Kitain 1937

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		42	0.43	46	0.00	12	0.11	12	0.45	40	0.06	8	0.16
Ashkenazy 1981		11	0.49	40	0.00	17	0.10	15	0.39	54	0.06	14	0.15
Beliavsky 2004		31	0.46	29	0.00	27	0.07	23	0.26	63	0.03	30	0.09
BenOr 1989		12	0.49	34	0.00	19	0.07	19	0.31	61	0.04	23	0.11
Biret 1990		29	0.46	61	0.00	32	0.08	31	0.16	49	0.06	28	0.10
Blet 2003		32	0.46	58	0.00	21	0.09	22	0.27	63	0.03	31	0.09
Block 1995		46	0.42	33	0.00	40	0.06	42	0.06	47	0.06	41	0.06
Brailowsky 1960		17	0.48	23	0.00	23	0.08	21	0.29	52	0.05	18	0.12
Chiu 1999		49	0.41	28	0.00	52	0.03	64	0.03	53	0.06	56	0.04
Clidat 1994		6	0.51	4	0.03	3	0.21	4	0.57	62	0.03	17	0.13
Cohen 1997		63	0.35	66	0.00	48	0.05	47	0.05	49	0.05	52	0.05
Coop 1987		48	0.41	54	0.00	54	0.03	62	0.03	51	0.06	60	0.04
Cortot 1951		40	0.44	41	0.00	28	0.08	27	0.22	63	0.04	32	0.09
Czerny 1949		21	0.47	5	0.02	35	0.09	36	0.09	61	0.04	39	0.06
Czerny 1949b		37	0.45	36	0.00	37	0.09	37	0.09	63	0.04	37	0.06
Ezaki 2006		50	0.40	55	0.00	55	0.03	58	0.03	55	0.06	53	0.04
Falvay 1989		55	0.39	21	0.00	56	0.03	57	0.03	54	0.06	57	0.04
Ferenczy 1958		61	0.37	64	0.00	60	0.04	50	0.04	62	0.04	61	0.04
Fiorentino 1962		39	0.44	38	0.00	45	0.06	45	0.06	52	0.06	42	0.06
Fliere 1977		16	0.48	13	0.01	34	0.09	35	0.09	60	0.04	36	0.06
Fou 1978		23	0.46	32	0.00	22	0.10	18	0.33	64	0.03	26	0.10
Francois 1956		58	0.39	60	0.00	49	0.04	51	0.04	54	0.05	64	0.04
Hatto 1997		56	0.39	51	0.00	47	0.04	49	0.04	47	0.06	45	0.05
Horowitz 1971		2	0.54	1	0.49	1	0.48	2	0.73	23	0.29	1	0.46
Horowitz 1985		7	0.51	10	0.01	8	0.17	7	0.55	20	0.31	2	0.41
Indjic 2001		54	0.39	59	0.00	46	0.05	46	0.05	52	0.06	49	0.05
Kapell 1951		35	0.45	30	0.00	26	0.07	28	0.20	59	0.04	29	0.09
Kiepura 1999		53	0.40	48	0.00	57	0.03	63	0.03	44	0.05	54	0.04
Kilenyi 1937		24	0.46	9	0.01	38	0.07	38	0.07	64	0.03	46	0.05
Kissin 1993		10	0.49	11	0.01	11	0.11	11	0.48	59	0.05	10	0.15
Kitain 1937		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Kushner 1990		13	0.49	37	0.00	13	0.13	14	0.40	51	0.05	16	0.14
Levy 1951		19	0.47	25	0.00	36	0.13	33	0.13	60	0.05	34	0.08
Luisada 1990		41	0.43	19	0.00	41	0.06	40	0.06	61	0.04	48	0.05
Lushtak 2004		25	0.46	35	0.00	29	0.08	29	0.18	51	0.06	27	0.10
Lympany 1968		30	0.46	22	0.00	20	0.08	20	0.30	62	0.04	22	0.11
Magaloff 1977		45	0.42	65	0.00	50	0.04	54	0.04	53	0.06	47	0.05
Magaloff 1977b		43	0.43	62	0.00	43	0.05	48	0.05	54	0.06	50	0.05
Magin 1975		51	0.40	18	0.01	53	0.04	55	0.04	63	0.04	59	0.04
Milkina 1970		27	0.46	31	0.00	16	0.08	16	0.39	51	0.06	9	0.15
Mohovich 1999		34	0.45	24	0.00	15	0.08	17	0.38	41	0.06	13	0.15
Nadelmann 1956		14	0.48	6	0.02	9	0.20	9	0.53	56	0.05	7	0.16
Ohlsson 1999		62	0.36	52	0.00	62	0.04	52	0.04	51	0.06	44	0.05
Olejniczac 1990		38	0.44	39	0.00	44	0.06	43	0.06	53	0.06	40	0.06
Olejniczak 1991		57	0.39	50	0.00	58	0.03	59	0.03	51	0.06	58	0.04
Osinska 1989		22	0.47	47	0.00	30	0.06	30	0.17	54	0.06	24	0.10
Paderewski 1912		26	0.46	27	0.00	14	0.13	13	0.44	57	0.05	11	0.15
Perahia 1994		59	0.38	49	0.00	59	0.03	56	0.03	41	0.06	62	0.04
Perlemuter 1986		5	0.52	8	0.01	7	0.19	5	0.56	56	0.05	6	0.17
Poblocka 1999		44	0.42	45	0.00	51	0.03	61	0.03	47	0.06	55	0.04
Rangell 2001		47	0.41	43	0.00	42	0.07	39	0.07	56	0.06	43	0.06
Risler 1920		52	0.40	26	0.00	61	0.03	60	0.03	58	0.04	65	0.03
Rosen 1989		33	0.45	17	0.01	39	0.06	41	0.06	63	0.03	63	0.04
Rubinstein 1939		3	0.53	3	0.04	4	0.14	6	0.55	44	0.06	4	0.18
Rubinstein 1952		15	0.48	44	0.00	25	0.08	25	0.25	38	0.06	21	0.12
Rubinstein 1966		28	0.46	57	0.00	33	0.10	34	0.10	35	0.06	35	0.08
Rummel 1943		9	0.49	20	0.00	6	0.18	8	0.53	53	0.04	12	0.15
Shebanova 2002		60	0.37	16	0.01	63	0.06	44	0.06	55	0.06	38	0.06
Smith 1975		4	0.52	15	0.01	5	0.17	3	0.59	52	0.05	5	0.17
Szpilman 1948		8	0.50	12	0.01	10	0.13	10	0.48	61	0.04	15	0.14
Uninsky 1971		18	0.47	14	0.01	24	0.08	24	0.26	39	0.06	19	0.12
Wasowski 1980		20	0.47	42	0.00	31	0.06	32	0.15	61	0.04	33	0.08
Weissenberg 1971		36	0.45	7	0.01	18	0.08	26	0.23	61	0.04	25	0.10
Average		1	0.55	2	0.25	2	0.46	1	0.81	55	0.06	3	0.22
Random 1		66	-0.03	63	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	47	0.04	66	0.03
Random 2		64	0.04	53	0.00	64	0.04	53	0.04	15	0.38	20	0.12
Random 3		65	-0.01	56	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	18	0.30	51	0.05

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).