Falvay 1989

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		28	0.62	30	0.00	29	0.06	41	0.15	72	0.03	45	0.07
Anderszewski 2003		66	0.46	62	0.00	59	0.08	46	0.08	52	0.04	46	0.06
Ashkenazy 1981		57	0.50	18	0.01	58	0.06	56	0.06	76	0.03	68	0.04
Bacha 2000		31	0.61	16	0.01	37	0.07	27	0.37	24	0.31	23	0.34
Badura 1965		74	0.39	34	0.00	76	0.04	75	0.04	82	0.02	79	0.03
Barbosa 1983		39	0.55	33	0.00	41	0.09	36	0.27	33	0.20	29	0.23
Biret 1990		29	0.62	43	0.00	39	0.08	23	0.38	58	0.05	37	0.14
Blet 2003		41	0.55	64	0.00	63	0.07	47	0.07	75	0.03	54	0.05
Block 1995		43	0.54	41	0.00	53	0.05	61	0.05	50	0.04	67	0.04
Blumental 1952		61	0.49	11	0.02	44	0.06	44	0.12	65	0.03	47	0.06
Boshniakovich 1969		60	0.50	87	0.00	72	0.04	76	0.04	81	0.03	80	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		8	0.71	20	0.01	7	0.11	9	0.55	4	0.57	6	0.56
Bunin 1987		75	0.39	65	0.00	77	0.03	81	0.03	76	0.03	81	0.03
Bunin 1987b		76	0.38	67	0.00	78	0.03	82	0.03	80	0.03	70	0.03
Chiu 1999		26	0.63	40	0.00	21	0.07	16	0.43	22	0.31	19	0.37
Cohen 1997		56	0.51	42	0.00	31	0.04	38	0.24	6	0.49	24	0.34
Cortot 1951		70	0.42	81	0.00	80	0.03	83	0.03	85	0.02	87	0.02
Csalog 1996		32	0.60	19	0.01	17	0.06	15	0.45	6	0.53	9	0.49
Czerny 1949		68	0.45	58	0.00	68	0.04	71	0.04	71	0.04	65	0.04
Czerny 1990		14	0.67	26	0.00	19	0.06	12	0.48	47	0.05	34	0.15
Duchoud 2007		71	0.42	73	0.00	66	0.04	74	0.04	81	0.03	77	0.03
Ezaki 2006		17	0.66	8	0.03	26	0.07	22	0.38	54	0.04	39	0.12
Falvay 1989		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Farrell 1958		21	0.64	32	0.00	23	0.08	20	0.40	16	0.31	22	0.35
Ferenczy 1958		54	0.51	29	0.00	65	0.04	70	0.04	44	0.07	55	0.05
Fliere 1977		33	0.59	89	0.00	45	0.06	57	0.06	70	0.03	58	0.04
Fou 1978		5	0.73	21	0.01	10	0.15	4	0.64	18	0.38	8	0.49
Francois 1956		9	0.70	3	0.07	5	0.11	2	0.67	5	0.57	3	0.62
Friedman 1923		86	0.07	74	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	88	0.01	90	0.01
Friedman 1923b		87	0.07	90	0.00	87	0.03	86	0.03	88	0.01	86	0.02
Friedman 1930		84	0.24	82	0.00	85	0.05	66	0.05	83	0.03	64	0.04
Garcia 2007		77	0.37	75	0.00	74	0.04	79	0.04	85	0.03	78	0.03
Garcia 2007b		83	0.26	76	0.00	79	0.04	80	0.04	85	0.02	83	0.03
Gierzod 1998		38	0.56	44	0.00	55	0.06	58	0.06	84	0.03	66	0.04
Gornostaeva 1994		27	0.63	12	0.02	38	0.06	35	0.28	40	0.14	32	0.20
Groot 1988		3	0.74	27	0.00	6	0.13	6	0.61	7	0.54	5	0.57
Harasiewicz 1955		46	0.53	83	0.00	47	0.05	65	0.05	79	0.03	69	0.04
Hatto 1993		82	0.28	59	0.00	71	0.04	69	0.04	88	0.02	82	0.03
Hatto 1997		80	0.33	69	0.00	67	0.04	68	0.04	82	0.03	76	0.03
Horowitz 1949		67	0.46	70	0.00	73	0.06	51	0.06	84	0.02	71	0.03
Indjic 1988		81	0.31	86	0.00	70	0.04	73	0.04	87	0.02	74	0.03
Kapell 1951		48	0.52	25	0.00	49	0.05	63	0.05	46	0.05	51	0.05
Kissin 1993		10	0.69	5	0.03	12	0.15	19	0.40	40	0.14	28	0.24
Kushner 1989		11	0.68	28	0.00	24	0.06	18	0.42	42	0.12	30	0.22
Luisada 1991		35	0.58	39	0.00	40	0.08	37	0.26	64	0.04	41	0.10
Lushtak 2004		18	0.66	10	0.02	4	0.13	11	0.52	20	0.29	17	0.39
