Block 1995

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		30	0.56	87	0.00	49	0.05	48	0.05	52	0.04	68	0.04
Anderszewski 2003		22	0.59	24	0.01	16	0.08	20	0.34	28	0.20	17	0.26
Ashkenazy 1981		48	0.48	32	0.00	33	0.05	32	0.20	64	0.04	38	0.09
Bacha 2000		40	0.50	36	0.00	22	0.07	26	0.27	31	0.22	19	0.24
Badura 1965		57	0.47	83	0.00	63	0.03	73	0.03	56	0.05	70	0.04
Barbosa 1983		78	0.34	50	0.00	82	0.03	79	0.03	77	0.04	79	0.03
Biret 1990		49	0.48	41	0.00	58	0.04	65	0.04	76	0.04	73	0.04
Blet 2003		46	0.49	21	0.01	51	0.04	51	0.04	37	0.13	46	0.07
Block 1995		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Blumental 1952		85	0.24	26	0.01	46	0.05	49	0.05	72	0.03	71	0.04
Boshniakovich 1969		1	0.67	5	0.07	3	0.14	1	0.52	11	0.54	1	0.53
Brailowsky 1960		12	0.62	7	0.05	5	0.12	11	0.39	14	0.41	4	0.40
Bunin 1987		69	0.40	53	0.00	81	0.03	67	0.03	53	0.05	72	0.04
Bunin 1987b		71	0.40	43	0.00	80	0.02	86	0.02	52	0.05	77	0.03
Chiu 1999		60	0.46	10	0.02	31	0.06	35	0.17	44	0.09	31	0.12
Cohen 1997		87	0.23	29	0.01	60	0.03	75	0.03	37	0.11	54	0.06
Cortot 1951		38	0.51	57	0.00	64	0.04	59	0.04	42	0.15	42	0.08
Csalog 1996		79	0.30	55	0.00	86	0.03	83	0.03	77	0.03	81	0.03
Czerny 1949		58	0.46	23	0.01	50	0.04	62	0.04	70	0.04	67	0.04
Czerny 1990		32	0.54	8	0.04	43	0.05	44	0.09	85	0.03	55	0.05
Duchoud 2007		61	0.45	88	0.00	68	0.03	69	0.03	71	0.04	83	0.03
Ezaki 2006		19	0.60	58	0.00	32	0.05	31	0.21	55	0.04	37	0.09
Falvay 1989		33	0.54	42	0.00	45	0.04	50	0.04	61	0.05	57	0.04
Farrell 1958		31	0.55	15	0.01	23	0.08	16	0.35	24	0.26	10	0.30
Ferenczy 1958		41	0.50	22	0.01	62	0.04	61	0.04	59	0.04	66	0.04
Fliere 1977		13	0.61	6	0.05	8	0.10	8	0.43	42	0.12	21	0.23
Fou 1978		20	0.59	25	0.01	14	0.06	15	0.35	38	0.12	23	0.20
Francois 1956		51	0.48	37	0.00	66	0.03	80	0.03	86	0.02	90	0.02
Friedman 1923		80	0.29	74	0.00	76	0.04	52	0.04	38	0.17	43	0.08
Friedman 1923b		81	0.29	76	0.00	75	0.03	84	0.03	38	0.17	50	0.07
Friedman 1930		77	0.34	79	0.00	74	0.03	77	0.03	56	0.05	65	0.04
Garcia 2007		37	0.51	52	0.00	35	0.06	33	0.18	26	0.31	20	0.24
Garcia 2007b		76	0.35	70	0.00	54	0.05	45	0.05	30	0.17	39	0.09
Gierzod 1998		39	0.51	63	0.00	53	0.05	47	0.05	73	0.03	69	0.04
Gornostaeva 1994		6	0.64	20	0.01	12	0.07	22	0.31	30	0.27	12	0.29
Groot 1988		2	0.67	2	0.12	2	0.16	3	0.49	20	0.44	2	0.46
Harasiewicz 1955		8	0.63	3	0.10	4	0.14	4	0.47	26	0.31	6	0.38
Hatto 1993		84	0.26	73	0.00	83	0.03	74	0.03	73	0.04	85	0.03
Hatto 1997		82	0.29	67	0.00	84	0.03	78	0.03	77	0.03	82	0.03
Horowitz 1949		28	0.57	30	0.01	30	0.07	23	0.29	36	0.30	11	0.29
Indjic 1988		83	0.27	61	0.00	85	0.04	63	0.04	68	0.04	63	0.04
Kapell 1951		55	0.47	13	0.02	55	0.04	55	0.04	78	0.04	60	0.04
Kissin 1993		7	0.64	28	0.01	21	0.07	18	0.34	52	0.05	29	0.13
Kushner 1989		5	0.64	12	0.02	13	0.09	7	0.45	36	0.17	13	0.28
Luisada 1991		21	0.59	39	0.00	27	0.07	13	0.36	42	0.08	25	0.17
Lushtak 2004		64	0.43	71	0.00	61	0.03	72	0.03	83	0.03	84	0.03
Malcuzynski 1961		14	0.61	44	0.00	25	0.07	28	0.26	35	0.14	24	0.19
