Czerny 1990

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		2	0.83	1	0.27	1	0.27	2	0.65	2	0.62	3	0.63
Anderszewski 2003		39	0.67	31	0.00	47	0.05	50	0.05	23	0.26	60	0.11
Ashkenazy 1981		49	0.64	23	0.00	32	0.06	34	0.18	32	0.22	37	0.20
Bacha 2000		69	0.54	67	0.00	70	0.05	49	0.05	42	0.15	66	0.09
Badura 1965		55	0.62	52	0.00	61	0.04	65	0.04	35	0.23	65	0.10
Barbosa 1983		66	0.57	42	0.00	62	0.04	67	0.04	21	0.28	58	0.11
Biret 1990		22	0.70	38	0.00	23	0.07	21	0.32	17	0.34	24	0.33
Blet 2003		13	0.74	45	0.00	19	0.09	17	0.41	4	0.52	15	0.46
Block 1995		68	0.54	47	0.00	72	0.03	85	0.03	44	0.09	74	0.05
Blumental 1952		53	0.63	18	0.01	17	0.13	24	0.28	2	0.48	21	0.37
Boshniakovich 1969		51	0.64	64	0.00	65	0.04	68	0.04	68	0.04	81	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		56	0.61	63	0.00	76	0.03	78	0.03	63	0.05	75	0.04
Bunin 1987		73	0.53	83	0.00	82	0.02	86	0.02	47	0.06	87	0.03
Bunin 1987b		74	0.51	85	0.00	83	0.04	61	0.04	49	0.06	73	0.05
Chiu 1999		60	0.59	79	0.00	60	0.03	72	0.03	23	0.31	63	0.10
Cohen 1997		87	0.30	29	0.00	87	0.04	63	0.04	69	0.04	82	0.04
Cortot 1951		38	0.68	25	0.00	51	0.05	48	0.05	18	0.38	52	0.14
Csalog 1996		82	0.47	84	0.00	81	0.02	87	0.02	43	0.10	79	0.04
Czerny 1949		1	0.84	2	0.14	2	0.19	1	0.69	1	0.70	1	0.69
Czerny 1990		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Duchoud 2007		62	0.59	32	0.00	66	0.04	59	0.04	39	0.15	69	0.08
Ezaki 2006		3	0.82	3	0.10	3	0.20	3	0.65	1	0.62	2	0.63
Falvay 1989		40	0.67	13	0.01	55	0.05	47	0.05	12	0.48	46	0.15
Farrell 1958		46	0.65	58	0.00	56	0.04	66	0.04	19	0.27	64	0.10
Ferenczy 1958		52	0.63	39	0.00	46	0.05	55	0.05	25	0.26	61	0.11
Fliere 1977		6	0.80	36	0.00	13	0.10	11	0.50	19	0.40	16	0.45
Fou 1978		58	0.59	26	0.00	39	0.04	43	0.09	51	0.05	71	0.07
Francois 1956		7	0.78	4	0.09	4	0.22	4	0.58	1	0.68	4	0.63
Friedman 1923		83	0.46	88	0.00	69	0.05	51	0.05	11	0.49	45	0.16
Friedman 1923b		84	0.46	89	0.00	64	0.04	60	0.04	11	0.48	51	0.14
Friedman 1930		61	0.59	56	0.00	48	0.06	46	0.06	12	0.46	40	0.17
Garcia 2007		72	0.53	86	0.00	79	0.03	84	0.03	47	0.06	80	0.04
Garcia 2007b		86	0.39	82	0.00	80	0.03	80	0.03	52	0.05	84	0.04
Gierzod 1998		11	0.74	50	0.00	15	0.10	15	0.46	14	0.44	17	0.45
Gornostaeva 1994		19	0.71	43	0.00	36	0.06	36	0.16	13	0.46	32	0.27
Groot 1988		43	0.66	44	0.00	40	0.05	41	0.10	32	0.30	42	0.17
Harasiewicz 1955		47	0.65	49	0.00	30	0.06	30	0.21	33	0.21	36	0.21
Hatto 1993		75	0.51	80	0.00	68	0.04	57	0.04	62	0.04	83	0.04
Hatto 1997		67	0.56	40	0.00	59	0.03	76	0.03	41	0.11	72	0.06
Horowitz 1949		65	0.57	78	0.00	78	0.03	79	0.03	64	0.04	85	0.03
Indjic 1988		71	0.53	51	0.00	67	0.04	69	0.04	64	0.04	78	0.04
Kapell 1951		15	0.73	11	0.02	11	0.11	12	0.50	7	0.47	13	0.48
Kissin 1993		14	0.74	34	0.00	22	0.09	18	0.41	13	0.45	18	0.43
Kushner 1989		4	0.81	27	0.00	6	0.11	7	0.54	4	0.57	10	0.55
Luisada 1991		29	0.69	72	0.00	24	0.07	27	0.25	25	0.38	26	0.31
Lushtak 2004		45	0.66	54	0.00	31	0.07	32	0.18	35	0.17	41	0.17