Malcuzynski 1961		44	0.54	56	0.00	54	0.06	52	0.06	72	0.04	52	0.05
Magaloff 1978		6	0.72	4	0.05	3	0.16	5	0.62	1	0.57	4	0.59
Magin 1975		64	0.48	50	0.00	60	0.09	45	0.09	85	0.02	60	0.04
Michalowski 1933		85	0.22	52	0.00	84	0.04	78	0.04	81	0.03	73	0.03
Milkina 1970		7	0.72	22	0.01	9	0.15	8	0.59	25	0.32	13	0.43
Mohovich 1999		2	0.74	23	0.01	8	0.12	7	0.60	22	0.39	11	0.48
Moravec 1969		13	0.67	14	0.01	14	0.09	14	0.47	8	0.49	10	0.48
Morozova 2008		45	0.53	71	0.00	50	0.05	60	0.05	70	0.03	63	0.04
Neighaus 1950		40	0.55	46	0.00	56	0.06	54	0.06	55	0.05	56	0.05
Niedzielski 1931		69	0.43	88	0.00	62	0.06	55	0.06	68	0.03	59	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		59	0.50	35	0.00	57	0.07	49	0.07	66	0.04	53	0.05
Osinska 1989		16	0.67	84	0.00	22	0.07	32	0.32	51	0.05	38	0.13
Pachmann 1927		30	0.61	54	0.00	43	0.06	43	0.12	8	0.42	31	0.22
Paderewski 1930		36	0.56	77	0.00	48	0.05	59	0.05	77	0.03	61	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		12	0.67	6	0.03	15	0.08	24	0.38	32	0.16	26	0.25
Pierdomenico 2008		25	0.63	15	0.01	11	0.16	13	0.48	2	0.54	7	0.51
Poblocka 1999		55	0.51	38	0.00	64	0.07	48	0.07	67	0.04	49	0.05
Rabcewiczowa 1932		34	0.59	13	0.01	32	0.05	21	0.40	30	0.24	25	0.31
Rachmaninoff 1923		50	0.52	79	0.00	42	0.07	40	0.15	75	0.03	44	0.07
Rangell 2001		52	0.52	68	0.00	18	0.06	39	0.18	38	0.17	33	0.17
Richter 1976		72	0.41	85	0.00	81	0.04	77	0.04	85	0.02	72	0.03
Rosen 1989		24	0.63	53	0.00	27	0.07	33	0.28	70	0.04	40	0.11
Rosenthal 1930		62	0.49	47	0.00	46	0.05	64	0.05	40	0.12	43	0.08
Rosenthal 1931		47	0.53	49	0.00	36	0.10	30	0.35	10	0.52	14	0.43
Rosenthal 1931b		49	0.52	57	0.00	35	0.06	31	0.33	11	0.50	15	0.41
Rosenthal 1931c		42	0.55	31	0.00	34	0.05	28	0.36	13	0.47	16	0.41
Rosenthal 1931d		37	0.56	45	0.00	30	0.05	26	0.37	7	0.52	12	0.44
Rossi 2007		58	0.50	9	0.02	16	0.06	34	0.28	6	0.49	18	0.37
Rubinstein 1939		65	0.47	63	0.00	52	0.07	50	0.07	29	0.29	35	0.14
Rubinstein 1952		4	0.73	2	0.18	2	0.30	1	0.70	3	0.66	2	0.68
Rubinstein 1966		23	0.63	17	0.01	28	0.06	25	0.38	25	0.37	20	0.37
Schilhawsky 1960		73	0.40	66	0.00	75	0.04	72	0.04	86	0.03	75	0.03
Shebanova 2002		22	0.63	72	0.00	33	0.05	42	0.15	63	0.04	42	0.08
Smith 1975		15	0.67	7	0.03	13	0.15	10	0.53	30	0.23	21	0.35
Sokolov 2002		51	0.52	61	0.00	51	0.06	53	0.06	48	0.05	50	0.05
Sztompka 1959		63	0.48	37	0.00	69	0.04	67	0.04	76	0.04	62	0.04
Tomsic 1995		1	0.78	1	0.32	1	0.32	3	0.67	2	0.73	1	0.70
Uninsky 1932		78	0.35	60	0.00	82	0.03	84	0.03	86	0.02	85	0.02
Uninsky 1971		79	0.34	48	0.00	83	0.03	85	0.03	87	0.02	84	0.02
Wasowski 1980		53	0.52	55	0.00	61	0.05	62	0.05	75	0.04	57	0.04
Zak 1937		19	0.65	24	0.00	25	0.08	29	0.35	51	0.06	36	0.14
Zak 1951		20	0.65	36	0.00	20	0.06	17	0.43	41	0.13	27	0.24
Random 1		89	-0.20	78	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	86	0.02	89	0.01
Random 2		90	-0.20	80	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	81	0.02	88	0.01
Random 3		88	-0.03	51	0.00	86	0.02	88	0.02	33	0.19	48	0.06

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).