Bunin 1987b

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		18	0.59	40	0.00	27	0.07	24	0.37	66	0.04	35	0.12
Anderszewski 2003		40	0.50	21	0.00	20	0.09	30	0.31	67	0.03	39	0.10
Ashkenazy 1981		24	0.58	41	0.00	22	0.08	19	0.40	45	0.06	26	0.15
Bacha 2000		80	0.32	3	0.00	80	0.03	77	0.03	88	0.02	85	0.02
Badura 1965		33	0.53	42	0.00	13	0.10	18	0.41	22	0.36	12	0.38
Barbosa 1983		60	0.43	27	0.00	54	0.05	51	0.05	64	0.04	62	0.04
Biret 1990		57	0.44	28	0.00	63	0.05	53	0.05	87	0.03	69	0.04
Blet 2003		29	0.55	12	0.00	42	0.07	38	0.19	50	0.05	40	0.10
Block 1995		67	0.40	29	0.00	50	0.05	52	0.05	86	0.02	79	0.03
Blumental 1952		77	0.34	9	0.00	70	0.03	79	0.03	50	0.04	80	0.03
Boshniakovich 1969		17	0.59	43	0.00	35	0.08	34	0.27	38	0.17	22	0.21
Brailowsky 1960		63	0.42	44	0.00	64	0.03	75	0.03	54	0.05	52	0.04
Bunin 1987		1	1.00	1	1.00	1	0.99	1	1.00	1	1.00	1	1.00
Bunin 1987b		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Chiu 1999		64	0.41	18	0.00	59	0.05	55	0.05	75	0.03	53	0.04
Cohen 1997		86	0.16	45	0.00	86	0.03	82	0.03	87	0.02	90	0.02
Cortot 1951		32	0.53	30	0.00	33	0.06	33	0.27	53	0.05	36	0.12
Csalog 1996		82	0.31	46	0.00	74	0.03	76	0.03	84	0.03	78	0.03
Czerny 1949		8	0.63	10	0.00	7	0.11	6	0.53	22	0.37	6	0.44
Czerny 1990		37	0.51	31	0.00	46	0.06	49	0.06	61	0.04	49	0.05
Duchoud 2007		20	0.58	47	0.00	28	0.07	21	0.39	22	0.35	13	0.37
Ezaki 2006		19	0.58	48	0.00	29	0.06	23	0.37	61	0.04	33	0.12
Falvay 1989		70	0.38	22	0.00	81	0.03	80	0.03	82	0.03	73	0.03
Farrell 1958		61	0.43	49	0.00	69	0.04	63	0.04	78	0.03	74	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		22	0.58	50	0.00	34	0.09	28	0.33	18	0.31	16	0.32
Fliere 1977		10	0.63	51	0.00	14	0.09	17	0.43	56	0.04	29	0.13
Fou 1978		50	0.47	52	0.00	62	0.04	65	0.04	67	0.04	58	0.04
Francois 1956		42	0.49	53	0.00	51	0.05	58	0.05	55	0.05	50	0.05
Friedman 1923		74	0.36	54	0.00	48	0.08	45	0.08	22	0.34	24	0.16
Friedman 1923b		72	0.37	23	0.00	47	0.06	48	0.06	25	0.30	32	0.13
Friedman 1930		54	0.46	24	0.00	23	0.06	31	0.31	25	0.36	14	0.33
Garcia 2007		55	0.45	55	0.00	56	0.04	73	0.04	58	0.04	66	0.04
Garcia 2007b		69	0.38	56	0.00	57	0.04	67	0.04	60	0.04	71	0.04
Gierzod 1998		34	0.53	57	0.00	45	0.06	47	0.06	78	0.03	65	0.04
Gornostaeva 1994		44	0.49	58	0.00	49	0.06	46	0.06	57	0.04	48	0.05
Groot 1988		27	0.57	59	0.00	19	0.08	29	0.33	46	0.06	28	0.14
Harasiewicz 1955		16	0.59	60	0.00	4	0.20	4	0.54	21	0.36	7	0.44
Hatto 1993		56	0.45	61	0.00	43	0.07	41	0.15	60	0.04	43	0.08
Hatto 1997		38	0.51	62	0.00	30	0.05	32	0.31	59	0.05	34	0.12
Horowitz 1949		15	0.61	4	0.00	21	0.08	20	0.40	22	0.40	10	0.40
Indjic 1988		49	0.48	63	0.00	37	0.06	37	0.21	50	0.06	38	0.11
Kapell 1951		4	0.65	13	0.00	10	0.18	8	0.51	29	0.28	11	0.38
Kissin 1993		51	0.47	19	0.00	66	0.05	59	0.05	77	0.03	61	0.04
Kushner 1989		48	0.48	14	0.00	58	0.04	61	0.04	80	0.03	75	0.03
Luisada 1991		52	0.47	32	0.00	65	0.04	71	0.04	83	0.03	72	0.03
Lushtak 2004		9	0.63	33	0.00	9	0.14	5	0.54	33	0.20	15	0.33
Malcuzynski 1961		25	0.57	11	0.00	18	0.09	16	0.43	40	0.11	21	0.22
