Garcia 2007

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		30	0.54	18	0.00	38	0.06	33	0.20	71	0.03	36	0.08
Anderszewski 2003		10	0.58	31	0.00	17	0.08	9	0.47	29	0.19	6	0.30
Ashkenazy 1981		8	0.58	77	0.00	15	0.06	18	0.37	51	0.05	23	0.14
Bacha 2000		41	0.51	42	0.00	49	0.05	51	0.05	45	0.07	41	0.06
Badura 1965		82	0.35	76	0.00	79	0.03	84	0.03	58	0.04	82	0.03
Barbosa 1983		84	0.34	67	0.00	81	0.03	80	0.03	63	0.04	78	0.03
Biret 1990		2	0.62	7	0.01	8	0.11	3	0.55	40	0.15	8	0.29
Blet 2003		25	0.55	5	0.02	24	0.06	32	0.26	54	0.05	32	0.11
Block 1995		39	0.51	15	0.01	5	0.19	26	0.31	33	0.18	11	0.24
Blumental 1952		36	0.53	6	0.01	13	0.08	35	0.20	39	0.13	16	0.16
Boshniakovich 1969		11	0.58	8	0.01	18	0.09	27	0.31	50	0.06	22	0.14
Brailowsky 1960		38	0.52	48	0.00	57	0.03	71	0.03	47	0.05	55	0.04
Bunin 1987		63	0.46	45	0.00	68	0.05	57	0.05	72	0.04	65	0.04
Bunin 1987b		64	0.45	60	0.00	67	0.04	58	0.04	73	0.04	60	0.04
Chiu 1999		61	0.46	32	0.00	69	0.03	73	0.03	85	0.03	72	0.03
Cohen 1997		86	0.30	20	0.00	80	0.03	76	0.03	75	0.03	83	0.03
Cortot 1951		14	0.56	87	0.00	32	0.10	19	0.37	36	0.18	10	0.26
Csalog 1996		87	0.28	53	0.00	83	0.03	83	0.03	82	0.03	80	0.03
Czerny 1949		59	0.47	82	0.00	50	0.06	46	0.06	46	0.06	43	0.06
Czerny 1990		33	0.53	49	0.00	47	0.06	47	0.06	84	0.03	66	0.04
Duchoud 2007		18	0.55	22	0.00	28	0.06	24	0.33	35	0.23	9	0.28
Ezaki 2006		34	0.53	74	0.00	53	0.05	50	0.05	71	0.03	53	0.04
Falvay 1989		80	0.37	70	0.00	85	0.03	85	0.03	79	0.04	73	0.03
Farrell 1958		6	0.61	10	0.01	4	0.17	4	0.54	15	0.34	3	0.43
Ferenczy 1958		49	0.50	35	0.00	45	0.04	60	0.04	49	0.06	50	0.05
Fliere 1977		4	0.61	26	0.00	10	0.09	7	0.49	64	0.04	19	0.14
Fou 1978		32	0.53	65	0.00	48	0.05	56	0.05	55	0.05	47	0.05
Francois 1956		76	0.39	79	0.00	66	0.05	52	0.05	79	0.03	69	0.04
Friedman 1923		71	0.41	59	0.00	76	0.03	77	0.03	67	0.05	70	0.04
Friedman 1923b		70	0.42	39	0.00	74	0.03	81	0.03	75	0.04	84	0.03
Friedman 1930		77	0.39	50	0.00	75	0.03	82	0.03	51	0.05	63	0.04
Garcia 2007		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Garcia 2007b		1	0.72	1	0.73	1	0.72	1	0.84	1	0.81	1	0.82
Gierzod 1998		20	0.55	75	0.00	30	0.07	21	0.36	50	0.05	27	0.13
Gornostaeva 1994		52	0.49	64	0.00	61	0.04	63	0.04	87	0.02	85	0.03
Groot 1988		62	0.46	71	0.00	36	0.07	40	0.14	85	0.03	45	0.06
Harasiewicz 1955		28	0.54	14	0.01	11	0.09	8	0.47	54	0.04	24	0.14
Hatto 1993		50	0.49	89	0.00	42	0.05	39	0.16	70	0.04	37	0.08
Hatto 1997		48	0.50	80	0.00	44	0.05	42	0.10	54	0.05	40	0.07
Horowitz 1949		51	0.49	66	0.00	40	0.05	43	0.10	57	0.04	42	0.06
Indjic 1988		47	0.50	83	0.00	43	0.04	41	0.11	65	0.04	39	0.07
Kapell 1951		29	0.54	25	0.00	9	0.10	10	0.46	45	0.07	14	0.18
Kissin 1993		44	0.50	81	0.00	59	0.05	55	0.05	84	0.03	62	0.04
Kushner 1989		13	0.56	11	0.01	16	0.07	12	0.43	51	0.05	18	0.15
Luisada 1991		5	0.61	4	0.02	14	0.08	20	0.36	51	0.05	25	0.13
Lushtak 2004		22	0.55	19	0.00	34	0.10	25	0.31	49	0.06	21	0.14
Malcuzynski 1961		57	0.47	62	0.00	64	0.04	70	0.04	56	0.04	61	0.04
Magaloff 1978		58	0.47	43	0.00	65	0.05	53	0.05	61	0.04	57	0.04
