Cohen 1997

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		61	0.28	44	0.00	74	0.04	65	0.04	59	0.04	60	0.04
Anderszewski 2003		38	0.34	10	0.02	23	0.05	39	0.10	78	0.03	44	0.05
Ashkenazy 1981		10	0.49	6	0.04	18	0.06	23	0.24	60	0.04	25	0.10
Bacha 2000		1	0.60	4	0.06	4	0.22	3	0.54	22	0.32	4	0.42
Badura 1965		64	0.26	18	0.01	69	0.03	82	0.03	87	0.02	88	0.02
Barbosa 1983		22	0.42	72	0.00	26	0.06	22	0.25	67	0.04	24	0.10
Biret 1990		7	0.50	69	0.00	11	0.08	13	0.38	69	0.04	17	0.12
Blet 2003		42	0.33	16	0.01	33	0.05	36	0.12	87	0.02	45	0.05
Block 1995		71	0.23	12	0.02	29	0.05	37	0.11	75	0.03	39	0.06
Blumental 1952		23	0.42	50	0.00	32	0.05	35	0.13	64	0.03	40	0.06
Boshniakovich 1969		68	0.25	76	0.00	68	0.04	68	0.04	76	0.03	80	0.03
Brailowsky 1960		8	0.50	51	0.00	7	0.11	8	0.44	57	0.05	9	0.15
Bunin 1987		77	0.17	27	0.00	82	0.04	64	0.04	82	0.03	81	0.03
Bunin 1987b		79	0.16	62	0.00	81	0.02	87	0.02	82	0.03	84	0.02
Chiu 1999		9	0.49	13	0.01	21	0.07	16	0.31	71	0.03	23	0.10
Cohen 1997		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Cortot 1951		60	0.29	61	0.00	71	0.04	70	0.04	72	0.04	63	0.04
Csalog 1996		13	0.47	5	0.05	3	0.24	2	0.56	12	0.45	2	0.50
Czerny 1949		81	0.15	85	0.00	83	0.04	67	0.04	77	0.04	59	0.04
Czerny 1990		55	0.30	58	0.00	61	0.04	69	0.04	63	0.04	62	0.04
Duchoud 2007		48	0.32	33	0.00	64	0.03	77	0.03	72	0.04	77	0.03
Ezaki 2006		35	0.36	42	0.00	58	0.04	63	0.04	63	0.04	49	0.04
Falvay 1989		5	0.51	3	0.15	5	0.23	6	0.49	38	0.24	5	0.34
Farrell 1958		11	0.48	49	0.00	19	0.06	15	0.31	77	0.04	18	0.11
Ferenczy 1958		25	0.40	19	0.01	25	0.05	26	0.21	38	0.11	10	0.15
Fliere 1977		34	0.36	36	0.00	44	0.04	40	0.08	81	0.03	42	0.05
Fou 1978		4	0.53	40	0.00	12	0.10	4	0.51	76	0.04	11	0.14
Francois 1956		53	0.31	15	0.01	41	0.04	45	0.07	77	0.03	48	0.05
Friedman 1923		88	0.06	88	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01	90	0.01
Friedman 1923b		87	0.06	90	0.00	89	0.02	88	0.02	90	0.01	89	0.01
Friedman 1930		75	0.18	81	0.00	80	0.02	86	0.02	86	0.02	86	0.02
Garcia 2007		56	0.30	55	0.00	67	0.03	75	0.03	76	0.03	78	0.03
Garcia 2007b		58	0.29	38	0.00	54	0.06	49	0.06	78	0.03	64	0.04
Gierzod 1998		28	0.39	26	0.00	34	0.06	33	0.14	85	0.03	38	0.06
Gornostaeva 1994		62	0.28	63	0.00	55	0.04	57	0.04	60	0.04	61	0.04
Groot 1988		36	0.35	68	0.00	42	0.04	44	0.07	57	0.04	47	0.05
Harasiewicz 1955		52	0.31	24	0.01	60	0.04	62	0.04	75	0.03	83	0.03
Hatto 1993		18	0.43	56	0.00	37	0.06	31	0.15	84	0.03	37	0.07
Hatto 1997		19	0.43	23	0.01	36	0.06	28	0.20	61	0.04	27	0.09
Horowitz 1949		80	0.15	87	0.00	79	0.02	85	0.02	70	0.03	85	0.02
Indjic 1988		21	0.42	86	0.00	38	0.06	34	0.13	66	0.04	35	0.07
Kapell 1951		51	0.31	89	0.00	35	0.06	32	0.15	83	0.03	34	0.07
Kissin 1993		39	0.34	74	0.00	48	0.05	52	0.05	60	0.04	57	0.04
Kushner 1989		32	0.37	22	0.01	30	0.05	30	0.17	86	0.03	33	0.07
Luisada 1991		26	0.40	52	0.00	43	0.04	42	0.08	81	0.03	41	0.05
Lushtak 2004		3	0.53	48	0.00	8	0.09	9	0.41	72	0.03	20	0.11
