Cortot 1951

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		11	0.66	79	0.00	25	0.08	19	0.35	45	0.05	33	0.13
Anderszewski 2003		40	0.57	41	0.00	47	0.05	62	0.05	48	0.05	55	0.05
Ashkenazy 1981		20	0.63	26	0.00	11	0.13	11	0.46	26	0.31	14	0.38
Bacha 2000		70	0.46	52	0.00	73	0.04	77	0.04	73	0.04	59	0.04
Badura 1965		46	0.56	6	0.03	37	0.06	33	0.20	33	0.27	23	0.23
Barbosa 1983		71	0.45	66	0.00	65	0.04	70	0.04	62	0.05	68	0.04
Biret 1990		15	0.65	45	0.00	14	0.09	9	0.46	33	0.23	18	0.33
Blet 2003		19	0.63	83	0.00	42	0.06	39	0.16	47	0.06	40	0.10
Block 1995		59	0.51	38	0.00	29	0.05	42	0.15	59	0.04	49	0.08
Blumental 1952		34	0.59	35	0.00	13	0.11	13	0.42	5	0.41	10	0.41
Boshniakovich 1969		30	0.61	65	0.00	59	0.06	47	0.06	53	0.05	56	0.05
Brailowsky 1960		64	0.48	62	0.00	79	0.04	65	0.04	71	0.04	60	0.04
Bunin 1987		53	0.54	77	0.00	56	0.09	45	0.09	33	0.29	29	0.16
Bunin 1987b		55	0.53	81	0.00	55	0.05	53	0.05	33	0.27	36	0.12
Chiu 1999		78	0.41	34	0.00	74	0.04	79	0.04	64	0.04	61	0.04
Cohen 1997		87	0.29	42	0.00	80	0.04	72	0.04	70	0.04	73	0.04
Cortot 1951		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Csalog 1996		76	0.43	69	0.00	71	0.03	82	0.03	55	0.05	69	0.04
Czerny 1949		4	0.71	16	0.01	6	0.14	4	0.62	19	0.40	5	0.50
Czerny 1990		9	0.68	13	0.01	18	0.07	18	0.38	48	0.05	32	0.14
Duchoud 2007		24	0.63	14	0.01	26	0.07	14	0.41	13	0.40	13	0.40
Ezaki 2006		14	0.65	11	0.02	35	0.08	29	0.28	87	0.03	42	0.09
Falvay 1989		77	0.42	57	0.00	82	0.02	85	0.02	83	0.03	88	0.02
Farrell 1958		27	0.62	20	0.00	23	0.06	23	0.30	38	0.12	26	0.19
Ferenczy 1958		13	0.66	18	0.00	12	0.16	10	0.46	6	0.45	7	0.45
Fliere 1977		12	0.66	15	0.01	40	0.06	35	0.19	69	0.03	46	0.08
Fou 1978		72	0.45	56	0.00	77	0.04	73	0.04	78	0.04	62	0.04
Francois 1956		56	0.53	28	0.00	66	0.06	48	0.06	74	0.03	75	0.04
Friedman 1923		66	0.47	85	0.00	51	0.05	61	0.05	15	0.44	30	0.15
Friedman 1923b		68	0.47	82	0.00	50	0.05	56	0.05	16	0.40	31	0.14
Friedman 1930		58	0.52	88	0.00	49	0.05	58	0.05	28	0.29	37	0.12
Garcia 2007		47	0.56	60	0.00	32	0.06	36	0.18	19	0.37	21	0.26
Garcia 2007b		73	0.45	19	0.00	22	0.07	38	0.17	29	0.17	28	0.17
Gierzod 1998		17	0.64	51	0.00	34	0.07	25	0.30	52	0.05	38	0.12
Gornostaeva 1994		48	0.56	53	0.00	64	0.04	69	0.04	84	0.02	84	0.03
Groot 1988		42	0.57	17	0.01	30	0.07	40	0.16	62	0.04	50	0.08
Harasiewicz 1955		52	0.55	31	0.00	31	0.06	24	0.30	64	0.04	39	0.11
Hatto 1993		74	0.45	90	0.00	54	0.05	60	0.05	53	0.05	57	0.05
Hatto 1997		61	0.50	76	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.10	48	0.07	48	0.08
Horowitz 1949		43	0.57	54	0.00	48	0.04	66	0.04	44	0.08	52	0.06
Indjic 1988		69	0.46	86	0.00	53	0.05	64	0.05	51	0.06	54	0.05
Kapell 1951		2	0.75	2	0.17	2	0.39	2	0.69	6	0.47	2	0.57
Kissin 1993		45	0.56	87	0.00	62	0.05	55	0.05	87	0.03	67	0.04
Kushner 1989		23	0.63	47	0.00	45	0.05	50	0.05	76	0.03	63	0.04
Luisada 1991		63	0.50	27	0.00	69	0.04	67	0.04	87	0.02	76	0.03
Lushtak 2004		35	0.59	24	0.00	16	0.08	22	0.31	40	0.13	25	0.20
Malcuzynski 1961		16	0.65	3	0.11	4	0.12	15	0.40	31	0.19	20	0.28
