Ezaki 2006

Performance		0-Rank	0-Score	1-Rank	1-Score	2-Rank	2-Score	3-Rank	3-Score	3R-Rank	3R-Score	4-Rank	4-Score	NED
Afanassiev 2001		44	0.69	27	0.00	45	0.07	52	0.07	24	0.26	48	0.13
Ashkenazy 1981		18	0.79	23	0.00	19	0.13	17	0.55	11	0.55	17	0.55
Beliavsky 2004		47	0.69	52	0.00	47	0.08	45	0.08	21	0.25	45	0.14
BenOr 1989		12	0.82	12	0.01	13	0.20	6	0.68	7	0.62	10	0.65
Biret 1990		23	0.77	25	0.00	23	0.15	22	0.42	11	0.58	22	0.49
Blet 2003		46	0.69	51	0.00	46	0.08	49	0.08	25	0.23	47	0.14
Block 1995		27	0.75	44	0.00	33	0.12	34	0.12	16	0.49	35	0.24
Brailowsky 1960		55	0.61	48	0.00	56	0.06	54	0.06	37	0.09	51	0.07
Chiu 1999		9	0.82	8	0.02	11	0.15	12	0.60	4	0.68	11	0.64
Clidat 1994		32	0.73	17	0.00	36	0.11	35	0.11	14	0.37	38	0.20
Cohen 1997		57	0.58	50	0.00	59	0.04	63	0.04	50	0.05	61	0.04
Coop 1987		2	0.87	3	0.06	2	0.43	4	0.78	3	0.75	3	0.76
Cortot 1951		50	0.66	43	0.00	55	0.05	59	0.05	25	0.31	49	0.12
Czerny 1949		21	0.77	18	0.00	14	0.20	11	0.61	5	0.72	9	0.66
Czerny 1949b		30	0.74	21	0.00	20	0.12	28	0.31	11	0.60	26	0.43
Ezaki 2006		target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target	target
Falvay 1989		7	0.83	14	0.00	12	0.14	9	0.66	6	0.77	6	0.71
Ferenczy 1958		53	0.64	39	0.00	49	0.08	47	0.08	5	0.58	37	0.22
Fiorentino 1962		24	0.76	36	0.00	25	0.19	24	0.39	16	0.54	25	0.46
Fliere 1977		26	0.76	20	0.00	26	0.11	25	0.36	17	0.48	28	0.42
Fou 1978		10	0.82	5	0.02	7	0.26	10	0.65	6	0.64	12	0.64
Francois 1956		60	0.53	59	0.00	61	0.05	61	0.05	46	0.06	58	0.05
Hatto 1997		43	0.70	26	0.00	44	0.08	48	0.08	23	0.31	41	0.16
Horowitz 1971		56	0.61	38	0.00	57	0.06	56	0.06	61	0.03	63	0.04
Horowitz 1985		62	0.50	58	0.00	62	0.06	53	0.06	48	0.05	55	0.05
Indjic 2001		40	0.70	40	0.00	43	0.09	43	0.09	27	0.27	42	0.16
Kapell 1951		8	0.83	22	0.00	8	0.23	14	0.58	9	0.60	13	0.59
Kiepura 1999		35	0.72	54	0.00	42	0.09	40	0.09	14	0.54	36	0.22
Kilenyi 1937		13	0.81	7	0.02	6	0.24	15	0.57	9	0.61	14	0.59
Kissin 1993		15	0.80	49	0.00	17	0.29	13	0.59	13	0.44	20	0.51
Kitain 1937		63	0.40	45	0.00	63	0.06	55	0.06	58	0.03	62	0.04
Kushner 1990		29	0.74	13	0.00	30	0.14	26	0.35	2	0.81	18	0.53
Levy 1951		42	0.70	29	0.00	35	0.13	33	0.13	15	0.53	33	0.26
Luisada 1990		17	0.80	16	0.00	18	0.12	16	0.55	3	0.62	15	0.58
Lushtak 2004		28	0.75	4	0.03	28	0.09	30	0.23	4	0.71	30	0.40
Lympany 1968		49	0.68	35	0.00	50	0.10	38	0.10	32	0.13	50	0.11
Magaloff 1977		20	0.78	60	0.00	22	0.12	21	0.43	10	0.49	24	0.46
Magaloff 1977b		22	0.77	56	0.00	24	0.13	23	0.40	14	0.47	27	0.43
Magin 1975		5	0.84	11	0.01	9	0.29	7	0.67	6	0.69	8	0.68
Milkina 1970		48	0.68	55	0.00	51	0.07	51	0.07	53	0.05	53	0.06
Mohovich 1999		36	0.72	61	0.00	37	0.09	41	0.09	24	0.45	39	0.20
Nadelmann 1956		45	0.69	53	0.00	41	0.10	39	0.10	29	0.21	46	0.14
Ohlsson 1999		37	0.72	42	0.00	40	0.08	46	0.08	25	0.28	43	0.15
Olejniczac 1990		19	0.78	37	0.00	21	0.18	20	0.44	14	0.56	21	0.50
Olejniczak 1991		14	0.81	24	0.00	15	0.19	18	0.53	11	0.60	16	0.56
Osinska 1989		6	0.84	6	0.02	5	0.26	2	0.86	2	0.80	1	0.83
Paderewski 1912		52	0.64	62	0.00	48	0.07	50	0.07	36	0.07	52	0.07
Perahia 1994		59	0.54	31	0.00	53	0.05	58	0.05	47	0.05	57	0.05
Perlemuter 1986		54	0.63	28	0.00	54	0.06	57	0.06	50	0.05	56	0.05
Poblocka 1999		3	0.87	2	0.08	3	0.43	3	0.80	2	0.77	2	0.78
Rangell 2001		11	0.82	30	0.00	10	0.12	19	0.49	9	0.57	19	0.53
Risler 1920		41	0.70	57	0.00	32	0.10	32	0.20	7	0.55	31	0.33
Rosen 1989		38	0.71	10	0.01	39	0.11	36	0.11	7	0.63	34	0.26
Rubinstein 1939		61	0.53	33	0.00	60	0.05	60	0.05	53	0.04	59	0.04
Rubinstein 1952		39	0.71	41	0.00	38	0.10	37	0.10	20	0.42	40	0.20
Rubinstein 1966		51	0.65	46	0.00	52	0.09	42	0.09	56	0.04	54	0.06
Rummel 1943		58	0.57	63	0.00	58	0.04	62	0.04	46	0.05	60	0.04
Shebanova 2002		16	0.80	9	0.02	16	0.23	8	0.66	2	0.78	5	0.72
Smith 1975		34	0.72	34	0.00	34	0.09	44	0.09	30	0.22	44	0.14
Szpilman 1948		33	0.73	47	0.00	27	0.10	29	0.29	16	0.54	29	0.40
Uninsky 1971		31	0.73	32	0.00	31	0.09	31	0.21	19	0.43	32	0.30
Wasowski 1980		25	0.76	15	0.00	29	0.12	27	0.35	3	0.66	23	0.48
Weissenberg 1971		4	0.84	19	0.00	4	0.26	5	0.74	4	0.65	7	0.69
Average		1	0.89	1	0.66	1	0.65	1	0.92	7	0.56	4	0.72
Random 1		65	-0.02	64	0.00	65	0.03	65	0.03	45	0.04	64	0.03
Random 2		64	0.00	65	0.00	64	0.03	64	0.03	62	0.02	65	0.02
Random 3		66	-0.07	66	0.00	66	0.01	66	0.01	65	0.02	66	0.01

