Kapell 1951

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		51	0.64	50	0.00	49	0.07	43	0.07	46	0.05	58	0.06
Ashkenazy 1981		15	0.77	33	0.00	16	0.15	15	0.51	13	0.53	16	0.52
Beliavsky 2004		48	0.67	48	0.00	48	0.06	48	0.06	19	0.27	47	0.13
BenOr 1989		6	0.80	13	0.00	7	0.24	2	0.74	4	0.63	2	0.68
Biret 1990		21	0.75	12	0.01	17	0.19	16	0.51	13	0.57	14	0.54
Blet 2003		36	0.71	27	0.00	40	0.08	40	0.08	15	0.44	40	0.19
Block 1995		28	0.73	61	0.00	37	0.10	33	0.10	19	0.43	36	0.21
Brailowsky 1960		54	0.62	63	0.00	56	0.04	60	0.04	32	0.23	52	0.10
Chiu 1999		13	0.78	22	0.00	14	0.14	19	0.45	19	0.50	20	0.47
Clidat 1994		32	0.72	37	0.00	36	0.09	39	0.09	12	0.43	37	0.20
Cohen 1997		59	0.54	44	0.00	63	0.06	51	0.06	40	0.06	59	0.06
Coop 1987		2	0.84	6	0.01	2	0.24	4	0.69	10	0.66	3	0.67
Cortot 1951		47	0.67	20	0.00	50	0.06	53	0.06	9	0.51	43	0.17
Czerny 1949		38	0.70	47	0.00	22	0.08	27	0.30	16	0.50	26	0.39
Czerny 1949b		39	0.70	51	0.00	23	0.08	30	0.27	15	0.55	25	0.39
Ezaki 2006		4	0.83	5	0.01	4	0.28	9	0.60	14	0.58	7	0.59
Falvay 1989		11	0.80	2	0.05	13	0.20	10	0.59	9	0.64	6	0.61
Ferenczy 1958		57	0.60	62	0.00	58	0.06	52	0.06	29	0.19	51	0.11
Fiorentino 1962		19	0.75	55	0.00	29	0.14	25	0.32	20	0.48	27	0.39
Fliere 1977		20	0.75	21	0.00	28	0.10	28	0.30	20	0.46	28	0.37
Fou 1978		12	0.78	8	0.01	12	0.21	11	0.58	9	0.58	8	0.58
Francois 1956		61	0.52	23	0.00	61	0.03	63	0.03	41	0.06	63	0.04
Hatto 1997		45	0.69	17	0.00	47	0.07	45	0.07	22	0.35	45	0.16
Horowitz 1971		55	0.62	28	0.00	54	0.06	50	0.06	38	0.06	60	0.06
Horowitz 1985		60	0.53	41	0.00	60	0.04	57	0.04	34	0.10	56	0.06
Indjic 2001		40	0.70	7	0.01	44	0.08	41	0.08	20	0.37	42	0.17
Kapell 1951		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Kiepura 1999		50	0.65	40	0.00	51	0.05	54	0.05	46	0.05	61	0.05
Kilenyi 1937		14	0.78	15	0.00	10	0.21	7	0.60	16	0.56	9	0.58
Kissin 1993		8	0.80	57	0.00	11	0.16	8	0.60	19	0.41	17	0.50
Kitain 1937		63	0.45	45	0.00	62	0.04	59	0.04	28	0.20	53	0.09
Kushner 1990		35	0.71	25	0.00	39	0.10	34	0.10	6	0.64	33	0.25
Levy 1951		30	0.72	9	0.01	21	0.08	24	0.32	10	0.62	21	0.45
Luisada 1990		18	0.76	30	0.00	20	0.07	22	0.36	13	0.52	23	0.43
Lushtak 2004		42	0.70	35	0.00	38	0.09	38	0.09	22	0.35	41	0.18
Lympany 1968		43	0.70	43	0.00	42	0.06	47	0.06	6	0.58	38	0.19
Magaloff 1977		23	0.74	56	0.00	30	0.13	26	0.30	17	0.45	29	0.37
Magaloff 1977b		24	0.74	59	0.00	31	0.09	31	0.23	20	0.39	31	0.30
Magin 1975		9	0.80	14	0.00	8	0.17	13	0.54	19	0.59	12	0.56
Milkina 1970		44	0.70	18	0.00	46	0.07	46	0.07	28	0.21	49	0.12
Mohovich 1999		26	0.73	38	0.00	26	0.11	23	0.34	9	0.59	22	0.45
Nadelmann 1956		31	0.72	10	0.01	25	0.10	20	0.42	5	0.60	18	0.50
Ohlsson 1999		22	0.74	52	0.00	33	0.09	36	0.09	7	0.55	35	0.22
Olejniczac 1990		17	0.77	60	0.00	18	0.08	18	0.45	15	0.55	19	0.50
Olejniczak 1991		16	0.77	54	0.00	15	0.19	14	0.53	14	0.56	13	0.54
Osinska 1989		10	0.80	34	0.00	9	0.15	5	0.66	16	0.50	10	0.57
Paderewski 1912		49	0.66	36	0.00	43	0.06	49	0.06	21	0.28	48	0.13
Perahia 1994		62	0.52	58	0.00	59	0.04	61	0.04	59	0.04	62	0.04
Perlemuter 1986		53	0.63	4	0.02	57	0.05	56	0.05	34	0.08	57	0.06
Poblocka 1999		7	0.80	3	0.02	6	0.26	12	0.56	13	0.58	11	0.57
Rangell 2001		5	0.82	39	0.00	5	0.22	6	0.65	4	0.66	5	0.65
Risler 1920		41	0.70	46	0.00	34	0.10	35	0.10	9	0.54	34	0.23
Rosen 1989		52	0.64	42	0.00	55	0.03	62	0.03	27	0.20	54	0.08
Rubinstein 1939		58	0.57	29	0.00	53	0.04	58	0.04	32	0.11	55	0.07
Rubinstein 1952		34	0.71	11	0.01	27	0.12	29	0.27	17	0.47	30	0.36
Rubinstein 1966		46	0.68	26	0.00	45	0.07	44	0.07	18	0.37	44	0.16
Rummel 1943		56	0.60	24	0.00	52	0.05	55	0.05	22	0.27	50	0.12
Shebanova 2002		29	0.72	53	0.00	35	0.07	42	0.07	21	0.30	46	0.14
Smith 1975		27	0.73	49	0.00	24	0.09	21	0.37	15	0.44	24	0.40
Szpilman 1948		25	0.74	19	0.00	19	0.10	17	0.45	10	0.61	15	0.52
Uninsky 1971		37	0.71	31	0.00	32	0.10	32	0.19	24	0.38	32	0.27
Wasowski 1980		33	0.72	32	0.00	41	0.09	37	0.09	16	0.42	39	0.19
Weissenberg 1971		3	0.83	16	0.00	3	0.25	3	0.69	6	0.61	4	0.65
Average		1	0.87	1	0.79	1	0.78	1	0.89	11	0.53	1	0.69
Random 1		65	-0.03	66	0.00	65	0.02	65	0.02	41	0.04	64	0.03
Random 2		64	0.01	64	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	64	0.02	65	0.02
Random 3		66	-0.04	65	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	44	0.04	66	0.02

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).