Magaloff 1978		62	0.50	43	0.00	78	0.04	71	0.04	85	0.03	77	0.03
Magin 1975		65	0.48	75	0.00	72	0.04	75	0.04	84	0.02	80	0.03
Michalowski 1933		38	0.58	70	0.00	15	0.11	16	0.39	16	0.41	12	0.40
Milkina 1970		41	0.57	48	0.00	46	0.05	52	0.05	70	0.04	65	0.04
Mohovich 1999		49	0.55	72	0.00	60	0.06	49	0.06	82	0.03	71	0.04
Moravec 1969		28	0.61	8	0.02	19	0.07	26	0.29	16	0.40	15	0.34
Morozova 2008		36	0.59	22	0.00	24	0.06	32	0.21	64	0.04	44	0.09
Neighaus 1950		21	0.63	21	0.00	33	0.06	30	0.26	64	0.04	41	0.10
Niedzielski 1931		31	0.60	9	0.02	20	0.09	21	0.33	19	0.34	17	0.33
Ohlsson 1999		33	0.59	63	0.00	38	0.06	37	0.18	55	0.05	43	0.09
Osinska 1989		3	0.72	12	0.01	9	0.13	3	0.62	24	0.34	6	0.46
Pachmann 1927		86	0.30	80	0.00	87	0.02	86	0.02	87	0.02	89	0.02
Paderewski 1930		18	0.64	29	0.00	36	0.07	28	0.28	18	0.31	19	0.29
Perlemuter 1992		32	0.60	67	0.00	41	0.06	41	0.15	67	0.04	47	0.08
Pierdomenico 2008		79	0.41	7	0.02	76	0.03	81	0.03	76	0.03	78	0.03
Poblocka 1999		6	0.69	10	0.02	3	0.17	7	0.49	17	0.35	9	0.41
Rabcewiczowa 1932		29	0.61	58	0.00	43	0.08	43	0.15	31	0.22	27	0.18
Rachmaninoff 1923		39	0.57	30	0.00	21	0.09	27	0.28	54	0.05	35	0.12
Rangell 2001		75	0.44	36	0.00	68	0.05	63	0.05	75	0.03	74	0.04
Richter 1976		51	0.55	39	0.00	61	0.07	46	0.07	50	0.06	53	0.06
Rosen 1989		54	0.53	37	0.00	63	0.04	68	0.04	83	0.03	83	0.03
Rosenthal 1930		37	0.59	25	0.00	52	0.05	57	0.05	20	0.33	34	0.13
Rosenthal 1931		81	0.39	50	0.00	81	0.04	74	0.04	85	0.02	82	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		83	0.37	71	0.00	85	0.03	84	0.03	83	0.03	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		57	0.52	23	0.00	67	0.05	59	0.05	48	0.05	58	0.05
Rosenthal 1931d		82	0.38	64	0.00	86	0.03	80	0.03	78	0.03	85	0.03
Rossi 2007		80	0.41	5	0.03	17	0.07	31	0.22	22	0.29	22	0.25
Rubinstein 1939		85	0.35	73	0.00	83	0.02	87	0.02	75	0.04	79	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		84	0.36	49	0.00	84	0.03	83	0.03	69	0.04	87	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		60	0.51	32	0.00	70	0.04	76	0.04	65	0.04	70	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		5	0.70	59	0.00	5	0.10	5	0.61	15	0.45	4	0.52
Shebanova 2002		26	0.62	33	0.00	39	0.07	34	0.20	79	0.04	45	0.09
Smith 1975		22	0.63	55	0.00	28	0.05	20	0.35	36	0.13	24	0.21
Sokolov 2002		25	0.63	78	0.00	27	0.10	17	0.38	36	0.29	16	0.33
Sztompka 1959		1	0.77	1	0.39	1	0.39	1	0.72	6	0.54	1	0.62
Tomsic 1995		67	0.47	44	0.00	75	0.04	78	0.04	72	0.03	81	0.03
Uninsky 1932		7	0.68	74	0.00	7	0.16	6	0.55	11	0.52	3	0.53
Uninsky 1971		8	0.68	40	0.00	8	0.13	8	0.49	18	0.39	8	0.44
Wasowski 1980		10	0.67	4	0.05	10	0.13	12	0.46	15	0.35	11	0.40
Zak 1937		44	0.57	89	0.00	58	0.05	51	0.05	67	0.04	64	0.04
Zak 1951		50	0.55	84	0.00	57	0.05	54	0.05	76	0.04	66	0.04
Random 1		89	-0.05	61	0.00	88	0.01	89	0.01	4	0.54	51	0.07
Random 2		90	-0.10	68	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	63	0.04	90	0.02
Random 3		88	-0.01	46	0.00	89	0.01	88	0.01	32	0.19	72	0.04

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).