Malcuzynski 1961		24	0.70	35	0.00	35	0.05	31	0.19	7	0.48	28	0.30
Magaloff 1978		32	0.69	16	0.01	34	0.05	35	0.17	10	0.44	31	0.27
Magin 1975		48	0.65	20	0.01	27	0.08	28	0.25	11	0.41	25	0.32
Michalowski 1933		64	0.58	71	0.00	54	0.05	53	0.05	20	0.39	49	0.14
Milkina 1970		23	0.70	19	0.01	21	0.08	23	0.29	24	0.33	27	0.31
Mohovich 1999		12	0.74	14	0.01	16	0.13	10	0.50	6	0.56	11	0.53
Moravec 1969		16	0.73	12	0.02	10	0.14	13	0.47	1	0.72	6	0.58
Morozova 2008		18	0.72	53	0.00	14	0.11	19	0.39	6	0.42	19	0.40
Neighaus 1950		28	0.69	77	0.00	20	0.09	20	0.32	30	0.24	30	0.28
Niedzielski 1931		27	0.70	9	0.02	26	0.08	29	0.21	2	0.59	23	0.35
Ohlsson 1999		35	0.68	15	0.01	44	0.04	44	0.08	35	0.17	55	0.12
Osinska 1989		5	0.81	6	0.03	12	0.11	8	0.53	4	0.58	9	0.55
Pachmann 1927		78	0.50	68	0.00	84	0.03	81	0.03	49	0.05	77	0.04
Paderewski 1930		33	0.69	60	0.00	50	0.05	52	0.05	11	0.37	48	0.14
Perlemuter 1992		21	0.71	46	0.00	25	0.07	22	0.31	13	0.41	22	0.36
Pierdomenico 2008		59	0.59	69	0.00	63	0.04	64	0.04	20	0.41	54	0.13
Poblocka 1999		36	0.68	73	0.00	43	0.04	40	0.11	33	0.18	47	0.14
Rabcewiczowa 1932		9	0.76	17	0.01	7	0.13	9	0.51	1	0.65	7	0.58
Rachmaninoff 1923		17	0.72	8	0.02	8	0.12	5	0.55	1	0.66	5	0.60
Rangell 2001		80	0.49	57	0.00	77	0.03	82	0.03	55	0.04	88	0.03
Richter 1976		76	0.51	65	0.00	85	0.03	73	0.03	59	0.05	76	0.04
Rosen 1989		20	0.71	7	0.03	9	0.12	14	0.46	12	0.49	14	0.47
Rosenthal 1930		54	0.62	48	0.00	57	0.03	75	0.03	9	0.50	56	0.12
Rosenthal 1931		79	0.50	75	0.00	71	0.03	71	0.03	18	0.42	59	0.11
Rosenthal 1931b		81	0.47	70	0.00	75	0.04	62	0.04	20	0.33	62	0.11
Rosenthal 1931c		57	0.60	55	0.00	52	0.05	54	0.05	8	0.56	43	0.17
Rosenthal 1931d		77	0.51	41	0.00	74	0.03	83	0.03	23	0.27	67	0.09
Rossi 2007		63	0.58	10	0.02	53	0.04	56	0.04	1	0.66	44	0.16
Rubinstein 1939		85	0.46	66	0.00	86	0.04	70	0.04	42	0.13	70	0.07
Rubinstein 1952		70	0.54	59	0.00	73	0.03	77	0.03	34	0.25	68	0.09
Rubinstein 1966		44	0.66	21	0.01	41	0.05	42	0.09	27	0.35	39	0.18
Schilhawsky 1960		37	0.68	76	0.00	37	0.05	38	0.14	32	0.32	35	0.21
Shebanova 2002		25	0.70	37	0.00	42	0.04	39	0.11	21	0.32	38	0.19
Smith 1975		10	0.75	24	0.00	18	0.13	16	0.45	4	0.54	12	0.49
Sokolov 2002		41	0.67	28	0.00	38	0.06	37	0.15	23	0.38	33	0.24
Sztompka 1959		8	0.77	5	0.09	5	0.21	6	0.55	2	0.62	8	0.58
Tomsic 1995		50	0.64	62	0.00	58	0.03	74	0.03	17	0.44	57	0.11
Uninsky 1932		26	0.70	30	0.00	29	0.06	25	0.27	9	0.54	20	0.38
Uninsky 1971		42	0.66	61	0.00	49	0.06	45	0.06	30	0.32	50	0.14
Wasowski 1980		30	0.69	22	0.01	45	0.04	58	0.04	5	0.41	53	0.13
Zak 1937		31	0.69	74	0.00	33	0.06	33	0.18	27	0.27	34	0.22
Zak 1951		34	0.69	33	0.00	28	0.07	26	0.26	22	0.30	29	0.28
Random 1		90	-0.19	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	83	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		89	-0.11	87	0.00	88	0.02	89	0.02	71	0.03	89	0.02
Random 3		88	-0.09	81	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	63	0.04	86	0.03

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).