Csalog 1996

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		18	0.53	10	0.02	27	0.08	28	0.25	70	0.03	36	0.09
Anderszewski 2003		79	0.25	71	0.00	61	0.04	61	0.04	84	0.02	72	0.03
Ashkenazy 1981		62	0.35	82	0.00	55	0.04	69	0.04	70	0.03	80	0.03
Bacha 2000		8	0.56	23	0.00	7	0.10	10	0.46	14	0.39	5	0.42
Badura 1965		66	0.34	69	0.00	48	0.07	46	0.07	50	0.05	44	0.06
Barbosa 1983		51	0.39	47	0.00	23	0.07	25	0.28	27	0.23	13	0.25
Biret 1990		9	0.56	53	0.00	13	0.10	14	0.41	45	0.06	20	0.16
Blet 2003		20	0.52	22	0.00	30	0.06	29	0.24	61	0.04	32	0.10
Block 1995		73	0.30	33	0.00	80	0.03	77	0.03	83	0.03	77	0.03
Blumental 1952		67	0.33	63	0.00	60	0.04	63	0.04	84	0.02	78	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		60	0.36	56	0.00	76	0.04	71	0.04	85	0.02	79	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		47	0.41	74	0.00	40	0.07	39	0.15	49	0.05	33	0.09
Bunin 1987		72	0.31	66	0.00	78	0.03	85	0.03	74	0.03	81	0.03
Bunin 1987b		71	0.31	72	0.00	77	0.03	84	0.03	76	0.03	66	0.03
Chiu 1999		59	0.36	40	0.00	31	0.06	24	0.29	41	0.15	15	0.21
Cohen 1997		34	0.47	9	0.02	4	0.17	12	0.45	2	0.56	2	0.50
Cortot 1951		43	0.43	43	0.00	63	0.05	55	0.05	82	0.03	61	0.04
Csalog 1996		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Czerny 1949		64	0.34	78	0.00	74	0.03	80	0.03	81	0.03	74	0.03
Czerny 1990		33	0.47	59	0.00	44	0.05	43	0.10	87	0.02	59	0.04
Duchoud 2007		53	0.39	48	0.00	64	0.05	54	0.05	58	0.04	58	0.04
Ezaki 2006		49	0.40	45	0.00	53	0.05	53	0.05	62	0.04	47	0.04
Falvay 1989		7	0.60	11	0.01	3	0.14	6	0.53	15	0.45	3	0.49
Farrell 1958		52	0.39	60	0.00	67	0.05	56	0.05	81	0.03	54	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		12	0.54	13	0.01	22	0.07	16	0.40	28	0.22	10	0.30
Fliere 1977		26	0.50	19	0.00	32	0.05	30	0.23	59	0.04	29	0.10
Fou 1978		29	0.48	24	0.00	28	0.08	21	0.35	66	0.04	26	0.12
Francois 1956		25	0.50	37	0.00	25	0.07	27	0.26	59	0.05	28	0.11
Friedman 1923		87	-0.01	65	0.00	87	0.02	87	0.02	87	0.01	90	0.01
Friedman 1923b		86	0.00	67	0.00	86	0.02	86	0.02	85	0.02	88	0.02
Friedman 1930		85	0.06	81	0.00	85	0.03	75	0.03	85	0.02	85	0.02
Garcia 2007		77	0.28	87	0.00	79	0.03	82	0.03	83	0.03	75	0.03
Garcia 2007b		83	0.16	57	0.00	82	0.03	78	0.03	76	0.03	84	0.03
Gierzod 1998		24	0.51	30	0.00	43	0.06	41	0.12	65	0.04	42	0.07
Gornostaeva 1994		45	0.42	83	0.00	71	0.04	62	0.04	79	0.03	82	0.03
Groot 1988		23	0.51	26	0.00	29	0.07	33	0.19	41	0.10	22	0.14
Harasiewicz 1955		81	0.23	68	0.00	68	0.06	47	0.06	77	0.03	62	0.04
Hatto 1993		78	0.27	42	0.00	41	0.07	37	0.15	50	0.06	37	0.09
Hatto 1997		70	0.31	52	0.00	42	0.09	34	0.17	58	0.05	35	0.09
Horowitz 1949		63	0.35	73	0.00	72	0.03	83	0.03	59	0.04	68	0.03
Indjic 1988		74	0.30	49	0.00	33	0.05	36	0.16	49	0.06	31	0.10
Kapell 1951		2	0.65	3	0.07	5	0.15	3	0.56	63	0.04	21	0.15
Kissin 1993		21	0.52	14	0.01	18	0.06	11	0.45	42	0.12	14	0.23
Kushner 1989		15	0.53	17	0.01	19	0.06	18	0.38	44	0.10	17	0.19
Luisada 1991		68	0.33	29	0.00	39	0.05	31	0.21	80	0.03	38	0.08
Lushtak 2004		38	0.45	61	0.00	14	0.13	22	0.35	56	0.05	23	0.13
Malcuzynski 1961		50	0.40	27	0.00	75	0.03	81	0.03	68	0.04	67	0.03
