Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Ashkenazy 1981   62  0.4028  0.0039  0.1133  0.1118  0.4833  0.23
Ax 1995   19  0.6117  0.0112  0.1412  0.593  0.6711  0.63
Bacha 1998   40  0.5310  0.0128  0.0732  0.155  0.6330  0.31
Barbosa 1983   48  0.5025  0.0034  0.0939  0.0919  0.4734  0.21
BenOr 1989   12  0.6442  0.0015  0.1611  0.616  0.6810  0.64
Biret 1990   27  0.5921  0.0025  0.1226  0.2915  0.5028  0.38
Brailowsky 1960   39  0.5331  0.0026  0.0927  0.2917  0.5524  0.40
Chiu 1999   54  0.4841  0.0057  0.0558  0.0538  0.0759  0.06
Clidat 1994   38  0.5424  0.0042  0.0941  0.0920  0.3142  0.17
Cohen 1997   63  0.3557  0.0063  0.0653  0.0633  0.1055  0.08
Cortot 1951   57  0.4652  0.0060  0.0556  0.0520  0.3946  0.14
Csalog 1996   25  0.5949  0.0031  0.0930  0.2020  0.4431  0.30
Czerny 1989   36  0.5534  0.0035  0.0938  0.0927  0.2644  0.15
Ezaki 2006   18  0.616  0.0314  0.1320  0.467  0.6120  0.53
Falvay 1989   3  0.683  0.152  0.301  0.7810  0.644  0.71
Fiorentino 1962   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Fliere 1977   32  0.5715  0.0121  0.1123  0.418  0.5921  0.49
Fou 1978   17  0.629  0.0211  0.1413  0.588  0.6512  0.61
Francois 1956   53  0.4856  0.0056  0.0557  0.0534  0.0861  0.06
Goldenweiser 1946   44  0.5155  0.0045  0.0747  0.0711  0.4438  0.18
Gornostaeva 1994   56  0.4633  0.0047  0.0748  0.0711  0.5637  0.20
Groot 1988   6  0.664  0.045  0.217  0.643  0.697  0.66
Hatto 1993   8  0.6519  0.019  0.138  0.647  0.688  0.66
Hatto 1997   16  0.6262  0.0023  0.1822  0.4319  0.4522  0.44
Horszowski 1983   59  0.4548  0.0055  0.0560  0.0517  0.4145  0.14
Indjic 2001   7  0.6635  0.006  0.136  0.658  0.686  0.66
Katin 1996   9  0.6511  0.0113  0.129  0.6311  0.5314  0.58
Kiepura 1999   2  0.681  0.271  0.272  0.771  0.881  0.82
Korecka 1992   26  0.5930  0.0029  0.0828  0.216  0.6827  0.38
Kushner 1990   50  0.4965  0.0049  0.0844  0.0847  0.0756  0.07
Lilamand 2001   60  0.4451  0.0061  0.0652  0.0630  0.1153  0.08
Luisada 1990   30  0.5863  0.0027  0.0924  0.3217  0.4826  0.39
Luisada 2008   47  0.5053  0.0050  0.0845  0.0834  0.1349  0.10
Lushtak 2004   10  0.648  0.038  0.1714  0.576  0.6513  0.61
Malcuzynski 1951   34  0.5636  0.0041  0.1036  0.1025  0.3239  0.18
Malcuzynski 1961   5  0.677  0.034  0.264  0.712  0.733  0.72
Magaloff 1977   37  0.5437  0.0043  0.1135  0.117  0.6532  0.27
Magin 1975   15  0.6218  0.0119  0.1717  0.539  0.6015  0.56
Meguri 1997   45  0.5116  0.0151  0.0651  0.0622  0.2847  0.13
Milkina 1970   11  0.6427  0.0017  0.1615  0.5414  0.5418  0.54
Mohovich 1999   31  0.5732  0.0036  0.0940  0.0920  0.3043  0.16
Nezu 2005   23  0.6054  0.0032  0.1031  0.2029  0.2036  0.20
Ohlsson 1999   35  0.5545  0.0044  0.0843  0.0838  0.0852  0.08
Olejniczak 1990   1  0.702  0.253  0.333  0.741  0.862  0.80
Osinska 1989   4  0.6820  0.007  0.145  0.676  0.675  0.67
Perlemuter 1992   61  0.4350  0.0062  0.0462  0.0445  0.0563  0.04
Poblocka 1999   22  0.6038  0.0024  0.1325  0.3014  0.5225  0.39
Rangell 2001   52  0.4840  0.0053  0.0463  0.0432  0.1257  0.07
Richter 1960   55  0.4646  0.0058  0.0654  0.0646  0.0562  0.05
Richter 1961   49  0.4929  0.0048  0.0650  0.0612  0.5140  0.17
Rosen 1989   21  0.6022  0.0033  0.1037  0.1018  0.4635  0.21
Rubinstein 1939   43  0.5123  0.0037  0.0749  0.0729  0.2248  0.12
Rubinstein 1952   42  0.5144  0.0038  0.0942  0.0933  0.1050  0.09
Rubinstein 1966   20  0.6113  0.0116  0.1416  0.5314  0.5619  0.54
Rudanovskaya 2007   46  0.5059  0.0052  0.0461  0.0433  0.0960  0.06
Shebanova 2002   58  0.4626  0.0059  0.0559  0.0562  0.0464  0.04
Smith 1975   28  0.5839  0.0030  0.0829  0.2015  0.5629  0.33
Sztompka 1959   41  0.5258  0.0046  0.0746  0.0723  0.4041  0.17
Tanyel 1992   24  0.6014  0.0122  0.1221  0.469  0.6816  0.56
Tsujii 2005   13  0.6343  0.0018  0.1418  0.5223  0.3523  0.43
Uninsky 1959   29  0.5847  0.0040  0.1134  0.1153  0.0651  0.08
Vardi 1988   33  0.575  0.0420  0.1619  0.5112  0.6017  0.55
Wasowski 1980   51  0.4960  0.0054  0.0555  0.0545  0.0758  0.06
Zimerman 1975   14  0.6312  0.0110  0.1810  0.625  0.699  0.65
Random 1   64  0.0361  0.0064  0.0265  0.0214  0.3054  0.08
Random 2   66  0.0064  0.0066  0.0166  0.0147  0.0466  0.02
Random 3   65  0.0066  0.0065  0.0264  0.0250  0.0465  0.03

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).