Afanassiev 2001

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Anderszewski 2003		67	0.55	61	0.00	57	0.04	67	0.04	68	0.03	89	0.03
Ashkenazy 1981		54	0.60	50	0.00	41	0.09	41	0.17	36	0.19	42	0.18
Bacha 2000		64	0.56	37	0.00	54	0.04	57	0.04	38	0.17	67	0.08
Badura 1965		27	0.71	81	0.00	25	0.07	27	0.32	1	0.64	21	0.45
Barbosa 1983		55	0.60	44	0.00	53	0.04	55	0.04	12	0.42	44	0.13
Biret 1990		29	0.70	8	0.03	34	0.07	36	0.24	14	0.37	36	0.30
Blet 2003		6	0.78	43	0.00	15	0.08	21	0.40	2	0.57	15	0.48
Block 1995		65	0.56	78	0.00	52	0.04	52	0.04	48	0.05	80	0.04
Blumental 1952		73	0.51	52	0.00	44	0.05	44	0.09	26	0.19	45	0.13
Boshniakovich 1969		38	0.67	55	0.00	46	0.05	49	0.05	22	0.35	46	0.13
Brailowsky 1960		62	0.57	83	0.00	82	0.04	50	0.04	74	0.04	79	0.04
Bunin 1987		57	0.59	87	0.00	65	0.04	65	0.04	25	0.35	52	0.12
Bunin 1987b		61	0.59	79	0.00	64	0.04	66	0.04	24	0.37	50	0.12
Chiu 1999		59	0.59	51	0.00	60	0.03	85	0.03	25	0.29	62	0.09
Cohen 1997		87	0.28	45	0.00	87	0.04	59	0.04	65	0.04	82	0.04
Cortot 1951		39	0.66	86	0.00	47	0.05	45	0.05	19	0.35	47	0.13
Csalog 1996		71	0.53	32	0.00	73	0.03	70	0.03	28	0.25	65	0.09
Czerny 1949		3	0.81	1	0.30	1	0.30	1	0.64	2	0.67	1	0.65
Czerny 1990		1	0.83	2	0.15	2	0.32	2	0.62	2	0.65	2	0.63
Duchoud 2007		40	0.66	18	0.01	40	0.09	40	0.19	4	0.45	38	0.29
Ezaki 2006		2	0.81	15	0.01	3	0.13	3	0.62	2	0.61	3	0.61
Falvay 1989		51	0.62	16	0.01	76	0.03	72	0.03	41	0.15	74	0.07
Farrell 1958		46	0.63	26	0.01	69	0.03	80	0.03	72	0.04	87	0.03
Ferenczy 1958		43	0.65	20	0.01	43	0.05	43	0.10	15	0.32	41	0.18
Fliere 1977		4	0.81	28	0.01	4	0.13	4	0.57	6	0.53	5	0.55
Fou 1978		35	0.68	10	0.02	37	0.07	30	0.30	20	0.38	30	0.34
Francois 1956		10	0.76	23	0.01	17	0.09	9	0.47	2	0.65	6	0.55
Friedman 1923		80	0.49	46	0.00	62	0.03	76	0.03	10	0.53	48	0.13
Friedman 1923b		79	0.49	54	0.00	61	0.03	81	0.03	10	0.51	53	0.12
Friedman 1930		74	0.51	62	0.00	59	0.03	84	0.03	23	0.38	57	0.11
Garcia 2007		69	0.54	59	0.00	72	0.03	71	0.03	33	0.20	71	0.08
Garcia 2007b		85	0.40	84	0.00	66	0.03	75	0.03	23	0.21	73	0.08
Gierzod 1998		15	0.74	9	0.03	6	0.13	5	0.54	7	0.53	8	0.53
Gornostaeva 1994		33	0.69	38	0.00	23	0.06	33	0.26	15	0.44	32	0.34
Groot 1988		24	0.71	6	0.04	35	0.07	35	0.26	21	0.43	34	0.33
Harasiewicz 1955		44	0.64	13	0.02	31	0.12	29	0.30	20	0.37	35	0.33
Hatto 1993		78	0.49	60	0.00	55	0.05	47	0.05	29	0.19	61	0.10
Hatto 1997		63	0.56	33	0.00	42	0.05	42	0.11	23	0.26	43	0.17
Horowitz 1949		56	0.60	75	0.00	71	0.04	53	0.04	32	0.32	55	0.11
Indjic 1988		72	0.52	58	0.00	50	0.04	63	0.04	26	0.21	64	0.09
Kapell 1951		30	0.70	64	0.00	29	0.07	26	0.33	18	0.37	29	0.35
Kissin 1993		7	0.77	19	0.01	10	0.12	6	0.52	7	0.62	4	0.57
Kushner 1989		12	0.75	74	0.00	18	0.06	20	0.41	18	0.45	22	0.43
Luisada 1991		37	0.67	29	0.01	19	0.08	31	0.29	27	0.37	33	0.33
Lushtak 2004		34	0.68	88	0.00	36	0.08	34	0.26	28	0.23	40	0.24
