0.13	2	0.57	3	0.59	4	0.58
Friedman 1923		87	0.26	68	0.00	87	0.04	65	0.04	56	0.06	65	0.05
Friedman 1923b		86	0.27	89	0.00	86	0.04	56	0.04	60	0.05	83	0.04
Friedman 1930		81	0.37	78	0.00	80	0.03	86	0.03	63	0.05	75	0.04
Garcia 2007		75	0.46	51	0.00	74	0.03	85	0.03	40	0.14	62	0.06
Garcia 2007b		85	0.32	37	0.00	81	0.03	82	0.03	27	0.18	59	0.07
Gierzod 1998		43	0.59	25	0.00	56	0.04	55	0.04	69	0.04	79	0.04
Gornostaeva 1994		28	0.65	39	0.00	25	0.09	29	0.37	14	0.45	20	0.41
Groot 1988		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Harasiewicz 1955		44	0.58	66	0.00	27	0.10	26	0.38	34	0.20	31	0.28
Hatto 1993		82	0.35	70	0.00	83	0.03	75	0.03	82	0.03	89	0.03
Hatto 1997		77	0.41	60	0.00	79	0.03	81	0.03	80	0.03	86	0.03
Horowitz 1949		22	0.66	40	0.00	22	0.08	25	0.40	16	0.46	18	0.43
Indjic 1988		80	0.38	83	0.00	82	0.03	83	0.03	59	0.05	71	0.04
Kapell 1951		36	0.61	76	0.00	42	0.05	43	0.10	59	0.04	61	0.06
Kissin 1993		25	0.65	80	0.00	31	0.09	30	0.35	55	0.05	40	0.13
Kushner 1989		20	0.67	10	0.02	28	0.10	23	0.41	30	0.26	27	0.33
Luisada 1991		49	0.57	74	0.00	57	0.04	51	0.04	49	0.05	66	0.04
Lushtak 2004		26	0.65	54	0.00	24	0.09	9	0.53	19	0.31	19	0.41
Malcuzynski 1961		29	0.64	81	0.00	37	0.06	38	0.20	27	0.23	33	0.21
Magaloff 1978		9	0.71	3	0.06	5	0.15	12	0.51	3	0.50	10	0.50
Magin 1975		64	0.52	53	0.00	44	0.04	44	0.08	50	0.05	60	0.06
Michalowski 1933		84	0.32	84	0.00	84	0.03	77	0.03	77	0.03	85	0.03
Milkina 1970		6	0.71	41	0.00	20	0.08	24	0.41	19	0.38	21	0.39
Mohovich 1999		1	0.80	1	0.45	1	0.45	1	0.68	1	0.73	1	0.70
Moravec 1969		62	0.54	44	0.00	76	0.03	76	0.03	75	0.03	84	0.03
Morozova 2008		57	0.56	34	0.00	36	0.06	37	0.20	41	0.11	37	0.15
Neighaus 1950		5	0.72	62	0.00	12	0.11	10	0.52	25	0.30	22	0.39
Niedzielski 1931		63	0.53	36	0.00	67	0.04	64	0.04	53	0.04	68	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		50	0.57	24	0.00	59	0.04	70	0.04	52	0.05	69	0.04
Osinska 1989		14	0.69	38	0.00	23	0.09	22	0.43	29	0.27	25	0.34
Pachmann 1927		45	0.58	77	0.00	43	0.05	42	0.10	12	0.38	34	0.19
Paderewski 1930		39	0.60	45	0.00	52	0.04	71	0.04	45	0.06	63	0.05
Perlemuter 1992		10	0.71	21	0.00	8	0.13	3	0.56	6	0.51	7	0.53
Pierdomenico 2008		33	0.63	6	0.04	10	0.11	19	0.45	6	0.49	13	0.47
Poblocka 1999		56	0.56	27	0.00	49	0.05	50	0.05	82	0.03	67	0.04
Rabcewiczowa 1932		55	0.56	48	0.00	53	0.04	63	0.04	41	0.11	56	0.07
Rachmaninoff 1923		32	0.63	14	0.01	26	0.09	27	0.38	20	0.34	24	0.36
Rangell 2001		47	0.58	18	0.01	29	0.10	34	0.26	16	0.39	29	0.32
Richter 1976		61	0.55	33	0.00	51	0.05	47	0.05	44	0.10	57	0.07
Rosen 1989		31	0.63	13	0.01	35	0.10	35	0.26	33	0.23	32	0.24
Rosenthal 1930		70	0.49	17	0.01	68	0.03	79	0.03	35	0.20	54	0.08
Rosenthal 1931		72	0.48	90	0.00	65	0.04	58	0.04	24	0.37	41	0.12
Rosenthal 1931b		74	0.46	72	0.00	69	0.04	66	0.04	22	0.32	43	0.11
Rosenthal 1931c		71	0.48	73	0.00	75	0.03	72	0.03	37	0.18	58	0.07
Rosenthal 1931d		68	0.50	79	0.00	71	0.03	80	0.03	25	0.26	51	0.09
Rossi 2007		78	0.40	47	0.00	73	0.03	84	0.03	24	0.28	48	0.09
Rubinstein 1939		76	0.43	35	0.00	78	0.03	78	0.03	35	0.19	52	0.08
Rubinstein 1952		24	0.66	8	0.02	14	0.08	18	0.45	8	0.58	9	0.51
Rubinstein 1966		16	0.69	12	0.01	11	0.11	4	0.56	3	0.72	2	0.63
Schilhawsky 1960		46	0.58	49	0.00	47	0.05	48	0.05	61	0.04	74	0.04
Shebanova 2002		27	0.65	65	0.00	34	0.09	33	0.27	64	0.04	46	0.10
Smith 1975		21	0.66	19	0.01	15	0.07	13	0.49	14	0.43	16	0.46
Sokolov 2002		42	0.59	42	0.00	45	0.04	54	0.04	39	0.20	47	0.09
Sztompka 1959		40	0.60	5	0.04	48	0.07	45	0.07	44	0.12	49	0.09
Tomsic 1995		2	0.76	20	0.00	2	0.23	8	0.54	4	0.68	3	0.61
Uninsky 1932		73	0.47	57	0.00	72	0.03	87	0.03	51	0.06	77	0.04
Uninsky 1971		67	0.50	52	0.00	70	0.03	73	0.03	50	0.06	70	0.04
Wasowski 1980		37	0.60	61	0.00	41	0.05	40	0.11	42	0.09	45	0.10
Zak 1937		18	0.68	7	0.04	7	0.12	16	0.48	12	0.46	15	0.47
Zak 1951		15	0.69	11	0.01	3	0.15	6	0.55	9	0.48	8	0.51
Random 1		90	-0.16	88	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	44	0.12	88	0.03
Random 2		89	-0.12	82	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	84	0.02	90	0.01
Random 3		88	-0.03	86	0.00	89	0.01	88	0.01	34	0.16	81	0.04

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).