Column descriptions

• Performance:
• 0-Rank/0-Score: 0-Score is equivalent to Pearson correlation of the entire data sequence between the reference performance and a test performance. 0-Rank is the sorting order of the 0-scores (highest score has a rank of 1).
• 1-Rank/1-Score: 1-Score is the area fraction covered by a particular performance in the scape plot (see image above). These values should not be taken literally, since they are sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 2-Rank/2-Score: 2-Score values are equivalent to 1-Score values with all higher-ranking performances removed before the calculation of the area of coverage in the scape is calculated. Improvment over the 1-Rank scores, but still somewhat sensitive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3-Rank/3-Score: Similar to 2-Rank calculations. The bottom 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are kept constant as a noise floor for the similarity measurement. Then one-by-one the top 1/2 of the 2-rank performances are superimposed with the noise-floor performances, and a 3-score is measured as the area covered in the scape. This measure is not sentisive to the Hatto Effect.
• 3R-Rank/3R-Score: Reverse 3-rank/3-scores. 3-rankings and scores are not symmetric (A->B values are different from B->A values). So this column represents similarity measures in the opposite direction.
• 4-Rank/4-Score: The geometric mean between 3-scores and 3R-scores. This column gives the best overall similarity ranking between the various performances (see color codes below).
• NED: Noise Equivalient Distance (not yet implemented)

Color codes for 3-rank listings:

• red = strongly similar performance to target
• orange = moderately similar performance
• yellow = weakly similar performance
• green = marginally similar/dissimilar performance
• white = dissimilar to target
• blue = false positive (has high 3-rank score but low 3R-rank score)

3-rank/scores are not symmetric, so the 3R-rank/score columns give the 3-rank/scores going in the opposite direction. More matches in the 3-rank column than in the 3R-rank column indicates an individualistic performance, while more matches in the 3R-rank column indicates a mainstream performance.

If a 3-rank and a 3R-rank are both marked as similar to each other, then there is a possible direct relation between the performances. If one is similar to the other but not in the reverse direction, then the similarity is more likely to be by chance (performers randomly chose a similar interpretation).