Performance0-Rank  0-Score1-Rank  1-Score2-Rank  2-Score3-Rank  3-Score3R-Rank  3R-Score4-Rank  4-Score  NED
Ashkenazy 1981   47  0.6218  0.0121  0.0925  0.3037  0.0828  0.15
Ax 1995   11  0.714  0.085  0.176  0.6210  0.522  0.57
Bacha 1998   52  0.6164  0.0048  0.0548  0.0536  0.0849  0.06
Barbosa 1983   49  0.627  0.0312  0.1515  0.5018  0.484  0.49
BenOr 1989   48  0.6236  0.0026  0.0926  0.2546  0.0635  0.12
Biret 1990   28  0.6732  0.0025  0.1224  0.3034  0.1322  0.20
Brailowsky 1960   46  0.6259  0.0040  0.0560  0.0538  0.0848  0.06
Chiu 1999   41  0.6425  0.0049  0.0549  0.0528  0.2039  0.10
Clidat 1994   51  0.6156  0.0051  0.0834  0.0859  0.0556  0.06
Cohen 1997   63  0.4530  0.0063  0.0644  0.0657  0.0464  0.05
Cortot 1951   62  0.5048  0.0062  0.0643  0.0618  0.2137  0.11
Csalog 1996   30  0.6751  0.0039  0.0642  0.0639  0.0654  0.06
Czerny 1989   target  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  targettarget  target
Ezaki 2006   10  0.7144  0.0017  0.1418  0.4511  0.573  0.51
Falvay 1989   1  0.752  0.202  0.203  0.6625  0.267  0.41
Fiorentino 1962   32  0.6546  0.0043  0.0556  0.0538  0.0946  0.07
Fliere 1977   15  0.699  0.0218  0.1517  0.4726  0.2211  0.32
Fou 1978   18  0.683  0.086  0.2111  0.5717  0.395  0.47
Francois 1956   54  0.6034  0.0047  0.0561  0.0520  0.3531  0.13
Goldenweiser 1946   40  0.6417  0.0154  0.0552  0.056  0.5425  0.16
Gornostaeva 1994   57  0.6041  0.0034  0.0933  0.0920  0.4421  0.20
Groot 1988   14  0.7016  0.0119  0.1516  0.4837  0.0723  0.18
Hatto 1993   5  0.7312  0.029  0.204  0.6332  0.1613  0.32
Hatto 1997   7  0.7324  0.0010  0.149  0.6032  0.1514  0.30
Horszowski 1983   38  0.6550  0.0050  0.0645  0.0610  0.4324  0.16
Indjic 2001   6  0.7322  0.0011  0.1610  0.6036  0.0917  0.23
Katin 1996   23  0.6854  0.0027  0.0727  0.1842  0.0832  0.12
Kiepura 1999   61  0.5529  0.0045  0.0559  0.0519  0.3729  0.14
Korecka 1992   50  0.6149  0.0058  0.0558  0.0540  0.0850  0.06
Kushner 1990   60  0.5758  0.0033  0.0638  0.0638  0.0752  0.06
Lilamand 2001   59  0.5755  0.0060  0.0641  0.0649  0.0655  0.06
Luisada 1990   26  0.6828  0.0022  0.0923  0.3232  0.2215  0.27
Luisada 2008   34  0.6547  0.0036  0.0640  0.0633  0.1640  0.10
Lushtak 2004   13  0.7013  0.0113  0.1712  0.5321  0.366  0.44
Malcuzynski 1951   42  0.6411  0.027  0.1519  0.3930  0.1616  0.25
Malcuzynski 1961   19  0.681  0.281  0.287  0.6225  0.278  0.41
Magaloff 1977   39  0.6537  0.0035  0.0736  0.0724  0.2033  0.12
Magin 1975   16  0.6920  0.0023  0.1022  0.3340  0.0727  0.15
Meguri 1997   44  0.6323  0.0046  0.0550  0.0534  0.0753  0.06
Milkina 1970   12  0.708  0.0316  0.1513  0.5331  0.1912  0.32
Mohovich 1999   20  0.6857  0.0029  0.0631  0.1448  0.0544  0.08
Nezu 2005   31  0.6639  0.0028  0.0729  0.1537  0.0934  0.12
Ohlsson 1999   29  0.6742  0.0038  0.0554  0.0545  0.0751  0.06
Olejniczak 1990   25  0.6843  0.0030  0.0628  0.1640  0.0738  0.11
Osinska 1989   4  0.736  0.044  0.192  0.7131  0.209  0.38
Perlemuter 1992   58  0.5866  0.0061  0.0462  0.0445  0.0565  0.04
Poblocka 1999   8  0.7310  0.0215  0.1714  0.5137  0.0919  0.21
Rangell 2001   36  0.6552  0.0055  0.0637  0.0635  0.0947  0.07
Richter 1960   27  0.6726  0.0037  0.0735  0.0721  0.2730  0.14
Richter 1961   45  0.6353  0.0053  0.0557  0.0531  0.1443  0.08
Rosen 1989   33  0.6535  0.0041  0.0551  0.0541  0.0758  0.06
Rubinstein 1939   24  0.6838  0.0024  0.1220  0.3845  0.0626  0.15
Rubinstein 1952   17  0.6921  0.0014  0.198  0.6129  0.2110  0.36
Rubinstein 1966   3  0.745  0.073  0.251  0.7215  0.461  0.58
Rudanovskaya 2007   37  0.6531  0.0059  0.0639  0.0640  0.0657  0.06
Shebanova 2002   9  0.7214  0.0120  0.1421  0.3732  0.1220  0.21
Smith 1975   55  0.6033  0.0057  0.0553  0.0558  0.0560  0.05
Sztompka 1959   35  0.6519  0.0042  0.0546  0.0533  0.0945  0.07
Tanyel 1992   53  0.6160  0.0056  0.0463  0.0461  0.0466  0.04
Tsujii 2005   2  0.7427  0.008  0.205  0.6238  0.0818  0.22
Uninsky 1959   22  0.6815  0.0131  0.0630  0.1440  0.0642  0.09
Vardi 1988   43  0.6445  0.0044  0.0547  0.0547  0.0661  0.05
Wasowski 1980   56  0.6061  0.0052  0.0555  0.0555  0.0559  0.05
Zimerman 1975   21  0.6840  0.0032  0.0732  0.1336  0.0841  0.10
Random 1   66  0.0062  0.0064  0.0265  0.022  0.5636  0.11
Random 2   64  0.0165  0.0066  0.0166  0.0121  0.2362  0.05
Random 3   65  0.0163  0.0065  0.0264  0.0230  0.1463  0.05

Note: To load data table give above into Excel, copy and paste the data into a text editor (such as WordPad) first, then copy the text in the editor and past into Excel. You should remove the "target" line from the data before pasting into Excel so that plotting graphs of the data is done properly.

Column descriptions

  • Performance:
  • 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
  • 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
  • 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
  • 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
  • NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

  • red = strongly similar performance to target
  • orange = moderately similar performance
  • yellow = weakly similar performance
  • green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
  • white = dissimilar to target
  • blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).