Malcuzynski 1961		83	0.14	54	0.00	84	0.03	78	0.03	86	0.03	72	0.03
Magaloff 1978		14	0.46	46	0.00	15	0.09	10	0.39	69	0.04	15	0.12
Magin 1975		76	0.18	21	0.01	76	0.04	56	0.04	68	0.03	71	0.03
Michalowski 1933		74	0.18	20	0.01	73	0.04	59	0.04	82	0.03	74	0.03
Milkina 1970		17	0.45	8	0.03	9	0.09	7	0.48	44	0.09	8	0.21
Mohovich 1999		29	0.39	64	0.00	39	0.05	38	0.11	68	0.04	36	0.07
Moravec 1969		37	0.35	25	0.01	47	0.05	51	0.05	64	0.04	50	0.04
Morozova 2008		65	0.26	67	0.00	62	0.03	79	0.03	60	0.04	76	0.03
Neighaus 1950		57	0.30	78	0.00	65	0.03	81	0.03	75	0.04	82	0.03
Niedzielski 1931		78	0.17	43	0.00	66	0.03	72	0.03	55	0.04	70	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		27	0.39	14	0.01	45	0.04	58	0.04	59	0.04	56	0.04
Osinska 1989		24	0.41	59	0.00	17	0.06	17	0.31	76	0.03	22	0.10
Pachmann 1927		33	0.36	29	0.00	28	0.06	27	0.21	42	0.10	12	0.14
Paderewski 1930		16	0.45	71	0.00	10	0.07	12	0.38	64	0.03	19	0.11
Perlemuter 1992		31	0.38	82	0.00	49	0.05	50	0.05	87	0.02	65	0.03
Pierdomenico 2008		72	0.22	79	0.00	63	0.04	71	0.04	86	0.02	69	0.03
Poblocka 1999		45	0.32	41	0.00	31	0.05	29	0.18	69	0.04	30	0.08
Rabcewiczowa 1932		40	0.34	37	0.00	46	0.06	47	0.06	80	0.03	52	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		84	0.13	53	0.00	85	0.03	73	0.03	82	0.03	68	0.03
Rangell 2001		67	0.25	39	0.00	40	0.04	41	0.08	72	0.03	46	0.05
Richter 1976		73	0.22	28	0.00	59	0.04	55	0.04	78	0.03	73	0.03
Rosen 1989		20	0.42	11	0.02	14	0.09	18	0.30	75	0.03	29	0.09
Rosenthal 1930		69	0.24	57	0.00	53	0.06	48	0.06	82	0.02	79	0.03
Rosenthal 1931		59	0.29	34	0.00	24	0.06	24	0.23	71	0.03	31	0.08
Rosenthal 1931b		46	0.32	30	0.00	20	0.07	21	0.26	44	0.08	14	0.14
Rosenthal 1931c		49	0.31	83	0.00	27	0.05	25	0.23	50	0.05	21	0.11
Rosenthal 1931d		41	0.33	66	0.00	16	0.09	19	0.30	31	0.18	7	0.23
Rossi 2007		66	0.25	80	0.00	70	0.03	76	0.03	80	0.03	67	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		6	0.51	1	0.19	1	0.19	5	0.49	6	0.46	3	0.47
Rubinstein 1952		2	0.54	2	0.17	2	0.27	1	0.58	15	0.51	1	0.54
Rubinstein 1966		12	0.48	17	0.01	6	0.13	11	0.38	36	0.23	6	0.30
Schilhawsky 1960		70	0.24	60	0.00	75	0.05	53	0.05	85	0.03	58	0.04
Shebanova 2002		15	0.45	7	0.03	13	0.10	14	0.32	46	0.06	13	0.14
Smith 1975		30	0.39	45	0.00	22	0.06	20	0.30	83	0.03	26	0.09
Sokolov 2002		47	0.32	35	0.00	57	0.03	74	0.03	78	0.03	66	0.03
Sztompka 1959		63	0.27	84	0.00	77	0.05	54	0.05	77	0.04	55	0.04
Tomsic 1995		44	0.32	73	0.00	50	0.04	60	0.04	53	0.05	54	0.04
Uninsky 1932		85	0.11	77	0.00	78	0.03	80	0.03	87	0.02	87	0.02
Uninsky 1971		82	0.15	9	0.02	72	0.04	61	0.04	81	0.03	75	0.03
Wasowski 1980		54	0.30	31	0.00	56	0.04	66	0.04	67	0.04	51	0.04
Zak 1937		43	0.33	75	0.00	51	0.06	46	0.06	79	0.03	53	0.04
Zak 1951		50	0.31	70	0.00	52	0.08	43	0.08	80	0.03	43	0.05
Random 1		90	-0.08	65	0.00	88	0.02	89	0.02	16	0.36	32	0.08
Random 2		89	0.00	47	0.00	87	0.03	84	0.03	15	0.26	28	0.09
Random 3		86	0.08	32	0.00	86	0.03	83	0.03	10	0.45	16	0.12

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).