Boshniakovich 1969

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		16	0.67	62	0.00	27	0.07	22	0.35	49	0.05	37	0.13
Anderszewski 2003		47	0.59	32	0.00	49	0.05	54	0.05	60	0.03	69	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		40	0.62	11	0.02	29	0.08	31	0.23	57	0.04	42	0.10
Bacha 2000		73	0.47	46	0.00	73	0.04	72	0.04	60	0.05	62	0.04
Badura 1965		15	0.67	14	0.01	7	0.11	9	0.55	4	0.57	4	0.56
Barbosa 1983		83	0.37	53	0.00	74	0.04	66	0.04	76	0.04	68	0.04
Biret 1990		54	0.57	29	0.00	61	0.04	62	0.04	70	0.04	74	0.04
Blet 2003		41	0.62	73	0.00	43	0.06	42	0.11	64	0.04	49	0.07
Block 1995		14	0.67	3	0.08	5	0.15	11	0.54	1	0.52	5	0.53
Blumental 1952		65	0.51	10	0.02	22	0.06	43	0.11	47	0.05	50	0.07
Boshniakovich 1969		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Brailowsky 1960		39	0.62	57	0.00	58	0.03	75	0.03	33	0.24	45	0.08
Bunin 1987		48	0.59	88	0.00	40	0.05	40	0.16	35	0.23	30	0.19
Bunin 1987b		51	0.59	82	0.00	33	0.04	38	0.17	34	0.27	29	0.21
Chiu 1999		69	0.49	43	0.00	63	0.05	58	0.05	59	0.04	64	0.04
Cohen 1997		87	0.25	63	0.00	86	0.03	76	0.03	68	0.04	84	0.03
Cortot 1951		43	0.61	60	0.00	62	0.05	53	0.05	47	0.06	61	0.05
Csalog 1996		86	0.36	67	0.00	77	0.02	85	0.02	71	0.04	83	0.03
Czerny 1949		26	0.64	27	0.00	31	0.10	27	0.27	47	0.06	36	0.13
Czerny 1990		27	0.64	47	0.00	59	0.04	68	0.04	68	0.04	73	0.04
Duchoud 2007		61	0.52	35	0.00	67	0.04	65	0.04	62	0.04	72	0.04
Ezaki 2006		22	0.65	81	0.00	54	0.07	47	0.07	75	0.03	55	0.05
Falvay 1989		68	0.50	64	0.00	84	0.03	81	0.03	76	0.04	79	0.03
Farrell 1958		50	0.59	86	0.00	56	0.07	45	0.07	43	0.09	46	0.08
Ferenczy 1958		66	0.51	65	0.00	81	0.02	82	0.02	82	0.03	88	0.02
Fliere 1977		1	0.79	1	0.32	1	0.32	3	0.63	9	0.51	3	0.57
Fou 1978		19	0.66	52	0.00	6	0.10	12	0.53	13	0.41	9	0.47
Francois 1956		59	0.53	83	0.00	68	0.04	71	0.04	76	0.03	86	0.03
Friedman 1923		85	0.37	89	0.00	66	0.03	73	0.03	39	0.17	52	0.07
Friedman 1923b		84	0.37	79	0.00	65	0.04	61	0.04	39	0.17	47	0.08
Friedman 1930		71	0.47	71	0.00	64	0.04	60	0.04	69	0.04	70	0.04
Garcia 2007		53	0.58	66	0.00	45	0.06	50	0.06	27	0.31	35	0.14
Garcia 2007b		67	0.50	55	0.00	48	0.04	63	0.04	31	0.15	48	0.08
Gierzod 1998		6	0.71	15	0.01	11	0.17	4	0.58	29	0.28	13	0.40
Gornostaeva 1994		4	0.72	30	0.00	17	0.07	16	0.41	23	0.31	14	0.36
Groot 1988		42	0.61	49	0.00	42	0.07	41	0.14	36	0.22	31	0.18
Harasiewicz 1955		18	0.67	4	0.07	3	0.18	2	0.63	16	0.39	7	0.50
Hatto 1993		76	0.45	61	0.00	36	0.05	32	0.21	38	0.12	34	0.16
Hatto 1997		72	0.47	25	0.00	38	0.08	34	0.19	75	0.04	44	0.09
Horowitz 1949		9	0.69	5	0.05	8	0.12	5	0.57	4	0.63	2	0.60
Indjic 1988		74	0.46	87	0.00	37	0.06	33	0.21	54	0.05	41	0.10
Kapell 1951		57	0.54	58	0.00	69	0.04	70	0.04	81	0.03	81	0.03
Kissin 1993		3	0.74	6	0.05	4	0.21	6	0.57	14	0.43	6	0.50
Kushner 1989		10	0.69	36	0.00	18	0.06	14	0.43	38	0.16	23	0.26
Luisada 1991		32	0.64	40	0.00	39	0.05	39	0.17	45	0.06	39	0.10
Lushtak 2004		45	0.60	54	0.00	55	0.07	46	0.07	60	0.04	60	0.05
Malcuzynski 1961		5	0.72	9	0.03	13	0.11	8	0.56	13	0.41	8	0.48
