Bacha 2000

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		26	0.56	12	0.02	39	0.07	38	0.17	57	0.04	46	0.08
Anderszewski 2003		37	0.54	30	0.00	49	0.05	59	0.05	71	0.03	66	0.04
Ashkenazy 1981		12	0.63	25	0.00	14	0.08	12	0.42	52	0.05	29	0.14
Bacha 2000		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Badura 1965		81	0.33	67	0.00	80	0.05	65	0.05	73	0.04	69	0.04
Barbosa 1983		52	0.50	55	0.00	30	0.05	30	0.22	32	0.21	24	0.21
Biret 1990		1	0.72	14	0.02	4	0.14	5	0.51	20	0.32	9	0.40
Blet 2003		49	0.51	90	0.00	65	0.04	71	0.04	79	0.03	80	0.03
Block 1995		50	0.50	72	0.00	18	0.06	31	0.22	26	0.27	17	0.24
Blumental 1952		43	0.52	20	0.01	44	0.06	44	0.11	31	0.16	31	0.13
Boshniakovich 1969		62	0.47	36	0.00	63	0.05	60	0.05	72	0.04	71	0.04
Brailowsky 1960		3	0.70	16	0.01	8	0.13	11	0.45	12	0.45	5	0.45
Bunin 1987		80	0.33	35	0.00	87	0.04	72	0.04	78	0.03	84	0.03
Bunin 1987b		82	0.32	62	0.00	86	0.02	88	0.02	77	0.03	87	0.02
Chiu 1999		15	0.61	5	0.06	5	0.14	4	0.52	8	0.51	2	0.51
Cohen 1997		19	0.60	19	0.01	26	0.11	22	0.32	3	0.54	7	0.42
Cortot 1951		63	0.46	60	0.00	76	0.04	73	0.04	77	0.04	73	0.04
Csalog 1996		25	0.56	21	0.01	16	0.07	14	0.39	10	0.46	6	0.42
Czerny 1949		72	0.40	17	0.01	74	0.03	77	0.03	49	0.06	68	0.04
Czerny 1990		34	0.54	46	0.00	38	0.07	42	0.15	49	0.05	45	0.09
Duchoud 2007		35	0.54	32	0.00	52	0.06	49	0.06	68	0.04	56	0.05
Ezaki 2006		20	0.60	4	0.07	13	0.08	20	0.33	68	0.04	34	0.11
Falvay 1989		16	0.61	10	0.02	24	0.07	24	0.31	27	0.37	11	0.34
Farrell 1958		6	0.67	57	0.00	25	0.08	17	0.34	30	0.22	14	0.27
Ferenczy 1958		32	0.54	15	0.01	19	0.06	33	0.18	41	0.08	32	0.12
Fliere 1977		22	0.58	42	0.00	27	0.06	25	0.30	67	0.04	35	0.11
Fou 1978		8	0.64	11	0.02	15	0.10	8	0.45	37	0.13	16	0.24
Francois 1956		40	0.53	48	0.00	50	0.05	63	0.05	58	0.05	58	0.05
Friedman 1923		84	0.31	64	0.00	84	0.03	85	0.03	63	0.05	75	0.04
Friedman 1923b		83	0.32	87	0.00	83	0.03	84	0.03	59	0.06	72	0.04
Friedman 1930		85	0.30	75	0.00	81	0.03	80	0.03	75	0.04	82	0.03
Garcia 2007		47	0.51	47	0.00	53	0.07	45	0.07	51	0.05	51	0.06
Garcia 2007b		70	0.41	31	0.00	47	0.06	54	0.06	42	0.09	48	0.07
Gierzod 1998		18	0.60	6	0.04	10	0.09	15	0.36	43	0.13	22	0.22
Gornostaeva 1994		29	0.55	29	0.00	36	0.05	41	0.16	59	0.04	47	0.08
Groot 1988		17	0.61	38	0.00	29	0.08	26	0.26	60	0.04	42	0.10
Harasiewicz 1955		75	0.39	51	0.00	54	0.05	58	0.05	74	0.03	74	0.04
Hatto 1993		42	0.52	84	0.00	41	0.05	34	0.18	26	0.21	26	0.19
Hatto 1997		27	0.56	41	0.00	43	0.08	37	0.17	53	0.05	44	0.09
Horowitz 1949		65	0.45	43	0.00	75	0.04	74	0.04	72	0.03	77	0.03
Indjic 1988		31	0.55	53	0.00	42	0.08	35	0.18	32	0.15	27	0.16
Kapell 1951		41	0.53	59	0.00	34	0.05	29	0.22	74	0.04	43	0.09
Kissin 1993		55	0.49	88	0.00	48	0.05	61	0.05	53	0.05	54	0.05
Kushner 1989		21	0.59	81	0.00	20	0.06	27	0.25	65	0.04	41	0.10
Luisada 1991		11	0.64	3	0.11	3	0.14	2	0.61	23	0.41	3	0.50
Lushtak 2004		36	0.54	37	0.00	45	0.06	50	0.06	73	0.03	70	0.04
Malcuzynski 1961		61	0.47	39	0.00	78	0.05	62	0.05	57	0.04	60	0.04