Magaloff 1978		24	0.58	49	0.00	24	0.06	27	0.26	52	0.06	32	0.12
Magin 1975		23	0.59	11	0.02	15	0.06	19	0.34	32	0.18	18	0.25
Michalowski 1933		74	0.37	72	0.00	56	0.04	58	0.04	61	0.05	62	0.04
Milkina 1970		3	0.66	38	0.00	6	0.11	9	0.40	29	0.25	8	0.32
Mohovich 1999		16	0.60	31	0.01	17	0.07	17	0.35	63	0.04	34	0.12
Moravec 1969		70	0.40	69	0.00	78	0.02	87	0.02	63	0.04	74	0.03
Morozova 2008		42	0.50	59	0.00	42	0.05	39	0.11	56	0.04	47	0.07
Neighaus 1950		15	0.60	16	0.01	10	0.09	6	0.45	36	0.16	15	0.27
Niedzielski 1931		47	0.48	46	0.00	44	0.05	42	0.10	36	0.15	33	0.12
Ohlsson 1999		63	0.44	82	0.00	71	0.04	57	0.04	84	0.03	78	0.03
Osinska 1989		4	0.65	18	0.01	20	0.07	12	0.39	45	0.07	27	0.17
Pachmann 1927		56	0.47	77	0.00	72	0.04	60	0.04	48	0.05	61	0.04
Paderewski 1930		35	0.52	40	0.00	39	0.05	40	0.11	53	0.04	45	0.07
Perlemuter 1992		10	0.62	4	0.08	9	0.09	2	0.51	27	0.25	7	0.36
Pierdomenico 2008		34	0.54	34	0.00	18	0.06	14	0.36	19	0.41	5	0.38
Poblocka 1999		27	0.57	27	0.01	38	0.05	38	0.12	66	0.04	44	0.07
Rabcewiczowa 1932		65	0.43	78	0.00	73	0.04	66	0.04	50	0.04	59	0.04
Rachmaninoff 1923		50	0.48	65	0.00	48	0.04	56	0.04	79	0.03	76	0.03
Rangell 2001		26	0.57	1	0.17	1	0.17	5	0.45	6	0.46	3	0.45
Richter 1976		11	0.62	17	0.01	26	0.08	29	0.24	27	0.28	16	0.26
Rosen 1989		9	0.63	14	0.01	7	0.11	10	0.40	26	0.26	9	0.32
Rosenthal 1930		73	0.38	54	0.00	79	0.03	82	0.03	86	0.02	88	0.02
Rosenthal 1931		67	0.41	86	0.00	70	0.03	70	0.03	66	0.03	80	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		68	0.41	75	0.00	69	0.03	81	0.03	58	0.04	86	0.03
Rosenthal 1931c		75	0.36	45	0.00	77	0.02	85	0.02	66	0.03	89	0.02
Rosenthal 1931d		59	0.46	89	0.00	59	0.03	71	0.03	34	0.16	51	0.07
Rossi 2007		54	0.47	19	0.01	36	0.07	34	0.17	29	0.23	22	0.20
Rubinstein 1939		86	0.24	81	0.00	87	0.04	64	0.04	54	0.05	58	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		72	0.39	60	0.00	57	0.03	68	0.03	45	0.10	56	0.05
Rubinstein 1966		66	0.41	33	0.00	47	0.04	53	0.04	59	0.05	64	0.04
Schilhawsky 1960		52	0.48	9	0.03	11	0.07	37	0.15	47	0.07	36	0.10
Shebanova 2002		25	0.57	66	0.00	29	0.06	25	0.27	48	0.06	30	0.13
Smith 1975		18	0.60	68	0.00	19	0.06	21	0.33	72	0.04	35	0.11
Sokolov 2002		62	0.45	80	0.00	67	0.03	76	0.03	76	0.03	75	0.03
Sztompka 1959		36	0.51	35	0.00	40	0.06	41	0.11	42	0.16	28	0.13
Tomsic 1995		17	0.60	48	0.00	28	0.07	24	0.27	31	0.27	14	0.27
Uninsky 1932		53	0.48	64	0.00	65	0.04	54	0.04	43	0.12	48	0.07
Uninsky 1971		44	0.50	56	0.00	52	0.05	46	0.05	41	0.13	41	0.08
Wasowski 1980		29	0.56	47	0.00	34	0.06	30	0.24	37	0.12	26	0.17
Zak 1937		45	0.49	62	0.00	41	0.05	43	0.10	72	0.04	52	0.06
Zak 1951		43	0.50	85	0.00	37	0.06	36	0.16	67	0.04	40	0.08
Random 1		89	-0.10	84	0.00	89	0.01	89	0.01	25	0.32	53	0.06
Random 2		90	-0.20	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	77	0.03	87	0.02
Random 3		88	0.02	51	0.00	88	0.02	88	0.02	22	0.26	49	0.07

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).