Malcuzynski 1961		31	0.69	24	0.01	38	0.06	37	0.23	5	0.51	31	0.34
Magaloff 1978		53	0.61	40	0.00	49	0.04	60	0.04	45	0.08	78	0.06
Magin 1975		58	0.59	17	0.01	22	0.06	38	0.22	17	0.31	39	0.26
Michalowski 1933		75	0.50	66	0.00	51	0.04	64	0.04	23	0.37	51	0.12
Milkina 1970		23	0.71	14	0.01	33	0.07	24	0.36	17	0.38	27	0.37
Mohovich 1999		13	0.74	31	0.00	27	0.08	15	0.43	9	0.53	16	0.48
Moravec 1969		52	0.61	68	0.00	75	0.04	58	0.04	25	0.34	49	0.12
Morozova 2008		21	0.71	11	0.02	7	0.11	17	0.43	3	0.50	18	0.46
Neighaus 1950		11	0.75	41	0.00	8	0.09	7	0.52	6	0.53	9	0.52
Niedzielski 1931		47	0.63	47	0.00	63	0.03	83	0.03	14	0.41	54	0.11
Ohlsson 1999		25	0.71	34	0.00	21	0.07	16	0.43	14	0.43	23	0.43
Osinska 1989		8	0.76	56	0.00	16	0.06	12	0.46	7	0.55	11	0.50
Pachmann 1927		60	0.59	71	0.00	77	0.04	51	0.04	19	0.33	56	0.11
Paderewski 1930		50	0.62	53	0.00	70	0.03	68	0.03	28	0.20	70	0.08
Perlemuter 1992		19	0.73	73	0.00	30	0.08	32	0.27	10	0.45	28	0.35
Pierdomenico 2008		68	0.54	77	0.00	78	0.04	56	0.04	41	0.13	76	0.07
Poblocka 1999		9	0.76	7	0.03	11	0.12	13	0.46	7	0.50	13	0.48
Rabcewiczowa 1932		32	0.69	42	0.00	32	0.08	28	0.31	7	0.49	25	0.39
Rachmaninoff 1923		22	0.71	12	0.02	20	0.11	19	0.41	4	0.57	14	0.48
Rangell 2001		77	0.49	39	0.00	80	0.05	46	0.05	33	0.22	60	0.10
Richter 1976		48	0.63	69	0.00	67	0.03	79	0.03	24	0.29	63	0.09
Rosen 1989		16	0.73	3	0.06	5	0.11	10	0.47	10	0.53	12	0.50
Rosenthal 1930		66	0.55	70	0.00	74	0.04	62	0.04	32	0.22	66	0.09
Rosenthal 1931		84	0.41	72	0.00	83	0.03	73	0.03	62	0.04	88	0.03
Rosenthal 1931b		86	0.39	80	0.00	86	0.03	69	0.03	49	0.05	84	0.04
Rosenthal 1931c		76	0.50	65	0.00	79	0.04	61	0.04	39	0.17	72	0.08
Rosenthal 1931d		83	0.43	63	0.00	85	0.02	88	0.02	46	0.07	83	0.04
Rossi 2007		81	0.45	36	0.00	81	0.03	74	0.03	27	0.24	69	0.08
Rubinstein 1939		82	0.43	25	0.01	84	0.02	86	0.02	62	0.04	86	0.03
Rubinstein 1952		70	0.53	21	0.01	58	0.03	82	0.03	54	0.06	85	0.04
Rubinstein 1966		49	0.62	27	0.01	48	0.04	54	0.04	31	0.27	59	0.10
Schilhawsky 1960		28	0.70	48	0.00	28	0.09	25	0.34	20	0.43	26	0.38
Shebanova 2002		14	0.74	76	0.00	26	0.06	18	0.42	13	0.50	19	0.46
Smith 1975		41	0.65	57	0.00	45	0.05	48	0.05	43	0.10	75	0.07
Sokolov 2002		36	0.68	35	0.00	39	0.07	39	0.20	16	0.42	37	0.29
Sztompka 1959		5	0.78	30	0.00	9	0.13	8	0.51	3	0.57	7	0.54
Tomsic 1995		45	0.64	67	0.00	68	0.03	78	0.03	27	0.31	58	0.10
Uninsky 1932		26	0.71	49	0.00	24	0.06	22	0.39	4	0.57	17	0.47
Uninsky 1971		20	0.72	4	0.05	12	0.12	11	0.47	5	0.55	10	0.51
Wasowski 1980		42	0.65	82	0.00	56	0.03	77	0.03	27	0.20	68	0.08
Zak 1937		18	0.73	22	0.01	14	0.10	23	0.38	13	0.45	24	0.41
Zak 1951		17	0.73	5	0.04	13	0.12	14	0.43	10	0.48	20	0.45
Random 1		90	-0.20	90	0.00	90	0.01	90	0.01	76	0.02	90	0.01
Random 2		88	-0.08	85	0.00	88	0.02	87	0.02	20	0.22	77	0.07
Random 3		89	-0.11	89	0.00	89	0.02	89	0.02	43	0.08	81	0.04

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).