Magaloff 1978		14	0.62	23	0.01	21	0.07	19	0.34	49	0.06	28	0.14
Magin 1975		64	0.46	40	0.00	46	0.05	55	0.05	51	0.05	52	0.05
Michalowski 1933		87	0.29	74	0.00	66	0.04	70	0.04	64	0.05	64	0.04
Milkina 1970		2	0.71	2	0.16	2	0.24	1	0.61	14	0.45	1	0.52
Mohovich 1999		5	0.67	7	0.03	7	0.09	7	0.50	35	0.22	12	0.33
Moravec 1969		30	0.55	65	0.00	37	0.06	43	0.14	22	0.36	19	0.22
Morozova 2008		74	0.40	86	0.00	59	0.07	46	0.07	58	0.04	55	0.05
Neighaus 1950		13	0.63	24	0.01	28	0.06	23	0.32	70	0.04	39	0.11
Niedzielski 1931		51	0.50	70	0.00	35	0.05	40	0.16	29	0.25	25	0.20
Ohlsson 1999		9	0.64	28	0.00	22	0.07	9	0.45	41	0.10	23	0.21
Osinska 1989		24	0.58	78	0.00	9	0.11	18	0.34	41	0.14	20	0.22
Pachmann 1927		59	0.49	52	0.00	77	0.04	68	0.04	56	0.05	62	0.04
Paderewski 1930		44	0.51	68	0.00	62	0.04	66	0.04	80	0.03	78	0.03
Perlemuter 1992		54	0.50	9	0.02	55	0.06	53	0.06	74	0.03	59	0.04
Pierdomenico 2008		67	0.43	44	0.00	58	0.07	47	0.07	51	0.06	50	0.06
Poblocka 1999		48	0.51	63	0.00	33	0.06	28	0.23	56	0.05	36	0.11
Rabcewiczowa 1932		53	0.50	58	0.00	51	0.06	48	0.06	61	0.04	53	0.05
Rachmaninoff 1923		68	0.42	27	0.00	71	0.03	81	0.03	84	0.03	76	0.03
Rangell 2001		33	0.54	69	0.00	31	0.05	32	0.19	26	0.28	18	0.23
Richter 1976		86	0.29	56	0.00	85	0.02	87	0.02	80	0.03	88	0.02
Rosen 1989		4	0.68	1	0.21	1	0.21	3	0.53	16	0.43	4	0.48
Rosenthal 1930		78	0.34	89	0.00	82	0.03	82	0.03	83	0.02	89	0.02
Rosenthal 1931		69	0.41	61	0.00	73	0.03	79	0.03	53	0.04	79	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		66	0.44	85	0.00	64	0.05	64	0.05	54	0.05	57	0.05
Rosenthal 1931c		73	0.40	45	0.00	79	0.04	67	0.04	79	0.03	85	0.03
Rosenthal 1931d		57	0.49	82	0.00	60	0.06	51	0.06	30	0.21	38	0.11
Rossi 2007		79	0.34	34	0.00	61	0.06	52	0.06	54	0.06	49	0.06
Rubinstein 1939		56	0.49	50	0.00	57	0.05	57	0.05	18	0.35	30	0.13
Rubinstein 1952		28	0.56	18	0.01	23	0.07	16	0.34	20	0.45	10	0.39
Rubinstein 1966		10	0.64	22	0.01	40	0.06	39	0.17	28	0.29	21	0.22
Schilhawsky 1960		71	0.40	80	0.00	70	0.03	83	0.03	73	0.04	81	0.03
Shebanova 2002		7	0.65	71	0.00	6	0.10	6	0.50	22	0.32	8	0.40
Smith 1975		39	0.53	66	0.00	17	0.07	21	0.32	70	0.04	37	0.11
Sokolov 2002		60	0.48	76	0.00	72	0.03	76	0.03	85	0.02	86	0.02
Sztompka 1959		58	0.49	79	0.00	68	0.04	69	0.04	75	0.04	63	0.04
Tomsic 1995		45	0.51	77	0.00	56	0.05	56	0.05	56	0.04	61	0.04
Uninsky 1932		77	0.37	33	0.00	67	0.04	75	0.04	58	0.05	67	0.04
Uninsky 1971		76	0.38	26	0.00	69	0.03	78	0.03	55	0.06	65	0.04
Wasowski 1980		46	0.51	54	0.00	32	0.06	36	0.17	46	0.06	40	0.10
Zak 1937		23	0.58	8	0.02	11	0.11	10	0.45	35	0.19	13	0.29
Zak 1951		38	0.53	13	0.02	12	0.13	13	0.42	34	0.16	15	0.26
Random 1		90	-0.15	73	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	60	0.04	90	0.02
Random 2		89	-0.07	49	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	59	0.04	83	0.03
Random 3		88	0.15	83	0.00	88	0.03	86	0.03	7	0.51	33	0.12

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).