Magaloff 1978		58	0.44	64	0.00	53	0.05	54	0.05	83	0.03	54	0.04
Magin 1975		41	0.50	6	0.00	39	0.06	43	0.13	62	0.04	45	0.07
Michalowski 1933		43	0.49	65	0.00	17	0.11	11	0.48	21	0.39	8	0.43
Milkina 1970		73	0.37	66	0.00	79	0.03	81	0.03	76	0.04	76	0.03
Mohovich 1999		30	0.55	15	0.00	40	0.05	39	0.17	73	0.03	47	0.07
Moravec 1969		84	0.29	16	0.00	83	0.02	84	0.02	86	0.02	86	0.02
Morozova 2008		31	0.54	25	0.00	32	0.06	35	0.27	54	0.04	41	0.10
Neighaus 1950		7	0.64	67	0.00	8	0.11	10	0.51	50	0.06	23	0.17
Niedzielski 1931		68	0.39	68	0.00	67	0.04	70	0.04	59	0.04	56	0.04
Ohlsson 1999		28	0.56	69	0.00	31	0.06	26	0.33	57	0.04	37	0.11
Osinska 1989		62	0.42	70	0.00	71	0.04	62	0.04	66	0.04	51	0.04
Pachmann 1927		39	0.51	34	0.00	41	0.06	40	0.16	16	0.35	19	0.24
Paderewski 1930		47	0.49	71	0.00	52	0.05	50	0.05	79	0.03	60	0.04
Perlemuter 1992		23	0.58	72	0.00	25	0.07	22	0.38	53	0.05	27	0.14
Pierdomenico 2008		71	0.37	73	0.00	77	0.04	74	0.04	64	0.04	55	0.04
Poblocka 1999		14	0.61	74	0.00	12	0.10	14	0.44	41	0.13	18	0.24
Rabcewiczowa 1932		59	0.44	75	0.00	60	0.04	64	0.04	60	0.04	57	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		26	0.57	35	0.00	16	0.08	13	0.45	30	0.20	17	0.30
Rangell 2001		75	0.36	76	0.00	73	0.04	60	0.04	86	0.03	81	0.03
Richter 1976		5	0.65	77	0.00	6	0.16	9	0.51	7	0.51	3	0.51
Rosen 1989		66	0.40	26	0.00	72	0.05	57	0.05	82	0.03	67	0.04
Rosenthal 1930		36	0.52	78	0.00	36	0.07	36	0.22	28	0.25	20	0.23
Rosenthal 1931		78	0.34	79	0.00	75	0.04	72	0.04	77	0.03	77	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		79	0.33	80	0.00	76	0.05	56	0.05	80	0.03	70	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		65	0.41	81	0.00	68	0.04	69	0.04	78	0.03	83	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		81	0.31	82	0.00	78	0.03	83	0.03	79	0.03	82	0.03
Rossi 2007		87	0.15	36	0.00	87	0.02	85	0.02	87	0.02	87	0.02
Rubinstein 1939		85	0.28	5	0.00	85	0.02	86	0.02	77	0.03	88	0.02
Rubinstein 1952		83	0.30	37	0.00	84	0.02	87	0.02	76	0.04	84	0.03
Rubinstein 1966		76	0.34	7	0.00	82	0.03	78	0.03	87	0.02	89	0.02
Schilhawsky 1960		3	0.69	17	0.00	2	0.27	3	0.57	12	0.45	4	0.51
Shebanova 2002		53	0.46	83	0.00	61	0.04	66	0.04	53	0.05	63	0.04
Smith 1975		35	0.53	84	0.00	38	0.05	42	0.15	59	0.04	42	0.08
Sokolov 2002		6	0.65	85	0.00	5	0.15	7	0.52	8	0.48	5	0.50
Sztompka 1959		21	0.58	20	0.00	26	0.07	25	0.36	54	0.06	25	0.15
Tomsic 1995		45	0.49	2	0.00	55	0.04	68	0.04	52	0.05	59	0.04
Uninsky 1932		12	0.62	86	0.00	11	0.13	12	0.46	23	0.41	9	0.43
Uninsky 1971		2	0.71	8	0.00	3	0.29	2	0.60	13	0.45	2	0.52
Wasowski 1980		46	0.49	38	0.00	44	0.06	44	0.11	77	0.04	44	0.07
Zak 1937		13	0.61	87	0.00	24	0.06	27	0.33	64	0.05	30	0.13
Zak 1951		11	0.62	39	0.00	15	0.09	15	0.43	68	0.04	31	0.13
Random 1		89	-0.02	88	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	6	0.50	46	0.07
Random 2		90	-0.08	89	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	24	0.20	64	0.04
Random 3		88	0.00	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	31	0.19	68	0.04

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).