Magaloff 1978		40	0.44	34	0.00	58	0.03	73	0.03	84	0.03	65	0.03
Magin 1975		75	0.29	41	0.00	49	0.05	57	0.05	69	0.03	52	0.04
Michalowski 1933		82	0.20	38	0.00	81	0.03	76	0.03	74	0.04	70	0.03
Milkina 1970		4	0.62	25	0.00	8	0.12	8	0.51	40	0.12	12	0.25
Mohovich 1999		10	0.56	54	0.00	21	0.07	15	0.40	78	0.03	27	0.11
Moravec 1969		6	0.61	21	0.00	9	0.13	9	0.49	18	0.39	4	0.44
Morozova 2008		76	0.29	84	0.00	52	0.04	70	0.04	69	0.03	73	0.03
Neighaus 1950		57	0.36	79	0.00	70	0.03	74	0.03	86	0.02	89	0.02
Niedzielski 1931		28	0.50	31	0.00	35	0.05	38	0.15	47	0.04	39	0.08
Ohlsson 1999		35	0.46	6	0.03	17	0.06	23	0.30	43	0.09	19	0.16
Osinska 1989		16	0.53	35	0.00	24	0.06	20	0.35	59	0.04	25	0.12
Pachmann 1927		37	0.46	15	0.01	46	0.05	52	0.05	55	0.05	45	0.05
Paderewski 1930		31	0.48	80	0.00	47	0.07	45	0.07	82	0.02	55	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		48	0.40	50	0.00	37	0.05	42	0.10	70	0.04	43	0.06
Pierdomenico 2008		65	0.34	75	0.00	69	0.04	72	0.04	68	0.04	51	0.04
Poblocka 1999		3	0.64	5	0.06	6	0.16	2	0.65	34	0.17	8	0.33
Rabcewiczowa 1932		30	0.48	70	0.00	45	0.06	48	0.06	83	0.03	53	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		80	0.24	64	0.00	83	0.04	66	0.04	57	0.04	49	0.04
Rangell 2001		27	0.50	36	0.00	36	0.05	40	0.14	48	0.05	41	0.08
Richter 1976		55	0.37	20	0.00	38	0.05	44	0.10	43	0.11	30	0.10
Rosen 1989		14	0.53	8	0.02	34	0.05	32	0.20	79	0.03	40	0.08
Rosenthal 1930		36	0.46	51	0.00	56	0.04	58	0.04	71	0.03	76	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		56	0.36	88	0.00	65	0.04	59	0.04	65	0.03	71	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		58	0.36	85	0.00	66	0.04	60	0.04	72	0.03	83	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		32	0.47	58	0.00	57	0.05	49	0.05	59	0.04	63	0.04
Rosenthal 1931d		46	0.42	77	0.00	59	0.04	65	0.04	55	0.05	60	0.04
Rossi 2007		84	0.13	76	0.00	84	0.05	51	0.05	72	0.04	48	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		41	0.43	62	0.00	10	0.10	26	0.27	16	0.36	9	0.31
Rubinstein 1952		1	0.70	1	0.43	1	0.42	1	0.65	11	0.56	1	0.60
Rubinstein 1966		17	0.53	32	0.00	11	0.14	13	0.43	30	0.27	7	0.34
Schilhawsky 1960		44	0.43	55	0.00	51	0.04	68	0.04	70	0.04	56	0.04
Shebanova 2002		5	0.61	2	0.13	2	0.19	4	0.56	29	0.26	6	0.38
Smith 1975		54	0.38	89	0.00	62	0.05	50	0.05	62	0.04	50	0.04
Sokolov 2002		39	0.44	28	0.00	54	0.04	67	0.04	66	0.03	64	0.03
Sztompka 1959		61	0.36	86	0.00	73	0.03	79	0.03	81	0.04	69	0.03
Tomsic 1995		13	0.54	12	0.01	20	0.06	17	0.39	39	0.18	11	0.26
Uninsky 1932		69	0.33	46	0.00	50	0.04	64	0.04	73	0.04	57	0.04
Uninsky 1971		42	0.43	4	0.06	16	0.07	35	0.16	70	0.05	34	0.09
Wasowski 1980		22	0.51	16	0.01	26	0.07	19	0.36	74	0.04	24	0.12
Zak 1937		11	0.56	18	0.01	12	0.12	5	0.54	58	0.06	18	0.18
Zak 1951		19	0.53	7	0.02	15	0.11	7	0.52	45	0.08	16	0.20
Random 1		89	-0.07	44	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	27	0.30	46	0.05
Random 2		90	-0.10	90	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	57	0.04	86	0.02
Random 3		88	-0.02	39	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	56	0.04	87	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).