Magin 1975		12	0.57	23	0.00	22	0.06	23	0.33	41	0.11	12	0.19
Michalowski 1933		46	0.50	30	0.00	20	0.07	22	0.34	35	0.28	5	0.31
Milkina 1970		53	0.49	46	0.00	52	0.05	49	0.05	82	0.04	59	0.04
Mohovich 1999		23	0.55	44	0.00	37	0.05	34	0.20	87	0.02	44	0.06
Moravec 1969		78	0.38	54	0.00	70	0.04	65	0.04	67	0.03	71	0.03
Morozova 2008		16	0.56	63	0.00	29	0.06	28	0.30	59	0.04	33	0.11
Neighaus 1950		15	0.56	24	0.00	27	0.05	13	0.43	79	0.04	28	0.13
Niedzielski 1931		43	0.51	2	0.04	3	0.23	16	0.41	16	0.36	4	0.38
Ohlsson 1999		26	0.54	47	0.00	21	0.06	30	0.29	67	0.04	31	0.11
Osinska 1989		42	0.51	12	0.01	51	0.06	48	0.06	86	0.03	54	0.04
Pachmann 1927		83	0.35	72	0.00	87	0.04	67	0.04	81	0.03	77	0.03
Paderewski 1930		56	0.48	38	0.00	54	0.06	45	0.06	61	0.04	49	0.05
Perlemuter 1992		3	0.61	3	0.03	2	0.31	2	0.64	23	0.30	2	0.44
Pierdomenico 2008		65	0.45	21	0.00	62	0.04	62	0.04	52	0.06	46	0.05
Poblocka 1999		19	0.55	16	0.00	19	0.09	11	0.43	52	0.05	17	0.15
Rabcewiczowa 1932		55	0.48	41	0.00	58	0.04	61	0.04	58	0.04	58	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		21	0.55	33	0.00	12	0.08	14	0.42	62	0.04	26	0.13
Rangell 2001		75	0.39	55	0.00	72	0.03	78	0.03	78	0.03	86	0.03
Richter 1976		60	0.46	28	0.00	56	0.04	69	0.04	47	0.06	48	0.05
Rosen 1989		37	0.52	13	0.01	41	0.05	44	0.09	72	0.03	51	0.05
Rosenthal 1930		68	0.42	37	0.00	77	0.05	54	0.05	65	0.04	64	0.04
Rosenthal 1931		73	0.40	57	0.00	71	0.03	74	0.03	64	0.03	79	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		66	0.43	27	0.00	55	0.04	66	0.04	53	0.05	68	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		79	0.38	90	0.00	78	0.03	79	0.03	75	0.03	87	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		67	0.43	56	0.00	63	0.04	68	0.04	67	0.04	67	0.04
Rossi 2007		74	0.40	9	0.01	60	0.04	59	0.04	58	0.05	56	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		81	0.36	84	0.00	84	0.03	87	0.03	72	0.04	75	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		85	0.32	85	0.00	86	0.03	72	0.03	66	0.04	88	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		72	0.40	34	0.00	82	0.03	75	0.03	81	0.03	81	0.03
Schilhawsky 1960		24	0.55	17	0.00	6	0.18	5	0.53	41	0.17	7	0.30
Shebanova 2002		31	0.53	36	0.00	39	0.08	38	0.17	54	0.05	35	0.09
Smith 1975		35	0.53	73	0.00	46	0.04	64	0.04	78	0.03	74	0.03
Sokolov 2002		27	0.54	51	0.00	31	0.08	29	0.30	62	0.04	30	0.11
Sztompka 1959		7	0.59	40	0.00	7	0.19	6	0.52	48	0.07	13	0.19
Tomsic 1995		69	0.42	58	0.00	73	0.03	86	0.03	74	0.03	76	0.03
Uninsky 1932		9	0.58	52	0.00	23	0.06	17	0.41	55	0.06	15	0.16
Uninsky 1971		17	0.56	29	0.00	25	0.07	15	0.41	63	0.05	20	0.14
Wasowski 1980		40	0.51	86	0.00	33	0.10	31	0.27	61	0.05	29	0.12
Zak 1937		45	0.50	69	0.00	26	0.06	36	0.19	76	0.04	34	0.09
Zak 1951		54	0.48	78	0.00	35	0.05	37	0.17	82	0.03	38	0.07
Random 1		89	-0.12	68	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	35	0.23	52	0.05
Random 2		90	-0.15	61	0.00	89	0.01	88	0.01	72	0.03	89	0.02
Random 3		88	-0.08	88	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	65	0.04	90	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).