Magaloff 1978		37	0.62	16	0.01	52	0.05	59	0.05	38	0.16	43	0.09
Magin 1975		12	0.68	33	0.00	25	0.08	24	0.31	29	0.21	22	0.26
Michalowski 1933		56	0.56	22	0.01	34	0.04	36	0.17	40	0.17	33	0.17
Milkina 1970		24	0.65	80	0.00	28	0.07	23	0.33	32	0.21	24	0.26
Mohovich 1999		29	0.64	21	0.01	44	0.05	44	0.10	52	0.05	51	0.07
Moravec 1969		81	0.37	39	0.00	87	0.03	74	0.03	78	0.03	77	0.03
Morozova 2008		17	0.67	48	0.00	19	0.08	18	0.39	33	0.18	25	0.26
Neighaus 1950		2	0.76	2	0.10	2	0.27	1	0.68	5	0.57	1	0.62
Niedzielski 1931		58	0.53	31	0.00	57	0.04	69	0.04	72	0.03	80	0.03
Ohlsson 1999		35	0.63	37	0.00	46	0.06	49	0.06	65	0.04	57	0.05
Osinska 1989		7	0.70	45	0.00	26	0.08	17	0.40	33	0.23	19	0.30
Pachmann 1927		44	0.60	38	0.00	32	0.05	35	0.17	6	0.51	20	0.29
Paderewski 1930		11	0.69	19	0.01	23	0.06	26	0.28	14	0.34	18	0.31
Perlemuter 1992		31	0.64	34	0.00	30	0.08	28	0.26	54	0.05	38	0.11
Pierdomenico 2008		55	0.57	59	0.00	60	0.04	67	0.04	35	0.23	40	0.10
Poblocka 1999		13	0.68	20	0.01	20	0.08	15	0.41	36	0.16	21	0.26
Rabcewiczowa 1932		62	0.52	69	0.00	80	0.02	87	0.02	77	0.03	87	0.02
Rachmaninoff 1923		60	0.52	28	0.00	47	0.05	52	0.05	77	0.03	65	0.04
Rangell 2001		46	0.59	13	0.02	15	0.09	25	0.28	8	0.45	15	0.35
Richter 1976		33	0.64	23	0.00	21	0.06	19	0.37	10	0.48	11	0.42
Rosen 1989		21	0.66	26	0.00	24	0.07	29	0.26	30	0.24	26	0.25
Rosenthal 1930		63	0.51	70	0.00	72	0.05	55	0.05	48	0.05	59	0.05
Rosenthal 1931		80	0.41	85	0.00	83	0.03	77	0.03	60	0.04	82	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		79	0.42	90	0.00	76	0.03	80	0.03	66	0.04	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		70	0.48	72	0.00	79	0.02	86	0.02	73	0.03	90	0.02
Rosenthal 1931d		75	0.45	76	0.00	82	0.02	84	0.02	43	0.10	75	0.04
Rossi 2007		77	0.44	77	0.00	85	0.02	83	0.02	64	0.04	78	0.03
Rubinstein 1939		82	0.37	74	0.00	75	0.03	78	0.03	55	0.05	66	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		78	0.44	50	0.00	78	0.03	79	0.03	55	0.06	76	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		64	0.51	75	0.00	71	0.05	56	0.05	46	0.06	58	0.05
Schilhawsky 1960		38	0.62	17	0.01	16	0.09	20	0.36	43	0.15	27	0.23
Shebanova 2002		8	0.70	24	0.00	14	0.12	13	0.51	20	0.34	12	0.42
Smith 1975		25	0.65	78	0.00	53	0.05	51	0.05	49	0.05	56	0.05
Sokolov 2002		49	0.59	44	0.00	51	0.04	64	0.04	47	0.05	63	0.04
Sztompka 1959		34	0.64	51	0.00	50	0.06	48	0.06	59	0.06	53	0.06
Tomsic 1995		52	0.58	41	0.00	70	0.05	57	0.05	67	0.04	67	0.04
Uninsky 1932		36	0.62	18	0.01	35	0.05	30	0.24	37	0.21	28	0.22
Uninsky 1971		23	0.65	7	0.04	12	0.12	21	0.36	32	0.28	17	0.32
Wasowski 1980		30	0.64	42	0.00	41	0.06	37	0.17	30	0.17	32	0.17
Zak 1937		20	0.66	8	0.03	9	0.15	7	0.57	23	0.33	10	0.43
Zak 1951		28	0.64	12	0.02	10	0.19	10	0.55	30	0.19	16	0.32
Random 1		89	-0.10	56	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	24	0.33	54	0.06
Random 2		90	-0.12	84	0.00	88	0.01	88	0.01	36	0.14	71	0.04
Random 3		88	-0.05	68	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	62	0.04	89	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).